REVIEW 2 cited by
Increasing stability and accuracy of the lattice Boltzmann scheme: recursivity and regularization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In the present paper a lattice Boltzmann scheme is presented which exhibits an increased stability and accuracy with respect to standard single- or multi-relaxation-time (MRT) approaches. The scheme is based on a single-relaxation-time model where a special regularization procedure is applied. This regularization is based on the fact that, for a-thermal flows, there exists a recursive way to express the velocity distribution function at any order (in the Hermite series sense) in terms of the density, velocity, and stress tensor. A linear stability analysis is conducted which shows enhanced dispersion/dissipation relations with respect to existing models. The model is then validated on two (one 2D and one 3D) moderately high Reynolds number simulations ($\mathrm{Re}\sim 1000$) at moderate Mach numbers ($\mathrm{Ma}\sim 0.5$). In both cases the results are compared with an MRT model and an enhanced accuracy and stability is shown by the present model.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Kinetic closure of turbulence: collision-side modeling beyond the filtered BGK--Boltzmann equation
The work introduces a BGK-like closure for the collision-covariance source term using the subgrid equilibrium residual and a phenomenological turbulent relaxation frequency, validated in lattice Boltzmann simulations ...
-
Accurate wetting dynamics via a conservative Allen-Cahn based lattice Boltzmann approach for multiphase flows
A local geometric ghost-node wetting boundary condition for conservative Allen-Cahn lattice Boltzmann simulations imposes contact angles accurately and matches droplet spreading, impact, and orifice-passage benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.