Search for Dyson rings around pulsars: unexpected light curves

E. Haliki; K. Bas; O. Kayali; R. J. Nemiroff

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 31 references

Search for Dyson rings around pulsars: unexpected light curves

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A pulsar's superluminal beam spot can create multiple phantom images on a Dyson ring, producing light curves that differ sharply from the uniformly bright ring assumed in previous searches.

desk verdict New application of RID to Dyson rings with a load-bearing idealization gap; the math is simple and sound, but the observability claim needs a finite-beam-width treatment. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17086 v1 pith:QQMA2CRK submitted 2024-12-22 astro-ph.IM

O. Kayali , E. Haliki , K. Bas , R. J. Nemiroff This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.IM

keywords DysonringspulsarsrelativisticimagedoublinglightcurvessuperluminalmotioncreationandannihilationSETIdust

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a pulsar's sweeping beam spot, moving faster than light across a Dyson ring, produces relativistic image doubling: an observer sees image creation and annihilation events and often multiple spots at once. These effects make the ring's light curve non-uniform and time-dependent, unlike the uniformly bright ring assumed in earlier Dyson ring searches. The authors compute example light curves and show that the signature could appear as bright flashes or as a periodic windowing effect in exposures. If correct, Dyson rings around pulsars could have been observed in past surveys without being recognized.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the total light-travel time formula $t_{\rm tot} = \frac{p\beta}{2\pi} + \frac{R}{c} + \frac{R}{c}\cos\theta \sin\beta$, which gives the arrival time at a distant observer of light reflected (or thermally emitted) from each azimuthal point $\beta$ on the ring. Setting $d t_{\rm tot}/d\beta = 0$ yields the RID condition $\cos\beta_{IC/IA} = -c/(v\cos\theta)$, the angular positions of image creation and annihilation. The brightness is then weighted by Lambert's cosine law, $\cos\theta \sin\beta$, and the ring is divided into discrete azimuthal sections whose arrival times are binned into exposure windows; counting intersections of the $t_{\rm tot}$ versus $\beta$ curve with a vertical time line gives the number of simultaneously visible spot images.

What would settle it

Take a pulsar with known period and a candidate ring radius and inclination; compute the expected IC/IA times and brightness curve, then observe at high time resolution (exposure much shorter than the period). If no bright IC/IA flashes and no periodic windowing effect appear over many cycles, the model's prediction for that geometry fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that when the beam spot's speed toward the observer drops from superluminal to subluminal, relativistic image doubling creates a pair of perceived spot images in a formally infinite flash (an image creation event), and when it rises back, the images merge and vanish (an image annihilation event). On a circular ring, these events occur at angular positions given by $\cos\beta = -c/(v\cos\theta)$, so they depend only on the ring's radius, the pulsar's period, and the ring's inclination to the line of sight. Because the spot can complete many rotations while some images persist, multiple spot images are visible simultaneously, and the light curve contains sharp peaks, non-uniform brightening, and a phase-dependent windowing effect when exposures are binned. The paper therefore concludes that Dyson ring detections should not assume uniform brightness, and that RID features may also appear in naturally occurring dust rings around pulsars.

Load-bearing premise

The light curves assume a point-like beam spot on an infinitely thin ring with Lambertian reflection, so the predicted bright flashes are infinitely bright only in this idealization; a real beam's finite size and a ring's finite thickness would smooth and weaken the signature, and the paper does not quantify when the signature disappears.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Searches for Dyson rings around pulsars should look for time-variable, non-uniform light curves with bright IC/IA flashes, not just steady infrared excess.
The windoing effect provides a new detection channel: random exposure phases relative to the pulsar's sweeping beam cause a periodic on/off increase in detected flux.
The same RID features should appear in reflected or thermally emitted radiation from any ring-like structure around a pulsar, including natural dust rings.
Detection of a Dyson ring via RID flashes does not require the observer to be aligned with the pulsar beam, widening the set of target pulsars.
If past surveys recorded such light curves without recognizing them, reanalysis of archival pulsar photometry could uncover existing Dyson ring candidates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If real pulsar beams have finite opening angles and rings have finite width, the formally infinite IC/IA flashes will be smoothed into finite pulses; quantifying that smoothing would let observers predict whether the signature survives in realistic observations.
The windoing effect could be tested on known pulsars with surrounding material by staring long enough to catch multiple exposure phases; a periodic extra-flux signature would be a falsifiable prediction of the model.
The same RID formalism might apply to other superluminal spots, such as light echoes from fast-spinning magnetars or gamma-ray pulsar wind nebulae, where ring-like geometries are observed.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The genuinely new thing here is the application of Relativistic Image Doubling (RID) to pulsar-illuminated Dyson rings, yielding light curves with image-creation/annihilation flashes, multiple simultaneous spot images, and a windowing noise effect. Previous work treated these rings as uniformly brightened, so this is a real extension, and the core derivation (Eq. 1 and the condition from dt/dβ = 0) is simple, clear, and internally consistent for the idealized geometry. The authors also deserve credit for putting the code on GitHub and for explicitly acknowledging that RID points are formally infinitely bright in their model.

