Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Creative Writing with an AI-Powered Writing Assistant: Perspectives from Professional Writers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.05030 v1 pith:QROXLSTZ submitted 2022-11-09 cs.HC cs.CL

classification cs.HCcs.CL
keywords writingwriterscreativeai-poweredworkassistancebuildingdiverse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent developments in natural language generation (NLG) using neural language models have brought us closer than ever to the goal of building AI-powered creative writing tools. However, most prior work on human-AI collaboration in the creative writing domain has evaluated new systems with amateur writers, typically in contrived user studies of limited scope. In this work, we commissioned 13 professional, published writers from a diverse set of creative writing backgrounds to craft stories using Wordcraft, a text editor with built-in AI-powered writing assistance tools. Using interviews and participant journals, we discuss the potential of NLG to have significant impact in the creative writing domain--especially with respect to brainstorming, generation of story details, world-building, and research assistance. Experienced writers, more so than amateurs, typically have well-developed systems and methodologies for writing, as well as distinctive voices and target audiences. Our work highlights the challenges in building for these writers; NLG technologies struggle to preserve style and authorial voice, and they lack deep understanding of story contents. In order for AI-powered writing assistants to realize their full potential, it is essential that they take into account the diverse goals and expertise of human writers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 50 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. First Steps Towards Overhearing LLM Agents: A Case Study With Dungeons & Dragons Gameplay

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Large audio-language models can act as overhearing agents that listen to human conversation and provide useful suggestions, as shown in a Dungeons & Dragons study where audio cues helped distinguish in-character from ...

  2. CRAFT: Exploring Wearable Creative AI on Smart Glasses for Fiction Writing in Real-World Contexts

    cs.HC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Smart glasses with multimodal AI can help fiction writers transform real-world observations into fictional ideas during brief in-situ moments, according to interviews, co-design, and 24 field-trial sessions.

  3. PromptCanvas: Composable Prompting Workspaces Using Dynamic Widgets for Exploration and Iteration in Creative Writing

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A widget-based canvas for AI writing prompts was rated as more creativity-supportive and less mentally demanding than a conversational chat UI in a lab study (N=18) and a follow-up field study (N=10).

Pith tools