pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04463 · v1 · pith:QOTQPOSWnew · submitted 2026-05-06 · 🪐 quant-ph

Floquet quantum multiparameter estimation with periodic-driving-induced topological phase transition

Yu Yang , Yuyang Tang , Pei Zhang , Fuli Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords Floquet theoryquantum multiparameter estimationtopological phase transitionperiodic drivingquantum Fisher informationmeasurement incompatibilityRashba spin-orbitHeisenberg limit
0
0 comments X

The pith

Near a driving-induced topological phase transition, multiparameter estimation reaches Heisenberg scaling and beyond.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Periodically driven systems often resist analysis via static effective Hamiltonians, prompting the development of a Floquet theory method to compute the full quantum Fisher information matrix and measurement incompatibility. The framework accounts for eigenmodes, quasienergies, and multi-photon processes. Applied to a ring-shaped Rashba spin-orbit interferometer that exhibits a topological phase transition, the approach identifies a sharp rise in estimation precision for multiple parameters close to the transition boundary. Precision scales at the Heisenberg limit or higher, incompatibility oscillates and reaches zero at certain points, and stroboscopic projective measurements attain the ultimate bound. The result supplies a general route to time-dependent critical metrology in driven quantum systems.

Core claim

In the Floquet theory framework applied to a periodically driven Rashba spin-orbit interferometer with topological phase transition, the quantum Fisher information matrix and measurement incompatibility receive explicit contributions from Floquet eigenmodes, quasienergies, and multi-photon processes. In the vicinity of the TPT boundary, this produces pronounced enhancement in the estimation precision of multiple parameters with Heisenberg limit scaling and higher, while measurement incompatibility vanishes in an oscillatory manner and stroboscopic projective measurement achieves the highest attainable precision.

What carries the argument

Floquet theory framework that isolates the separate roles of eigenmodes, quasienergies, and multi-photon processes in determining the quantum Fisher information matrix and measurement incompatibility for the ring-shaped Rashba spin-orbit interferometer.

If this is right

  • Estimation precision for multiple parameters is markedly enhanced near the TPT boundary and attains Heisenberg scaling or better.
  • Measurement incompatibility vanishes in an oscillatory manner with changes in driving parameters.
  • Stroboscopic projective measurements reach the highest estimation precision possible in these driven systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Floquet decomposition could be applied to other periodically driven models to recover optimal multiparameter bounds when static approximations break down.
  • Topological phase transitions engineered by periodic driving may serve as a tunable resource for super-Heisenberg metrology in a range of quantum sensors.
  • Varying the driving frequency or amplitude in cold-atom or photonic realizations could directly map the predicted oscillatory decay of incompatibility.

Load-bearing premise

That the Floquet framework fully accounts for eigenmodes, quasienergies, and multi-photon processes in the quantum Fisher information matrix and incompatibility for general time-periodically driven systems where static Hamiltonians fail.

What would settle it

An experiment on the Rashba interferometer that measures no precision enhancement or persistently non-zero incompatibility near the topological phase transition boundary would falsify the reported scaling and oscillatory vanishing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04463 by Fuli Li, Pei Zhang, Yu Yang, Yuyang Tang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Ring-shaped Rashba spin-orbit interferometer. view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Contourplot of the total phase of equation (47). The view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a)-(c) QFIs view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a)-(c) Total QFI versus its Floquet-resolved components (eigenmodes, quasienergies, multi-photon processes, and view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a)-(c) Comparison of the QFI (blue surface) and its upper bound (yellow surface) for the parameters view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Measurement incompatibility view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparison among the QFI upper bounds for the parameters view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a)-(b) Convergence dependence of QFIs view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. QFIs view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Periodically driven systems provide a powerful platform for quantum multiparameter estimation. Constructing a static effective Hamiltonian in a proper rotating frame is commonly employed to assess the attainable precision. However, such an approach becomes nonfeasible for more general time-periodically driven systems. To tackle this dilemma, we develop a quantum multiparameter estimation strategy in the Floquet theory framework. The contributions of Floquet eigenmodes, quasienergies, and multi-photon processes to the quantum Fisher information matrix and measurement incompatibility are determined, respectively. Moreover, this approach is applied to a ring-shaped Rashba spin-orbit interferometer model exhibiting the topological phase transition (TPT). In the vicinity of the TPT boundary, we reveal a pronounced enhancement in the estimation precision of multiple parameters with the Heisenberg limit scaling and even higher. Meanwhile, the measurement incompatibility vanishes in an oscillatory manner, and the stroboscopic projective measurement enables the highest estimation precision achievable. This work provides a complete Floquet picture for time-dependent critical quantum multiparameter estimation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Floquet-theory framework for quantum multiparameter estimation in general time-periodically driven systems where static effective-Hamiltonian constructions fail. It derives the separate contributions of Floquet eigenmodes, quasienergies, and multi-photon processes to the quantum Fisher information matrix and to measurement incompatibility. The framework is then applied to a ring-shaped Rashba spin-orbit interferometer that exhibits a periodic-driving-induced topological phase transition; near the TPT boundary the authors report enhanced multiparameter precision that reaches or exceeds Heisenberg scaling, an oscillatory vanishing of incompatibility, and optimality of stroboscopic projective measurements.