The main soft spot is exactly what the stress-test note flags: the predicted flashes are caustics that depend on a point-like beam spot and an infinitesimally thin ring. A real pulsar beam has finite opening angle, and a real ring has thickness, so the spikes will be smoothed and attenuated. The paper gives no quantitative estimate of the smoothing scale, no limit on beam width or ring thickness before the signature disappears, and no discussion of how the thermal response time of the ring material would affect the flash. That missing calculation is load-bearing because the paper's stated value is as a detection template—"Dyson rings might have been observed previously, but not noticed" only works if the spikes survive realistic smoothing. This is not a fatal flaw, but it needs to be addressed before the predictions can be used observationally.

There is also an internal inconsistency in Section 4: the text describes Figure 10 as a case with θ = 90° (face-on), but earlier the paper correctly states that face-on geometry produces no RID, and the Lambert factor cos(θ) sin(β) is zero at θ = 90°. This looks like a typo (likely θ = 0 or another angle), but it must be fixed. A minor issue is that the thermal emission case is hand-waved; the authors note that the temperature gradient must be known, but they don't model it, so the claim that thermal radiation resolves both IC and IA remains qualitative.

Citation practice is fine: the RID theory relies on prior work by Nemiroff, but that work has independent experimental support (Clerici et al. 2016), and the new contribution here is the application, not the RID effect itself. The paper is honest about its assumptions and limitations, and the central idea is plausible.

Who is this for? Researchers in SETI and technosignatures, pulsar observers looking for natural dust rings, and anyone interested in RID phenomena. It deserves a serious referee. I would send it to peer review, but the referee should ask for a quantitative treatment of finite beam width and ring thickness, along with clarification of the Figure 10 geometry.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that a pulsar beam sweeping a Dyson ring can move superluminally, and that relativistic image doubling (RID) then creates image creation (IC) and image annihilation (IA) events. It derives the arrival-time formula Eq. (1) and the critical condition Eq. (2), discusses the dependence on ring geometry and inclination, computes example light curves by binning discrete ring points in exposure time, and argues that the resulting spikes and multiple simultaneous images distinguish Dyson rings from the uniformly bright rings assumed in previous work. The same mechanism is suggested for naturally occurring dust rings around pulsars.

Significance. If the predicted IC/IA spikes survive realistic beam widths and ring thicknesses, the paper identifies a new observable for technosignature searches and for studies of pulsar environments. The analytic arrival-time derivation is compact, the geometry is well motivated, and the code is made publicly available; the step from an assumed uniformly bright ring to one with RID-specific brightness structure is a genuine extension of earlier Dyson-ring studies. However, the idealized point-spot and zero-thickness model, together with an internal inconsistency in the face-on example, currently limit how strongly the observational claims can be endorsed.

major comments (2)

[Section 4, Figure 10] The text states that Figure 10 shows a case with beam speed v = 10c and theta = 90 degrees. This cannot be correct as written: Section 2 explicitly states that face-on rings with theta = pi/2 produce no RID event, Eq. (2) has no solution when cos(theta) = 0, and the Lambert factor used in Section 4 vanishes at theta = 90 degrees. Please state the inclination angle actually used in the simulations and relabel or rerun the affected figures, since the multiple-image and windowing claims tied to Figure 10 depend on this geometry.
[Section 4, light-curve calculation] The light-curve calculation treats the beam spot as a point and the ring as an infinitesimally thin collection of azimuthal points. Because dt_tot/d beta = 0 at IC/IA, the number of points per exposure-time bin is formally infinite; the paper itself notes that RID points are formally infinitely bright. A real pulsar beam has finite opening angle, a real ring has finite radial and vertical thickness, and thermal emission has a finite response time, all of which smooth and attenuate the caustic spikes. The paper gives no quantitative estimate of these smoothing scales or a threshold beyond which the IC/IA signature becomes undetectable. This is load-bearing because the central claim is that real observations could reveal Dyson rings through these spikes.

