Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 83 references

Hierarchical multiscale fracture modeling of carbon-nitride nanosheet reinforced composites by combining cohesive phase-field and molecular dynamics

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that combining molecular-dynamics input with a cohesive phase-field fracture model predicts that the tensile strength of graphene- and carbon-nitride-nanosheet reinforced polymers rises nonlinearly with filler thickness…

desk verdict The MD data and phase-field benchmarks are solid, but the 1-10 nm scaling claim likely reflects the fixed regularization length, not a material effect. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14492 v1 pith:QO34VLYT submitted 2024-11-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Qinghua Zhang , Navid Valizadeh , Mingpeng Liu , Xiaoying Zhuang , Bohayra Mortazavi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords hierarchicalmultiscalemodelingmoleculardynamicscohesivephase-fieldfracturecarbon-nitridenanosheetgraphene-reinforcedcompositescalingeffectfillerthicknessvanderWaalsinterface
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is trying to establish that a hierarchical multiscale pipeline—molecular dynamics supplying atomic-scale elastic and fracture parameters, then a cohesive phase-field model carrying them into micron-scale representative volume elements—can predict the fracture strength of polymer composites reinforced by graphene and carbon-nitride nanosheets. The central result is a scaling effect: the ultimate tensile strength rises nonlinearly with filler thickness, and for graphene composites most of the change (about 45.8% between 1 nm and 5 nm, another 22.5% between 5 nm and 10 nm) is concentrated in the 1–10 nm range. A sympathetic reader would care because this makes filler dimension a first-order design variable for nanocomposites, alongside volume fraction, and because the model predicts that van der Waals interface strength reverses the trend seen when interfaces are ignored. The same framework also quantifies stiffness gains, such as a roughly 1.49-fold modulus enhancement for 3% C3N in P3HT, while predicting that elastic modulus is nearly scale-independent.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a two-step hierarchical transfer: molecular dynamics supplies the homogenized parameter set $\zeta_p=[E,\nu,G_c,\sigma_0]$ for the fiber, the matrix, and the van der Waals interface; a cohesive phase-field fracture model then uses these parameters in a smeared damage field $d\in[0,1]$ (0 intact, 1 cracked) whose crack density is anisotropic for the fiber through the structure tensor $A=I+\alpha\,\mathbf{a}\otimes\mathbf{a}$ and isotropic for the matrix. The star-convex energy decomposition with parameter $\gamma^*$ separates tension from compression so that mixed-mode crack initiation is controlled, and the fracture scale is set by Irwin's internal length $l_{ch}=E G_c/\sigma_0^2$, which fixes the degradation parameter $a_1=4l_{ch}/(\pi l_f)$. The scaling claim emerges from sweeping the representative volume element size from 1 nm to 1 µm at fixed volume fraction while keeping the MD-derived parameters fixed.

What would settle it

Run the same composite-cell simulations at RVE sizes 1, 5, and 10 nm with successively smaller crack-band widths (for example $l_f=0.01$, $0.005$, $0.002$) while keeping the MD-derived interface strength fixed. If the 45.78% strength drop between 1 nm and 5 nm shrinks or vanishes as the band narrows, the scaling effect is a regularization artifact; alternatively, direct MD tensile tests of composites with different nanosheet thicknesses would settle whether the continuum prediction matches atomistics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the fracture strength of a nanosheet-reinforced composite is governed not only by reinforcement content but by the physical size of the filler in the few-nanometer regime. The authors obtain homogenized elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio, critical energy release rate, and cohesive interface strength from molecular dynamics for graphene and several carbon-nitride monolayers (C3N, C2N, C3N4, C6N6, C7N6) with a P3HT matrix, and feed these into an anisotropic star-convex cohesive phase-field model at the microscale. The model predicts that tensile strength increases nonlinearly with filler thickness, with the strongest variation below 10 nm; they attribute this to interface strength dominating fracture resistance for thin nanosheets and reinforcement distribution and density taking over for thicker fillers. They also show that the cohesive model gives a decreasing ultimate tensile strength with rising fiber volume fraction, opposite to the non-cohesive model, and that the homogenized elastic modulus is barely affected by scale.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that one fixed crack-band width and the hand-set model parameters ($\alpha=500$, $\gamma^*=3$) remain physically valid for every simulated cell size from 1 nm to 1 µm; if that width is comparable to the smallest cells, the predicted 1–10 nm strength drop could be an artifact of how the model spreads cracks rather than a real material property.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claimed scaling effect is real, nanocomposite strength data should report nanosheet thickness or lateral size alongside volume fraction, because the 1–10 nm window is where strength changes fastest.
  • The reversal between cohesive and non-cohesive predictions means that models that ignore van der Waals interface strength will overestimate the benefit of raising filler content in polymer nanocomposites.
  • For design, smooth inclusions are preferable: the simulations show fiber edge tips generate stress concentrations that seed secondary damage.
  • The framework gives quantitative validation targets, such as a 3% C3N/P3HT composite being about 1.49 times stiffer than pure P3HT and all tested 3% composites having moduli in the 1.827–1.839 GPa range.
  • The predicted elastic modulus is nearly scale-independent, so stiffness can be treated as size-independent while strength cannot.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct way to test whether the 1–10 nm scaling is physical rather than numerical would be to repeat the RVE sweep with progressively smaller regularization lengths; if the strength drop vanishes as the crack band narrows, the effect belongs to the model's diffused crack geometry, not the material.
  • The reported points suggest that a power-law or exponential design rule could be fitted to the 1–10 nm strength data, but the paper does not fit one; extracting such a curve would give engineers a compact formula.
  • Because temperature effects are omitted, coupling the same pipeline to temperature-dependent potentials could shift both the cohesive strength and the size-effect onset.
  • The cohesive strengths are tens of megapascals below the pure-matrix strength, which implies a critical RVE size below which interface failure dominates bulk failure—a crossover length the paper does not explicitly extract.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes a hierarchical multiscale scheme in which molecular dynamics simulations supply elastic constants, critical energy release rates, and interfacial cohesive strengths for graphene and carbon-nitride nanosheets and a P3HT matrix, and a regularized cohesive phase-field model then simulates fracture in composite RVE microstructures. The phase-field part uses an anisotropic crack density function with a structure tensor, a star-convex tension/compression energy decomposition, and cohesive softening laws. The model is validated against reference three-point bending tests, and RVE simulations are used to report a size effect in which the homogenized ultimate tensile strength increases nonlinearly as the RVE 'scale size' decreases from 1 micrometer to 1 nanometer, with the largest variation between 1 nm and 10 nm. The conclusion interprets this as a filler-thickness-dependent strengthening effect.

Significance. If established, the framework would be valuable because it offers a practical MD-to-continuum workflow for 2D-material nanocomposites and the central scaling prediction is falsifiable by experiments or fully atomistic models. The paper deserves credit for computing the nanoscale inputs independently of the continuum model, for reproducing reference force-displacement curves in the three-point bending benchmarks, and for preferring an energy-based crack-driving force that avoids nonphysical damage initiation at small loads. However, the manuscript's central quantitative claim is not yet supported because the composite-scale simulations fix the phase-field regularization length and use the RVE size as a proxy for filler thickness without a stated mapping or a convergence study at the composite scale.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sections 4.2 and 4.3] The regularization length is set to lf=0.01 with no units stated in Section 4.2, and the same value is used for every RVE in Section 4.3, where the smallest scale sizes are 1 nm, 5 nm, and 10 nm. If lf=0.01 µm, then lf equals the 10 nm RVE size and is ten times the 1 nm RVE size, so at these scales the 'crack' is a diffuse damage band spanning the entire RVE and the computed UTS reflects the regularization parameter rather than a material property. The benchmark convergence studies in Section 3 (lf = 2.5 mm and lf = 5 µm) do not cover the nanometer range. The authors should state the units of lf and provide a composite-scale convergence study, for example varying lf at fixed volume fraction and mesh resolution for RVE sizes of 1, 5, and 10 nm and reporting the homogenized UTS and crack patterns; without this, the 45.78% and 22.54% differences reported in Fig. 10(a) cannot be attributed to filler-thickness scaling.
  2. [Sections 4.3 and 5] The manuscript uses 'scale size' and 'filler thickness' interchangeably, but no mapping between the RVE side length and the physical filler thickness is provided. In the RVE construction the fiber is a rectangular inclusion at a fixed volume fraction, so changing the 'scale size' simultaneously changes the inclusion dimensions and their spacing; this does not isolate the thickness of a nanosheet reinforcement. The conclusion that 'tensile strength increased nonlinearly with filler thickness' is therefore under-specified. The authors should define how filler thickness is extracted from the RVE geometry and, ideally, vary the filler thickness or aspect ratio independently of the RVE size.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] The sentence attributing the synthesis of g-C3N4 to '2009' with reference [5] appears inconsistent with the cited 2015 publication; please verify the date and the reference.
  2. [Throughout] The text uses the nonstandard typography 'R VE' in many places; it should be consistently written as 'RVE'.
  3. [Equation (18)] The expression 'a1 = 4 lch/π lf' should be written with brackets or spacing (e.g., a1 = 4 lch / (π lf)) to avoid a misreading of the denominator; the derivation in Appendix C.2 is consistent, so this is purely a typographical issue.
  4. [Table 1 and Section 4.2] The computed Poisson's ratio for P3HT (0.40) differs from the cited reference values, and the text states that reference Poisson's ratios are substituted when discrepancies are large; it would be helpful to state the substituted values explicitly and to note whether the reported scaling trends are sensitive to this substitution.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the MD inputs are computed independently, and the composite scaling curves are genuine model outputs, not fitted targets; the score reflects only minor unnamed self-citations that are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular in the reduction sense. The material parameters E, nu, Gc, and sigma0 are obtained from LAMMPS via the virial stress and energy-release-rate formulas (Eqs. 1-2), independently of the phase-field model, and are then used as inputs in the microscale cohesive phase-field formulation. No composite ultimate tensile strength datum is used to fit these parameters or to tune the phase-field parameters; lf = 0.01, alpha = 500, and gamma* = 3 are fixed in Section 4.2 and the 1 nm to 1 micron scaling curves in Fig. 10(a) are outputs rather than fitted targets. The phase-field model is checked against external benchmarks (Rots et al. three-point bending and Teichtmeister et al. anisotropic bending) with convergence studies at the benchmark scale, so the central modeling machinery has independent support. The main verifiability defect is the repeated reliance on unnamed prior work by the same authors, e.g., Section 2.1.1: 'For more details, the reader is referred to our previous work .', Section 2.1.2 on the hierarchical bridging concept, and Section 4.3 on earlier scaling observations; these citations cannot be checked but they are not the logical basis for the headline scaling claim. The more serious concern is a correctness and sensitivity issue, not circularity: with lf fixed while the RVE scale is swept from 1 nm to 1 micron, the 1-10 nm window could be dominated by the regularization length, and no composite-scale lf-convergence study is provided; the concluding limitations on temperature effects, rigid nanosheets, and transverse isotropy are acknowledged but do not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central scaling result rests on four hand-set numerical parameters or substitutions and several domain assumptions, while no new physical entities are introduced. The largest burden is the unverified transfer of monolayer MD data to continuum RVEs and the fixed regularization length across scales.

