Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Dark Energy: A Short Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1401.0046 v1 pith:QGBQHZSJ submitted 2013-12-30 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords constantmeasurementscosmiccosmologicaldatatensionstheyacceleration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The accelerating expansion of the universe is the most surprising cosmological discovery in many decades. In this short review, we briefly summarize theories for the origin of cosmic acceleration and the observational methods being used to test these theories. We then discuss the current observational state of the field, with constraints from the cosmic microwave background (CMB), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), Type Ia supernovae (SN), direct measurements of the Hubble constant ($H_0$), and measurements of galaxy and matter clustering. Assuming a flat universe and dark energy with a constant equation-of-state parameter $w = P/\rho$, the combination of Planck CMB temperature anisotropies, WMAP CMB polarization, the Union2.1 SN compilation, and a compilation of BAO measurements yields $w = -1.10^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$, consistent with a cosmological constant ($w=-1$). However, with these constraints the cosmological constant model predicts a value of $H_0$ that is lower than several of the leading recent estimates, and it predicts a parameter combination $\sigma_8(\Omega_m)^{0.5}$ that is higher than many estimates from weak gravitational lensing, galaxy clusters, and redshift-space distortions. Individually these tensions are only significant at the ~$2\sigma$ level, but they arise in multiple data sets with independent statistics and distinct sources of systematic uncertainty. The tensions are stronger with Planck CMB data than they were with WMAP because of the smaller statistical errors and the higher central value of $\Omega_m.$ With the improved measurements expected from the next generation of data sets, these tensions may diminish, or they may sharpen in a way that points towards a more complete physical understanding of cosmic acceleration.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Collider Probes of Dark Energy Microphysics

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.5 of 10

    Derivative couplings of a k-essence dark-energy scalar to a 2HDM+a pseudoscalar make the mediator’s invisible width and kinematics depend on the dark-energy sound speed c_s².

  2. Probing the Sound Speed of Dark Energy with a Lunar Laser Interferometer

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A lunar laser interferometer is claimed to be able to directly constrain the dark energy sound speed through ultra-low-frequency strain from scalar metric perturbations, but the forecast depends on an ad hoc transfer ...

  3. Statistical consistency of sign-switching vacuum energy with cosmological observations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using exact non-Gaussian shift and posterior predictive tests, ΛsCDM improves CMB–BAO consistency and softens but does not resolve the Hubble tension, which persists at p≈4×10⁻⁴.

  4. Dark energy and cosmic acceleration

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 unverdicted

    A review chapter summarizing the history, theory, and current observations of dark energy, presenting no new research results.

Pith tools