Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Exponential F(R) gravity with axion dark matter

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.20302 v1 pith:QNLAKDMH submitted 2023-10-31 gr-qc astro-ph.CO

classification gr-qcastro-ph.CO
keywords darkmatterexponentialgravityanalysedaxioncosmiccosmological
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The cosmological evolution within the framework of exponential $F(R)$ gravity is analysed by assuming two forms for dark matter: (a) a standard dust-like fluid and (b) an axion scalar field. As shown in previous literature, an axion-like field oscillates during the cosmological evolution but can play the role of dark matter when approaching the minimum of its potential. Both scenarios are confronted with recent observational data including the Pantheon Type Ia supernovae, Hubble parameter estimations (Cosmic Chronometers), Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmic Microwave Background distances. The models show great possibilities in describing these observations when compared with the $\Lambda$CDM model, supporting the viability of exponential $F(R)$ gravity. The differences between both descriptions of dark matter is analysed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exponential $f(R)$ cosmology with massive neutrinos as a dynamical dark energy framework

    gr-qc 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Exponential f(R) gravity with massive neutrinos fits current expansion data about as well as ΛCDM and yields slightly different H0 and Σmν constraints, but does not eliminate the Hubble tension.

  2. Modified gravity/Dynamical Dark Energy vs $\Lambda$CDM: is the game over?

    gr-qc 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    An AIC/χ² comparison of exponential F(R) gravity, wCDM, and CPL models against Pantheon+, DESI DR1, cosmic chronometer, and Planck-compressed data claims ΛCDM is excluded at 4σ, but the significance conversion is not ...

Pith tools