Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 60 references

Generating two-mechanical mode entangled cat states, and steady-state entanglement, in cavity optomechanics in the presence of dissipation

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A phase-controlled phonon hopping can turn two mechanical modes into an entangled Schrödinger cat state via engineered dissipation.

desk verdict A phase-controlled two-mechanical-mode cat proposal with honest numerics; the key analytical step Eq. (8) is asserted without derivation, so it needs a careful revision before acceptance. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05503 v1 pith:QRJBXFCF submitted 2026-08-06 quant-ph physics.optics

Sanket Das , Jason Twamley This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords cavityoptomechanicsSchrödingercatstatetwo-modeentanglementreservoirengineeringtwo-phonondissipationbrightanddarkmodesphononhoppingphasesteady-state
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that a single lossy cavity coupled to two identical mechanical oscillators, together with a phase-dependent phonon-hopping interaction, can act as an engineered reservoir that generates a two-mode Schrödinger cat state of the mechanical motion. The central claim is that the phase of the phonon hopping selects which collective mechanical mode becomes non-Gaussian: at phase 0 or π the cat forms in the bright or dark mode alone, while at phase π/2 the two collective modes become entangled in a cat of the form $|\alpha,\alpha\rangle \pm |{-}\alpha,{-}\alpha\rangle$, with maximum bipartite entanglement near $\Gamma_2 t = 0.5$ under weak phonon hopping. If correct, this gives a dissipation-based route to prepare non-Gaussian multipartite mechanical states with tunable entanglement, without requiring strong Kerr nonlinearity or a linearized interaction. The paper also finds numerically that the same hopping interaction tunes steady-state entanglement between the bare mechanical modes even with thermal noise.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is engineered dissipation: a bad cavity, adiabatically eliminated, converts its own fast decay into nonlinear (quadratic) damping and a parametric drive for the collective mechanical mode $b_1+b_2$. The active objects are the phase-dependent bright and dark collective modes $D_\pm = (b_1 \pm e^{\pm i\theta} b_2)/\sqrt{2}$, defined so that the phonon-hopping phase $\theta$ decides which combination receives the two-phonon loss. The explicit analytical object is the two-mode cat density matrix of Eq. (9), whose coherence term $c(t)$ carries the entanglement; the argument works by reducing the full master equation to the simplified phase-sensitive form of Eq. (8) in the regime $\chi/\Gamma_2 \ll 1$, $\Gamma_i/\Gamma_2 \ll 1$.

