Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 90 references

Holographic RG flows and wormholes from sinusoidal scalars

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sinusoidal scalar sources in AdS make the large wormhole the dominant saddle of the two-boundary path integral whenever it exists.

desk verdict A careful numerical study of planar sinusoidal-scalar wormholes whose central claim—large wormhole always dominant, no Hawking–Page transition—is plausible but awaits stability and contour analysis. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06465 v1 pith:QHZC37J2 submitted 2026-08-06 hep-th

Pompey Leung This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords EuclideanwormholesAdS/CFTfactorizationpuzzleensembleaveragingholographicrenormalizationgroupboomerangRGflowsmultivaluedbeta-functionssinusoidalscalarsources
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies a bottom-up holographic model in which identical sinusoidal scalar sources are turned on two asymptotic anti-de Sitter boundaries. It finds that wormhole solutions exist only above a critical source strength, and that whenever they exist the large wormhole is the dominant saddle of the two-boundary Euclidean gravitational path integral. There is no intermediate regime in which wormholes exist but are subdominant, unlike earlier examples with inhomogeneous matter on compact boundaries. Under the ensemble interpretation of the gravitational path integral, the model therefore predicts that the dual ensemble is exactly self-averaging below the threshold and strongly non-self-averaging above it, with normalized fluctuations growing exponentially in the action difference. The same geometries also give holographic renormalization-group flows with multivalued $\beta$-functions: boomerang flows for disconnected boundaries and gapped flows ending at the throat for wormholes.

What carries the argument

The sinusoidal scalar ansatz is the load-bearing construction: $d$ complex scalars $\Phi_I(r,\vec x)=\phi(r)e^{ikx^I}$, each a plane wave in one boundary direction, give a stress tensor whose phases cancel, so the inhomogeneous matter sources a homogeneous and isotropic geometry and the Einstein--Klein--Gordon system reduces to coupled ODEs for the scale factor and radial profile. The saddle comparison is carried by holographically renormalized on-shell actions, with the $d=3$, $\Delta=2$ counterterms derived in the appendix; the dimensionless source strength $\tilde J=J/k^{d-\Delta}$ parametrizes all physical solutions. For the RG interpretation, the folding trick maps a $Z_2$-symmetric wormhole to a one-sided flow on $\mathbb{R}^d\times S^0$, whose throat is a finite-depth endpoint.