free parameters (4)
  • Anisotropic penalty parameter alpha = 500
    Used in structure tensor A for fiber fracture. Eq. (47) would give alpha=248 for the bending test, so 500 is a hand-set value. No sensitivity study for composite RVEs.
  • Star-convex decomposition parameter gamma* = 3
    Controls compression/tension energy split in Eq. (21). Chosen to govern precise crack evolution with no derivation or sensitivity analysis.
  • Phase-field regularization length lf = 0.01 (unit not specified)
    Fixed for composite RVE simulations in Section 4.2 while RVE sizes span 1 nm to 1 micrometer. No convergence study at composite scale; could dominate scaling behavior.
  • Substituted Poisson's ratios for fibers = Reference values from [71-74]
    Section 4.2 says reference Poisson ratios are employed when MD results deviate substantially; this is a data substitution affecting microscale inputs.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The regularized phase-field crack surface Gamma_l Gamma-converges to the sharp crack Gamma_c as lf approaches 0.
    Invoked in Eqs. (7) and (8) following Braides [49] and Ambrosio-Tortorelli [51].
  • domain assumption P3HT is brittle and linear under small strains below its glass transition temperature.
    Used in Section 2.2.1 to justify small-strain kinematics and isotropic elastic phase-field behavior for the matrix.
  • domain assumption Homogenized MD properties of a single monolayer and of the polymer can be transferred directly to the continuum RVE without size corrections.
    The hierarchical bridge in Section 2.3 feeds nanoscale E, nu, Gc, sigma0 into the micro-scale phase-field model; no validation of this transfer for the composite systems is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The fiber fracture orientation is captured by a single predefined angle phi=pi/3 with a constant structure tensor A (alpha=500).
    Section 4.2 sets phi based on MD crack trajectories but uses one fixed orientation for all RVEs; alpha is declared a flexible numerical parameter.
  • domain assumption Lennard-Jones 9-6 hybrid potential with Waldman-Hagler mixing describes the fiber-matrix interface adequately.
    Eq. (5) and Table B.3; the choice is justified by comparison with 12-6 potentials in Appendix B, but no direct experimental validation for CxNy/P3HT interfaces is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hierarchical multiscale fracture modeling of carbon-nitride nanosheet reinforced composites by combining cohesive phase-field and molecular dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QO34VLYT

@misc{pith2026241114492,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hierarchical multiscale fracture modeling of carbon-nitride nanosheet reinforced composites by combining cohesive phase-field and molecular dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QO34VLYT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14492}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding the fracture mechanisms in composite materials across scales, from nano- to micro-scales, is essential for an in-depth understanding of the reinforcement mechanisms and designing the next generation of lightweight, high-strength composites. However, conventional methods struggle to model the complex fracture behavior of nanocomposites, particularly at the fiber-matrix interface. The phase-field regularized cohesive fracture model has proven to be effective in simulating crack initiation, branching, and propagation; however, capturing the cohesive fracture strength at smaller scales remains a significant challenge. This study introduces a novel approach that combines an energy-based star-convex decomposition cohesive phase-field fracture model with molecular dynamics simulations to explore the thickness dependency of nanocomposite mechanical properties. The proposed framework enables hierarchical modeling of carbon-nitride nanosheet-reinforced composites' mechanical and fracture behaviors. The developed model could elucidate complex fracture processes across different scales and highlight critical scaling effects. This methodology provides an efficient solution for uncovering hierarchical fracture mechanisms in reinforced nanocomposites, offering valuable insights into their fracture behavior and strengthening mechanisms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14492 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A C3N monolayer with an initial crack length of a ˚A and containing 3840 atoms (in the absence of a notch) is visualized using VESTA [34]. An enlarged view highlights the monolayer’s lattice structure. (b) A schematic illustration of the cohesive zone model is shown by employing a C3N monolayer under a hybrid empirical interatomic potential that governs the fiber, interface, and matrix by ψTersoff, ψcoh, and ψCOMPAS… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A schematic illustration depicts an arbitrary solid matrix domain ΩM and a fiber domain ΩF with a sharp crack Γc and a phase-field regularized crack Γl . Here, lf denotes the diffused length of the regularized crack band. f¯ and t¯ represent the body force in Ω and the traction on the Neumann boundary ΓN , respectively. The anisotropic fiber orientation is expressed by a predefined angle ϕ. Γc = Z S dA | {z } sharp … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Geometry and boundary conditions for the three-point bending test using an isotropic cohesive phase-field fracture model, with a specimen thickness of 100 mm. (b) Contour plot showing phase-field fracture results with a length scale parameter lf = 2.5 mm. (c) Comparison of force-displacement curves with reference studies. (d) Study of the length scale parameter lf , varying from 1 mm to 5 mm. The results in Fig.… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Geometry and boundary value problem of the anisotropic three-point bending test with a predefined triangular notch. The dashed arrows represent the predefined anisotropic angles ϕ1 = 3π/4 and ϕ2 = π/4; (b) contour plot of the phase-field fracture trajectory in the …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The homogenized stress-strain response of GN and CxNy monolayers for uniaxial tensile tests along the armchair direction at 300 K with predefined notches of 0 ˚A, 10 ˚A, and 35 ˚A, where the predefined notches are located in the zigzag direction. Here, a = 0 ˚A indicat…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a-f) Schematic illustration of normal stress (σxx) distribution; the crack tips are enlarged for GN and CxNy nanosheets with an initial crack length of 35 ˚A; (g-k) von Mises stress contour plots and the anisotropic crack evolution of a C3N nanosheet under uniaxial te…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Schematic illustration of the stress-strain response for P3HT matrix under uni-axial tensile testing along X, Y , and Z directions at 300K. The cubic specimen is designed as an RVE with a length of 60.1 ˚A. The atomic structure illustrates the fracture of the P3HT …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Force-displacement curves comparison in the case of 1%, 2%, and 3% graphene (GN) reinforce composites. (b) Homogenized elastic modulus and enhancement (Ecomposite/Ematrix) comparison between graphene reinforced composites and CxNy reinforced composites. (c). The ho…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Phase-field fracture of graphene-reinforced P3HT composites for fiber’s volume fraction of (a) 1%, (b) 2%, and (c) 3% at the microscale. The white area represents the fibers and the rest part denotes the matrix. Fig.9 shows the phase-field fracture results of the graph…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Fracture strengths comparison for scale size from 1 nm to 1 µm as well as non-cohesive model (AT2, 1 µm) for volume fraction range from 1% to 3%. (b) Homogenized elastic modulus comparison for scale size of 1 nm to 1 µm, and non-cohesive model. Another critical ph…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films

    Kostya S Novoselov, Andre K Geim, Sergei V Morozov, De-eng Jiang, Yanshui Zhang, Sergey V Dubonos, Irina V Grigorieva, and Alexandr A Firsov. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science, 306(5696):666–669, 2004

    2004

  2. [2]

    The rise of graphene

    Andre K Geim and Konstantin S Novoselov. The rise of graphene. Nature Materials, 6(3):183–191, 2007

    2007

  3. [3]

    Detection of individual gas molecules adsorbed on graphene

    Fredrik Schedin, Andrei Konstantinovich Geim, Sergei Vladimirovich Morozov, Ew W Hill, Peter Blake, Mi I Katsnelson, and Kostya Sergeevich Novoselov. Detection of individual gas molecules adsorbed on graphene. Nature Materials, 6(9):652–655, 2007

    2007

  4. [4]

    The electronic properties of graphene

    AH Castro Neto, Francisco Guinea, Nuno MR Peres, Kostya S Novoselov, and Andre K Geim. The electronic properties of graphene. Reviews of Modern Physics , 81(1):109, 2009

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway

    Juan Liu, Yang Liu, Naiyun Liu, Yuzhi Han, Xing Zhang, Hui Huang, Yeshayahu Lifshitz, Shuit-Tong Lee, Jun Zhong, and Zhenhui Kang. Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway. Science, 347(6225):970–974, 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Graphene–multilayer graphene nanocomposites as highly efficient thermal interface materials

    Khan MF Shahil and Alexander A Balandin. Graphene–multilayer graphene nanocomposites as highly efficient thermal interface materials. Nano Letters, 12(2):861–867, 2012

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene

    Alexander A Balandin, Suchismita Ghosh, Wenzhong Bao, Irene Calizo, Desalegne Teweldebrhan, Feng Miao, and Chun Ning Lau. Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Letters, 8(3):902–907, 2008

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene

    Changgu Lee, Xiaoding Wei, Jeffrey W Kysar, and James Hone. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science, 321(5887):385–388, 2008

    work page 2008

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    Physicochemical and Piezoresistive properties of smart cementitious composites with graphene nanoplates and graphite plates

    Wenkui Dong, Wengui Li, Kejin Wang, and Surendra P Shah. Physicochemical and Piezoresistive properties of smart cementitious composites with graphene nanoplates and graphite plates. Construction and Building Materials , 286:122943, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    Thermal conductivity of graphene polymorphs and compounds: From C 3N to graphdiyne lattices