Significance. If the derivations are correct and the claimed reductions hold, the work supplies a general, non-perturbative tool for metrology in driven systems that static approximations cannot address. The concrete demonstration of precision enhancement at a driven TPT, together with the incompatibility analysis, would be a useful addition to the quantum-sensing literature. The absence of an explicit high-frequency benchmark against known rotating-frame results, however, leaves the central technical claim incompletely validated.

major comments (1)
  1. Floquet QFIM and incompatibility derivation: the manuscript presents new expressions for the contributions of eigenmodes, quasienergies, and multi-photon processes but does not supply an explicit analytic or numerical reduction to the known effective-Hamiltonian (rotating-wave) result in the high-frequency limit on a minimal driven system (e.g., a periodically driven two-level atom). Without this check, it remains unclear whether the quasienergy derivatives and stroboscopic averaging reproduce established limits, which is load-bearing for the claim that the framework fully captures the physics when static methods fail.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our work and for the constructive suggestion regarding validation of the Floquet framework. We address the major comment below and will incorporate the requested benchmark in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Floquet QFIM and incompatibility derivation: the manuscript presents new expressions for the contributions of eigenmodes, quasienergies, and multi-photon processes but does not supply an explicit analytic or numerical reduction to the known effective-Hamiltonian (rotating-wave) result in the high-frequency limit on a minimal driven system (e.g., a periodically driven two-level atom). Without this check, it remains unclear whether the quasienergy derivatives and stroboscopic averaging reproduce established limits, which is load-bearing for the claim that the framework fully captures the physics when static methods fail.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit high-frequency benchmark would strengthen the validation of our general framework. Although the derivations are constructed such that the quasienergy and eigenmode contributions reduce to the rotating-wave effective Hamiltonian when the driving frequency is large compared to other scales, we acknowledge the value of a concrete demonstration. In the revised manuscript we will add a numerical example on a periodically driven two-level atom, explicitly comparing the Floquet QFIM and incompatibility expressions to the known rotating-wave results in the high-frequency regime. This will confirm that the stroboscopic averaging and quasienergy derivatives recover the established limits. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Floquet QFIM and incompatibility derivation is self-contained from standard theory

full rationale

The paper derives the multiparameter estimation expressions by determining the separate contributions of Floquet eigenmodes, quasienergies, and multi-photon processes to the QFIM and measurement incompatibility directly within the Floquet framework. This is presented as a general first-principles construction for time-periodic driving where static effective-Hamiltonian methods fail, followed by application to the Rashba model near the TPT. No step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation; the central formulas are not equivalent to their inputs via renaming or ansatz smuggling. The derivation chain remains independent of the specific model results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms beyond standard Floquet applicability, or invented entities are detailed.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Floquet theory applies to the periodically driven quantum system and captures all relevant contributions to estimation precision
    Invoked as the basis for the new strategy when static Hamiltonian methods fail.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5475 in / 1332 out tokens · 89061 ms · 2026-05-08T18:06:02.247115+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The ratio tan θ = ωSO/ω relates the Lamor frequency ωSO of spin precession to the frequency ω of changing the magnetic field direction

    Berry phase in adiabatic approximation For a generic spin state |ψ(t)⟩, the Berry phase is de- fined as γB = Z T 0 dt⟨ψ(t)|i∂t|ψ(t)⟩ = Ω 2 , (37) with the solid angle Ω = 2 π(1 − cos θ) , (38) where θ represents the angle between the spin precession axis and the binormal direction to the ring plane. The ratio tan θ = ωSO/ω relates the Lamor frequency ωSO ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    ihMoICDSZ8G+48oA4+9ARDS790U=

    Aharonov-Anandan phase in non-adiabatic evolution One can perform an SU(2) rotation transformation such that the spin is instantaneously aligned with the ap- plied field. The generic spin state |ψ(t)⟩ is transformed into |ψR(t)⟩ = U †(t)|ψ(t)⟩ with U †(t) = exp (iϑ(t)σz/2). The Schrödinger equation for |ψR(t)⟩ writes iℏ∂t|ψR(t)⟩ = U †(t)H(t)U (t) + i∂tU †...

    work page

  3. [3]

    8Z8zuormByVYUM4eqtd54VWXfHs=

    As shown in figures 7 (a)-(b), the QFI maximum for the parameter B scales as ∼ t2 (HL), and the scaling reaches ∼ t4 for the parameter ω. Although the scaling ∼ t4 for the frequency estimation appears in both the Rashba model and the rotating magnetic-field model, this is not a universal property of all periodically driven two-level systems within the Flo...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Status Solidi (RRL)–Rapid Res

    Cayssol J, Dóra B, Simon F and Moessner R 2013 Floquet topological insulators Phys. Status Solidi (RRL)–Rapid Res. Lett. 7 101

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Zhang X et al 2022 Digital quantum simulation of Flo- quet symmetry-protected topological phases Nature 607 468

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Greilich A, Kopteva N E, Korenev V L, Haude P A and Bayer M 2025 Exploring nonlinear dynamics in periodi- cally driven time crystal from synchronization to chaotic motion Nat. Commun. 16 2936

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Lange G D, Rist `e D, Dobrovitski V V and Hanson R 2011 Single-spin magnetometry with multipulse sensing sequences Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 080802

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Lang J, Liu R and Monteiro T 2015 Dynamical- decoupling-based quantum sensing: Floquet spec- troscopy Phys. Rev. X 5 041016

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Pham L M, Bar-Gill N, Belthangady C, Sage D L, Cap- pellaro P, Lukin M D, Yacoby A and Walsworth R L 2012 Enhanced solid-state multispin metrology using dy- namical decoupling Phys. Rev. B 86 045214

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Saleem Z H, Shaji A and Gray S K 2023 Optimal time for sensing in open quantum systems Phys. Rev. A 108 022413

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Bai S and An J 2023 Floquet engineering to overcome no-go theorem of noisy quantum metrology Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 050801

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Erglis A, Sazhin A, Vewinger F, Weitz M, Buhmann S Y and Schmitt J 2025 Time-periodic driving of a bath- coupled open quantum gas of light Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 033603

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Kundu A, Rajak A and Nag T 2021 Dynamics of fluctu- ation correlation in a periodically driven classical system Phys. Rev. B 104 075161

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Giovannetti V, Lloyd S and Maccone L 2006 Quantum metrology Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 010401

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    Paris M G A 2009 Quantum estimation for quantum technology Int. J. Quantum Inf. 7 125

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Yuan H 2016 Sequential feedback scheme outperforms the parallel scheme for Hamiltonian parameter estima- tion Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 160801

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Liu J, Yuan H, Lu X M, Wang X 2020 Quantum Fisher information matrix and multiparameter estimation J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53 023001

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Pang S and Jordan A N 2017 Optimal adaptive control for quantum metrology with time-dependent Hamiltoni- ans Nat. Commun. 8 14695

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Super-Heisenberg

    Hou Z, Jin Y, Chen H, Tang J-F, Huang C-J, Yuan H, Xiang G, Li C-Y and Guo G-C 2021 “Super-Heisenberg” and Heisenberg scalings achieved simultaneously in the estimation of a rotating field Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 070503

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Shirley J H 1965 Solution of the Schrödinger equation with a hamiltonian periodic in time Phys. Rev. 138 B979

    work page 1965

  21. [21]

    Schmidt A and Vega S 1992 The Floquet theory of nu- clear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of single spins and dipolar coupled spin pairs in rotating solids J. Chem. Phys. 96 2655

    work page 1992

  22. [22]

    Chu S-I and Telnov D A 2004 Beyond the Floquet the- orem: generalized Floquet formalisms and quasienergy methods for atomic and molecular multiphoton processes in intense laser fields Phys. Rep. 390 1

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    Mishra U and Bayat A 2021 Driving enhanced quantum sensing in partially accessible many-body systems Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 080504

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Duan Q, Li T, Chen S, Pang S and Lu H 2025 Floquet di- 16 amond sensor with optimal precision (arXiv:2510.03618)

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Iemini F, Fazio R and Sanpera A 2024 Floquet time crys- tals as quantum sensors of ac fields Phys. Rev. A 109 L050203

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Holthaus M 2015 Floquet engineering with quasienergy bands of periodically driven optical lattices J. Phys. B 49 013001

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    Boyers E, Pandey M, Campbell D K, Polkovnikov A, Sels D and Sushkov A O 2019 Floquet-engineered quantum state manipulation in a noisy qubit Phys. Rev. A 100 012341

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Goldman N and Dalibard J 2014 Periodically driven quantum systems: Effective Hamiltonians and engi- neered gauge fields Phys. Rev. X 4 031027

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Eckardt A 2017 Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in periodically driven optical lattices Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 011004

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Albarelli F and Demkowicz-Dobrza ´nski R 2022 Probe in- compatibility in multiparameter noisy quantum metrol- ogy Phys. Rev. X 12 011039

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Ragy S, Jarzyna M and Demkowicz-Dobrzański R 2016 Compatibility in multiparameter quantum metrology Phys. Rev. A 94 052108

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Sidhu J S, Ouyang Y, Campbell E T and Kok P 2021 Tight bounds on the simultaneous estimation of incom- patible parameters Phys. Rev. X 11 011028

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Matsumoto K 2002 A new approach to the Cramér–Rao- type bound of the pure-state model J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 3111

    work page 2002

  34. [34]

    Carollo A, Spagnolo B, Dubkov A A and Valenti D 2019 On quantumness in multi-parameter quantum estimation J. Stat. Mech. 094010

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Belliardo F and Giovannetti V 2021 Incompatibility in quantum parameter estimation New J. Phys. 23 063055

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Yang Y, Ru S, An M, Wang Y, Wang F, Zhang P and Li F 2022 Multiparameter simultaneous optimal estimation with an SU(2) coding unitary evolution Phys. Rev. A 105 022406

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Giovannetti V, Lloyd S and Maccone L 2004 Quantum- enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit Science 306 1330

    work page 2004

  38. [38]

    Caves C M 1981 Quantum-mechanical noise in an inter- ferometer Phys. Rev. D 23 1693

    work page 1981

  39. [39]

    Zhao X, Yang Y and Chiribella G 2020 Quantum metrol- ogy with indefinite causal order Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 190503

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Fresco G D, Spagnolo B, Valenti D and Carollo A 2022 Multiparameter quantum critical metrology SciPost Phys. 13 077

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Candia R D, Minganti F, Petrovnin K V, Paraoanu G S and Felicetti S 2023 Critical parametric quantum sensing npj Quantum Inf. 9 23

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Hotter C, Ritsch H and Gietka K 2024 Combining critical and quantum metrology Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 060801

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Mihailescu G, Alushi U, Di Candia R, Felicetti S and Gietka K 2025 Critical quantum sensing: a tutorial on parameter estimation near quantum phase transitions (arXiv:2510.02035)

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Niezgoda A and Chwedeńczuk J 2021 Many-body non- locality as a resource for quantum-enhanced metrology Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 210506

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Ding D S, Liu Z-K, Shi B-S, Guo G-C, Mølmer K and Adams C S 2022 Enhanced metrology at the critical point of a many-body Rydberg atomic system Nat. Phys. 18 1447

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Boixo S, Flammia S T, Caves C M and Geremia J M 2007 Generalized limits for single-parameter quantum estima- tion Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 090401

    work page 2007

  47. [47]

    Tech- nol

    Garbe L, Abah O, Felicetti S and Puebla R 2022 Critical quantum metrology with fully-connected models: from Heisenberg to Kibble–Zurek scaling Quantum Sci. Tech- nol. 7 035010

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Mukhopadhyay C and Bayat A 2024 Modular many-body quantum sensors Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 120601

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Yu M, Li X, Chu Y, Mera B, Ünal F N, Yang P, Liu Y, Goldman N and Cai J 2024 Experimental demonstration of topological bounds in quantum metrology Natl. Sci. Rev. 11 nwae065

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Yang Y, Yuan H and Li F 2024 Quantum multiparameter estimation enhanced by a topological phase transition Phys. Rev. A 109 022604

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Mizuta K 2025 Nearly optimal quasienergy estimation and eigenstate preparation of time-periodic Hamiltonians by Sambe space formalism Phys. Rev. Research 7 013068

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Eckardt A and Anisimovas E 2015 High-frequency ap- proximation for periodically driven quantum systems from a Floquet-space perspective New J. Phys. 17 093039

    work page 2015

  53. [54]

    The Fourier factor satisfies ⟨t|m⟩ = eimωt for the time vector |t⟩, which indicates that the probe state is |β, 0⟩, since ⟨0|m⟩ = 1 at the initial time t = 0

    work page

  54. [55]