What would settle it

Measure, in a numerical or experimental realization with $\theta=\pi/2$ and $\chi/\Gamma_2=0.01$, the Wigner function of the bright mode conditioned on the dark mode being in vacuum at $\Gamma_2 t = 0.6$: the analytical state predicts a negative Wigner function and fidelity near 0.97; a strictly positive Wigner function, or an entanglement peak at a substantially different time, would refute the claim. The paper's own steady-state discrepancy in Table I already marks the regime where the approximation begins to fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper derives, by adiabatically eliminating a bad cavity from a cavity optomechanical system with two degenerate mechanical modes coupled by $\chi e^{i\theta}$ hopping, an effective master equation for the mechanics containing a collective quadratic (two-phonon) dissipation channel and a parametric drive acting on the sum mode $b_1+b_2$. In the bright/dark basis defined by $D_\pm = (b_1 \pm e^{\pm i\theta} b_2)/\sqrt{2}$, the engineered dissipation is phase-sensitive: for $\theta=0$ the bright mode stabilizes to a single-mode cat while the dark mode stays Gaussian; for $\theta=\pi$ the roles swap; and for general $\theta$ both modes participate. For $\theta=\pi/2$, with phonon hopping weak compared with the two-phonon decay rate ($\chi/\Gamma_2 \ll 1$) and cavity-induced linear damping neglected, the paper obtains the explicit transient two-mode cat density matrix of Eq. (9), $\rho \propto |\alpha,\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha,\alpha| + |{-}\alpha,{-}\alpha\rangle\langle{-}\alpha,{-}\alpha| + c(t)(|\alpha,\alpha\rangle\langle{-}\alpha,{-}\alpha| + \mathrm{h.c.})$, and shows the coherence, and hence logarithmic negativity, peaks near $\Gamma_2 t = 0.5$. The paper also shows numerically that steady-state entanglement of the bare mechanical modes survives thermal noise up to $n_b=0.5$ and is tunable by the hopping amplitude $\chi$ and phase $\theta$.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's explicit cat state rests on assuming that the exchange of vibrational quanta between the two oscillators is much slower than the cavity-induced two-at-a-time loss, and that other cavity-induced damping can be neglected; when those rates are comparable, the simplified equation that produces the cat is no longer accurate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Preparing a two-mode mechanical cat becomes a purely dissipative process: no strong Kerr term or linearized interaction is needed, only a lossy cavity and a phase-controlled hopping interaction.
  • The phase $\theta$ acts as a switch: $\theta=0$ puts the cat in the bright mode, $\theta=\pi$ puts it in the dark mode, and intermediate phases, especially $\theta=\pi/2$, produce an entangled two-mode cat.
  • The transient bipartite entanglement between collective modes is predicted to peak at $\Gamma_2 t = 0.5$, with logarithmic negativity around 0.81 to 0.89 for the stated parameters, then decay as the coherence decoheres.
  • Steady-state entanglement between the bare mechanical modes persists with thermal occupancy $n_b=0.5$ and can be enhanced by increasing $\chi$ in the weak-hopping regime.
  • The analytical density matrix is accurate only transiently and for weak hopping; the paper's own comparison shows it under-reads steady-state entanglement because neglected self-Kerr and dispersive terms matter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same phase-switching mechanism could be used to route non-Gaussian states between different mechanical modes on demand, a protocol the paper does not develop.
  • Because the entanglement maximum is transient, a practical generation scheme would need timing or a heralding measurement to catch the state; the paper's conditional-measurement fidelity analysis suggests this is within reach, but no complete state-transfer or heralding protocol is given.
  • The bad-cavity adiabatic elimination used here is the same machinery behind dissipative squeezing and cat-qubit stabilization; extending it to more than two mechanical modes could produce multimode entangled cat states with the hopping phases as a control manifold.
  • A natural experimental test would implement the engineered two-phonon dissipation in an optomechanical crystal or superconducting circuit platform, where the hopping phase can be tuned by a synthetic gauge field; the paper specifies frequency scales but not a concrete device layout.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a dissipation-engineering scheme in cavity optomechanics to prepare phase-dependent two-mode mechanical Schrödinger cat states. The model consists of a single lossy cavity mode coupled to two degenerate mechanical modes with a phase-dependent phonon-hopping interaction. After adiabatically eliminating the cavity, the authors obtain the reduced master equation Eq. (4), which contains collective linear and two-phonon dissipation of the symmetric combination b1+b2. Introducing bright and dark modes, they argue that for θ=0 or π the two-phonon dissipation acts on only one collective mode, while for θ=π/2 they approximate the dynamics by Eq. (8) and propose the two-mode cat state Eq. (9), with bipartite entanglement peaking at Γ2 t = 0.5. The paper also reports numerical QuTiP studies of steady-state entanglement for the collective and bare mechanical modes as functions of the hopping strength χ and phase θ. The numerical parameter set is stated explicitly.

Significance. If the analytical derivation were correct, the paper would offer a phase-controlled dissipative route to two-mode mechanical cat states, with a specific prediction for the entanglement maximum and a tunable steady-state entanglement resource. The numerical QuTiP simulations of the full reduced master equation Eq. (4) and the explicit experimentally motivated parameters are strengths, and the authors are candid about the fidelity limits in Appendix B and the steady-state discrepancy in Table I. However, the central analytical result Eq. (9) is not derived from Eq. (4): the jump operator in Eq. (8) is not the eigenmode form of the two-phonon dissipator in Eq. (4). This undermines the claimed analytical prediction and currently limits the paper's contribution to a numerical study whose analytical interpretation needs substantial revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [III, Eq. (8)] The two-phonon dissipator in Eq. (8) does not follow from Eq. (4) by the transformation to bright and dark modes. With the orthonormal definitions D_+=(b_1+e^{iθ}b_2)/√2 and D_-=(b_1-e^{iθ}b_2)/√2, at θ=π/2 one obtains (b_1+b_2)^2 = -iD_+^2 + iD_-^2 + 2D_+D_-, whereas Eq. (8) uses -i(D_+ + D_-)^2 = -iD_+^2 - iD_-^2 - 2iD_+D_-. The dark-state condition -i(D_+ + D_-)^2|α,α> = β0^2|α,α> is therefore not the condition enforced by the actual dissipation; the correct condition (b_1+b_2)^2|α,α> = β0^2|α,α> gives α^2 = β0^2/2 instead of α^2 = iβ0^2/4. Consequently, Eq. (9) and the predicted entanglement maximum at Γ2 t = 0.5 lack a derivation from the model. The numerical solution of Eq. (4) may still exhibit the reported behavior, but the analytical claims need to be rederived from the correct dissipator or replaced by a purely numerical characterization.
  2. [Appendix B and Table I] The support for Eq. (9) is numerical fidelity against solutions of Eq. (4), not a derivation, and the reported agreement is limited. Table I shows a steady-state discrepancy between the analytical and numerical logarithmic negativities (0.10 versus 0.18), and Fig. 6 shows that the fidelity declines as χ/Γ2 increases. The paper should state the precise parameter range in which Eq. (9) is quantitatively accurate and explain why the transient regime is exempt from the errors that are visible at steady state.
  3. [III, reduction from Eq. (4) to Eq. (8)] The reduction from Eq. (4) to Eq. (8) also drops the dispersive, self-Kerr, and cavity-induced linear damping terms in Hs without an estimate of their effect. Because Table I shows that neglected terms affect steady-state entanglement, the paper should provide an explicit error bound or a separate numerical test that varies these couplings; otherwise the claimed regime of validity χ/Γ2 << 1 is not established.
minor comments (6)
  1. [II, Eq. (6)] The definition of D± is ambiguous: the notation b_{1(2)} and e^{±iθ}b_{2(1)} should be written explicitly as D_+ and D_-; as printed, the expression is not a valid orthonormal transformation for all θ.
  2. [III, near Eq. (11)] The text says the conditional Wigner function is shown in Fig. 2(a)-(c), but the temporal evolution of the conditional bright-mode state appears in Fig. 3; the figure reference should be corrected.
  3. [I] There is a typo in the Introduction: 'sufficient' should be 'sufficient'.
  4. [III, Eq. (8)] The parameter β0 is used in Eq. (8) but defined only immediately afterwards; the definition should appear together with the equation.
  5. [III, Eq. (9)] The time t0 at which coherence is maximal is introduced without a relation to the model parameters; the text should state how t0 depends on Γ2, Γ, and α.
  6. [Abstract] The phrase 'multi mode' should be 'multimode' for consistency with standard usage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found; the main cat-state and entanglement results are derived from the stated optomechanical master equation with fixed, independently chosen parameters, and the acknowledged approximations are not masked.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: Eq. (4) is obtained from the model Hamiltonian Eq. (1) by adiabatic elimination (Appendix A), the collective-mode transformation is a change of basis, and Eq. (8) is an explicitly stated approximation of Eq. (4) in the regime χ/Γ2 ≪ 1 and Γi/Γ2 ≪ 1. The analytical cat-state density matrix Eq. (9) is not obtained by fitting any parameter to the target entanglement; the cat amplitude is fixed by the drive and dissipation rates, α = (β0/2)e^{iπ/4} with β0² = −2iε2/Γ2, and the coherence factor c(t) has the standard exponential decoherence form. The Appendix B fidelity check compares Eq. (9) with a numerical solution of the same master equation; this is an internal consistency test of the analytical solution rather than a circular reuse of the result, since the analytical expression is derived from the dissipative dark-state condition and the paper explicitly reports where the approximation fails (Table I and Fig. 6 show degradation with increasing χ and at steady state). The comparison time Γ2t = 0.5 is taken from the numerical maximum in Fig. 2; it is an evaluation point, not a fitted value of the claimed entanglement. No load-bearing self-citation appears: Ref. [48] is background for the radiation-pressure coupling, and no uniqueness theorem or prior-work ansatz is invoked to force the cat-state form. A separate concern that Eq. (8) may mis-express the two-phonon dissipator in the D± basis for θ = π/2 would, if valid, be a derivation error affecting correctness, not a circularity in which the prediction reduces to the input by construction. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the reduced master equation from adiabatic elimination and on the weak-hopping approximation that makes the analytical cat solution tractable. The control parameters θ, χ, α_bar, β, Δ, and n_b are chosen by hand; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • Phonon hopping phase θ = 0 to π (radians)
    Free phase of the inter-mechanical hopping; selects which collective mode is driven and controls bipartite entanglement (Section III, Figs. 2, 4, 5).
  • Phonon hopping strength χ/Γ2 = 0.01 to 0.2
    Ratio of inter-mode hopping to engineered two-phonon loss; must be small for the analytical state Eq. (9) to be accurate; also tunes steady-state entanglement (Figs. 4, 5, 6).
  • Steady-state cavity amplitude alpha_bar = 0.02
    Chosen small to keep the bad-cavity picture; sets g1 and g2, hence all engineered dissipation rates and the cat amplitude (Section II).
  • Drive ratio β = sqrt(|εd|/|g2|) = 1.6
    Determines the parametric drive amplitude ε2, which fixes the cat coherent amplitude α (Section II and Fig. 2 caption).
  • Cavity detuning Δ = -2ωm
    Chosen to resonantly enhance the two-phonon emission rate Γ2 while suppressing the counter-rotating terms (Section II).
  • Mechanical thermal occupancy n_b = 0 for cat generation, 0.5 for steady-state entanglement
    Environmental parameter; the steady-state entanglement claim is demonstrated only up to n_b = 0.5 (Section III A and Figs. 4, 5).
  • Experimental device parameters (ωm/2π=15 MHz, Γ/2π=15 Hz, γa/2π=100 kHz, g0/2π=1 MHz) = as listed
    Standard optomechanical parameters chosen to demonstrate feasibility; not fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Adiabatic elimination of the fast-decaying cavity mode is valid under the hierarchy γa >> g1, g2, χ, Γ (Section II and Appendix A).
    The reduced master equation Eq. (4) is the foundation of all results; if the hierarchy fails, the engineered dissipation rates and effective Hamiltonian are not correctly captured.
  • domain assumption The two mechanical modes are exactly degenerate with equal frequencies and damping (Section II).
    The bright/dark-mode decomposition Eq. (6) requires ωm1 = ωm2; a mismatch would mix the collective modes and change the cat-state and entanglement predictions.
  • ad hoc to paper For θ = π/2 and χ/Γ2 << 1, the dispersive, self-Kerr, and cavity-induced linear damping terms in Hs can be neglected, yielding Eq. (8) (Section III).
    This approximation is needed to obtain the analytical two-mode cat state Eq. (9); Appendix B shows fidelity degrades as χ/Γ2 grows and Table I shows a steady-state mismatch.
  • standard math The Schrieffer-Wolff transformation at leading order in g0/ωm captures the relevant nonlinear optomechanical terms (Appendix A, Eq. (A1)).
    Standard perturbative treatment used to derive the second-order coupling g2; higher-order corrections are not estimated.
  • domain assumption The synthetic gauge field condition θ12 = -θ21 = θ is imposed (Section II, Eq. (1)).
    This phase convention defines the bright/dark modes and is central to the phase-dependent behavior; other conventions change the mode definitions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generating two-mechanical mode entangled cat states, and steady-state entanglement, in cavity optomechanics in the presence of dissipation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QRJBXFCF

@misc{pith2026260805503,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generating two-mechanical mode entangled cat states, and steady-state entanglement, in cavity optomechanics in the presence of dissipation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QRJBXFCF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05503}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate a dissipation-engineering approach to produce a phase-dependent collective-mode Schr\"odinger cat state involving two modes. Our model features a single cavity mode that interacts with two spectrally identical mechanical oscillators. Both oscillators are coupled through a phase-dependent hopping interaction. We demonstrate that by adjusting the phase of the phonon-hopping interaction, one can control the bipartite entanglement of the phase-dependent two-mode cat state during its generation. Additionally, our study reveals that phonon interactions act as a tunable parameter, enabling the manipulation of steady-state entanglement between the bare mechanical modes, even in the presence of environmental effects and thermal excitations. Our scheme provides a feasible approach for the phase-dependent multi mode non-Gaussian states preparation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05503 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A schematic diagram of a cavity optomechanical sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The central panel shows evolution of bipartite entanglement between the collective modes. The panels a(b) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Temporal evolution of the conditional state of the bright mode. The phonon hopping interaction strength is charac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Steady-state bipartite entanglement between the col [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Temporal evolution of fidelity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [47]

    Z. Yu, M. Wei, and H. Tan, Dissipatively driven non- Gaussian mechanical entanglement and remote prepara- tion of motional Schrödinger cat states, Physical Review A 112, 043707 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    Schrödinger, Die gegenwärtige situation in der quan- tenmechanik, Naturwissenschaften 23, 844 (1935)

    E. Schrödinger, Die gegenwärtige situation in der quan- tenmechanik, Naturwissenschaften 23, 844 (1935)

    work page 1935

  3. [2]

    Schrödinger, Der stetige übergang von der mikro- zur makromechanik, Naturwissenschaften 14, 664 (1926)

    E. Schrödinger, Der stetige übergang von der mikro- zur makromechanik, Naturwissenschaften 14, 664 (1926)

    work page 1926

  4. [3]

    E. C. G. Sudarshan, Equivalence of Semiclassical and Quantum Mechanical Descriptions of Statistical Light Beams, Physical Review Letters 10, 277 (1963)

    work page 1963

  5. [4]

    R. J. Glauber, Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field, Physical Review 131, 2766 (1963)

    work page 1963

  6. [5]

    C. L. Mehta, P. Chand, E. C. G. Sudarshan, and R. Vedam, Dynamics of Coherent States, Physical Re- view 157, 1198 (1967)

    work page 1967

  7. [6]

    Zhang, D

    W.-M. Zhang, D. H. Feng, and R. Gilmore, Coherent states: Theory and some applications, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics 62, 867 (1990)

    work page 1990

  8. [7]

    P. T. Cochrane, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro, Macro- scopically distinct quantum-superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping, Physical Review A 59, 2631 (1999)

    1999

Show all 60 references
  1. [8]

    Li, C.-L

    L. Li, C.-L. Zou, V. V. Albert, S. Muralidharan, S. Girvin, and L. Jiang, Cat Codes with Optimal Deco- herence Suppression for a Lossy Bosonic Channel, Phys- ical Review Letters 119, 030502 (2017)

    2017

  2. [9]

    J. M. Gertler, B. Baker, J. Li, S. Shirol, J. Koch, and C. Wang, Protecting a bosonic qubit with autonomous quantum error correction, Nature 590, 243 (2021)

    2021

  3. [10]

    W. Cai, Y. Ma, W. Wang, C.-L. Zou, and L. Sun, Bosonic quantum error correction codes in superconducting quan- tum circuits, Fundamental Research 1, 50 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    Guillaud and M

    J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, Repetition cat qubits for fault-tolerant quantum computation, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041053 (2019)

    2019

  5. [12]

    Yurke, S

    B. Yurke, S. L. McCall, and J. R. Klauder, Su(2) and su(1,1) interferometers, Phys. Rev. A 33, 4033 (1986)

    1986

  6. [13]

    Yurke and D

    B. Yurke and D. Stoler, Generating quantum mechanical superpositions of macroscopically distinguishable states via amplitude dispersion, Physical Review Letters 57, 13 (1986)

    1986

  7. [14]

    Yurke and D

    B. Yurke and D. Stoler, The dynamic generation of Schrödinger cats and their detection, Physica B+C 151, 298 (1988)

    1988

  8. [15]

    Kirchmair, B

    G. Kirchmair, B. Vlastakis, Z. Leghtas, S. E. Nigg, H. Paik, E. Ginossar, M. Mirrahimi, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Observation of quantum state collapse and revival due to the single-photon Kerr effect, Nature 495, 205 (2013)

    2013

  9. [16]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit, Nature 584, 205 (2020)

    2020

  10. [17]

    X. L. He, Y. Lu, D. Q. Bao, H. Xue, W. B. Jiang, Z. Wang, A. F. Roudsari, P. Delsing, J. S. Tsai, and Z. R. Lin, Fast generation of Schrödinger cat states using a Kerr-tunable superconducting resonator, Nature Com- munications 14, 6358 (2023)

    2023

  11. [18]

    Ourjoumtsev, R

    A. Ourjoumtsev, R. Tualle-Brouri, J. Laurat, and P. Grangier, Generating Optical Schrödinger Kittens for Quantum Information Processing, Science 312, 83 (2006)

    2006

  12. [19]

    Ourjoumtsev, H

    A. Ourjoumtsev, H. Jeong, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier, Generation of optical ‘Schrödinger cats’ from photon number states, Nature 448, 784 (2007)

    2007

  13. [20]

    D. V. Sychev, A. E. Ulanov, A. A. Pushkina, M. W. Richards, I. A. Fedorov, and A. I. Lvovsky, Enlargement 9 of optical Schrödinger’s cat states, Nature Photonics 11, 379 (2017)

    2017

  14. [21]

    Glancy and H

    S. Glancy and H. M. de Vasconcelos, Methods for pro- ducing optical coherent state superpositions, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 25, 712 (2008)

    2008

  15. [22]

    Mirrahimi, Z

    M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V. V. Albert, S. Touzard, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M. H. Devoret, Dynam- ically protected cat-qubits: A new paradigm for univer- sal quantum computation, New Journal of Physics 16, 10.1088/1367-2630/16/4/045014 (2014)

    2014 doi

  16. [23]

    Leghtas, G

    Z. Leghtas, G. Kirchmair, B. Vlastakis, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. H. Devoret, and M. Mirrahimi, Hardware-Efficient Autonomous Quantum Memory Protection, Physical Re- view Letters 111, 120501 (2013)

    2013

  17. [24]

    Leghtas, S

    Z. Leghtas, S. Touzard, I. M. Pop, A. Kou, B. Vlas- takis, A. Petrenko, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, S. Shankar, M. J. Hatridge, M. Reagor, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss...

    2015

  18. [25]

    Vlastakis, G

    B. Vlastakis, G. Kirchmair, Z. Leghtas, S. E. Nigg, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. De- voret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Deterministically Encod- ing Quantum Information Using 100-Photon Schrödinger Cat States, Science 342, 607 (2013)

    2013

  19. [26]

    Agarwal, R

    G. Agarwal, R. Puri, and R. Singh, Atomic Schrödinger cat states, Physical Review A 56, 2249 (1997)

    1997

  20. [27]

    Dooley, F

    S. Dooley, F. McCrossan, D. Harland, M. J. Everitt, and T. P. Spiller, Collapse and revival and cat states with an n-spin system, Phys. Rev. A 87, 052323 (2013)

    2013

  21. [28]

    M. Bild, M. Fadel, Y. Yang, U. von Lüpke, P. Mar- tin, A. Bruno, and Y. Chu, Schrödinger cat states of a 16-microgram mechanical oscillator, Science 380, 274 (2023)

    2023

  22. [29]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics 86, 1391 (2014)

    2014

  23. [30]

    Kronwald, F

    A. Kronwald, F. Marquardt, and A. A. Clerk, Arbitrar- ily large steady-state bosonic squeezing via dissipation, Physical Review A 88, 063833 (2013)

    2013

  24. [31]

    Wang and A

    Y.-D. Wang and A. A. Clerk, Reservoir-Engineered En- tanglement in Optomechanical Systems, Physical Review Letters 110, 253601 (2013)

    2013

  25. [32]

    Xu, Y.-x

    X.-W. Xu, Y.-x. Liu, C.-P. Sun, and Y. Li, Mechanical PT symmetry in coupled optomechanical systems, Phys- ical Review A 92, 013852 (2015)

    2015

  26. [33]

    Chakraborty and A

    S. Chakraborty and A. K. Sarma, Delayed sudden death of entanglement at exceptional points, Physical Review A 100, 063846 (2019)

    2019

  27. [34]

    P. M. Harrington, E. J. Mueller, and K. W. Murch, Engi- neered dissipation for quantum information science, Na- ture Reviews Physics 4, 660 (2022)

    2022

  28. [35]

    Wilson-Rae, N

    I. Wilson-Rae, N. Nooshi, W. Zwerger, and T. J. Kippen- berg, Theory of Ground State Cooling of a Mechanical Oscillator Using Dynamical Backaction, Physical Review Letters 99, 093901 (2007)

    2007

  29. [36]

    Genes, D

    C. Genes, D. Vitali, P. Tombesi, S. Gigan, and M. As- pelmeyer, Ground-state cooling of a micromechanical os- cillator: Comparing cold damping and cavity-assisted cooling schemes, Physical Review A 77, 033804 (2008)

    2008

  30. [37]

    J. D. Teufel, T. Donner, D. Li, J. W. Harlow, M. S. Allman, K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, K. W. Lehnert, and R. W. Simmonds, Sideband cooling of mi- cromechanical motion to the quantum ground state, Na- ture 475, 359 (2011)

    2011

  31. [38]

    J. Chan, T. P. M. Alegre, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. T. Hill, A. Krause, S. Gröblacher, M. Aspelmeyer, and O. Painter, Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state, Nature 478, 89 (2011)

    2011

  32. [39]

    E. E. Wollman, C. U. Lei, A. J. Weinstein, J. Suh, A. Kronwald, F. Marquardt, A. A. Clerk, and K. C. Schwab, Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator, Science 349, 952 (2015)

    2015

  33. [40]

    G. S. Agarwal and S. Huang, Strong mechanical squeez- ing and its detection, Physical Review A 93, 043844 (2016)

    2016

  34. [41]

    M. J. Woolley and A. A. Clerk, Two-mode squeezed states in cavity optomechanics via engineering of a single reservoir, Physical Review A 89, 063805 (2014)

    2014

  35. [42]

    C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, E. Damskägg, J.-M. Pirkkalainen, M. Asjad, A. A. Clerk, F. Massel, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanpää, Stabilized entan- glement of massive mechanical oscillators, Nature 556, 478 (2018)

    2018

  36. [43]

    H. Tan, G. Li, and P. Meystre, Dissipation-driven two- mode mechanical squeezed states in optomechanical sys- tems, Physical Review A 87, 033829 (2013)

    2013

  37. [44]

    Asjad and D

    M. Asjad and D. Vitali, Reservoir engineering of a me- chanical resonator: generating a macroscopic superpo- sition state and monitoring its decoherence, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 47, 045502 (2014)

    2014

  38. [45]

    H. Tan, F. Bariani, G. Li, and P. Meystre, Generation of macroscopic quantum superpositions of optomechanical oscillators by dissipation, Physical Review A 88, 023817 (2013)

    2013

  39. [46]

    Hauer, J

    B. Hauer, J. Combes, and J. Teufel, Nonlinear Sideband Cooling to a Cat State of Motion, Physical Review Let- ters 130, 213604 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Das and T

    S. Das and T. N. Dey, Phase-dependent controllable field generation in a ring cavity resonator, Journal of the Op- tical Society of America B 39, 859 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Genes, D

    C. Genes, D. Vitali, and P. Tombesi, Simultaneous cool- ing and entanglement of mechanical modes of a micromir- ror in an optical cavity, New Journal of Physics 10, 095009 (2008)

    2008

  42. [50]

    S. Huang, Double electromagnetically induced trans- parency and narrowing of probe absorption in a ring cavity with nanomechanical mirrors, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 47, 055504 (2014)

    2014

  43. [51]

    Lai, J.-Q

    D.-G. Lai, J.-Q. Liao, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Noise- Tolerant Optomechanical Entanglement via Synthetic Magnetism, Physical Review Letters 129, 063602 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    D.-G. Lai, F. Zou, B.-P. Hou, Y.-F. Xiao, and J.-Q. Liao, Simultaneous cooling of coupled mechanical resonators in cavity optomechanics, Physical Review A 98, 023860 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Lai, J.-F

    D.-G. Lai, J.-F. Huang, X.-L. Yin, B.-P. Hou, W. Li, D. Vitali, F. Nori, and J.-Q. Liao, Nonreciprocal ground- state cooling of multiple mechanical resonators, Physical Review A 102, 011502 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    Xu, D.-G

    R. Xu, D.-G. Lai, B.-P. Hou, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Millionfold improvement in multivibration-feedback op- 10 tomechanical refrigeration via auxiliary mechanical cou- pling, Physical Review A 106, 033509 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity Optomechanics , edited by M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    Favero and F

    I. Favero and F. Marquardt, Focus on optomechanics, New Journal of Physics 16, 085006 (2014)

    2014

  49. [57]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, Tutorial: projector approach to master equations for open quantum systems, Quantum 8, 1454 (2024)

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, Tutorial: projector approach to master equations for open quantum systems, Quantum 8, 1454 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Azouit, A

    R. Azouit, A. Sarlette, and P. Rouchon, Adiabatic elimi- nation for open quantum systems with effective lindblad master equations (2016), arXiv:1603.04630 [quant-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  51. [59]

    S. Nakajima, On quantum theory of transport phenom- ena: Steady diffusion, Progress of Theoretical Physics 20, 948 (1958), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/20/6/948/5440766/20-6-948.pdf

    1958

  52. [60]

    Wilson-Rae, N

    I. Wilson-Rae, N. Nooshi, J. Dobrindt, T. J. Kippen- berg, and W. Zwerger, Cavity-assisted backaction cool- ing of mechanical resonators, New Journal of Physics 10, 095007 (2008)

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.