Shadowing for Infinite Dimensional Dynamical Systems

Alexandre N. Carvalho; Carlos R. Takaessu Jr; Jos\'e M. Arrieta

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Shadowing for Infinite Dimensional Dynamical Systems

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Morse-Smale semigroups in Hilbert spaces have Lipschitz shadowing on their global attractors and Hölder shadowing in neighborhoods, without requiring an inertial manifold.

desk verdict First shadowing result for infinite-dimensional Morse-Smale systems without inertial manifolds, but the proof has a load-bearing gap: lower semicontinuity of S is unproved and justified circularly. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08315 v2 pith:QKWUEQEL submitted 2025-02-12 math.DS math.AP

José M. Arrieta , Alexandre N. Carvalho , Carlos R. Takaessu Jr This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DSmath.AP MSC 37L0535R1537D0537L45

keywords ShadowingMorse-SmalesemigroupsGlobalattractorHilbertspaceHölderLipschitzStructuralstabilityContinuityofattractors

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that Morse-Smale semigroups in Hilbert spaces possess a strong approximation property known as shadowing: any approximate orbit of the time-one map on the global attractor is within a bounded distance of a true orbit, and the error scales linearly with the approximation error. Outside the attractor, in any positively invariant bounded neighborhood, the same is true with a Hölder rather than linear error bound. This matters because the main examples, such as damped wave equations, cannot be reduced to a finite-dimensional inertial manifold, and the prior finite-dimensional shadowing theorems did not apply. The proof adapts the finite-dimensional compatible-subbundle construction, handling the fact that the derivative need not be surjective in infinite dimensions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the family of compatible subbundles: closed subspaces S(x) and U(x) splitting the Hilbert space at each point x of the attractor, positively invariant under the derivative and exponentially contracting in forward time on S(x) and in backward time on U(x). These subbundles let the proof transfer the finite-dimensional Lipschitz shadowing argument to infinite dimensions, despite the derivative not being surjective. The construction proceeds by induction over the equilibria, using continuity and lower semicontinuity of the subbundles, inclination estimates near unstable manifolds, and a final Banach fixed point argument that produces the shadowing orbit.

What would settle it

Check whether the stable subbundle S(x) constructed in Proposition 3.8 is lower semicontinuous at every point of the global attractor for a concrete Morse-Smale damped wave equation on a bounded three-dimensional domain; if some point admits no continuous family of subspaces below S(x0), then Lemma 3.19 is false as stated and the induction in Theorem 3.21 loses its justification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that Morse-Smale semigroups in Hilbert spaces, even when the dynamics cannot be projected onto a finite-dimensional inertial manifold, still satisfy strong shadowing. Specifically, for a semigroup {T(t)} with global attractor A and non-wandering set consisting only of hyperbolic equilibria, and with Fréchet derivatives obeying the exponential-growth and continuity conditions (H1) and (H2), the time-one map T(1) restricted to A has Lipschitz shadowing: every δ-pseudo-orbit in A lies within Lδ of a true orbit. Moreover, on any positively invariant bounded neighborhood U of A, the map T(1)|_U has α-Hölder shadowing for some 0<α<1. This is the first such neighborhood shadowing result in infinite dimensions that does not pass through a finite-dimensional reduction.

