Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 59 references

Fundamentals and applications of Van der Waals magnets in magnon spintronics

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This perspective argues that van der Waals magnets are the ideal platform for the next stage of magnon spintronics, with the eventual prospect of spin superfluid transport, topologically protected magnon edge states, and quantum…

desk verdict A candid, well-hedged perspective that separates demonstrated vdW magnon transport from the monolayer promise; the outlook rests on an extrapolation the authors openly flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14979 v2 pith:QQTFAP4E submitted 2024-11-22 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Samuel Mañas-Valero , Toeno van der Sar , Rembert A. Duine , Bart van Wees This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el
keywords magnonspintronicsvanderWaalsmagnetstwo-dimensionalmaterialsspinwavessuperfluiditytopologicalmagnonstransportquantummagnonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a perspective, not a new experiment. It argues that atomically thin van der Waals magnets—layered magnetic crystals that can be exfoliated to a few atomic layers and tuned with electric fields, strain, stacking, and twisting—are the most promising platform for the next generation of magnon spintronics, the technology that carries information in spin waves rather than electric charge. The authors marshal recent demonstrations—ferromagnetic resonance, spin Seebeck effects, nonlocal magnon transport, magnon transistors, and edge-state detection—to support the claim that these materials can make elusive phenomena practical, including spin superfluid transport and topologically protected magnon edge states. They also state plainly that the field's central challenge is to keep magnon signals measurable when the magnetic layer is only one atom thick, since signal strength generally scales with thickness. If the trajectory they describe holds, magnon devices could move from thick garnet films to gate-tunable, heterostructure-integrated two-dimensional magnets, and possibly operate at room temperature.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the magnon itself—the quantum of spin-wave excitation on top of a magnetically ordered state, carrying one unit of spin angular momentum—together with the van der Waals crystal that hosts it. The paper's argument rests on the ability to control the magnetic order underneath the magnons: in these materials, exchange and anisotropy can be tuned by electric gating, strain, interlayer stacking and twisting, and the ordering temperature survives down to ultrathin flakes for compounds such as Fe5GeTe2. The second mechanism is the spin Hall effect in heavy-metal (platinum) contacts, which injects and detects magnon spin currents and enables the nonlocal transport geometry that underlies many of the reviewed experiments. A third piece is the recently demonstrated ability to detect magnons by spin-filter tunnelling and by coupling to excitons, plasmons, and microwave resonators, which provides the read-out routes that the small magnetic volume of a monolayer would otherwise deny.

What would settle it

A direct falsifier would be a careful thickness-scaling study of nonlocal magnon transport in a single material (for example CrPS4 or CrSBr) showing that the magnon signal, normalized by the number of magnetic layers, does not remain detectable as the flake approaches one monolayer—or conversely, that the spin diffusion length collapses below the injector–detector spacing. A second concrete observation that would weaken the central claim is if electrical spin injection into an easy-plane van der Waals antiferromagnet fails to produce the predicted signatures of spin superfluidity (upper and lower critical currents and a short-circuit drop in thermal magnon signal) in the geometry the paper describes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that van der Waals magnets combine, in one material family, the properties that magnon spintronics has been seeking separately: low-damping magnetic insulators with coherent spin-wave excitations; electrical control of magnetism via gating and doping; stacking and twisting as a design knob; and compatibility with heavy-metal contacts that convert charge currents into magnon currents through the spin Hall effect. On this basis the authors argue that these magnets are the natural stage for phenomena that have so far resisted conclusive demonstration—spin superfluid transport, expected in easy-plane antiferromagnets such as CrCl3 and CrPS4 when spin current is injected perpendicular to the easy plane; topologically protected chiral magnon edge states, recently detected in atomically thin CrI3; and quantum magnonics, in which magnons couple coherently to microwave photons or optical cavities. The paper also makes clear that this is a roadmap: coherent spin-wave transport in true monolayers has not yet been shown, and the strongest recent results are on flakes tens of nanometres thick. The discovery claim is therefore conditional: if the thickness-scaling problem is solved, van der Waals magnets offer a route toward magnon functionality that conventional three-dimensional magnets cannot.

