Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Noise Detection in ECGs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.04122 v1 pith:QHKGBSBF submitted 2018-10-05 eess.SP cs.LGcs.NEstat.ML

classification eess.SPcs.LGcs.NEstat.ML
keywords ecgsnetworksnoisecardiovascularcauseconvolutionaldetectionneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Mobile electrocardiogram (ECG) recording technologies represent a promising tool to fight the ongoing epidemic of cardiovascular diseases, which are responsible for more deaths globally than any other cause. While the ability to monitor one's heart activity at any time in any place is a crucial advantage of such technologies, it is also the cause of a drawback: signal noise due to environmental factors can render the ECGs illegible. In this work, we develop convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to automatically label ECGs for noise, training them on a novel noise-annotated dataset. By reducing distraction from noisy intervals of signals, such networks have the potential to increase the accuracy of models for the detection of atrial fibrillation, long QT syndrome, and other cardiovascular conditions. Comparing several architectures, we find that a 16-layer CNN adapted from the VGG16 network which generates one prediction per second on a 10-second input performs exceptionally well on this task, with an AUC of 0.977.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Complex Deep Learning Models for Denoising of Human Heart ECG signals

    cs.LG 2019-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    CNN models outperform LSTM, RBM, and wavelet on same-record ECG denoising, but cross-record generalization is poor, with negative SNR on a held-out record.

Pith tools