What would settle it

Compute the spectrum of quadratic fluctuations around the large $\mathbb{R}^3$ wormhole in $d=3$, $\Delta=2$, or carry out a Picard--Lefschetz deformation of the gravitational path-integral contour. A negative mode in the fluctuation operator, or a steepest-descent contour that does not pass through the wormhole saddle, would overturn the claim that the large wormhole dominates whenever it exists.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working in $d=3$ with a conformally coupled scalar ($\Delta=2$) and identical sinusoidal sources $J_I=Je^{ikx^I}$ on two $\mathbb{R}^3$ boundaries, the paper constructs numerically the fully backreacted disconnected and $Z_2$-symmetric wormhole saddles. Below $\tilde J\equiv J/k\simeq 22.5$ no wormhole exists; above it, a small and a large wormhole coexist, and the renormalized on-shell action difference $\Delta s=s_{\mathrm{disc.}}-s_{\mathrm{conn.}}$ is positive and monotonically increasing for both branches, with the large wormhole always ahead. The central claim is that above threshold the large wormhole dominates the semiclassical path integral and there is no Hawking--Page-like regime of subdominant wormholes; equivalently, the normalized variance of the putative dual ensemble jumps from zero to $\exp(\Delta S)$ at the threshold. The paper also claims the disconnected geometry is dual to a boomerang RG flow that returns to the same CFT, while the folded wormholes are dual to gapped flows ending at the throat.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the large wormhole is a genuine saddle of the Euclidean gravitational path integral---perturbatively stable and lying on the integration contour. The paper does not compute its quadratic fluctuation spectrum; it argues by analogy with the $T^3$ wormholes of [23] and explicitly assumes the contour passes through the wormhole saddles.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $\tilde J\equiv J/k^{d-\Delta}$ below the critical value, only the disconnected saddle exists, so the two-boundary partition function factorizes to leading order and the would-be ensemble is exactly self-averaging.
  • For $\tilde J\ge \tilde J_{\mathrm{crit}}$, the large wormhole dominates immediately; the transition is zeroth-order (the action difference jumps to positive), not a Hawking--Page-like first-order transition.
  • The normalized variance of the ensemble jumps from 0 to $\exp(\Delta S)$, where $\Delta S>0$ is $O(G_N^{-1})\mathrm{Vol}(\mathbb{R}^d)$, so a typical member of the ensemble is not represented by the mean.
  • The disconnected geometry is dual to a boomerang RG flow that leaves and returns to the same CFT, with a multivalued $\beta$-function whose branch point is a turning point, not a fixed point.
  • Folded wormholes describe a single CFT on $\mathbb{R}^d\times S^0$ that flows to a gapped theory at the throat, with cross-boundary two-point functions decaying exponentially with $\sqrt{\lambda_0}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: If the large wormhole turns out to be free of negative modes, the model becomes a higher-dimensional example where non-factorization is not exponentially suppressed, and restoring factorization would require non-geometric cancellations of the same order as the wormhole action itself.
  • Editorial: A direct check of the paper's suspected mechanism is to build the disconnected counterpart of the $T^3$ wormholes of [23] and compare the action difference; if it is discontinuous there too, the missing compact boundary scale is the culprit, while a smooth Hawking--Page-like transition would point to boundary topology.
  • Editorial: The multivalued $\beta$-function is likely generic for any periodic boundary source, not just a single sinusoid; testing other periodic profiles or different operator dimensions would show whether boomerang flows with two $\beta$ branches are a universal feature of inhomogeneous sources.
  • Editorial: The wormhole's UV invisibility gives a concrete field-theoretic signature: any candidate dual ensemble must reproduce the finite cross-boundary correlator, and this could be checked numerically in a lattice model before a full gravitational dual is known.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies Euclidean Einstein-scalar gravity in d=3 with a conformally coupled scalar (Δ=2), turning on identical sinusoidal scalar sources on two planar AdS boundaries. It numerically constructs one-boundary (disconnected) solutions and Z2-symmetric wormhole solutions, maps their parameter space (small and large branches meeting at a critical wormhole), and interprets both families as holographic RG flows: the disconnected geometry as a boomerang flow returning to the same CFT, and the folded wormhole as a gapped flow. The paper then computes renormalized on-shell actions and compares saddles, concluding that above the critical source strength the large wormhole is always the dominant saddle, with no Hawking–Page-like subdominant window. Under an ensemble interpretation, the normalized variance is claimed to jump from zero to exp(ΔS) at the threshold.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper is a significant counterpoint to the Marolf–Santos bottom-up wormhole results: it would establish a two-boundary semiclassical path integral with a sharp transition directly from disconnected-only to large-wormhole dominance, and an ensemble that is strongly non-self-averaging whenever wormholes exist. The paper is transparent about its numerical workflow, derives the holographic counterterms in an appendix, and gives a falsifiable prediction for the phase diagram and for the normalized variance. These are genuine strengths. However, the headline dominance claim is conditional on two unverified premises—perturbative stability of the large wormhole and placement of the integration contour through the wormhole saddles—and the numerical evidence for the sharp transition lacks error estimates. The result is therefore significant but not yet fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6, Eq. (6.1), Abstract] The central claim that for eJ ≥ eJcrit the large wormhole is always the dominant saddle presupposes that this saddle is perturbatively stable and lies on the integration contour of the Euclidean gravitational path integral. The paper explicitly states that no stability analysis was carried out and that the contour was assumed to pass through the wormhole saddles (Section 6: “While we did not carry out a stability analysis...” and “we have implicitly assumed that the integration contour for the gravitational path integral passes through the wormhole saddles”). A negative mode or an off-contour saddle would invalidate the dominance statement and the exponential variance in Eq. (6.1). The analogy with the T^3 wormholes of [23] is suggestive but not a substitute for the R^3 calculation, since compactness of the transverse space changes the perturbation spectrum. I request a quadratic-fluctuation analysis for at least the large wormhole branch and a Picard–Lefschetz discussion of contour placement, or a substantially qualified formulation of the headline claim.
  2. [Section 5.3, Fig. 10] The numerical action differences Δs are presented without estimates of numerical uncertainty (shooting tolerances, sensitivity to the choice of cutoff window, or fitting errors in the ϵ→0 extrapolation described around Eq. (5.22)). The sharp conclusions that Δs is positive at eJcrit and that Δs ∼ J^4/k follow from a linear best fit through sampled points, but no residuals or fit ranges are reported. Moreover, the text concedes near the bifurcation that the saddle-point approximation cannot clearly resolve the dominant saddle (Section 6). Without error bars or a dedicated near-critical analysis, the claimed discontinuity (‘zeroth-order phase transition’) and the absence of a Hawking–Page-like regime are not demonstrated to the precision required for the paper's strongest claim.
  3. [Section 5.3, Eq. (5.21)] The dominance comparison is performed on the action density Δs after factoring out the infinite volume Vol(R^d). As a result, the statements “the large wormhole dominates” and “the normalized variance is exp(ΔS)” are statements about intensive free-energy densities, not about the actual finite path-integral weights exp(−S). This is a standard maneuver for planar boundaries, but the manuscript should state it explicitly and justify why the intensive comparison controls the saddle-point approximation in the noncompact case; otherwise the exponential factors exp(−Δs Vol(R^d)) appearing in the text are purely formal.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 8 caption] The caption states J/k = 2, but the surrounding text and Fig. 7 use J/k = 50; this appears to be a typo and should be corrected.
  2. [Section 5.3, Eq. (5.23)] The linear fit leading to Δs ∼ J^4/k should specify the fit range, whether the fit is on a log-log or linear plot, and the residuals; otherwise the functional form is hard to assess.
  3. [Section 6, Fig. 10] The statement in the abstract and Section 5.3 that “there is no regime where wormholes are subdominant” is slightly stronger than the text in Section 6, which notes that near the critical wormhole the dominant saddle cannot be clearly resolved; the authors should either resolve this region or qualify the global statement.
  4. [Section 4.1] The claim that no wormhole solutions exist below (J/k)crit is based on numerical root-finding; this should be stated as a numerical result, with the caveat that complex or otherwise non-geometric saddles are not excluded.
  5. [Section 5.1] The estimate of the truncation error in Eq. (5.7) is helpful, but the paper should also report the analogous convergence check for the wormhole action integrals and for the extraction of J from the near-boundary fit in Eq. (4.8).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the phase diagram and exponential variance are obtained by solving the equations and comparing computed on-shell actions; the stability and contour caveats are explicit limitations, not circular inputs.