    S Milad Hatam-Lee, Ali Rajabpour, and Sebastian Volz. Thermal conductivity of graphene polymorphs and compounds: From C 3N to graphdiyne lattices. Carbon, 161:816–826, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Carbon-nitride 2D nanostructures: thermal conductivity and interfacial thermal conductance with the silica substrate

    Ali Rajabpour, Saeed Bazrafshan, and Sebastian Volz. Carbon-nitride 2D nanostructures: thermal conductivity and interfacial thermal conductance with the silica substrate. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , 21(5):2507–2512, 2019

    2019

  4. [12]

    Two-dimensional polyaniline (C3N) from carbonized organic single crystals in solid state

    Javeed Mahmood, Eun Kwang Lee, Minbok Jung, Dongbin Shin, Hyun-Jung Choi, Jeong-Min Seo, Sun-Min Jung, Dongwook Kim, Feng Li, Myoung Soo Lah, et al. Two-dimensional polyaniline (C3N) from carbonized organic single crystals in solid state. Proceedings of the National Academy of...

    2016

  5. [13]

    A computational library for multiscale modeling of material failure

    Hossein Talebi, Mohammad Silani, St´ ephane PA Bordas, Pierre Kerfriden, and Timon Rabczuk. A computational library for multiscale modeling of material failure. Computational Mechanics, 53:1047–1071, 2014

    2014

  6. [14]

    Multiscale modeling of material failure: Theory and computational methods

    Pattabhi Ramaiah Budarapu, Xiaoying Zhuang, Timon Rabczuk, and Stephane PA Bordas. Multiscale modeling of material failure: Theory and computational methods. Advances in Applied Mechanics , 52:1–103, 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    Multiscale FE2 elastoviscoplastic analysis of composite structures

    Fr´ ed´ eric Feyel. Multiscale FE2 elastoviscoplastic analysis of composite structures. Computational Materials Science , 16(1-4):344–354, 1999

    1999

  8. [16]

    FE2 multiscale approach for modelling the elastoviscoplastic behaviour of long fibre SiC/Ti composite materials

    Fr´ ed´ eric Feyel and Jean-Louis Chaboche. FE2 multiscale approach for modelling the elastoviscoplastic behaviour of long fibre SiC/Ti composite materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 183(3-4):309–330, 2000

    2000

  9. [17]

    A comparative study of 1D nonlocal integral Timoshenko beam and 2D nonlocal integral elasticity theories for bending of nanoscale beams

    Hooman Danesh, Mahdi Javanbakht, and Mohammad Mohammadi Aghdam. A comparative study of 1D nonlocal integral Timoshenko beam and 2D nonlocal integral elasticity theories for bending of nanoscale beams. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, pages 1–23, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    Hooman Danesh and Mahdi Javanbakht. Free vibration analysis of nonlocal nanobeams: a comparison of the one-dimensional nonlocal integral Timoshenko beam theory with the two-dimensional nonlocal integral elasticity theory. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids , 27(4):557–577, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Nonlinear finite element methods

    Peter Wriggers. Nonlinear finite element methods . Springer Science & Business Media, 2008

    2008

  12. [20]

    A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: Robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits

    Christian Miehe, Martina Hofacker, and Fabian Welschinger. A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: Robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 199(45-48):2765– 2778, 2010

    2010

  13. [21]

    Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: Variational principles and multi-field FE implementations

    Christian Miehe, Fabian Welschinger, and Martina Hofacker. Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: Variational principles and multi-field FE implementations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering , 83(10):1273–1311, 2010

    2010

  14. [22]

    Extended finite element and meshfree methods

    Timon Rabczuk, Jeong-Hoon Song, Xiaoying Zhuang, and Cosmin Anitescu. Extended finite element and meshfree methods. Academic Press, 2019

    2019

  15. [23]

    Dual-horizon peridynamics

    Huilong Ren, Xiaoying Zhuang, Yongchang Cai, and Timon Rabczuk. Dual-horizon peridynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering , 108(12):1451–1476, 2016

    2016

  16. [24]

    Dual-horizon peridynamics: A stable solution to varying horizons

    Huilong Ren, Xiaoying Zhuang, and Timon Rabczuk. Dual-horizon peridynamics: A stable solution to varying horizons. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 318:762–782, 2017

    2017

  17. [25]

    A unified phase-field theory for the mechanics of damage and quasi-brittle failure

    Jian-Ying Wu. A unified phase-field theory for the mechanics of damage and quasi-brittle failure. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids , 103:72–99, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    An anisotropic cohesive fracture model: Advantages and limitations of length-scale insensitive phase-field damage models

    Shahed Rezaei, Ali Harandi, Tim Brepols, and Stefanie Reese. An anisotropic cohesive fracture model: Advantages and limitations of length-scale insensitive phase-field damage models. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 261:108177, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Prediction of fracture and damage in micro/nano coating systems using cohesive zone elements

    Shahed Rezaei, Stephan Wulfinghoff, and Stefanie Reese. Prediction of fracture and damage in micro/nano coating systems using cohesive zone elements. International Journal of Solids and Structures , 121:62–74, 2017

    2017

  20. [28]