minor comments (4)

[Equation (1)] The displayed expression for t_tot includes the term R/c plus (1/c)[R cos(theta)(1 + sin(beta))], which contains an extra constant R cos(theta)/c beyond the stated quantities t_beam = R/c and t_ref = d/c with d = R cos(theta) sin(beta). The derivative condition in Eq. (2) is unaffected, but the constant offset should be absorbed into k_3 explicitly or Eq. (1) should be corrected.
[General notation] The pulsar period is denoted p in Eq. (1) and Figure 2 but P in Eq. (2) and parts of Section 3; please unify the notation to avoid confusion.
[Section 3, geometry] The text says that positive values of sin(beta) correspond to the farthest half of the ring, but the accompanying Figure 5 and the definition of d could be clarified by stating the sign convention for beta explicitly, in particular whether beta = 0 points toward or away from the observer.
[Section 4, Lambert factor] The same Lambertian factor cos(theta) sin(beta) is applied to both reflection and thermal emission, but for optically thick thermal emission a Lambertian angular distribution is only one possible assumption; a sentence justifying this choice for the thermal case would improve the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the claimed RID light curves follow from a forward model using Eq. (1); the only self-cited input, RID theory, has independent laboratory support.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is an analytic forward model, not a fit. The observed time of each ring point is computed from geometry alone in Eq. (1), t_tot = (p beta)/(2 pi) + R/c + (1/c)[R cos theta (1+sin beta)], and IC/IA locations are obtained by setting d t_tot/d beta = 0 (Eq. 2). The light curves in Section 4 are produced by counting equally spaced azimuthal points whose arrival times fall in an exposure bin; no observed data are used to set any parameter, and no quantity that appears in the output is re-inserted as an input. The superluminal spot speeds are imported from Osmanov (2016, 2018), an external citation, and the ring stability arguments come from Haliki (2019) and are not the claimed result. The paper does rely on the prior RID theory of Nemiroff (2015, 2018, 2023), which is a self-citation, but that theory is not the target of the present claim and it has independent support: the paper cites Clerici et al. (2016), a laboratory measurement of the pair-creation event, and Bolotovskii & Bykov (1990), an earlier independent derivation for circular trajectories. Thus the self-citations are not load-bearing in the circular sense. The 'formally infinitely bright' RID flashes are a stated consequence of the point-spot, thin-ring idealization, not a hidden re-use of the conclusion. The comparison with 'classical' uniform-ring light curves is a comparison of two forward models, and the difference follows from the equations, not from imposing the answer.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on a small set of geometric and material assumptions about Dyson rings and pulsar beams. The most fragile are the point-spot thin-ring idealization and Lambertian treatment of thermal emission. The paper does not fit any constants to data, so the free-parameter burden is limited to the illustrative exposure times.

free parameters (1)

exposure time = 0.2 s, 0.5 s, 1 s, 2 s in Figure 10
The predicted light curves and the windowing effect depend on the assumed exposure time, which is varied to illustrate different observational regimes rather than fixed by the physics.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption The pulsar is at the center of a thin circular Dyson ring and its beam creates a point-like spot on the ring's inner surface.
Introduced in Section 3 and used in the geometry of Figure 5; a real beam has finite opening angle and the ring has finite thickness.
domain assumption The observer is effectively at infinity, so light rays from the ring to the observer are parallel.
Stated in Section 2.1: the observer position is considered to be the center of the ring and rays are parallel.
domain assumption Reflection and thermal emission follow Lambert's cosine law, represented by the factor cos(theta) sin(beta).
Section 4 applies this factor to both reflected and thermally emitted light; for thermal emission this is an approximation.
domain assumption The ring is optically thin or the geometry is such that the observer sees the relevant parts; for opaque rings, only the far half is visible.
Discussed in Section 3 and 5; affects whether both IC and IA events are visible.
domain assumption A single-ring Dyson configuration is stable and workable, while two-ring configurations are unstable (Haliki 2019).
Section 3 restricts the analysis to one ring based on prior stability calculations.
domain assumption Dyson ring radii and pulsar periods in the ranges R = 10^-4 to 1 AU and p = 10^-3 to 10 s produce superluminal beam spot speeds.
Section 3 and Figure 2, based on Osmanov 2016, 2018; not all pulsars or rings would be in this regime.
domain assumption The pulsar beam has constant brightness while sweeping and is always on during each rotation.
The light curve model sums a single sweep per rotation without accounting for pulse phase substructure; real pulsar beams have complex intensity patterns.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Search for Dyson rings around pulsars: unexpected light curves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QQMA2CRK

