Pith. sign in

REVIEW

What's Going On in Neural Constituency Parsers? An Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.07853 v1 pith:QQHTG5AJ submitted 2018-04-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords neuralmodelconstituencygrammarsinformationlexiconsprovidedrecent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A number of differences have emerged between modern and classic approaches to constituency parsing in recent years, with structural components like grammars and feature-rich lexicons becoming less central while recurrent neural network representations rise in popularity. The goal of this work is to analyze the extent to which information provided directly by the model structure in classical systems is still being captured by neural methods. To this end, we propose a high-performance neural model (92.08 F1 on PTB) that is representative of recent work and perform a series of investigative experiments. We find that our model implicitly learns to encode much of the same information that was explicitly provided by grammars and lexicons in the past, indicating that this scaffolding can largely be subsumed by powerful general-purpose neural machinery.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools