Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Ranking and empirical minimization of U-statistics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv math/0603123 v1 pith:QRXUTD3C submitted 2006-03-05 math.ST stat.TH

Ranking and empirical minimization of U-statistics

classification math.ST stat.TH
keywords rankingriskempiricalinstancesminimizationproblemu-processesachieved
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The problem of ranking/ordering instances, instead of simply classifying them, has recently gained much attention in machine learning. In this paper we formulate the ranking problem in a rigorous statistical framework. The goal is to learn a ranking rule for deciding, among two instances, which one is "better," with minimum ranking risk. Since the natural estimates of the risk are of the form of a U-statistic, results of the theory of U-processes are required for investigating the consistency of empirical risk minimizers. We establish in particular a tail inequality for degenerate U-processes, and apply it for showing that fast rates of convergence may be achieved under specific noise assumptions, just like in classification. Convex risk minimization methods are also studied.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.