REVIEW 2 cited by
TFWT: Tabular Feature Weighting with Transformer
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel feature weighting method to address the limitation of existing feature processing methods for tabular data. Typically the existing methods assume equal importance across all samples and features in one dataset. This simplified processing methods overlook the unique contributions of each feature, and thus may miss important feature information. As a result, it leads to suboptimal performance in complex datasets with rich features. To address this problem, we introduce Tabular Feature Weighting with Transformer, a novel feature weighting approach for tabular data. Our method adopts Transformer to capture complex feature dependencies and contextually assign appropriate weights to discrete and continuous features. Besides, we employ a reinforcement learning strategy to further fine-tune the weighting process. Our extensive experimental results across various real-world datasets and diverse downstream tasks show the effectiveness of TFWT and highlight the potential for enhancing feature weighting in tabular data analysis.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Towards Data-Centric AI: A Comprehensive Survey of Traditional, Reinforcement, and Generative Approaches for Tabular Data Transformation
A survey of feature selection and feature generation for tabular data, categorizing traditional, RL-based, and generative AI methods into a unified taxonomy.
-
A Survey on Data-Centric AI: Tabular Learning from Reinforcement Learning and Generative AI Perspective
A review that organizes RL-based and generative methods for tabular feature selection and generation into a taxonomy, compares their strengths and limitations, and outlines research challenges.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.