Load-bearing premise

The proof needs the stable subbundles S(x) to be lower semicontinuous across the whole attractor; the paper states this without a full proof, and the compatible-subbundle induction leans on it at each step.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For the damped wave equation, T(1) has Hölder shadowing in any positively invariant bounded neighborhood of its attractor, even though no inertial manifold exists.
Small perturbations of a Morse-Smale semigroup have global orbits that stay close to global orbits of the unperturbed system, with the gap bounded by a Hölder power of the perturbation size.
The distance between global attractors can be controlled by the time-one map distance with any Hölder exponent less than one, under exponential attraction and subexponential Lipschitz growth.
The finite-dimensional Lipschitz shadowing theorem for Morse-Smale systems with only equilibrium non-wandering points is recovered as a special case.
Non-autonomous perturbations of Morse-Smale semigroups also inherit orbit proximity, as shown in Theorem 5.2.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If Lemma 3.19's lower semicontinuity claim fails for some admissible Morse-Smale semigroup, the induction proving S(x)+U_j(x)=X in Theorem 3.21 loses its justification; the theorem's conclusion could survive, but the proof would need a different transversality argument.
The proof does not identify the Hölder exponent α or the shadowing constants explicitly; reading the estimate in Lemma 4.1 as a recipe would give concrete exponents in terms of the Lipschitz constant of T(1)|_U and the exponential attraction rate, making the result quantitative.
Because the construction only needs the derivative to be an isomorphism onto its range along the attractor, the same compatible-subbundle method should apply to gradient semigroups whose time-one map is non-invertible outside the attractor, as long as the attractor dynamics remain invertible.
A direct stress test of the method would be to check whether the stable subbundle S(x) is lower semicontinuous for parabolic systems with critical nonlinearities, where unstable manifolds may have infinite codimension; a failure there would not automatically disprove the shadowing conclusion, but it would require replacing the current proof.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read this one for the main theorem, not for the proof as written. Arrieta, Carvalho and Takaessu claim the first Lipschitz shadowing result on the global attractor of an infinite-dimensional Morse-Smale semigroup that avoids an inertial manifold, plus a Holder shadowing statement in a neighborhood. If correct, that is a genuine advance: the damped wave equation satisfies their hypotheses while failing the spectral gap condition needed for inertial manifolds, so the result covers a natural class that previous shadowing results did not. The applications to structural stability and attractor continuity are plausible and well motivated.

The paper does real work. Section 3 adapts Pilyugin and Robinson's compatible subbundles to the non-invertible infinite-dimensional setting, and the technical machinery (Lemmas 3.12, 3.15, 3.17, Proposition 3.28) is nontrivial. The Holder neighborhood part in Section 4 is cleaner and mostly independent; Lemma 4.1's distance-to-attractor estimate is a useful tool in its own right.

The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test lands. Lemma 3.19 says S and U are lower semicontinuous, and for S it is stated with no proof, with the text pointing to Theorem 3.21. But Lemma 3.23 uses Lemma 3.19 to prove the induction hypothesis (3.14) that Theorem 3.21 needs. So the crucial lower semicontinuity of the stable subbundle is not established independently. This is load-bearing, not cosmetic. The proof of Theorem 3.21 as written is therefore conditional on an unproved lemma that is justified by the very construction it supports. The same section also has local typos: in Lemma 3.9 the definition of S'_i uses R(Pu) where it should be R(Ps). These are fixable, but the lower semicontinuity gap is substantive and should be resolved before the claim is relied on.

My guess is the theorem is true and the gap is repairable. The strategy is coherent and the finite-dimensional roadmap is credible. But this is not a paper where a referee can rubber-stamp the proof. It is for researchers in infinite-dimensional dynamics who want the latest on shadowing for dissipative PDEs, and it deserves serious refereeing. I would not cite it as a finished result until the gap in Lemma 3.19 is closed.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims an infinite-dimensional generalization of the Lipschitz and Hölder shadowing theorems for Morse-Smale semigroups. Specifically, Theorem 1.1 asserts that for a C^1 Morse-Smale semigroup on a Hilbert space with global attractor A, satisfying growth and continuity conditions (H1) and (H2) on the Fréchet derivative, the time-one map T(1) restricted to A has the Lipschitz shadowing property, and its restriction to any positively invariant bounded neighborhood U of A has the α-Hölder shadowing property for some α∈(0,1). The proof adapts Pilyugin's finite-dimensional compatible-subbundle construction, with substantial new work to handle the non-surjectivity of derivatives in infinite dimensions. Applications to structural stability and to rates of convergence of global attractors are also given.

Significance. If the proof is completed, this is a significant result: it removes the inertial-manifold assumption that was previously needed to obtain shadowing in a neighborhood of the attractor, and it applies to equations such as the damped wave equation. The paper also provides a new route to Hölder estimates between attractors and to orbit-tracking statements for perturbed Morse-Smale semigroups. The claimed theorems are concrete and falsifiable, and the overall strategy is well motivated by the finite-dimensional theory. However, the central proof currently rests on a lemma that the authors explicitly decline to prove, and that lemma is used in a load-bearing way, so the manuscript is not yet complete.

major comments (4)

[Section 3.1, Lemma 3.19] Lemma 3.19 asserts that the extended stable subbundle S(x) is lower semicontinuous on the global attractor, but the proof is omitted; the text says the strategy is 'similar to the construction of the subbundles S_i in Theorem 3.21' and that the authors 'choose to prove Theorem 3.21 rigorously instead.' This is circular: Theorem 3.21 uses Lemma 3.19 (via Lemma 3.23) to establish the induction hypothesis (3.14), and Lemma 3.19 is not independently proved. Lower semicontinuity of S is not a formal consequence of the continuity of projection-valued maps in infinite dimensions, especially because the extension in Proposition 3.8 uses preimages under non-surjective derivatives. The main Lipschitz shadowing conclusion of Theorem 3.32 therefore depends on an unproved statement. A complete proof of Lemma 3.19, or an alternative argument that does not rely on Theorem 3.21, must be supplied.
[Section 3.2, Lemma 3.23 and Theorem 3.21] Equation (3.31) is the key step that moves the transversality condition S(y)+U_j(y)=X from the compact set J_j to a neighborhood, and the proof of (3.31) invokes Lemma 3.19. Without Lemma 3.19, the induction hypothesis (3.14) cannot be propagated from j+1,...,p to i, and the construction of the compatible subbundles U_i and S_i collapses. This is not a presentation issue but a load-bearing gap in the proof of the paper's central theorem.
[Section 3.1, Lemma 3.9] The displayed definition of S'_i(x) as R(P_u(x)) is apparently a typo: it should be R(P_s(x)). As written, both S'_i and U'_i are defined by the same projection, which would make (3.4) and (3.5) inconsistent. The intended construction is clear from the preceding sentence, but the typo should be corrected because Lemma 3.9 is used to produce the local subbundles in Theorem 3.21.
[Section 3.2, Theorem 3.21, item (5)] The proof states that items (4) and (5) follow from hyperbolicity and continuity of the subbundles, but continuity of S_i is only asserted on O_i, while the estimates (3.12) and (3.13) are claimed for all x in O_i along forward/backward times in [0,1]. The passage from the local subbundle continuity to these uniform exponential estimates is only sketched, and the non-surjectivity of D_xT(t) makes this step nontrivial. A few lines of justification are needed here, especially for the backward estimate involving U_i.

minor comments (5)

[Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'eloborated' should be 'elaborated', 'stablish' should be 'establish', 'Bihrkhoff' should be 'Birkhoff', and 'It holds' should be lowercase in Theorem 4.7.
[Section 3.3, Lemma 3.27] In the statement of Lemma 3.27, the hypotheses introduce subbundles P(x), Q(x), Z(x), but the body of the lemma then refers to S(x), U(x), V(x). These notations should be aligned for readability.
[Section 3.2, Lemma 3.22] In the compactness argument, the use of Proposition 6.4 with σ_k=k and ξ_k(s)=ψ_k(s+k) is confusing because ψ_k is defined as ξ_k(·−k), making the substitution tautological. The intended limiting argument is clear, but the exposition should be rephrased.
[Section 3.3, proof of Lemma 3.31] The constants C_0 and C_1 introduced in (3.42) collide with the Lipschitz constant C_1 used in Lemma 3.24; this notational overlap makes the text harder to follow.
[Section 5, Theorem 5.2] The statement says 'S_0 is a Morse-Smale semigroup (autonomous)' while the family {S_ϵ} consists of evolution processes; this is understandable but should be phrased more carefully to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Lemma 3.19's proof is deferred to Theorem 3.21, but Theorem 3.21's induction (via Lemma 3.23) depends on Lemma 3.19; the compatible-subbundle construction is supported by a circular dependency.

other [Section 3, Lemma 3.19 and Lemma 3.23 (Sections 3.1-3.2)]
"Since the strategy of the proof is similar to the construction of the subbundles Si in Theorem 3.21, we will not replicate it here. In fact, the proof of Theorem 3.21 is even more complex. Therefore we choose to prove Theorem 3.21 rigorously instead of proving the lower semicontinuity of S. ... From the compactness of Jj, the continuity of Uj in γ+(Oj) and the lower semicontinuity of S, we can Lemma 3.19 to obtain an ϵ2 > 0 such that (3.31) ..."

Lemma 3.19 is the only stated source for the lower semicontinuity of the extended stable subbundle S on the attractor. Lemma 3.23 invokes it to pass from the compact set Jj to the neighborhood BA(Jj, ε2), thereby proving the induction hypothesis (3.14) S(x)+Uj(x)=X needed in Theorem 3.21. The authors justify Lemma 3.19 by saying its proof is 'similar to the construction of the subbundles Si in Theorem 3.21'; but that construction presupposes (3.14), whose proof is Lemma 3.23, which uses Lemma 3.19. Thus the only support offered for Lemma 3.19 is the very theorem that depends on it.

full rationale

The central shadowing claim is a genuine infinite-dimensional adaptation of Pilyugin's finite-dimensional proof, not a renamed known result or a fitted parameter. No equation in the paper is defined in terms of the conclusion, and no numerical input is fitted and then re-labelled as a prediction. The main circularity concern is local but load-bearing: Lemma 3.19, asserting lower semicontinuity of S, is stated without proof, and its stated justification points to Theorem 3.21, whose proof uses Lemma 3.19 through Lemma 3.23 to establish the induction hypothesis (3.14). This creates a dependency cycle in the written proof: Lemma 3.19 → Lemma 3.23 → Theorem 3.21 → (alleged proof of Lemma 3.19). If the omitted proof of Lemma 3.19 is supplied independently, the rest of the argument appears self-contained and the shadowing result would follow; as written, however, the compatible-subbundle construction rests on an unproved lemma whose only offered support is circular. The other references to prior work, including Pilyugin's book and the authors' earlier monographs, are used as standard external tools and do not by themselves force the conclusion. Score 4 reflects a partial, proof-architectural circularity rather than a fully definitional or fit-based circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. It relies on a package of standard dynamical-systems assumptions, most importantly the Morse-Smale structure and the Hilbert space setting.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption T is a Morse-Smale semigroup (Definition 2.9): global attractor, non-wandering set a finite set of hyperbolic equilibria, injective time-one maps, transversality, finite-dimensional unstable manifolds.
This is the central structural hypothesis of Theorem 1.1. It provides the hyperbolic splitting and Lyapunov function used throughout the proof.
domain assumption The Fréchet derivative satisfies (H1) and (H2): exponential growth bound and t-continuity for each x in A, v in X.
Used to control the derivative along pseudo-orbits and to obtain continuity of subbundles in Section 3.
domain assumption The phase space is a Hilbert space (not merely Banach).
Orthogonal projections and the equivalence of continuity notions in Lemma 3.7 require Hilbert space geometry.
domain assumption Global attractor attracts bounded sets exponentially (Lemma 4.2).
Needed in Lemma 4.1 to bound the distance of pseudo-orbits from the attractor. Cited from [14] for gradient semigroups.
standard math Abstract fixed point theorem (Theorem 6.9) as stated in [42, 53].
The final step of the Lipschitz shadowing proof invokes this theorem as a black box.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Shadowing for Infinite Dimensional Dynamical Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QKWUEQEL

@misc{pith2026250208315,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Shadowing for Infinite Dimensional Dynamical Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QKWUEQEL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08315}
}

abstract

In this paper we extend to an infinite dimensional setting some results on the shadowing property that are known on finite dimensional compact manifolds without border and in $\mathbb{R}^n$. In fact, we show that if $\{\T(t):t\ge 0\}$ is a Morse-Smale semigroup defined in a Hilbert space with a global attractor $\mathcal{A}$ and non-wandering set given only by its equilibria, then $\T(1)|_{\mathcal{A}}:\mathcal{A}\to \mathcal{A} $ admits the Lipschitz Shadowing property. Moreover, for any positively invariant bounded neighborhood $\U\supset\mathcal{A}$ of the global attractor, the map $\T(1)|_{\U}:\U\to \U$ has the H\"{o}lder-Shadowing property. We obtain results related to the structural stability of Morse-Smale semigroups, that were only known on finite dimension and continuity of global attractors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08315 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Discontinuity of the intersection of subbundles Therefore we need to find conditions that guarantees the continuity of the intersection of two continuous subbundles. Proposition 3.17. Let (M, d) be a metric space, X be a Hilbert space and {Em ⊂ X}m∈M, {Fm ⊂ X}m∈M be continuous subbundles. If Em + Fm = X and dim(Em) ⊥ < +∞, for all m ∈ M, then the family {Em ∩ Fm}m∈M is continuous. Proof. From Em + Fm = X we have E ⊥… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Inclination of V(n) As we said before, the inclination of V(n) goes to infinity in relation to the decomposition U ⊕ S = X because V(n) was leaning into U. Note that if we have defined a continuous family V(t) = ⟨(1, t)⟩ and let the parameter t varies from (0, +∞) the same would happen. On the other hand, if the parameter t varies in a compact subset K ⊂ (0, +∞), then the continuous subbundle {V(t) : t ∈ K} does not… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Generalized hyperbolicity for diffeomorphisms of Banach spaces
math.DS 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A generalized, possibly discontinuous version of hyperbolicity is shown to imply Lipschitz shadowing, periodic-point density, and C^1-robustness for diffeomorphisms of Banach spaces.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

& Langa, J

Aragao-Costa, E., Caraballo, T., Carvalho, A. & Langa, J. Non-autonomous Morse-decomposition and Lyapunov functions for gradient-like processes.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 365, 5277-5312 (2013)

work page 2013
[2]

& Carvalho, A

Arrieta, J. & Carvalho, A. Abstract parabolic problems with critical nonlinearities and applications to Navier-Stokes and heat equations.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 352, 285-310 (2000)

work page 2000
[3]

& Hale, J

Arrieta, J., Carvalho, A. & Hale, J. A damped hyerbolic equation with critical exponent.Communica- tions in Partial Differential Equations. 17, 841-866 (1992)

work page 1992
[4]

& Santamar´ ıa, E

Arrieta, J. & Santamar´ ıa, E. Distance of attractors of reaction-diffusion equations in thin domains. Journal of Differential Equations. 263, 5459-5506 (2017)

work page 2017
[5]

& Santamaría, E

Arrieta, J. & Santamaría, E. Estimates on the distance of inertial manifolds.Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems. 34, 3921-3944 (2014)

work page 2014
[6]

& Santamaría, E.C 1,θ-Estimates on the distance of inertial manifolds.Collectanea mathe- matica

Arrieta, J. & Santamaría, E.C 1,θ-Estimates on the distance of inertial manifolds.Collectanea mathe- matica. 69(3), 315-336 (2018)

work page 2018
[7]

& Pires, L

Bortolan, M., Cardoso, C., Carvalho, A. & Pires, L. Lipschitz perturbations of Morse-Smale semigroups. Journal of Differential Equations. 269, 1904-1943 (2020)

work page 2020
[8]

& Langa, J

Bortolan, M., Carvalho, A. & Langa, J. Attractors Under Autonomous and Non-autonomous Pertur- bations. Vol. 246.American Mathematical Society(2020)

work page 2020

Show all 60 references

[9]

& Langa, J

Bortolan, M., Carvalho, A. & Langa, J. Structure of attractors for skew product semiflows.Journal of Differential Equations. 257, 490-522 (2014)

2014
[10]

& Raugel, G

Bortolan, M., Carvalho, A., Langa, J. & Raugel, G. Nonautonomous Perturbations of Morse–Smale Semigroups: Stability of the Phase Diagram.Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations. 1-67 (2022)

2022
[11]