@misc{pith2026241217086,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Search for Dyson rings around pulsars: unexpected light curves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QQMA2CRK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17086}
}

read the original abstract

Finding Dyson rings around distant pulsars may involve identifying light curve features that have not been previously identified. Previous studies covered the detection of a ring structure uniformly brightened by the central pulsar, mostly in infrared light. Here, more complex light curves are explored, which arise inherently from the pulsar beam spot's commonly predicted superluminal speed. These speeds may cause multiple images of the pulsar's spot on the Dyson ring to appear simultaneously to a distant observer, and so feature bright creation and annihilation events. Therefore, it is possible that even if Dyson ring structures had been observed previously, they might have remained unnoticed. Similar light curve features may appear on naturally occurring dust rings around pulsars that reflect detectable pulsar radiation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.17086 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Two ring-like Dyson structures are shown. In subfigure a, the inclination angle of pulsar 𝛼 is not close to 90◦ and in order to gather the energy from both directions, two separate ring structures are needed. In subfigure b, the inclination angle 𝛼 is close to 90◦ so that one larger ring can intersect both beams. in this paper, a single-ring structure will be assumed. Due to the powerful (∼ 1029 erg s−1 ) nature of … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Observed Relativistic Image Doubling (RID) is diagrammed for a straight spot trajectory, where the spot moves left to right faster than light and the observer is to the right of the perceived RID location. The top row represents objective reality, while the bottom row represents how RID appears from the perspective of the observer. The shading represents the time frame, and black and white denote the initial and fin… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** An image creation (IC) and image annihilation (IA) events around a circle where the central pulsar sweeps the circle clockwise. there is no speed limit. Special Relativity (SR) is not violated in either case. In objective reality, in cases where the rotational period of a pulsar is relatively short, and its surrounding Dyson ring is relatively large, the pulsar’s beam may sweep across the surface of the ring faster … view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (6 more)

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: A single Dyson ring structure as seen by a distant observer. Here, the rotation of the sweeping beam is clockwise. If only reflected radiation is observed, then only the farther plane is visible. Due to the circular structure, a circular beam spot would become signific…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The geometry of RID over a Dyson ring around a pulsar where the observer is infinitely far on the left so that the projected trajectory represents the angular motion of the spot’s trajectory from the observer’s point of view. Here 𝛽 and 𝜃 define the angular position of…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Angular position vs. time plots are shown for Dyson ring cases with different 𝑝, 𝑅, and 𝜃 values, where relative observation time and angular position of the beam (𝛽) are represented with the x-axis and y-axis respectively. Here, 𝜃 values are shown with different colo…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: An example scenario of multiple images appearing and disappearing where the beam spot’s speed is 10c. The red-shaded, blue-shaded, and yellowshaded areas correspond to 3, 5, and 7 images existing within that time interval. The unhatched area represents the actual obse…

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Example light curves of a Dyson ring around a pulsar with a 10 𝑐 beam spot speed. In the left vertical plot, the angular position over time is shown for 10 full rotations. The shaded red area represents the possible detection as the rest does not include enough binnin…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

[1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...
[2]

Bagchi M., 2013, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 22, 1330021

work page 2013
[3]

Baune S., 2009, @doi [Physics Education] 10.1088/0031-9120/44/3/010 , 44, 296

work page doi:10.1088/0031-9120/44/3/010 2009
[4]

M., Bykov V

Bolotovskiĭ B. M., Bykov V. P., 1990, @doi [Soviet Physics Uspekhi] 10.1070/PU1990v033n06ABEH002601 , 33, 477

work page doi:10.1070/pu1990v033n06abeh002601 1990
[5]

Cavaliere A., Morrison P., Sartori L., 1971, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.173.3996.525 , 173, 525

work page doi:10.1126/science.173.3996.525 1971
[6]

P., Lorimer D., Werthimer D., 2015, New Astronomy, 34, 245

Chennamangalam J., Siemion A. P., Lorimer D., Werthimer D., 2015, New Astronomy, 34, 245

work page 2015
[7]

Clerici M., et al., 2016, Science advances, 2, e1501691

work page 2016
[8]

DeBiase R. L., 2008, in 56th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law. pp A4--1

work page 2008

Show all 31 references

[9]

