Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Large Language Models are Strong Zero-Shot Retriever

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.14233 v2 pith:QHRDASOY submitted 2023-04-27 cs.CL cs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.IR
keywords retrievallanguagequeryretrievercandidatesmethodperformancepropose
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we propose a simple method that applies a large language model (LLM) to large-scale retrieval in zero-shot scenarios. Our method, the Language language model as Retriever (LameR), is built upon no other neural models but an LLM, while breaking brute-force combinations of retrievers with LLMs and lifting the performance of zero-shot retrieval to be very competitive on benchmark datasets. Essentially, we propose to augment a query with its potential answers by prompting LLMs with a composition of the query and the query's in-domain candidates. The candidates, regardless of correct or wrong, are obtained by a vanilla retrieval procedure on the target collection. As a part of the prompts, they are likely to help LLM generate more precise answers by pattern imitation or candidate summarization. Even if all the candidates are wrong, the prompts at least make LLM aware of in-collection patterns and genres. Moreover, due to the low performance of a self-supervised retriever, the LLM-based query augmentation becomes less effective as the retriever bottlenecks the whole pipeline. Therefore, we propose to leverage a non-parametric lexicon-based method (e.g., BM25) as the retrieval module to capture query-document overlap in a literal fashion. As such, LameR makes the retrieval procedure transparent to the LLM, thus circumventing the performance bottleneck.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Semantically Similar, Logically Distinct: Diagnosing the Semantic-Answerability Gap in Table RAG

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On a new sibling-table benchmark, dense retrievers find the right table group but identify the uniquely answerable table at near-chance rates; cross-encoder reranking lifts top-1 from 18.2% to 57.4%.

  2. A Tale of LLMs and Induced Small Proxies: Scalable Small Language Models for Knowledge Mining

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-written pipelines and LLM-generated labels are distilled into one small instruction-following model that performs classification and span extraction cheaply at corpus scale.

  3. Harnessing the Power of Reinforcement Learning for Language-Model-Based Information Retriever via Query-Document Co-Augmentation

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A bidirectional RL framework jointly optimizes LLM query and document augmentation and improves retrieval accuracy on BEIR benchmarks beyond query-only rewriting.

Pith tools