REVIEW 1 cited by
LexSubCon: Integrating Knowledge from Lexical Resources into Contextual Embeddings for Lexical Substitution
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Lexical substitution is the task of generating meaningful substitutes for a word in a given textual context. Contextual word embedding models have achieved state-of-the-art results in the lexical substitution task by relying on contextual information extracted from the replaced word within the sentence. However, such models do not take into account structured knowledge that exists in external lexical databases. We introduce LexSubCon, an end-to-end lexical substitution framework based on contextual embedding models that can identify highly accurate substitute candidates. This is achieved by combining contextual information with knowledge from structured lexical resources. Our approach involves: (i) introducing a novel mix-up embedding strategy in the creation of the input embedding of the target word through linearly interpolating the pair of the target input embedding and the average embedding of its probable synonyms; (ii) considering the similarity of the sentence-definition embeddings of the target word and its proposed candidates; and, (iii) calculating the effect of each substitution in the semantics of the sentence through a fine-tuned sentence similarity model. Our experiments show that LexSubCon outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods on LS07 and CoInCo benchmark datasets that are widely used for lexical substitution tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Learning to Substitute Words with Model-based Score Ranking
A BERT model fine-tuned with ranking losses against BARTScore substitutes words to improve that score, outperforming supervised and LLM baselines on BARTScore-based metrics without human labels.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.