Nuclear-Spin Statistical Weights from Young Diagrams

Eric Kubischta; Ian Teixeira

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 23 references

Nuclear-Spin Statistical Weights from Young Diagrams

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Nuclear-spin statistical weights follow from the major indices of Young tableaux.

desk verdict Useful transfer of the major-index branching rule to cyclic nuclear-spin weights, but the dihedral reflection step is justified by a false Young-symmetrizer rule and needs repair. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06339 v1 pith:QFW3OBYH submitted 2026-08-06 physics.chem-ph

Eric Kubischta , Ian Teixeira This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.chem-ph MSC 05E1020C3081V55

keywords nuclear-spinstatisticalweightsYoungtableauxSchur-Weyldualitymajorindexcyclicgrouprestrictiondihedralsymmetrymolecularspectroscopypermutation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the nuclear-spin statistical weights of rigid and semi-rigid molecules can be computed directly from Young-tableau data, with no projection operators, cycle-index polynomials, or case-by-case constructions. The route combines the Schur–Weyl decomposition of the $N$-nucleus spin space with the Kráskiewicz–Weyman–Adin–Roichman branching rule, which assigns to each standard Young tableau a definite cyclic character given by its major index modulo the order of the realized rotation. A reflection generator is then adjoined to recover dihedral point-group species. The paper applies this uniform recipe to XeOF$_4$, SF$_4$, benzene, deuterated benzene, and the tropylium cation and reproduces the established statistical weights in each case, while also yielding spin-resolved species tables.

What carries the argument

The carrying objects are standard Young tableaux and their major index $\operatorname{maj}(T)$, the sum of all descents $i$ for which $i+1$ lies in a row below $i$. The load-bearing theorem is the Kráskiewicz–Weyman–Adin–Roichman branching rule: restricting an $S_N$ irrep to a cyclic subgroup generated by an element of order $m$, the multiplicity of the character $\chi_j$ equals the number of standard tableaux of that shape with $\operatorname{maj}(T)\equiv j\pmod m$. Schur–Weyl duality supplies the starting multiplicities, and the Young symmetrizer row/column sign rule for a reflection generator converts the cyclic decomposition into dihedral point-group species.

What would settle it

Directly compute the action of $s=(2\,6)(3\,5)$ on the benzene tableau $1$ $2$ $4$ / $3$ $5$ $6$ in the Young–Yamanouchi basis; if the eigenvalue is not the row/column-rule prediction, the $A/B$ labels in the benzene weights $13:1:7:3:9:11$ would change, while the cyclic part from major indices would be unaffected.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the restriction $S_N \downarrow C_m$ of the symmetric-group irreps in the Schur–Weyl decomposition is entirely controlled by the major index of standard Young tableaux: a tableau $T$ of shape $\lambda$ contributes the cyclic character $\chi_j$ with $j \equiv \operatorname{maj}(T) \pmod m$. Since the Schur–Weyl multiplicity of the $S_N$ irrep $\lambda$ in $(\mathbb{C}^{2I+1})^{\otimes N}$ is the number of semistandard tableaux of shape $\lambda$, the full nuclear-spin symmetry content is obtained by enumerating tableaux and reducing major indices. Reflections lift the cyclic species to dihedral or point-group species, so the molecular nuclear-spin representation and the statistical weights follow from tableau data alone.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the reflection-sign rule proved for a single transposition—$+1$ for entries in the same row and $-1$ for entries in the same column—also applies to the products of transpositions used for benzene and tropylium, even when the moved entries lie in different rows and columns and only the single-transposition case is proved in the text.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For any molecule whose feasible nuclear permutations include a rotation of order $m$, the nuclear-spin statistical weights are obtained by enumerating standard Young tableaux and reducing their major indices modulo $m$.
The procedure works whether the rotation embeds as a single $N$-cycle or as a product of disjoint cycles, so it covers both benzene-like and SF$_4$-like geometries without modification.
The total-spin refinement is read directly from the Young shape for spin-$1/2$ nuclei, and from an SU(2)-embedding for higher spin, giving spin-resolved point-group species.
Because the same tableau enumeration works for any single-nucleus spin $I$, the method extends unchanged to isotopologues such as C$_6$D$_6$, including three-row shapes absent in the spin-$1/2$ case.
The resulting species and weights are exactly the factors required for rovibrational line-intensity modeling and are structured so the whole computation can be automated.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper leaves implicit that the same major-index machinery should handle any cyclic permutation subgroup, including rotations embedded as several cycles of equal length; testing this on molecules with symmetric methyl rotors or equivalent hydride positions would be a direct extension.
One natural next step is to replace the manually evaluated reflection signs with an automatically generated matrix action on tableau basis vectors, which would also resolve whether the row/column rule extends to products of transpositions acting between different rows and columns.
If the method is automated, it could feed directly into line-intensity fitting pipelines, where computed spin weights for candidate assignments would tighten the link between symmetry and observed intensity ratios.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Good news first: the cyclic part is solid and genuinely useful. Applying the Kráskiewicz–Weyman–Adin–Roichman major-index branching rule to S_N ↓ C_m, on top of Schur–Weyl multiplicities, gives a clean, automatable route to cyclic nuclear-spin species. I checked several of the enumerations by hand; the tableaux and dimensions match, and the final weights for XeOF4, SF4, benzene, C6D6, and tropylium are the established ones. The C6D6 example is a nice bonus because it shows the method handles I=1 and three-row shapes, where the simple two-row total-spin correspondence fails.

The soft spot is the dihedral extension. Section III.A states that a transposition (a b) acts by +1 or −1 on the Young symmetrizer basis according to whether a and b share a row or a column. That rule is not true for the polytabloid basis. The stress-test counterexample is legitimate: for shape (2,2), T = 1 3 / 2 4, and s = (2 4), both entries lie in row 2, yet s e_T is not a scalar multiple of e_T. So the A1/B2 assignments in XeOF4 are not justified by the stated rule. The same asserted rule is then applied to products like (2 6)(3 5) in benzene and (2 7)(3 6)(4 5) in tropylium, where entries are neither in common rows nor common columns, a case the rule does not even address. The final statistical weights are correct—I verified them independently—but the derivation as written is invalid.

There is a second, smaller overreach in Section III.E: the claim that major index mod m works whenever C_m embeds as a product of disjoint m-cycles is too broad. The stress-test example with shape (2,1,1) and r = (12)(34) shows it can fail for three-row shapes, so SF4 needs a real argument or a restricted statement.

None of this kills the central idea. The cyclic application is new and worth having; the dihedral layer is a repairable gap. The fix is either to prove the reflection action in the appropriate eigenbasis or to limit the advertised method to cyclic subgroups and compute dihedral labels by standard character projection. Who is this for? Molecular spectroscopists who compute spin statistical weights for line-intensity modeling, and combinatorics people who like to see branching rules used. I would send it to peer review; a referee should ask for the dihedral step to be made correct.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a combinatorial method for computing nuclear-spin statistical weights and symmetry species in molecules. The authors combine the Schur–Weyl decomposition of the n-spin Hilbert space with the Kráskiewicz–Weyman–Adin–Roichman major-index branching rule for restricting S_N to a cyclic subgroup C_m, claiming that each standard Young tableau carries a definite cyclic character via its major index. They then extend the treatment to dihedral point groups by adjoining a reflection generator and applying a simple row/column rule for transpositions on the Young symmetrizer basis. The method is applied to XeOF4, SF4, benzene, deuterated benzene, and the tropylium cation; the reported final statistical weights agree with established values.

Significance. If the cyclic part alone is considered, the paper gives a clean, checkable way to obtain cyclic species and statistical weights, and the enumerated major-index data are reproducible. No free parameters are introduced, and the dimension checks (e.g., 16 = 2^4 for XeOF4 and 729 = 3^6 for C6D6) are correctly enforced. However, the advertised fully combinatorial treatment of dihedral groups rests on a reflection rule that is incorrect for the stated tableau basis, and the extension of the major-index rule to embeddings as products of disjoint cycles is not covered by the cited theorem and can fail. The numerical outputs happen to be correct, but the derivation of the dihedral labels is not established. A repaired dihedral step would make the paper a useful contribution; as written, the central claim is only proven for cyclic subgroups generated by a single N-cycle.

major comments (3)