full rationale

I walked the paper's derivation chain: the sinusoidal ansatz (Eqs. 2.8-2.11), the numerical one-boundary solutions from Eqs. (3.3)-(3.8), the wormhole solutions from Eqs. (4.2)-(4.7), the extraction of the source J from the near-boundary expansion (Eq. 4.8), the renormalized on-shell actions (Eqs. 5.3-5.16), and the saddle comparison through the action difference Eq. (5.21) and Fig. 10. At each step, quantities are computed by solving the stated differential equations or by evaluating the stated action integrals; no parameter is fitted to the target claim and then renamed as a prediction. The linear fit f(J/k) ~ J/k in Section 5.3 is explicitly a posteriori ('the linear best-fit curve ... suggests') and is not load-bearing for the central claim that the large wormhole dominates; that claim rests on the computed positive values of the action difference. The paper also does not rely on a self-citation chain: the sinusoidal ansatz is attributed to the independent prior work [23, 36], and the RG-flow vocabulary comes from earlier external literature. The paper explicitly flags in Section 6 that it did not perform a stability analysis and that it implicitly assumed the contour passes through the wormhole saddles; these are acknowledged assumptions and potential correctness risks, but they are not cases where a 'prediction' reduces by construction to an input. No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's own equations.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on the AdS/CFT dictionary, the semiclassical saddle-point approximation, and the unproven assumption that the wormhole saddles are stable and on the integration contour. The free parameters of the scan are the source strength and throat size; no constants are fitted to external data.

