REVIEW 3 cited by
Constraints on Strongly-Interacting Dark Matter from the James Webb Space Telescope
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Direct-detection searches for dark matter are insensitive to dark matter particles that have large interactions with ordinary matter, which are stopped in the atmosphere or the Earth's crust before reaching terrestrial detectors. We use ``dark'' calibration images taken with the HgCdTe detectors in the Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to derive novel constraints on sub-GeV dark matter candidates that scatter off electrons. We supplement the JWST analysis pipeline with additional masks to remove pixels with high-energy background events. For a 0.4% subcomponent of dark matter that interacts with an ultralight dark photon, we disfavor all previously allowed parameter space at high cross sections, and constrain some parameter regions for subcomponent fractions as low as $\sim$0.01%.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
DarkNESS: A skipper-CCD NanoSatellite for Dark Matter Searches
A mission design paper describing how a skipper-CCD CubeSat in low Earth orbit could search for strongly interacting sub-GeV dark matter and decaying dark matter X-rays.
-
Neutrino lines and photon continua from cascade dark matter decay
In cascade dark-matter decay, neutrino-line searches can beat gamma-ray limits whenever the intermediate mediator is long-lived enough to suppress the photon flux.
-
Dark Secrets of Baryons: Illuminating Dark Matter-Baryon Interactions with JWST
JWST ultraviolet luminosity function data currently provide the strongest upper limits on velocity-dependent (∝v^{-2}) dark matter–proton scattering for sub-GeV dark matter.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.