Load-bearing premise

The entire roadmap depends on the assumption that magnon signals remain measurable when the van der Waals magnet is only one atomic layer thick; the paper notes that current experiments mostly use relatively thick flakes because signal strength scales with thickness, and that injecting, controlling, and detecting magnons in atomically thin samples remains a challenge.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the roadmap is correct, magnon spin transistors and nonlocal magnon devices can be built from gate-tunable two-dimensional magnets, where the transistor action demonstrated in CrPS4 becomes a general design pattern.
  • Spin superfluid transport—dissipationless spin current carried by a winding of the easy-plane angle—could first be demonstrated in a van der Waals antiferromagnet with easy-plane anisotropy, possibly at room temperature.
  • Topologically protected magnon edge states, once brought to zero frequency by driving, become detectable and usable for backscatter-free spin transport in atomically thin flakes.
  • Magnon–photon and magnon–exciton coupling in these materials opens a concrete path toward quantum magnonic devices, including coherent coupling to superconducting resonators.
  • The same strong magnon–magnon interactions that produce hydrodynamic behaviour in monolayers could be used to realize viscosity-sensitive magnon transport and eventually neuromorphic magnonic circuits.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the thickness-scaling problem is solved, the true monolayer limit may reveal qualitatively different transport from thicker flakes, because enhanced fluctuations and reduced screening in two dimensions can renormalize magnon lifetimes; the paper's linear extrapolation from tens-of-nanometre flakes to monolayers is optimistic and should be tested directly.
  • The spin-superfluid proposal implicitly requires an injector geometry with polarization perpendicular to the easy plane, which the paper mentions only briefly; a near-term experimental milestone would be measuring the injected component of spin polarization in a CrCl3 or CrPS4 device.
  • The emphasis on magnetic-order control suggests that twisted van der Waals bilayers could serve as tunable platforms for magnon band topology, where the twist angle plays the role that magnetic field plays in conventional magnonic crystals—an idea the paper gestures at but does not develop.
  • If room-temperature van der Waals magnets with low damping are identified, the same fabrication toolkit developed for graphene devices could transfer magnon spintronics from cryogenic proof-of-principle to ambient-condition technology, which would be a larger impact than the individual results.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This perspective article reviews the current state-of-the-art and future directions of magnon spintronics based on atomically thin van der Waals magnets. It discusses two main excitation/detection schemes: coherent spin waves via antennas or local probes, and incoherent magnon transport via heavy-metal spin injection and the spin Seebeck effect. The authors summarize recent experimental milestones—FMR in CrCl3, propagating spin waves in Fe5GeTe2, nonlocal magnon transport in CrPS4, and the first magnon transistors—and outline prospects for spin superfluidity, topological magnon edge states, quantum magnonics, and moiré engineering. The central claim is that van der Waals magnets are a uniquely tunable and versatile platform for advanced magnon spintronics, while acknowledging that many demonstrations still rely on relatively thick flakes and that injection, control, and detection in truly atomically thin samples remains an open challenge.

Significance. Provided the perspective is read as a forward-looking review rather than a quantitative proposal, this is a useful and timely contribution. Its strengths are the honest separation of demonstrated results from speculative proposals, explicit acknowledgment of the thickness-scaling problem that underlies its own outlook, and coverage of the relevant experimental literature. The paper contains no derivations or fitting, so there is no circularity. The 'ideal platform' statements are hedged with 'appear to be' and 'eventually perhaps,' and the authors explicitly flag the monolayer challenge in the Outlook paragraph. The main concern one might raise is that the outlook depends on magnon signals surviving in atomically thin samples, but the paper itself states that 'the strength of the various signals typically scales with sample thickness' and that it 'remains a challenge to inject, control, and detect magnons in atomically thin samples.' This transparency means the manuscript does not mislead, and the extrapolation is presented as an open challenge rather than a demonstrated result. The perspective is therefore internally consistent and appropriately hedged.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Generation and Detection of Coherent Spin Waves] The section heading 'GENERATION AND DECTION' contains a typo; it should read 'GENERATION AND DETECTION.'
  2. [Keywords] The keywords list mixes capitalization styles ('van der Waals magnets' vs. 'Two-dimensional materials'); please capitalize consistently as 'Van der Waals magnets.'
  3. [References] Several references are to arXiv preprints (Refs. 29, 34, 51); if published versions exist at the time of production, please update them.
  4. [Declaration of Interests] The declaration of interests states 'R. A. is an advisory board member for Newton' but does not identify which author this refers to; please use the full name or initials matching the author list.
  5. [Outlook] The Outlook already acknowledges that signal strength scales with sample thickness and that atomically thin injection/detection remains a challenge; consider adding one sentence in the abstract or introduction making clear that the 'ideal platform' statements refer to long-term potential conditional on overcoming this challenge.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identified: the paper is a literature-based perspective with no fitted parameters, predictive equations, or derivation chain that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

This manuscript is a perspective article, not a derivation or simulation paper. It surveys experimental and theoretical results from the literature and extrapolates them into an outlook for van der Waals magnets in magnon spintronics. There is no equation that is fitted to data and then used to predict the same data, no parameter defined in terms of the quantity it is claimed to derive, and no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work to force a conclusion. The authors cite their own research extensively—for example, nonlocal magnon transport in CrPS4 (de Wal et al.), magnon transistors, and theoretical work on spin superfluidity and topological magnons—but these citations are used as evidence of field progress and as background for the outlook, not as inputs to a circular argument. The paper is transparent about limitations, explicitly stating that 'the strength of the various signals typically scales with sample thickness' and that 'it remains a challenge to inject, control, and detect magnons in atomically thin samples.' This is an acknowledged extrapolation rather than a disguised assumption. The central projections, such as 'Van der Waals magnets appear to be the ideal platform to demonstrate spin transport via topologically protected magnon edge states' and the hope for eventual room-temperature superfluid spin transport, are forward-looking assessments supported by cited results in thicker samples and by theoretical proposals. Even if one doubts the strength of the extrapolation from thick flakes to monolayers, that is a matter of scientific judgment about the outlook, not a circularity in the paper's reasoning. No claim is justified solely by a self-citation whose content is equivalent to the claim itself. Therefore, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or new entities. The central claims rest on the validity of cited experiments, the transferability of bulk magnon spintronics concepts, and an extrapolation to the atomically thin limit, all of which are domain assumptions.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The cited experimental results are correct as reported.
    The perspective's central claim rests on the validity of the primary literature it surveys, including magnon transport in CrPS4 and FMR in CrCl3. No independent verification is provided.
  • domain assumption Concepts from bulk magnon spintronics transfer to van der Waals magnets.
    The paper builds on established results in YIG and hematite (spin Seebeck effect, spin Hall injection, non-local detection) and assumes they apply to 2D magnets, as discussed in the Introduction and Generation and Detection sections.
  • domain assumption Magnon signals remain measurable at the atomically thin limit.
    The outlook states that current experiments use relatively thick samples because signal strength scales with thickness, and it remains a challenge to work with atomically thin samples. The platform potential assumes this challenge is surmountable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fundamentals and applications of Van der Waals magnets in magnon spintronics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QQTFAP4E

@misc{pith2026241114979,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fundamentals and applications of Van der Waals magnets in magnon spintronics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QQTFAP4E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14979}
}
read the original abstract

Spintronics is concerned with replacing charge current with current of spin, the electron's intrinsic angular momentum. In magnetic insulators, spin currents are carried by magnons, the quanta of spin-wave excitations on top of the magnetically ordered state. Magnon spin currents are especially promising for information technology due to their low intrinsic damping, non-reciprocal transport, micrometer wavelengths at microwave frequencies, and strong interactions that enable signal transduction. In this perspective, we give our view on the progress and challenges towards realizing magnon spintronics based on atomically thin Van der Waals magnets, a recently discovered class of magnetic materials of which the tunability and versatility has attracted a great deal of ongoing research.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14979 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Magnonics based on Van der Waals magnets. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Non-local magnon detection in Van der Waals magnets. A) Measurement configuration for local and non-local measurements of thermally and electrically injected magnon transport. The electrical circuit elements are represented as I, for the applied current, and Vl and Vnl, for the measured voltages at the injector and detector, respectively. The injector and detector are platinum (Pt) strips separated by a distance d. … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Holanda, J., Maior, D.S., Azevedo, A., and Rezende, S.M. (2018). Detecting the phonon spin in magnon-phonon conversion experiments. Nat Phys 14, 500–506. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018- 0079-y

    doi:10.1038/s41567-018- 2018

  2. [2]

    Gückelhorn, J., de-la-Peña, S., Scheufele, M., Grammer, M., Opel, M., Geprägs, S., Cuevas, J.C., Gross, R., Huebl, H., Kamra, A., et al. (2023). Observation of the Nonreciprocal Magnon Hanle Effect. Phys Rev Lett 130, 216703. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.216703

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.216703 2023

  3. [3]

    Yu, H., Xiao, J., and Schultheiss, H. (2021). Magnetic texture based magnonics. Phys Rep 905, 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.12.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.12.004 2021

  4. [4]

    V., Vasyuchka, V.I., Serga, A.A., and Hillebrands, B

    Chumak, A. V., Vasyuchka, V.I., Serga, A.A., and Hillebrands, B. (2015). Magnon spintronics. Nat Phys 11, 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3347

    doi:10.1038/nphys3347 2015

  5. [5]

    Yuan, H.Y., Cao, Y., Kamra, A., Duine, R.A., and Yan, P. (2022). Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information science. Phys Rep 965, 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2022.03.002

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.03.002 2022

  6. [6]

    V., Serga, A.A., and Hillebrands, B

    Chumak, A. V., Serga, A.A., and Hillebrands, B. (2014). Magnon transistor for all-magnon data processing. Nat Commun 5, 4700. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5700

    doi:10.1038/ncomms5700 2014

  7. [7]

    Uchida, K., Xiao, J., Adachi, H., Ohe, J., Takahashi, S., Ieda, J., Ota, T., Kajiwara, Y., Umezawa, H., Kawai, H., et al. (2010). Spin Seebeck insulator. Nat Mater 9, 894–897. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2856

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat2856 2010

  8. [8]

    Ben, and van Wees, B.J

    Cornelissen, L.J., Liu, J., Duine, R.A., Youssef, J. Ben, and van Wees, B.J. (2015). Long-distance transport of magnon spin information in a magnetic insulator at room temperature. Nat Phys 11, 1022–

    work page 2015

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Lebrun, R., Ross, A., Bender, S.A., Qaiumzadeh, A., Baldrati, L., Cramer, J., Brataas, A., Duine, R.A., and Kläui, M. (2018). Tunable long-distance spin transport in a crystalline antiferromagnetic iron oxide. Nature 561, 222–225. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0490-7

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    Wang, Q.H., Bedoya-Pinto, A., Blei, M., Dismukes, A.H., Hamo, A., Jenkins, S., Koperski, M., Liu, Y., Sun, Q.-C., Telford, E.J., et al. (2022). The Magnetic Genome of Two-Dimensional van der Waals Materials. ACS Nano 16, 6960–7079. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c09150

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Jiang, S., Li, L., Wang, Z., Mak, K.F., and Shan, J. (2018). Controlling magnetism in 2D CrI3 by electrostatic doping. Nat Nanotechnol 13, 549–553. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0135-x

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    Boix-Constant, C., Jenkins, S., Rama-Eiroa, R., Santos, E.J.G., Mañas-Valero, S., and Coronado, E. (2024). Multistep magnetization switching in orthogonally twisted ferromagnetic monolayers. Nat Mater 23, 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-023-01735-6

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    Wei, D.S., van der Sar, T., Lee, S.H., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Halperin, B.I., and Yacoby, A. (2018). Electrical generation and detection of spin waves in a quantum Hall ferromagnet. Science (1979) 362, 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4061

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    Lu, X., Stepanov, P., Yang, W., Xie, M., Aamir, M.A., Das, I., Urgell, C., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Zhang, G., et al. (2019). Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene. Nature 574, 653–657. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1695-0

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    Wu, F., Gibertini, M., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Gutiérrez‐Lezama, I., Ubrig, N., and Morpurgo, A.F. (2023). Gate‐Controlled Magnetotransport and Electrostatic Modulation of Magnetism in 2D Magnetic Semiconductor CrPS 4. Advanced Materials 35. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202211653