free parameters (3)
  • dimensionless source strength eJ = J/k^(d-Δ) = critical eJcrit ≈ 22.5 for d=3, Δ=2
    Control parameter of the phase diagram; solutions are scanned over J/k, and the critical value is set by wormhole branch coalescence in §4.1.
  • wormhole throat size a0/k = branch interval roughly (a0/k)min ≈ 0.373 to (a0/k)max ≈ √2/2 ≈ 0.707
    Free initial condition in Eq. (4.6) that parametrizes the small and large wormhole branches; not fitted to external data.
  • wavenumber k = fixed to k=2 in numerics
    Scaling symmetry k→λk, z→z/λ makes the physics depend only on J/k; fixing k is a coordinate choice, not a fitted constant.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math AdS/CFT dictionary identifies the non-normalizable mode coefficient with the boundary source and the on-shell action with the boundary generating functional.
    Used in Eqs. (2.10), (3.5), (4.8), and throughout for interpreting and renormalizing saddles.
  • domain assumption The two-boundary gravitational path integral is approximated by the three semiclassical saddles (disconnected, small wormhole, large wormhole) with no other topologies or non-geometric contributions.
    Eq. (5.19) sums only over these saddles; Section 6 acknowledges possible half-wormholes, counter-wormholes, and contour choices that are not included.
  • domain assumption The large wormhole saddle is perturbatively stable and lies on the integration contour of the gravitational path integral.
    Invoked in Section 5 and abstract; not proven. Section 6 says no stability analysis was carried out and assumes the contour passes through wormholes.
  • domain assumption The radial coordinate can be interpreted as an RG scale and the sine-wave scalar profile as a running coupling through an effective beta function.
    Used in Section 3.2 and 4.2; the paper itself notes this is an effective beta function for spatially dependent sources, not the full beta function.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Holographic RG flows and wormholes from sinusoidal scalars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QHZC37J2

@misc{pith2026260806465,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Holographic RG flows and wormholes from sinusoidal scalars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QHZC37J2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06465}
}
abstract

We study semiclassical geometries induced by turning on identical sinusoidal scalar sources on two asymptotic anti-de Sitter (AdS) boundaries. Varying the source strength, we find that large and small wormhole solutions appear beyond a certain threshold. Above this threshold, the large wormhole is always the dominant saddle in the two-boundary gravitational path integral; there is no regime where wormholes are subdominant. Under the ensemble interpretation of the gravitational path integral, this implies that once wormhole solutions exist, the putative ensemble has exponentially large fluctuations relative to the mean. This is unlike previously studied examples of wormholes sourced by inhomogeneous matter which have a region in parameter space where wormholes are subdominant, and therefore the ensemble is sharply concentrated around the mean. Interpreting the bulk geometries as holographic renormalization group (RG) flows, we also find that the sinusoidal modulation of scalar boundary sources results in effective holographic $\beta$-functions which are multivalued, indicating exotic RG flows. In particular, disconnected geometries correspond to flows that return to the starting fixed point in the infrared, while wormholes describe flows to a gapped phase in the infrared.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Marolf and J

    D. Marolf and J. E. Santos,AdS Euclidean wormholes,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 224002, [2101.08875]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [1]

    J. M. Maldacena and L. Maoz,Wormholes in AdS,JHEP02(2004) 053, [hep-th/0401024]

    arXiv 2004

  3. [2]

    G. V. Lavrelashvili, V. A. Rubakov and P. G. Tinyakov,Disruption of Quantum Coherence upon a Change in Spatial Topology in Quantum Gravity,JETP Lett.46(1987) 167–169

    1987

  4. [3]

    S. W. Hawking,Quantum Coherence Down the Wormhole,Phys. Lett. B195(1987) 337

    1987

  5. [4]

    S. R. Coleman,Black holes as red herrings: Topological fluctuations and the loss of quantum coherence,Nucl. Phys. B307(1988) 867–882

    1988

  6. [5]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger,Loss of incoherence and determination of coupling constants in quantum gravity,Nucl. Phys. B307(1988) 854–866

    1988

  7. [6]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger,Baby Universes, Third Quantization and the Cosmological Constant,Nucl. Phys. B321(1989) 481–508

    1989

  8. [7]

    Marolf and H

    D. Marolf and H. Maxfield,Transcending the ensemble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information,JHEP08(2020) 044, [2002.08950]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 90 references
  1. [8]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,JT gravity as a matrix integral,1903.11115

    1903 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Cotler and K

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen,AdS 3 gravity and random CFT,JHEP04(2021) 033, [2006.08648]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Cotler and K

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen,AdS 3 wormholes from a modular bootstrap,JHEP11(2020) 058, [2007.15653]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Stanford and E

    D. Stanford and E. Witten,JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.24(2020) 1475–1680, [1907.03363]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Afkhami-Jeddi, H

    N. Afkhami-Jeddi, H. Cohn, T. Hartman and A. Tajdini,Free partition functions and an averaged holographic duality,JHEP01(2021) 130, [2006.04839]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Maloney and E

    A. Maloney and E. Witten,Averaging over Narain moduli space,JHEP10(2020) 187, [2006.04855]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Blommaert,Dissecting the ensemble in JT gravity,JHEP09(2022) 075, [2006.13971]

    A. Blommaert,Dissecting the ensemble in JT gravity,JHEP09(2022) 075, [2006.13971]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [15]

    A. M. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa and V. Godet,Euclidean wormhole in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 046014, [2010.11633]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Pollack, M

    J. Pollack, M. Rozali, J. Sully and D. Wakeham,Eigenstate Thermalization and Disorder Averaging in Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 021601, [2002.02971]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Cotler and K

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen,A precision test of averaging in AdS/CFT,JHEP11(2022) 070, [2205.12968]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford,Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 106002, [1604.07818]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Belin and J

    A. Belin and J. de Boer,Random statistics of OPE coefficients and Euclidean wormholes,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 164001, [2006.05499]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Chandra, S

    J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman and A. Maloney,Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs,JHEP12(2022) 069, [2203.06511]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [21]

    J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]. – 30 –

    1998 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Aharony, O

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena,N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,JHEP10(2008) 091, [0806.1218]

    2008 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Schlenker and E

    J.-M. Schlenker and E. Witten,No ensemble averaging below the black hole threshold,JHEP07 (2022) 143, [2202.01372]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger,Axion Induced Topology Change in Quantum Gravity and String Theory,Nucl. Phys. B306(1988) 890–907

    1988

  18. [26]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger,String Wormholes,Phys. Lett. B230(1989) 46–51

    1989

  19. [27]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. Orgera and J. Polchinski,Euclidean wormholes in string theory,JHEP12 (2007) 018, [0705.2768]

    2007 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Hertog, M

    T. Hertog, M. Trigiante and T. Van Riet,Axion Wormholes in AdS Compactifications,JHEP 06(2017) 067, [1702.04622]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Hertog, B

    T. Hertog, B. Truijen and T. Van Riet,Euclidean axion wormholes have multiple negative modes,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 081302, [1811.12690]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    G. J. Loges, G. Shiu and N. Sudhir,Complex saddles and Euclidean wormholes in the Lorentzian path integral,JHEP08(2022) 064, [2203.01956]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Hertog, S

    T. Hertog, S. Maenaut, B. Missoni, R. Tielemans and T. Van Riet,Stability of axion-saxion wormholes,JHEP11(2024) 151, [2405.02072]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Loveridge and H.-Y

    A. Loveridge and H.-Y. Sun,AdS 3 axion wormholes as stable contributions to the Euclidean gravitational path integral,JHEP04(2026) 138, [2504.10868]

    2026 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Marolf and B

    D. Marolf and B. Missoni,Euclidean wormholes stability analysis revisited,JHEP10(2025) 117, [2505.21118]

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    J. Held, M. Kaplan, D. Marolf and Z. Wang,Axion Wormholes and the AdS/CFT Factorization Problem,2601.02507

  27. [35]

    Maldacena, A

    J. Maldacena, A. Maloney and B. McPeak,Wormholes and the imaginary distance bound, 2605.05336

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Maloney, V

    A. Maloney, V. Meruliya and M. Van Raamsdonk,Ordinary wormholes,2503.12227

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Girardello, M

    L. Girardello, M. Petrini, M. Porrati and A. Zaffaroni,Novel local CFT and exact results on perturbations of N=4 superYang Mills from AdS dynamics,JHEP12(1998) 022, [hep-th/9810126]

    1998 arXiv

  30. [38]

    D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, K. Pilch and N. P. Warner,Renormalization group flows from holography: supersymmetry and ac-theorem,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(1999) 363–417, [hep-th/9904017]

    1999 arXiv

  31. [39]

    de Boer, E

    J. de Boer, E. P. Verlinde and H. L. Verlinde,On the holographic renormalization group,JHEP 08(2000) 003, [hep-th/9912012]

    2000 arXiv

  32. [40]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105–114, [hep-th/9802109]. – 31 –

    1998 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

    1998 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Fefferman and C

    C. Fefferman and C. R. Graham,Conformal invariants, in ´Elie Cartan et les math´ ematiques d’aujourd’hui, Ast´ erisque, pp. 95–116. 1985

    1985

  35. [43]

    I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten,AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,Nucl. Phys. B556(1999) 89–114, [hep-th/9905104]

    1999 arXiv

  36. [44]

    A. W. Peet and J. Polchinski,UV / IR relations in AdS dynamics,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 065011, [hep-th/9809022]

    1999 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Porrati and A

    M. Porrati and A. Starinets,RG fixed points in supergravity duals of 4-D field theory and asymptotically AdS spaces,Phys. Lett. B454(1999) 77–83, [hep-th/9903085]

    1999 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Balasubramanian and P

    V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus,Space-time and the holographic renormalization group,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 3605–3608, [hep-th/9903190]

    1999 arXiv

  39. [47]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory,JETP Lett.43(1986) 730–732

    1986

  40. [48]

    Girardello, M

    L. Girardello, M. Petrini, M. Porrati and A. Zaffaroni,Confinement and condensates without fine tuning in supergravity duals of gauge theories,JHEP05(1999) 026, [hep-th/9903026]

    1999 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Girardello, M

    L. Girardello, M. Petrini, M. Porrati and A. Zaffaroni,The Supergravity dual of N=1 superYang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B569(2000) 451–469, [hep-th/9909047]

    2000 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Polchinski and M

    J. Polchinski and M. J. Strassler,The String dual of a confining four-dimensional gauge theory, hep-th/0003136

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Hoyos, U

    C. Hoyos, U. Kol, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz,The a-theorem and conformal symmetry breaking in holographic RG flows,JHEP03(2013) 063, [1207.0006]

    2013 arXiv

  44. [52]

    S. A. Hartnoll, D. M. Ramirez and J. E. Santos,Emergent scale invariance of disordered horizons,JHEP09(2015) 160, [1504.03324]

    2015 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Aharony, Z

    O. Aharony, Z. Komargodski and S. Yankielowicz,Disorder in Large-N Theories,JHEP04 (2016) 013, [1509.02547]

    2016 arXiv

  46. [54]

    T. L. Curtright and C. K. Zachos,Renormalization Group Functional Equations,Phys. Rev. D 83(2011) 065019, [1010.5174]

    2011 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Donos, J

    A. Donos, J. P. Gauntlett, C. Rosen and O. Sosa-Rodriguez,Boomerang RG flows in M-theory with intermediate scaling,JHEP07(2017) 128, [1705.03000]

    2017 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Donos, J

    A. Donos, J. P. Gauntlett, C. Rosen and O. Sosa-Rodriguez,Boomerang RG flows with intermediate conformal invariance,JHEP04(2018) 017, [1712.08017]

    2018 arXiv

  49. [57]

    T. L. Curtright, X. Jin and C. K. Zachos,RG flows, cycles, and c-theorem folklore,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 131601, [1111.2649]

    2012 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Ilderton,Renormalization Group Flow of the Jaynes-Cummings Model,Phys

    A. Ilderton,Renormalization Group Flow of the Jaynes-Cummings Model,Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020) 130402, [2005.06485]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Kiritsis, F

    E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. Silva Pimenta,Exotic RG Flows from Holography,Fortsch. Phys.65 (2017) 1600120, [1611.05493]. – 32 –

    2017 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Casini, M

    H. Casini, M. Huerta and R. C. Myers,Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy,JHEP05(2011) 036, [1102.0440]

    2011 arXiv

  53. [61]

    D. L. Jafferis, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu and B. R. Safdi,Towards the F-Theorem: N=2 Field Theories on the Three-Sphere,JHEP06(2011) 102, [1103.1181]

    2011 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,On the RG running of the entanglement entropy of a circle,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 125016, [1202.5650]

    2012 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Mahajan and K

    R. Mahajan and K. Singhi,A Brief Note on Complex AdS-Schwarzschild Black Holes, 2509.08883

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    Ghodsi, J

    A. Ghodsi, J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and V. Nourry,Holographic QFTs on AdS d, wormholes and holographic interfaces,JHEP01(2023) 121, [2209.12094]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Chandra,Euclidean wormholes in holographic RG flows,JHEP11(2024) 096, [2407.15630]

    J. Chandra,Euclidean wormholes in holographic RG flows,JHEP11(2024) 096, [2407.15630]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Van Raamsdonk,Cosmology from confinement?,JHEP03(2022) 039, [2102.05057]

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Cosmology from confinement?,JHEP03(2022) 039, [2102.05057]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Antonini, P

    S. Antonini, P. Simidzija, B. Swingle and M. Van Raamsdonk,Cosmology from the vacuum, Class. Quant. Grav.41(2024) 045008, [2203.11220]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Antonini, P

    S. Antonini, P. Simidzija, B. Swingle and M. Van Raamsdonk,Can one hear the shape of a wormhole?,JHEP09(2022) 241, [2207.02225]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Wong and I

    E. Wong and I. Affleck,Tunneling in quantum wires: A Boundary conformal field theory approach,Nucl. Phys. B417(1994) 403–438, [cond-mat/9311040]

    1994 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories, Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 505–532, [hep-th/9803131]

    1998 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Osterwalder and R

    K. Osterwalder and R. Schrader,Axioms for Euclidean Green’s functions II.,Commun. Math. Phys.42(1975) 281

    1975

  64. [72]

    D. Z. Freedman, S. D. Mathur, A. Matusis and L. Rastelli,Correlation functions in the CFTd/AdSd+1 correspondence,Nucl. Phys. B546(1999) 96–118, [hep-th/9804058]

    1999 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Betzios, E

    P. Betzios, E. Kiritsis and O. Papadoulaki,Euclidean Wormholes and Holography,JHEP06 (2019) 042, [1903.05658]

    2019 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Betzios, E

    P. Betzios, E. Kiritsis and O. Papadoulaki,Interacting systems and wormholes,JHEP02 (2022) 126, [2110.14655]

    2022 arXiv

  67. [75]

    de Haro, S

    S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin and K. Skenderis,Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence,Commun. Math. Phys.217(2001) 595–622, [hep-th/0002230]

    2001 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class

    K. Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5849–5876, [hep-th/0209067]

    2002 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Witten,Analytic Continuation Of Chern-Simons Theory,AMS/IP Stud

    E. Witten,Analytic Continuation Of Chern-Simons Theory,AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math.50 (2011) 347–446, [1001.2933]

    2011 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Witten,A Note On Complex Spacetime Metrics,2111.06514

    E. Witten,A Note On Complex Spacetime Metrics,2111.06514

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Chesler, A

    P. Chesler, A. Lucas and S. Sachdev,Conformal field theories in a periodic potential: results from holography and field theory,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 026005, [1308.0329]

    2014 arXiv

  72. [80]

    V. P. Maslov,Zeroth-Order Phase Transitions,Mathematical Notes76(2004) 697–710. – 33 –

    2004

  73. [81]

    Gunasekaran, R

    S. Gunasekaran, R. B. Mann and D. Kubiznak,Extended phase space thermodynamics for charged and rotating black holes and Born-Infeld vacuum polarization,JHEP11(2012) 110, [1208.6251]

    2012 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Altamirano, D

    N. Altamirano, D. Kubiznak and R. B. Mann,Reentrant phase transitions in rotating anti–de Sitter black holes,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 101502, [1306.5756]

    2013 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Kubiznak, R

    D. Kubiznak, R. B. Mann and M. Teo,Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda, Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) 063001, [1608.06147]

    2017 arXiv

  76. [84]

    W. Cong, D. Kubiznak, R. B. Mann and M. R. Visser,Holographic CFT phase transitions and criticality for charged AdS black holes,JHEP08(2022) 174, [2112.14848]

    2022 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Collier and E

    S. Collier and E. Perlmutter,Harnessing S-duality inN= 4 SYM & supergravity as SL(2, Z)-averaged strings,JHEP08(2022) 195, [2201.05093]

    2022 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Kudler-Flam and E

    J. Kudler-Flam and E. Witten,Wormholes and Averaging over N,2605.15180

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity, 1806.06840

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    Cotler and K

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen,Gravitational Constrained Instantons,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 081501, [2010.02241]

    2021 arXiv

  81. [89]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford and S. Yao,Wormholes without averaging,JHEP09(2024) 133, [2103.16754]

    2024 arXiv

  82. [90]

    source” and “VEV

    E. Gesteau, M. Marcolli and J. McNamara,Wormhole Renormalization: The gravitational path integral, holography, and a gauge group for topology change,2407.20324. A Holographic counterterms ford= 3,∆ = 2 Following the formalism developed in [75, 76], we derive the holographic co...

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.