    Finite deformation cohesive zone phase field model for crack propagation in multi-phase microstructures

    Preetam Tarafder, Saikat Dan, and Somnath Ghosh. Finite deformation cohesive zone phase field model for crack propagation in multi-phase microstructures. Computational Mechanics, 66(3):723–743, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    Phase field modeling and computer implementation: A review

    X Zhuang, S Zhou, GD Huynh, P Areias, and T Rabczuk. Phase field modeling and computer implementation: A review. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 262:108234, 2022. 24

    2022

  22. [30]

    Phase-field modeling of fluid-driven dynamic cracking in porous media.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 350:169–198, 2019

    Shuwei Zhou, Xiaoying Zhuang, and Timon Rabczuk. Phase-field modeling of fluid-driven dynamic cracking in porous media.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 350:169–198, 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Hooman Danesh and Mahdi Javanbakht. Thermodynamically consistent nonlocal kernel with boundary effect compensation and its application to the coupled phase field-nonlocal integral elasticity equations for modeling of martensitic transformations. Mechanics of Advanced Materials...

    2022

  24. [32]

    Hooman Danesh, Mahdi Javanbakht, and Sam Mirzakhani. Nonlocal integral elasticity based phase field modelling and simulations of nanoscale thermal-and stress-induced martensitic transformations using a boundary effect compensation kernel. Computational Materials Science, 194:1...

    2021

  25. [33]

    Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics

    Steve Plimpton. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics , 117(1):1–19, 1995

    1995

  26. [34]

    VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data

    Koichi Momma and Fujio Izumi. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. Journal of Applied Crystallography , 44(6):1272–1276, 2011

    2011

  27. [35]

    Optimized Tersoff and Brenner empirical potential parameters for lattice dynamics and phonon thermal transport in carbon nanotubes and graphene

    L Lindsay and DA Broido. Optimized Tersoff and Brenner empirical potential parameters for lattice dynamics and phonon thermal transport in carbon nanotubes and graphene. Physical Review B , 81(20):205441, 2010

    2010

  28. [36]

    Influence of disorder on thermal transport properties of boron nitride nanostructures

    Cem Sevik, Alper Kinaci, Justin B Haskins, and Tahir C ¸ a˘ gın. Influence of disorder on thermal transport properties of boron nitride nanostructures. Physical Review B , 86(7):075403, 2012

    2012

  29. [37]

    Stretchable organic solar cells

    Darren J Lipomi, Benjamin C-K Tee, Michael Vosgueritchian, and Zhenan Bao. Stretchable organic solar cells. Advanced Materials, 23(15):1771–1775, 2011

    2011

  30. [38]

    Rudolf Clausius. XVI. On a mechanical theorem applicable to heat. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science , 40(265):122–127, 1870

  31. [39]

    I.—On reciprocal figures, frames, and diagrams of forces

    J Clerk Maxwell. I.—On reciprocal figures, frames, and diagrams of forces. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , 26(1):1–40, 1870

  32. [40]

    A mathematical homogenization perspective of virial stress

    Wen Chen and Jacob Fish. A mathematical homogenization perspective of virial stress. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 67(2):189–207, 2006

    2006

  33. [41]

    An atomistic methodology of energy release rate for graphene at nanoscale

    Zhen Zhang, Xianqiao Wang, and James D Lee. An atomistic methodology of energy release rate for graphene at nanoscale. Journal of Applied Physics , 115(11), 2014

    2014

  34. [42]

    Molecular dynamics simulation of nanocrack propagation in single-layer MoS 2 nanosheets

    Hongwei Bao, Yuhong Huang, Zhi Yang, Yunjin Sun, Yu Bai, Yaping Miao, Paul K Chu, Kewei Xu, and Fei Ma. Molecular dynamics simulation of nanocrack propagation in single-layer MoS 2 nanosheets. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , 122(2):1351–1360, 2018

    2018

  35. [43]

    COMPASS: an ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds

    Huai Sun. COMPASS: an ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 102(38):7338–7364, 1998

    1998

  36. [44]

    Characterization of thermal transport in low-dimensional boron nitride nanostructures

    Cem Sevik, Alper Kinaci, Justin B Haskins, and Tahir C ¸ a˘ gın. Characterization of thermal transport in low-dimensional boron nitride nanostructures. Physical Review B , 84(8):085409, 2011

    2011

  37. [45]

    David A Pearlman, David A Case, James W Caldwell, Wilson S Ross, Thomas E Cheatham III, Steve DeBolt, David Ferguson, George Seibel, and Peter Kollman. AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free ene...

    1995

  38. [46]

    All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins

    Alex D MacKerell Jr, Donald Bashford, MLDR Bellott, Roland Leslie Dunbrack Jr, Jeffrey D Evanseck, Martin J Field, Stefan Fischer, Jiali Gao, H Guo, Sookhee Ha, et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. The Journal of Physical...

    1998

  39. [47]

    Structure and energetics of ligand binding to proteins: Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase-trimethoprim, a drug-receptor system

    Pnina Dauber-Osguthorpe, Victoria A Roberts, David J Osguthorpe, Jon Wolff, Moniqe Genest, and Arnold T Hagler. Structure and energetics of ligand binding to proteins: Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase-trimethoprim, a drug-receptor system. Proteins: Structure, Function,...