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    Esteras, D.L., Rybakov, A., Ruiz, A.M., and Baldoví, J.J. (2022). Magnon Straintronics in the 2D van der Waals Ferromagnet CrSBr from First-Principles. Nano Lett 22, 8771–8778. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02863

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    Wang, C., Gao, Y., Lv, H., Xu, X., and Xiao, D. (2020). Stacking Domain Wall Magnons in Twisted van der Waals Magnets. Phys Rev Lett 125, 247201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.247201

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    Boix‐Constant, C., Rybakov, A., Miranda‐Pérez, C., Martínez‐Carracedo, G., Ferrer, J., Mañas‐Valero, S., and Coronado, E. (2025). Programmable Magnetic Hysteresis in Orthogonally‐Twisted 2D CrSBr Magnets via Stacking Engineering. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adm...

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    Li, Y.-H., and Cheng, R. (2020). Moiré magnons in twisted bilayer magnets with collinear order. Phys Rev B 102, 094404. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.094404

    2020 doi

  12. [20]

    Sonin, E.B. (2010). Spin currents and spin superfluidity. Adv Phys 59, 181–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00018731003739943

    2010 doi

  13. [21]

    Owerre, S.A. (2016). A first theoretical realization of honeycomb topological magnon insulator. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 28, 386001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/38/386001

    2016 doi

  14. [22]

    Cornelissen, L.J., Liu, J., van Wees, B.J., and Duine, R.A. (2018). Spin-Current-Controlled Modulation of the Magnon Spin Conductance in a Three-Terminal Magnon Transistor. Phys Rev Lett 120, 097702. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.097702

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    Tang, C., Alahmed, L., Mahdi, M., Xiong, Y., Inman, J., McLaughlin, N.J., Zollitsch, C., Kim, T.H., Du, C.R., Kurebayashi, H., et al. (2023). Spin dynamics in van der Waals magnetic systems. Phys Rep 1032, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2023.09.002

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    MacNeill, D., Hou, J.T., Klein, D.R., Zhang, P., Jarillo-Herrero, P., and Liu, L. (2019). Gigahertz Frequency Antiferromagnetic Resonance and Strong Magnon-Magnon Coupling in the Layered Crystal CrCl3. Phys Rev Lett 123, 047204. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.047204

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    V., Schütz, G., et al

    Schulz, F., Litzius, K., Powalla, L., Birch, M.T., Gallardo, R.A., Satheesh, S., Weigand, M., Scholz, T., Lotsch, B. V., Schütz, G., et al. (2023). Direct Observation of Propagating Spin Waves in the 2D van der Waals Ferromagnet Fe5GeTe2. Nano Lett 23, 10126–10131. https://doi...

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    Thiel, L., Wang, Z., Tschudin, M.A., Rohner, D., Gutiérrez-Lezama, I., Ubrig, N., Gibertini, M., Giannini, E., Morpurgo, A.F., and Maletinsky, P. (2019). Probing magnetism in 2D materials at the nanoscale with single-spin microscopy. Science 364, 973–976. https://doi.org/10.11...

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    Ghiasi, T.S., Borst, M., Kurdi, S., Simon, B.G., Bertelli, I., Boix-Constant, C., Mañas-Valero, S., van der Zant, H.S.J., and van der Sar, T. (2023). Nitrogen-vacancy magnetometry of CrSBr by diamond membrane transfer. NPJ 2D Mater Appl 7, 62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-02...

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    Huang, M., Green, J.C., Zhou, J., Williams, V., Li, S., Lu, H., Djugba, D., Wang, H., Flebus, B., Ni, N., et al. (2023). Layer-Dependent Magnetism and Spin Fluctuations in Atomically Thin van der Waals Magnet CrPS4. Nano Lett 23, 8099–8105. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02129

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    Xue, R., Maksimovic, N., Dolgirev, P.E., Xia, L.-Q., Kitagawa, R., Müller, A., Machado, F., Klein, D.R., MacNeill, D., Watanabe, K., et al. (2024). Signatures of magnon hydrodynamics in an atomically-thin ferromagnet. Arxiv: 2403.01057