J., 1960, Science, 131, 1667

Dyson F. J., 1960, Science, 131, 1667

1960
[10]

Haliki E., 2019, International Journal of Astrobiology, 18, 455

2019
[11]

Haliki E., 2020, @doi [International Journal of Astrobiology] 10.1017/S1473550420000257 , 19, 474–481

2020 doi
[12]

R., Richards J., Shostak S., Tarter J

Harp G. R., Richards J., Shostak S., Tarter J. C., Vakoch D. A., Munson C., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/0004-637x/825/2/155 , 825, 155

2016 doi
[13]

Y.-Y., et al., 2021, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stab1832 , 506, 1723

Hsiao T. Y.-Y., et al., 2021, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stab1832 , 506, 1723

2021 doi
[14]

S., 1964, Soviet Astronomy, 8, 217

Kardashev N. S., 1964, Soviet Astronomy, 8, 217

1964
[15]

J., 2020, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab98fa , 898, 53

Kaushal N., Nemiroff R. J., 2020, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab98fa , 898, 53

2020 doi
[16]

pp 148--02

Kayali O., Nemiroff R., 2022, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. pp 148--02

2022
[17]

Kijak J., Gil J., 2003, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 397, 969

2003
[18]

J., 2015, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 32, e001

Nemiroff R. J., 2015, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 32, e001

2015
[19]

J., 2018, @doi [Annalen der Physik] https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.201700333 , 530, 1700333

Nemiroff R. J., 2018, @doi [Annalen der Physik] https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.201700333 , 530, 1700333

2018 doi
[20]

J., 2023, Faster Than Light: How Your Shadow Can Do It but You Can't

Nemiroff R. J., 2023, Faster Than Light: How Your Shadow Can Do It but You Can't. Betelgeuse Press

2023
[21]

J., Kaushal N., 2020, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6440 , 889, 122

Nemiroff R. J., Kaushal N., 2020, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6440 , 889, 122

2020 doi
[22]

Osmanov Z., 2016, @doi [International Journal of Astrobiology] 10.1017/S1473550415000257 , 15, 127–132

2016 doi
[23]

Osmanov Z., 2018, @doi [International Journal of Astrobiology] 10.1017/S1473550417000155 , 17, 112–115

2018 doi
[24]

Osmanov Z., Berezhiani V., 2019, Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 72, 254

2019
[25]

Mac Millan

Rayleigh L., 1896, The Theory of Sound. Mac Millan
[26]

Shaw E., Tudor V., Winkworth D., 2012, Physics Special Topics, 11

2012
[27]

Shostak S., 2020, @doi [International Journal of Astrobiology] 10.1017/S1473550420000233 , 19, 456–461

2020 doi
[28]

I., Gil J., Xu R.-X., 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 784, 59

Szary A., Zhang B., Melikidze G. I., Gil J., Xu R.-X., 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 784, 59

2014
[29]

Wright J., 2020, @doi [Serbian Astronomical Journal] 10.2298/saj2000001w , pp 1--18

2020 doi
[30]

Y., 1972, @doi [Astrophysics] 10.1007/BF01041744 , 8, 359

Éidman V. Y., 1972, @doi [Astrophysics] 10.1007/BF01041744 , 8, 359

1972 doi
[31]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

[2] [2]

Bagchi M., 2013, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 22, 1330021

work page 2013

[3] [3]

Baune S., 2009, @doi [Physics Education] 10.1088/0031-9120/44/3/010 , 44, 296

work page doi:10.1088/0031-9120/44/3/010 2009

[4] [4]

M., Bykov V

Bolotovskiĭ B. M., Bykov V. P., 1990, @doi [Soviet Physics Uspekhi] 10.1070/PU1990v033n06ABEH002601 , 33, 477

work page doi:10.1070/pu1990v033n06abeh002601 1990

[5] [5]

Cavaliere A., Morrison P., Sartori L., 1971, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.173.3996.525 , 173, 525

work page doi:10.1126/science.173.3996.525 1971

[6] [6]

P., Lorimer D., Werthimer D., 2015, New Astronomy, 34, 245

Chennamangalam J., Siemion A. P., Lorimer D., Werthimer D., 2015, New Astronomy, 34, 245

work page 2015

[7] [7]

Clerici M., et al., 2016, Science advances, 2, e1501691

work page 2016

[8] [8]

DeBiase R. L., 2008, in 56th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law. pp A4--1

work page 2008