[§III.A] The central rule of §III.A, that a transposition s=(a b) acts by +1 on a Young-symmetrizer tableau basis vector if a and b lie in the same row and by -1 if they lie in the same column, is false for the standard polytabloid basis. For T = 1 3 / 2 4 (shape (2,2)) and s=(2 4), both entries lie in row 2, yet s does not fix the polytabloid e_T: with {T} the row tabloid and A=(3 4){T}, one obtains e_T = 2{T} - 2A, while s e_T = 2{T} - 2B with B = {1,2}/{3,4}, which is not a scalar multiple of e_T. Consequently the A1 assignment for this tableau in the XeOF4 example is not justified, and the same rule is used to assign the A2/B1/B2 subscripts in all four dihedral examples.
[§III.B–D] Even if a single-transposition rule were valid, it is applied without justification to products of disjoint transpositions in which the moved entries lie in different rows and columns, such as s=(2 6)(3 5) in benzene and s=(2 7)(3 6)(4 5) in tropylium. For a tableau like 1 2 4 / 3 5 6, the entries 2 and 6, and 3 and 5, are neither in a common row nor a common column, so the stated rule does not address this case. The dihedral branching rules in §III.B–D therefore depend on an unproved lemma, and the A2/B1/B2 labels derived there are not established as written.
[§III.E] The claim in §III.E that the major-index rule applies when C_m embeds into S_N as a product of disjoint m-cycles, with the statistic taken modulo m, is unsupported and is not a consequence of the Kráskiewicz–Weyman–Adin–Roichman theorem, which concerns cyclic subgroups generated by an N-cycle (or conjugate/power thereof). The claim is in fact false in general: for S_4 with partition (2,1,1) and r=(12)(34), the major-index multiplicities do not match the restriction multiplicities. Although the SF4 example uses only two-row shapes where the C2 counts happen to match, the general assertion is too broad and needs a separate theorem or a restriction of the claim.

minor comments (4)

[§III.C] The sentence 'Comparing with the proton case C6H6 (Section III.C)' should refer to Section III.B, since benzene is treated in §III.B.
[§III.E] The notation 'C2,→S4' is typographically garbled; it should be 'C2 ↪ S4'.
[Abstract and Conclusion] The statement that 'each standard Young tableau carries a definite C_m species determined by its major index modulo m' should be qualified to the case where the cyclic subgroup is generated by an N-cycle (or a conjugate/power), since the product-of-cycles case in SF4 is not covered by the cited theorem.
[§IV] The conclusion's claim of a 'fully combinatorial procedure' is stronger than what is proved for dihedral groups; the reflection step currently relies on the unproved rule identified in the major comments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the derivation is a benchmarked application of external representation-theory theorems, with no fitted parameters, reverse-engineered constants, or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained from independent mathematical inputs. It combines the Schur-Weyl decomposition of the n-spin Hilbert space with the Kráskiewicz–Weyman–Adin–Roichman major-index branching theorem for S_N down to C_m, both of which are external results cited from the literature and not derived from the target statistical weights. The cyclic species are computed by arithmetic evaluation of major indices modulo m, a procedure that does not involve fitting or any parameter calibrated to the molecules considered. The subsequent dihedral extension uses a Young-symmetrizer sign rule for reflection generators, which is asserted rather than proved and may be invalid in the stated generality; however, that is a derivation gap or correctness issue, not circularity, because the final weights are not introduced as premises or fitted inputs. The agreement with established statistical weights for XeOF4, SF4, benzene, deuterated benzene, and tropylium is presented as a verification of the method against independent benchmarks, which is the standard and non-circular use of known results. There are no self-citations by the paper's authors, no uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' own prior work, and no ansatz smuggled in through citation. The central quantitative predictions follow from published theorems plus explicit tableau enumeration, so the paper does not reduce to its own outputs by construction. The only flagged concern in the manuscript context is the unproved reflection-eigenvalue rule, which affects the validity of the derivation but not its circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method is built on standard representation theory (Schur-Weyl duality and the major-index branching theorem) plus physical modeling assumptions (rigid-molecule permutation subgroups and total-wavefunction symmetry). There are no fitted free parameters or invented entities. The main unproved items are the mod-m extension of the branching rule and the reflection-sign rule for Young symmetrizer bases.

assumptions (5)

standard math Schur-Weyl duality: the N-spin Hilbert space (C^d)^{⊗N} decomposes as ⊕_λ V_λ^{U(d)} ⊗ S^λ, with SSYT multiplicities.
Invoked throughout Sections II and III as the starting decomposition (Ref. 2). Standard background, not proved in the paper.
standard math Kráskiewicz-Weyman and Adin-Roichman theorem: for S_N restricted to a cyclic subgroup generated by an N-cycle, the multiplicity of χ_j equals the number of SYT with major index congruent to j mod N.
The paper's core engine, cited as Refs. 8 and 9 in Section II.E. The theorem is external and not proved.
ad hoc to paper The mod-m major-index rule holds when C_m is embedded in S_N as a product of disjoint m-cycles, or any conjugate of a power of an N-cycle.
Stated in Section III.E without proof. It is a plausible corollary of the cited theorem via conjugation, but the paper does not supply the argument; SF4 and the other examples depend on it.
domain assumption A rigid molecule realizes only the permutation subgroup induced by feasible motions, and the spin/rovib factorization plus the total-wavefunction symmetry constraint reduces to counting compatible spin species.
Standard molecular symmetry group theory (Longuet-Higgins, Bunker, and Jensen), stated in the Introduction. Needed to connect the representation theory to physical weights.
ad hoc to paper The reflection generator's eigenvalue on a Young symmetrizer tableau basis is determined by whether the transposed entries lie in the same row or column, and this extends to products of transpositions.
Used in Section III.A for s=(2 4) and implicitly in Sections III.B and III.D for s=(2 6)(3 5) and s=(2 7)(3 6)(4 5). The single-transposition rule is true when entries share a row or column; the product extension is asserted without proof and is not generally valid for arbitrary tableaux.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nuclear-Spin Statistical Weights from Young Diagrams." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QFW3OBYH

@misc{pith2026260806339,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nuclear-Spin Statistical Weights from Young Diagrams},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QFW3OBYH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06339}
}

abstract

Nuclear-spin statistical weights and selection rules in molecular spectroscopy are governed by the permutation symmetry of identical nuclei, although rigid and semi-rigid molecules typically realize only a proper subgroup of the full symmetric group. Building on the Schur-Weyl framework of Schmiedt, Jensen, and Schlemmer, we extend this approach to molecular geometries whose rovibrational motion realizes cyclic and dihedral permutation subgroups. By combining the Schur-Weyl decomposition of the $n$-spin Hilbert space with the Kra\'skiewicz-Weyman-Adin-Roichman major-index branching rule for the restriction $S_N \downarrow C_m$, we obtain a fully combinatorial method for determining nuclear-spin symmetry species and statistical weights. Each standard Young tableau corresponds to a definite cyclic character determined by its major index, with reflections yielding the associated dihedral symmetry, so that nuclear-spin species follow directly from tableau data without projection operators or case-specific constructions. Applications to $XeOF_4$, $SF_4$, benzene, deuterated benzene, and the tropylium cation demonstrate that the method applies uniformly to realistic molecular point groups and reproduces established statistical weights while providing a transparent spin-resolved structure. The approach supplies the symmetry information required for rovibrational line-intensity modeling and provides a practical, automatable framework for nuclear-spin symmetry analysis in polyatomic molecules.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06339 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2: Sulfur tetrafluoride [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

[1]

Schmiedt , author P

author author H. Schmiedt , author P. Jensen ,\ and\ author S. Schlemmer ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960956 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 145 ,\ pages 074301 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1063/1.4960956 2016
[2]

Fulton \ and\ author J

author author W. Fulton \ and\ author J. Harris ,\ @noop title Representation theory ,\ edition 1st \ ed.,\ Graduate texts in mathematics\ ( publisher Springer ,\ address New York, NY ,\ year 1999 ) NoStop

work page 1999
[3]

author author H. C. \ Longuet-Higgins ,\ https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976300100501 journal journal Molecular Physics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 445 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

doi:10.1080/00268976300100501 1963
[4]

Quack ,\ https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977700101861 journal journal Molecular Physics \ volume 34 ,\ pages 477 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

author author M. Quack ,\ https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977700101861 journal journal Molecular Physics \ volume 34 ,\ pages 477 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1080/00268977700101861 1977
[5]

Park \ and\ author J

author author K. Park \ and\ author J. C. \ Light ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2805394 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 127 ,\ pages 224101 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1063/1.2805394 2007
[6]

Oka ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jms.2004.08.015 journal journal Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy \ volume 228 ,\ pages 635 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

author author T. Oka ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jms.2004.08.015 journal journal Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy \ volume 228 ,\ pages 635 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1016/j.jms.2004.08.015 2004
[7]

Bengs ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5140186 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 152 ,\ pages 054106 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

author author C. Bengs ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5140186 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 152 ,\ pages 054106 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1063/1.5140186 2020
[8]

Kr\'askiewicz \ and\ author J

author author W. Kr\'askiewicz \ and\ author J. Weyman ,\ @noop journal journal Bayreuth. Math. Schr. \ ,\ pages 265 ( year 2001 ) ,\ note originally circulated 1989 NoStop

work page 2001

Show all 23 references

[9]

author author R. M. \ Adin \ and\ author Y. Roichman ,\ https://doi.org/10.1006/eujc.2000.0469 journal journal European Journal of Combinatorics \ volume 22 ,\ pages 431 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

2000
[10]

author author P. R. \ Bunker \ and\ author P. Jensen ,\ @noop title Fundamentals of Molecular Symmetry ,\ edition 2nd \ ed.\ ( publisher CRC Press ,\ year 2006 ) NoStop

2006
[11]

D. J. Rowe and M. J. Carvalho and J. Repka , title =. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.711 , url =

doi
[12]

The Journal of Chemical Physics , year =

Hanno Schmiedt and Per Jensen and Stephan Schlemmer , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , year =
[13]

The Journal of Chemical Physics , year =

Christian Bengs , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , year =
[14]

Combinatorial approach to the representation of the Schur--Weyl duality in one-dimensional spin systems , journal =

Dorota Jakubczyk and Pawe. Combinatorial approach to the representation of the Schur--Weyl duality in one-dimensional spin systems , journal =. 2018 , volume =

2018
[15]

Representation theory

Fulton, William and Harris, Joe. Representation theory
[16]

2020 , eprint=

On the distribution of the major index on standard Young tableaux , author=. 2020 , eprint=

2020
[17]

Bunker, P. R. and Jensen, P. , title =
[18]

Bayreuth

Witold Kr\'askiewicz and Jerzy Weyman , title =. Bayreuth. Math. Schr. , number =. 2001 , pages =

2001
[19]

Adin and Yuval Roichman , title =

Ron M. Adin and Yuval Roichman , title =. European Journal of Combinatorics , volume =. 2001 , doi =

2001
[20]

Molecular Physics , volume =

Quack, Martin , title =. Molecular Physics , volume =. 1977 , doi =

1977
[21]

Longuet-Higgins, H. C. , title =. Molecular Physics , volume =. 1963 , doi =

1963
[22]

Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy , volume =

Oka, Takeshi , title =. Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy , volume =. 2004 , issn =

2004
[23]

, title =

Park, Kisam and Light, John C. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2007 , doi =

2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Schmiedt , author P

author author H. Schmiedt , author P. Jensen ,\ and\ author S. Schlemmer ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960956 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 145 ,\ pages 074301 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1063/1.4960956 2016

[2] [2]

Fulton \ and\ author J

author author W. Fulton \ and\ author J. Harris ,\ @noop title Representation theory ,\ edition 1st \ ed.,\ Graduate texts in mathematics\ ( publisher Springer ,\ address New York, NY ,\ year 1999 ) NoStop

work page 1999

[3] [3]

author author H. C. \ Longuet-Higgins ,\ https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976300100501 journal journal Molecular Physics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 445 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

doi:10.1080/00268976300100501 1963

[4] [4]

Quack ,\ https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977700101861 journal journal Molecular Physics \ volume 34 ,\ pages 477 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

author author M. Quack ,\ https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977700101861 journal journal Molecular Physics \ volume 34 ,\ pages 477 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1080/00268977700101861 1977

[5] [5]

Park \ and\ author J

author author K. Park \ and\ author J. C. \ Light ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2805394 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 127 ,\ pages 224101 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1063/1.2805394 2007

[6] [6]

Oka ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jms.2004.08.015 journal journal Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy \ volume 228 ,\ pages 635 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

author author T. Oka ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jms.2004.08.015 journal journal Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy \ volume 228 ,\ pages 635 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1016/j.jms.2004.08.015 2004

[7] [7]

Bengs ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5140186 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 152 ,\ pages 054106 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

author author C. Bengs ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5140186 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 152 ,\ pages 054106 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1063/1.5140186 2020

[8] [8]

Kr\'askiewicz \ and\ author J

author author W. Kr\'askiewicz \ and\ author J. Weyman ,\ @noop journal journal Bayreuth. Math. Schr. \ ,\ pages 265 ( year 2001 ) ,\ note originally circulated 1989 NoStop

work page 2001