& Raugel, G

Brunovsky, P. & Raugel, G. Genericity of the Morse-Smale property for damped wave equations. Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations. 15, 571-658 (2003)

2003
[12]

Hilbert space idempotents and involutions.Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

Buckholtz, D. Hilbert space idempotents and involutions.Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 128, 1415-1418 (2000)

2000
[13]

& Cholewa, J

Carvalho, A. & Cholewa, J. Regularity of solutions on the global attractor for a semilinear damped wave equation.Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 337, 932-948 (2008)

2008
[14]

& Cholewa, J

Carvalho, A. & Cholewa, J. Exponential global attractors for semigroups in metric spaces with applications to differential equations.Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems. 31, 1641-1667 (2011). 48 J. M. ARRIETA, A. N. CAR V ALHO, AND C. R. TAKAESSU JR

2011
[15]

& Cholewa, J

Carvalho, A. & Cholewa, J. Local well posedness, asymptotic behavior and asymptotic bootstrapping for a class of semilinear evolution equations of the second order in time.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 361, 2567-2586 (2009)

2009
[16]

& Dłotko, T

Carvalho, A., Cholewa, J. & Dłotko, T. Equi-exponential attraction and rate of convergence of attractors with application to a perturbed damped wave equation.Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics. 144, 13-51 (2014)

2014
[17]

& Robinson, J

Carvalho, A., Langa, J. & Robinson, J. Attractors for infinite-dimensional non-autonomous dynamical systems. Vol. 182.Springer Science & Business Media(2012)

2012
[18]

& Primo, M

Carvalho, A. & Primo, M. Boundary synchronization in parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions. Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems Series B: Application and Algorithm 7, 541-560 (2000)

2000
[19]

& Palmer, K

Chow, S., Lin, X. & Palmer, K. A shadowing lemma with applications to semilinear parabolic equations. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis. 20, 547-557 (1989)

1989
[20]

& Lunardi, A

Da Prato, G. & Lunardi, A. On the Dirichlet semigroup for Ornstein–Uhlenbeck operators in subsets of Hilbert spaces.Journal of Functional Analysis. 259, 2642-2672 (2010)

2010
[21]

& Kloeden, P

Desheng, L. & Kloeden, P. Equi-attraction and the continuous dependence of attractors on parameters. Glasgow Mathematical Journal. 46, 131-141 (2004)

2004
[22]

& Temam, R

Foias, C., Sell, G. & Temam, R. Inertial manifolds for nonlinear evolutionary equations.Journal of Differential Equations. 73, 309-353 (1988)

1988
[23]

A generalized shadowing lemma.Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems

Gan, S. A generalized shadowing lemma.Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems. 8, 627-632 (2002)

2002
[24]

Asymptotic behavior of dissipative systems

Hale, J. Asymptotic behavior of dissipative systems. No.25.American Mathematical Society(2010)

2010
[25]

Ordinary differential equations.Courier Corporation(2009)

Hale, J. Ordinary differential equations.Courier Corporation(2009)

2009
[26]

& Oliva, W

Hale, J., Magalhães, L. & Oliva, W. Dynamics in infinite dimensions. Vol 47.Springer Science & Business Media(2006)

2006
[27]

& Raugel, G

Hale, J. & Raugel, G. Lower semicontinuity of attractors of gradient systems and applications.Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata. 154, 281-326 (1989)

1989
[28]

& Raugel, G

Hale, J. & Raugel, G. Lower semicontinuity of the attractor for a singularly perturbed hyperbolic equation. Journal of Dynamics And Differential Equations. 2, 19-67 (1990)

1990
[29]

Exponential dichotomies, the shadowing lemma and homoclinic orbits in Banach spaces

Henry, D. Exponential dichotomies, the shadowing lemma and homoclinic orbits in Banach spaces. Resenhas do Instituto de Matemática e Estatística da Universidade de São Paulo. 1, 381-401 (1994)

1994
[30]

Geometric theory of semilinear parabolic equations

Henry, D. Geometric theory of semilinear parabolic equations. Vol 840.Springer (2006)

2006
[31]

& Robinson, J

Hoang, L., Olson, E. & Robinson, J. On the continuity of global attractors.Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 143, 4389-4395 (2015)

2015
[32]

Explicit construction of an inertial manifold for a reaction diffusion equation.Journal of Differential Equations

Jolly, M. Explicit construction of an inertial manifold for a reaction diffusion equation.Journal of Differential Equations. 78, 220-261 (1989)

1989
[33]

Nonlinear semi-groups in Hilbert space.Journal of The Mathematical Society Of Japan

Komura, Y. Nonlinear semi-groups in Hilbert space.Journal of The Mathematical Society Of Japan. 19, 493-507 (1967)

1967
[34]

Contribution a la théorie des champs génériques.Contributions to Differential Equations

Kupka, I. Contribution a la théorie des champs génériques.Contributions to Differential Equations. 2, 457-484 (1963)

1963
[35]

& Wen, X

Lee, M., Oh, J. & Wen, X. Diffeomorphisms with a generalized Lipschitz shadowing property.Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems: Series A. 41 (2021)

2021
[36]

Chaos and shadowing lemma for autonomous systems of infinite dimensions.Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations

Li, Y. Chaos and shadowing lemma for autonomous systems of infinite dimensions.Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations. 15, 699-730 (2003)

2003
[37]

On morse-smale dynamical systems.Topology

Palis, J. On morse-smale dynamical systems.Topology. 8, 385-404 (1969)

1969
[38]

& De Melo, W

Palis, J. & De Melo, W. Geometric theory of dynamical systems: an introduction.Springer Science & Business Media(2012)

2012
[39]

& Tikhomirov, S

Palmer, K., Pilyugin, S. & Tikhomirov, S. Lipschitz shadowing and structural stability of flows. Journal of Differential Equations. 252, 1723-1747 (2012)

2012
[40]

Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations

Pazy, A. Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations. Vol. 44. Springer Science & Business Media(2012)

2012
[41]

On an approximation theorem of Kupka and Smale.Journal of Differential Equations

Peixoto, M. On an approximation theorem of Kupka and Smale.Journal of Differential Equations. 3, 214-227 (1967)

1967
[42]

Shadowing in Dynamical Systems.Springer-Verlag (1999)

Pilyugin, S. Shadowing in Dynamical Systems.Springer-Verlag (1999). SHADOWING FOR INFINITE DIMENSIONAL DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS 49

1999
[43]

& Sakai, K

Pilyugin, S. & Sakai, K. Shadowing and hyperbolicity.Springer (2017)

2017
[44]

& Tikhomirov, S

Pilyugin, S. & Tikhomirov, S. Lipschitz shadowing implies structural stability.Nonlinearity. 23, 2509 (2010)

2010
[45]

Continuity of attractors.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis

Raugel, G. Continuity of attractors.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis. 23, 519-533 (1989)

1989
[46]

Global attractors in partial differential equations.Handbook of Dynamical Systems

Raugel, G. Global attractors in partial differential equations.Handbook of Dynamical Systems. 2, 885-982 (2002)

2002
[47]

A structural stability theorem.Annals of Mathematics

Robbin, J. A structural stability theorem.Annals of Mathematics. 94, 447-493 (1971)

1971
[48]

Structural stability of vector fields.Annals of Mathematics

Robinson, C. Structural stability of vector fields.Annals of Mathematics. 99, 154-175 (1974)

1974
[49]

Computing inertial manifolds.Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems

Robinson, J. Computing inertial manifolds.Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems. 8, 815-834 (2002)

2002
[50]

Infinite-dimensional dynamical systems: an introduction to dissipative parabolic PDEs and the theory of global attractors.Cambridge University Press(2001)

Robinson, J. Infinite-dimensional dynamical systems: an introduction to dissipative parabolic PDEs and the theory of global attractors.Cambridge University Press(2001)

2001
[51]

The global attractor for the 2D Navier-Stokes flow on some unbounded domains.Nonlinear Analysis

Rosa, R. The global attractor for the 2D Navier-Stokes flow on some unbounded domains.Nonlinear Analysis. 32, 71-86 (1998)

