REVIEW 1 cited by
A Dual-Channel Framework for Sarcasm Recognition by Detecting Sentiment Conflict
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Sarcasm employs ambivalence, where one says something positive but actually means negative, and vice versa. The essence of sarcasm, which is also a sufficient and necessary condition, is the conflict between literal and implied sentiments expressed in one sentence. However, it is difficult to recognize such sentiment conflict because the sentiments are mixed or even implicit. As a result, the recognition of sophisticated and obscure sentiment brings in a great challenge to sarcasm detection. In this paper, we propose a Dual-Channel Framework by modeling both literal and implied sentiments separately. Based on this dual-channel framework, we design the Dual-Channel Network~(DC-Net) to recognize sentiment conflict. Experiments on political debates (i.e. IAC-V1 and IAC-V2) and Twitter datasets show that our proposed DC-Net achieves state-of-the-art performance on sarcasm recognition. Our code is released to support research.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CAF-I: A Collaborative Multi-Agent Framework for Enhanced Irony Detection with Large Language Models
CAF-I, a multi-agent LLM framework with context, semantic, and rhetorical agents plus a refinement evaluator, reports state-of-the-art zero-shot irony detection, averaging 76.31 Macro-F1 across four benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.