    1988

  40. [48]

    Molecular dynamics simulation of nanocomposites using BIOVIA materials studio, lammps and gromacs

    Sumit Sharma. Molecular dynamics simulation of nanocomposites using BIOVIA materials studio, lammps and gromacs . Elsevier, 2019

    2019

  41. [49]

    Approximation of free-discontinuity problems

    Andrea Braides. Approximation of free-discontinuity problems. Number 1694. Springer Science & Business Media, 1998

    1998

  42. [50]

    Robust numerical implementation of non-standard phase-field damage models for failure in solids

    Jian-Ying Wu. Robust numerical implementation of non-standard phase-field damage models for failure in solids. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 340:767–797, 2018

    2018

  43. [51]

    Approximation of functional depending on jumps by elliptic functional via t- convergence

    Luigi Ambrosio and Vincenzo Maria Tortorelli. Approximation of functional depending on jumps by elliptic functional via t- convergence. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 43(8):999–1036, 1990

    1990

  44. [52]

    Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems

    David Bryant Mumford and Jayant Shah. Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 1989

    1989

  45. [53]

    Modeling dynamic fracture of solids with a phase-field regularized cohesive zone model

    Vinh Phu Nguyen and Jian-Ying Wu. Modeling dynamic fracture of solids with a phase-field regularized cohesive zone model. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 340:1000–1022, 2018

    2018

  46. [54]

    Experimental determination of crack softening characteristics of normalweight and lightweight

    H Cornelissen, D Hordijk, and H Reinhardt. Experimental determination of crack softening characteristics of normalweight and lightweight. Heron, 31(2):45–46, 1986

    1986

  47. [55]

    On the energy decomposition in variational phase-field models for brittle fracture under multi-axial stress states

    Francesco Vicentini, Camilla Zolesi, Pietro Carrara, Corrado Maurini, and Laura De Lorenzis. On the energy decomposition in variational phase-field models for brittle fracture under multi-axial stress states. International Journal of Fracture, pages 1–27, 2024

    2024

  48. [56]

    Double-phase-field formulation for mixed-mode fracture in rocks

    Fan Fei and Jinhyun Choo. Double-phase-field formulation for mixed-mode fracture in rocks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 376:113655, 2021

    2021

  49. [57]

    Adaptive virtual element method for large-strain phase-field fracture

    Blaˇ z Hudobivnik, Fadi Aldakheel, and Peter Wriggers. Adaptive virtual element method for large-strain phase-field fracture. In Current Trends and Open Problems in Computational Mechanics , pages 195–206. Springer, 2022

    2022

  50. [58]

    An efficient phase-field model of shear fractures using deviatoric stress split

    Ehsan Haghighat and David Santill´ an. An efficient phase-field model of shear fractures using deviatoric stress split. Computational Mechanics, pages 1–16, 2023. 25

    2023

  51. [59]

    Phase-field modeling of brittle fracture using an efficient virtual element scheme

    Fadi Aldakheel, Blaˇ z Hudobivnik, Ali Hussein, and Peter Wriggers. Phase-field modeling of brittle fracture using an efficient virtual element scheme. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 341:443–466, 2018

    2018

  52. [60]

    Simo and J.W

    J.C. Simo and J.W. Ju. Strain-and stress-based continuum damage models-I. formulation. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 23(7):821–840, 1987

    1987

  53. [61]

    Crack nucleation in variational phase-field models of brittle fracture

    Erwan Tann´ e, Tianyi Li, Blaise Bourdin, J-J Marigo, and Corrado Maurini. Crack nucleation in variational phase-field models of brittle fracture. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids , 110:80–99, 2018

    2018

  54. [62]

    Automation of Finite Element Methods

    Joze Korelc and Peter Wriggers. Automation of Finite Element Methods . Springer, 2016

    2016

  55. [63]

    Computational modeling of concrete fracture

    Jan Gerrit Rots et al. Computational modeling of concrete fracture. 1988

    1988

  56. [64]

    An iteration scheme for phase field model for cohesive fracture and its implementation in Abaqus

    Peng Zhang, Xiaofei Hu, Xiaoyi Wang, and Weian Yao. An iteration scheme for phase field model for cohesive fracture and its implementation in Abaqus. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 204:268–287, 2018

    2018

  57. [65]

    Phase field modeling of fracture in anisotropic brittle solids

    S Teichtmeister, D Kienle, Fadi Aldakheel, and M-A Keip. Phase field modeling of fracture in anisotropic brittle solids. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics , 97:1–21, 2017

    2017

  58. [66]

    Phase field modeling of fracture in fiber reinforced composite laminate

    Peng Zhang, Xiaofei Hu, Tinh Quoc Bui, and Weian Yao. Phase field modeling of fracture in fiber reinforced composite laminate. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences , 161:105008, 2019

    2019

  59. [67]

    A molecular dynamic study of nano-fracture of C3N

    MD Imrul Reza Shishir and Alireza Tabarraei. A molecular dynamic study of nano-fracture of C3N. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition , volume 59469, page V009T11A051. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2019

    2019

  60. [68]

    Strain modulation of band offsets at the PCBM/P3HT heterointerface

    Guido Menichetti, Renato Colle, and Giuseppe Grosso. Strain modulation of band offsets at the PCBM/P3HT heterointerface. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , 121(25):13707–13716, 2017

    2017

  61. [69]

    Elastic moduli of organic electronic materials by the buckling method

    Dongha Tahk, Hong H Lee, and Dahl-Young Khang. Elastic moduli of organic electronic materials by the buckling method. Macro- molecules, 42(18):7079–7083, 2009

    2009

  62. [70]

    Numerical and experimental analyses of the crack propagation in nanocomposite thin-films by using dynamic particle difference methods

    Kyeong-Hwan Kim, Seongsik Jeong, and Hae-Jin Kim. Numerical and experimental analyses of the crack propagation in nanocomposite thin-films by using dynamic particle difference methods. Polymer, 240:124527, 2022

    2022

  63. [71]

    Elastic moduli of single-walled carbon nanotubes and their ropes

    Shuchi Gupta, K Dharamvir, and VK Jindal. Elastic moduli of single-walled carbon nanotubes and their ropes. Physical Review B , 72(16):165428, 2005

    2005

  64. [72]

    Modeling of graphene–polymer interfacial mechanical behavior using molecular dynamics

    Amnaya P Awasthi, Dimitris C Lagoudas, and Daniel C Hammerand. Modeling of graphene–polymer interfacial mechanical behavior using molecular dynamics. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering , 17(1):015002, 2008

    2008

  65. [73]

    Band structure engineering of graphene by strain: First-principles calculations

    Gui Gui, Jin Li, and Jianxin Zhong. Band structure engineering of graphene by strain: First-principles calculations. Physical Review B, 78(7):075435, 2008

    2008

  66. [74]

    Computational characterization of monolayer C3N: A two-dimensional nitrogen-graphene crystal

    Xiaodong Zhou, Wanxiang Feng, Shan Guan, Botao Fu, Wenyong Su, and Yugui Yao. Computational characterization of monolayer C3N: A two-dimensional nitrogen-graphene crystal. Journal of Materials Research , 32(15):2993–3001, 2017

    2017

  67. [75]

    Investigation of fracture and mechanical properties of monolayer C3N using molecular dynamic simulations

    Md Imrul Reza Shishir, Mohan Surya Raja Elapolu, and Alireza Tabarraei. Investigation of fracture and mechanical properties of monolayer C3N using molecular dynamic simulations. Mechanics of Materials , 160:103895, 2021

    2021

  68. [76]

    Elastic and electronic properties of C 2N monolayer: first-principles calculation

    Yusuf Zuntu Abdullahi, Tiem Leong Yoon, and Thong Leng Lim. Elastic and electronic properties of C 2N monolayer: first-principles calculation. Materials Research Express, 6(2):025601, 2018

    2018

  69. [77]

    Anisotropic fracture of graphene revealed by surface steps on graphite

    Cangyu Qu, Diwei Shi, Li Chen, Zhanghui Wu, Jin Wang, Songlin Shi, Enlai Gao, Zhiping Xu, and Quanshui Zheng. Anisotropic fracture of graphene revealed by surface steps on graphite. Physical Review Letters, 129(2):026101, 2022

    2022

  70. [78]

    Atomistically motivated interface model to account for coupled plasticity and damage at grain boundaries

    Shahed Rezaei, David Jaworek, Jaber Rezaei Mianroodi, Stephan Wulfinghoff, and Stefanie Reese. Atomistically motivated interface model to account for coupled plasticity and damage at grain boundaries. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids , 124:325–349, 2019

    2019

  71. [79]

    A novel FFT-based phase field model for damage and cracking behavior of heterogeneous materials

    YJ Cao, WQ Shen, Jian-Fu Shao, and W Wang. A novel FFT-based phase field model for damage and cracking behavior of heterogeneous materials. International Journal of Plasticity , 133:102786, 2020

    2020

  72. [80]

    A cohesive law for interfaces between multi-wall carbon nanotubes and polymers due to the van der Waals interactions

    WB Lu, J Wu, J Song, KC Hwang, LY Jiang, and Y Huang. A cohesive law for interfaces between multi-wall carbon nanotubes and polymers due to the van der Waals interactions. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 197(41-42):3261–3267, 2008

    2008

  73. [81]

    Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites

    Shao-Yun Fu, Xi-Qiao Feng, Bernd Lauke, and Yiu-Wing Mai. Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. Composites Part B: Engineering , 39(6):933–961, 2008

    2008

  74. [82]

    Thermal conductivity of graphene laminate

    Hoda Malekpour, K-H Chang, J-C Chen, C-Y Lu, DL Nika, KS Novoselov, and AA Balandin. Thermal conductivity of graphene laminate. Nano Letters, 14(9):5155–5161, 2014

    2014

  75. [83]

    New combining rules for rare gas van der Waals parameters

    Marvin Waldman and Arnold T Hagler. New combining rules for rare gas van der Waals parameters. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 14(9):1077–1084, 1993. 26

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.