1998
[52]

& Stahn, R

Rozendaal, J., Seifert, D. & Stahn, R. Optimal rates of decay for operator semigroups on Hilbert spaces. Advances in Mathematics. 346, 359-388 (2019)

2019
[53]

Distance of attractors of evolutionary equations.Ph

Santamaria, E. Distance of attractors of evolutionary equations.Ph. D. thesis, Universidad Com- plutense de Madrid(2014)

2014
[54]

R., & You, Y

Sell, G. R., & You, Y. Dynamics of evolutionary equations. Vol. 143.Springer Science & Business Media (2013)

2013
[55]

Global stability of dynamical systems.Springer Science & Business Media(2013)

Shub, M. Global stability of dynamical systems.Springer Science & Business Media(2013)

2013
[56]

Stable manifolds for differential equations and diffeomorphisms.Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa-Scienze Fisiche e Matematiche

Smale, S. Stable manifolds for differential equations and diffeomorphisms.Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa-Scienze Fisiche e Matematiche. 17, 97-116 (1963)

1963
[57]

Tan, K. & Xu, H. Asymptotic behavior of almost-orbits of nonlinear semigroups of non-Lipschitzian mappings in Hilbert spaces.Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 117, 385-393 (1993)

1993
[58]

Infinite-dimensional dynamical systems in mechanics and physics

Temam, R. Infinite-dimensional dynamical systems in mechanics and physics. Vol 68.Springer Science & Business Media(2012)

2012
[59]

Hölder shadowing on finite intervals.Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems

Tikhomirov, S. Hölder shadowing on finite intervals.Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems. 35(6), 2000-2016 (2015)

2015
[60]

Foundations of Ergodic Theory

Viana, M. Foundations of Ergodic Theory. No. 151.Cambridge University Press(2016). (J. M. Arrieta) Dept. Análisis Matemático y Matemática Aplicada, Universidad Com- plutense de Madrid 28040 Madrid, Spain and Instituto de Ciencias Matemáticas ICMAT- CSIC-UAM-UC3M-UCM, Madrid, S...

2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

& Langa, J

Aragao-Costa, E., Caraballo, T., Carvalho, A. & Langa, J. Non-autonomous Morse-decomposition and Lyapunov functions for gradient-like processes.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 365, 5277-5312 (2013)

work page 2013

[2] [2]

& Carvalho, A

Arrieta, J. & Carvalho, A. Abstract parabolic problems with critical nonlinearities and applications to Navier-Stokes and heat equations.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 352, 285-310 (2000)

work page 2000

[3] [3]

& Hale, J

Arrieta, J., Carvalho, A. & Hale, J. A damped hyerbolic equation with critical exponent.Communica- tions in Partial Differential Equations. 17, 841-866 (1992)

work page 1992

[4] [4]

& Santamar´ ıa, E

Arrieta, J. & Santamar´ ıa, E. Distance of attractors of reaction-diffusion equations in thin domains. Journal of Differential Equations. 263, 5459-5506 (2017)

work page 2017

[5] [5]

& Santamaría, E

Arrieta, J. & Santamaría, E. Estimates on the distance of inertial manifolds.Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems. 34, 3921-3944 (2014)

work page 2014

[6] [6]

& Santamaría, E.C 1,θ-Estimates on the distance of inertial manifolds.Collectanea mathe- matica

Arrieta, J. & Santamaría, E.C 1,θ-Estimates on the distance of inertial manifolds.Collectanea mathe- matica. 69(3), 315-336 (2018)

work page 2018

[7] [7]

& Pires, L

Bortolan, M., Cardoso, C., Carvalho, A. & Pires, L. Lipschitz perturbations of Morse-Smale semigroups. Journal of Differential Equations. 269, 1904-1943 (2020)

work page 2020

[8] [8]

& Langa, J

Bortolan, M., Carvalho, A. & Langa, J. Attractors Under Autonomous and Non-autonomous Pertur- bations. Vol. 246.American Mathematical Society(2020)

work page 2020