Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Dual Pipeline Style Transfer with Input Distribution Differentiation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.05432 v1 pith:QPKEJOVF submitted 2023-11-09 cs.CV eess.IV

classification cs.CVeess.IV
keywords distributioninputsmoothtexturedifferentiationcolorcompletelygeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The color and texture dual pipeline architecture (CTDP) suppresses texture representation and artifacts through masked total variation loss (Mtv), and further experiments have shown that smooth input can almost completely eliminate texture representation. We have demonstrated through experiments that smooth input is not the key reason for removing texture representations, but rather the distribution differentiation of the training dataset. Based on this, we propose an input distribution differentiation training strategy (IDD), which forces the generation of textures to be completely dependent on the noise distribution, while the smooth distribution will not produce textures at all. Overall, our proposed distribution differentiation training strategy allows for two pre-defined input distributions to be responsible for two generation tasks, with noise distribution responsible for texture generation and smooth distribution responsible for color smooth transfer. Finally, we choose a smooth distribution as the input for the forward inference stage to completely eliminate texture representations and artifacts in color transfer tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools