REVIEW 1 cited by
Cryptoeconomics and Tokenomics as Economics: A Survey with Opinions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper surveys products and studies on cryptoeconomics and tokenomics from an economic perspective, as these terms are still (i) ill-defined and (ii) disconnected from economic disciplines. We first suggest that they can be novel when integrated; we then conduct a literature review and case study following consensus-building for decentralization and token value for autonomy. Integration requires simultaneous consideration of strategic behavior, spamming, Sybil attacks, free-riding, marginal cost, marginal utility and stabilizers. This survey is the first systematization of knowledge on cryptoeconomics and tokenomics, aiming to bridge the contexts of economics and blockchain.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
FedStrategist: A Meta-Learning Framework for Adaptive and Robust Aggregation in Federated Learning
A LinUCB contextual bandit selects federated aggregation rules online based on update variance, cosine similarity, and mean norm, claiming superior accuracy and tunable risk posture.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.