    Zhang L-H, Liu Z-K, Liu B, Zhang Z-Y, Guo G-C, Ding D-S and Shi B-S 2022 Rydberg microwave-frequency- comb spectrometer Phys. Rev. Applied 18 014033

    work page 2022

  55. [56]

    Bukov M, D’Alessio L and Polkovnikov A 2015 Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to Floquet engineering Adv. Phys. 64 139

    work page 2015

  56. [57]

    Restrepo S, Cerrillo J, Bastidas V M, Angelakis D G and Brandes T 2016 Driven open quantum systems and Flo- quet stroboscopic dynamics Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 250401

    work page 2016

  57. [58]

    Manchon A, Koo H C, Nitta J, Frolov S M and Duine R A 2015 New perspectives for Rashba spin–orbit coupling Nat. Mater. 14 871

    work page 2015

  58. [59]

    Lyanda-Geller Y 1993 Topological transitions in Berry’s phase interference effects Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 657

    work page 1993

  59. [60]

    Ying Z-J, Gentile P, Baltanás J P, Frustaglia D, Ortix C and Cuoco M 2020 Geometric driving of two-level quan- tum systems Phys. Rev. Research 2 023167

    work page 2020

  60. [61]

    Reynoso, Baltanás J P, Saarikoski H, Vázquez-Lozano J E, Nitta J and Frustaglia D 2017 Spin resonance under topological driving fields New J. Phys. 19 063010

    work page 2017

  61. [62]

    Nagasawa F, Frustaglia D, Saarikoski H, Richter K and Nitta J 2013 Control of the spin geometric phase in semi- conductor quantum rings Nat. Commun. 4 2526

    work page 2013

  62. [63]

    Ying Z-J, Gentile P, Ortix C and Cuoco M 2016 De- signing electron spin textures and spin interferometers by shape deformations Phys. Rev. B 94 081406

    work page 2016

  63. [64]

    Aharonov Y and Anandan J 1987 Phase change during a cyclic quantum evolution Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 1593

    work page 1987

  64. [65]

    Roy R and Harper F 2017 Periodic table for Floquet topological insulators Phys. Rev. B 96 155118

    work page 2017

  65. [66]

    Gavensky L, Usaj G and Goldman N 2025 Štředa formula for Floquet systems: topological invariants and quan- tized anomalies from Cesàro summation Phys. Rev. X 17 15 031067

    work page 2025

  66. [67]

    Popp M, Frustaglia D and Richter K 2003 Conditions for adiabatic spin transport in disordered systems Phys. Rev. B 68 041303

    work page 2003

  67. [68]

    Nagasawa F, Takagi J, Kunihashi Y, Kohda M and Nitta J 2012 Experimental demonstration of spin geometric phase: radius dependence of time-reversal Aharonov– Casher oscillations Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 086801

    work page 2012

  68. [69]

    Meijer F E, Morpurgo A F and Klapwijk T M 2002 One- dimensional ring in the presence of Rashba spin-orbit in- teraction: derivation of the correct Hamiltonian Phys. Rev. B 66 033107

    work page 2002

  69. [70]

    The midline extraction removes fast oscillations and al- lows us to focus on the background behavior near the TPT. Other extraction procedures, such as fitting the peaks with a Lorentzian lineshape on top of a quadratic polynomial background, are also applicable, but are not essential to our proposal and are used only to extract the slowly varying trend

    work page

  70. [71]

    Scully M O and Zubairy M S 1997 Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press)

    work page 1997

  71. [72]

    Wang G, Liu Y-X, Schloss J M, Alsid S T, Braje D A and Cappellaro P 2022 Sensing of arbitrary-frequency fields using a quantum mixer Phys. Rev. X 12 021061

    work page 2022

  72. [73]

    Scholz I, Meier B H and Ernst M 2007 Operator-based triple-mode Floquet theory in solid-state NMR J. Chem. Phys. 127 204504

    work page 2007

  73. [74]

    Leskes M, Madhu P K and Vega S 2010 Floquet theory in solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 57 345

    work page 2010

  74. [75]

    Awschalom D D, Samarth N and Loss D 2002 Semicon- ductor Spintronics and Quantum Computation (Springer Science & Business Media)

    work page 2002

  75. [76]

    Liu X Z, Xu Y G, Yu G, Wei L M, Lin T, Guo S L, Chu J H, Zhou W Z, Zhang Y G and Lockwood D J 2013 The effective g-factor in In 0.53Ga0.47As/In0.52Al0.48As quan- tum well investigated by magnetotransport measurement J. Appl. Phys. 113 033704

    work page 2013