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Lyons, T.P., Puebla, J., Yamamoto, K., Deacon, R.S., Hwang, Y., Ishibashi, K., Maekawa, S., and Otani, Y. (2023). Acoustically Driven Magnon-Phonon Coupling in a Layered Antiferromagnet. Phys Rev Lett 131, 196701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.196701

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    Bae, Y.J., Wang, J., Scheie, A., Xu, J., Chica, D.G., Diederich, G.M., Cenker, J., Ziebel, M.E., Bai, Y., Ren, H., et al. (2022). Exciton-coupled coherent magnons in a 2D semiconductor. Nature 609, 282–

    2022

  24. [32]

    Afanasiev, D., Hortensius, J.R., Matthiesen, M., Mañas-Valero, S., Šiškins, M., Lee, M., Lesne, E., van der Zant, H.S.J., Steeneken, P.G., Ivanov, B.A., et al. (2021). Controlling the anisotropy of a van der Waals antiferromagnet with light. Sci Adv 7, eabf3096. https://doi.or...

    2021 doi

  25. [33]

    Ghosh, S., Menichetti, G., Katsnelson, M.I., and Polini, M. (2023). Plasmon-magnon interactions in two- dimensional honeycomb magnets. Phys Rev B 107, 195302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.195302

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    Cham, T.M.J., Chica, D.G., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Roy, X., Luo, Y.K., and Ralph, D.C. (2024). Spin-filter tunneling detection of antiferromagnetic resonance with electrically-tunable damping. Arxiv 2407.09462

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    V, Kristanovski, O., Lichtenstein, A.I., et al

    Ghazaryan, D., Greenaway, M.T., Wang, Z., Guarochico-Moreira, V.H., Vera-Marun, I.J., Yin, J., Liao, Y., Morozov, S. V, Kristanovski, O., Lichtenstein, A.I., et al. (2018). Magnon-assisted tunnelling in van der Waals heterostructures based on CrBr3. Nat Electron 1, 344–349. ht...

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    Chen, G., Qi, S., Liu, J., Chen, D., Wang, J., Yan, S., Zhang, Y., Cao, S., Lu, M., Tian, S., et al. (2021). Electrically switchable van der Waals magnon valves. Nat Commun 12, 6279. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26523-1

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    Feringa, F., Vink, J.M., and van Wees, B.J. (2022). Spin-flop transition in the quasi-two-dimensional antiferromagnet MnPS3 detected via thermally generated magnon transport. Phys Rev B 106, 224409. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.224409

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    de Wal, D.K., Iwens, A., Liu, T., Tang, P., Bauer, G.E.W., and van Wees, B.J. (2023). Long-distance magnon transport in the van der Waals antiferromagnet CrPS4. Phys Rev B 107, L180403. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L180403

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    Qi, S., Chen, D., Chen, K., Liu, J., Chen, G., Luo, B., Cui, H., Jia, L., Li, J., Huang, M., et al. (2023). Giant electrically tunable magnon transport anisotropy in a van der Waals antiferromagnetic insulator. Nat Commun 14, 2526. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38172-7

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    de Wal, D.K., Zohaib, M., and van Wees, B.J. (2024). Magnon spin transport in the van der Waals antiferromagnet <math> <msub> <mi>CrPS</mi> <mn>4</mn> </msub> </math> for noncollinear and collinear magnetization. Phys Rev B 110, 174440. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.174440

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    de Wal, D.K., Mena, R.L., Zohaib, M., and van Wees, B.J. (2024). Gate control of magnon spin transport in unconventional magnon transistors based on the van der Waals antiferromagnet <math> <msub> <mrow> <mi>CrPS</mi> </mrow> <mn>4</mn> </msub> </math>. Phys Rev B 110, 224434....

