REVIEW 2 cited by
Bridging HCI and AI Research for the Evaluation of Conversational SE Assistants
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in software engineering, recently in the form of conversational assistants, ensuring these technologies align with developers' needs is essential. The limitations of traditional human-centered methods for evaluating LLM-based tools at scale raise the need for automatic evaluation. In this paper, we advocate combining insights from human-computer interaction (HCI) and artificial intelligence (AI) research to enable human-centered automatic evaluation of LLM-based conversational SE assistants. We identify requirements for such evaluation and challenges down the road, working towards a framework that ensures these assistants are designed and deployed in line with user needs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
DICE-BENCH: Evaluating the Tool-Use Capabilities of Large Language Models in Multi-Round, Multi-Party Dialogues
A new benchmark and metric show that large language models still struggle to call tools when the needed details are scattered across multi-party, multi-round group dialogues.
-
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Solving Simple Programming Tasks: A User-Centered Study
A within-subjects experiment with 15 high school students reports faster task completion with a collaborative ChatGPT-4o style than with a passive style, but the result is not significant versus proactive style and is...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.