Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Modal logic, fundamentally

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.14043 v3 pith:QKPIKM5T submitted 2024-03-20 math.LO cs.LO

classification math.LOcs.LO
keywords diamondlogicmodalvartriangleleftlatticeoperationadditivecase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Non-classical generalizations of classical modal logic have been developed in the contexts of constructive mathematics and natural language semantics. In this paper, we discuss a general approach to the semantics of non-classical modal logics via algebraic representation theorems. We begin with complete lattices $L$ equipped with an antitone operation $\neg$ sending $1$ to $0$, a completely multiplicative operation $\Box$, and a completely additive operation $\Diamond$. Such lattice expansions can be represented by means of a set $X$ together with binary relations $\vartriangleleft$, $R$, and $Q$, satisfying some first-order conditions, used to represent $(L,\neg)$, $\Box$, and $\Diamond$, respectively. Indeed, any lattice $L$ equipped with such a $\neg$, a multiplicative $\Box$, and an additive $\Diamond$ embeds into the lattice of propositions of a frame $(X,\vartriangleleft,R,Q)$. Building on our recent study of "fundamental logic", we focus on the case where $\neg$ is dually self-adjoint ($a\leq \neg b$ implies $b\leq\neg a$) and $\Diamond \neg a\leq\neg\Box a$. In this case, the representations can be constrained so that $R=Q$, i.e., we need only add a single relation to $(X,\vartriangleleft)$ to represent both $\Box$ and $\Diamond$. Using these results, we prove that a system of fundamental modal logic is sound and complete with respect to an elementary class of bi-relational structures $(X,\vartriangleleft, R)$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fundamental Logic Through the Lens of Modality

    math.LO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Three full-and-faithful translation theorems embed fundamental logic into modal versions of orthologic and intuitionistic logic, and embed intuitionistic logic into a modal extension of fundamental logic.

  2. Possibility Frames and Forcing for Modal Logic

    math.LO 2025-01 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Possibility frames generalize Kripke frames and yield continuum many Kripke-incomplete modal logics that are nevertheless complete for full possibility frames, with duality theory and completeness results for all norm...

  3. Fundamental Propositional Logic with Preconditional: Strong Completeness, Finite Model Property, and Modal Translations

    math.LO 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fundamental logic with a preconditional is strongly complete, has the finite model property, and embeds fully and faithfully into ortho-S4 and intuitionistic KTB.

  4. Vagueness and the Connectives

    cs.LO 2024-11 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sorites no-sharp-cutoff claims are satisfiable in orthologic and fundamental logic, making fundamental logic a candidate common base for epistemic-modality and vagueness phenomena.

Pith tools