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    Wei, X.Y., Santos, O.A., Lusero, C.H.S., Bauer, G.E.W., Ben Youssef, J., and van Wees, B.J. (2022). Giant magnon spin conductivity in ultrathin yttrium iron garnet films. Nat Mater 21, 1352–1356. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01369-0

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    Bender, S.A., Duine, R.A., and Tserkovnyak, Y. (2012). Electronic Pumping of Quasiequilibrium Bose- Einstein-Condensed Magnons. Phys Rev Lett 108, 246601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.246601

    2012 doi

  36. [44]

    Takei, S., and Tserkovnyak, Y. (2014). Superfluid Spin Transport Through Easy-Plane Ferromagnetic Insulators. Phys Rev Lett 112, 227201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.227201

    2014 doi

  37. [45]

    Das, K.S., Schoemaker, W.Y., van Wees, B.J., and Vera-Marun, I.J. (2017). Spin injection and detection via the anomalous spin Hall effect of a ferromagnetic metal. Phys Rev B 96, 220408. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.220408

    2017 doi

  38. [46]

    Yuan, W., Zhu, Q., Su, T., Yao, Y., Xing, W., Chen, Y., Ma, Y., Lin, X., Shi, J., Shindou, R., et al. (2018). Experimental signatures of spin superfluid ground state in canted antiferromagnet Cr2O3 via nonlocal spin transport. Sci Adv 4. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat1098

    2018 doi

  39. [47]

    Flebus, B., Bender, S.A., Tserkovnyak, Y., and Duine, R.A. (2016). Two-Fluid Theory for Spin Superfluidity in Magnetic Insulators. Phys Rev Lett 116, 117201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.117201

    2016 doi

  40. [48]

    Chen, L., Chung, J.-H., Gao, B., Chen, T., Stone, M.B., Kolesnikov, A.I., Huang, Q., and Dai, P. (2018). Topological Spin Excitations in Honeycomb Ferromagnet CrI3. Phys Rev X 8, 041028. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.041028

    2018 doi

  41. [49]

    Gunnink, P.M., Harms, J.S., Duine, R.A., and Mook, A. (2023). Zero-Frequency Chiral Magnonic Edge States Protected by Nonequilibrium Topology. Phys Rev Lett 131, 126601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.126601

    2023 doi

  42. [50]

    Rückriegel, A., Brataas, A., and Duine, R.A. (2018). Bulk and edge spin transport in topological magnon insulators. Phys Rev B 97, 081106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.081106

    2018 doi

  43. [51]

    Zhang, J., Zhang, M.-H., Li, P., Liu, Z., Tao, Y., Wang, H., Yao, D.-X., Guo, D., and Zhong, D. (2024). Direct observation of topological magnon edge states. Arxiv:2410.18960

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Ulloa, C., Tomadin, A., Shan, J., Polini, M., van Wees, B.J., and Duine, R.A. (2019). Nonlocal Spin Transport as a Probe of Viscous Magnon Fluids. Phys Rev Lett 123, 117203. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.117203

    2019 doi

  45. [53]

    Menezes, R.M., Mulkers, J., de Souza Silva, C.C., Van Waeyenberge, B., and Milošević, M. V. (2024). Toward magnonic logic and neuromorphic computing: controlling spin waves by spin-polarized current. Phys Rev Appl 22, 054056. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.054056

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    Pal, P.K., Mondal, A.K., and Barman, A. (2024). Using magnons as a quantum technology platform: a perspective. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter 36. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ad6828

    2024 doi

  47. [55]

    Pirro, P., Vasyuchka, V.I., Serga, A.A., and Hillebrands, B. (2021). Advances in coherent magnonics. Preprint at Nature Research, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00332-w https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00332-w

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    V., and Serga, A.A

    Bozhko, D.A., Vasyuchka, V.I., Chumak, A. V., and Serga, A.A. (2020). Magnon-phonon interactions in magnon spintronics (Review article). Low Temperature Physics 46, 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1063/10.0000872

    2020 doi

  49. [57]

    Zollitsch, C.W., Khan, S., Nam, V.T.T., Verzhbitskiy, I.A., Sagkovits, D., O’Sullivan, J., Kennedy, O.W., Strungaru, M., Santos, E.J.G., Morton, J.J.L., et al. (2023). Probing spin dynamics of ultra-thin van der Waals magnets via photon-magnon coupling. Nat Commun 14, 2619. ht...

    2023 doi

  50. [286]

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05024-1

    doi

  51. [1026]

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3465

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.