pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30859 · v1 · pith:QSCNT2BYnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Atomic-Scale Characterization of Oxide Interfaces and Superlattices Using Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy

Steven R. Spurgeon , Renae Gannon This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 01:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords scanning transmission electron microscopyoxide interfacessuperlatticesEELSEDSinterfacial conductivitycharge screeningiron oxides
0
0 comments X

The pith

Scanning transmission electron microscopy provides unmatched atomic-scale insight into oxide interfaces and superlattices.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) serves as the central method for characterizing oxide interfaces and superlattices. It states that no other technique matches STEM's ability to reveal structure, chemistry, composition, and dynamics across many material systems. STEM imaging and diffraction combined with EELS and EDS spectroscopies deliver high-resolution views of structure-property relationships. The review covers studies on interfacial conductivity, charge screening in magnetoelectric heterostructures, interface engineering in iron oxides, and atomic-scale chemical mapping, plus emerging plasma preparation and AI-guided methods. These elements integrate with theory to support predictive models for functional oxides.

Core claim

STEM is a cornerstone of our understanding of oxide interfaces and superlattices. No other technique provides the same level of insight into structure, chemistry, composition, and dynamics across as wide a variety of material systems. STEM imaging and diffraction, coupled with electron energy loss (EELS) and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDS) spectroscopies, offer unparalleled, high-resolution analysis of structure-property relationships.

What carries the argument

Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) imaging, diffraction, EELS, and EDS for atomic-scale analysis of structure, chemistry, composition, and dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The selected investigations into interfacial conductivity, charge screening, and iron oxides accurately represent the most important phenomena without selection bias.

What would settle it

Demonstration of another technique achieving comparable atomic-scale resolution, chemical mapping, and dynamic insight across oxide superlattices would challenge the uniqueness of STEM.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30859 by Renae Gannon, Steven R. Spurgeon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: B shows a composite STEM-EELS map of the integrated La M4,5, Cr L2,3, and Ti L2,3 signals, highlighting the asymmetric termination at each block of the superlattice. Figures 1C–D show line profiles averaged in the film plane for the integrated Ti L2,3 edge intensity and Ti L3 t2g–eg crystal field splitting, respectively; the latter may be used to investigate potential valence changes, since the transition … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: STEM-EELS mapping of the LSMO/PZT heterostructure. (A) Cross-sectional STEM-HAADF image of the film structure, with the ferroelectric polarization direction and linescan paths indicated. (B) O K-edge EEL spectra collected plane-by-plane from the LSMO/PZT interface; (a), (b), and (c) label the pre-, main-, and secondary-peak features, respectively. (C) Mn L2,3-edge EEL spectra across the same region. Reprin… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Spatially-resolved LSMO phase diagram. (A, B) O K pre- to main-peak separation (∆EO(b−a)) in the vicinity of the PZT interface for the bottom and top LSMO layers, respectively, overlaid with an illustration of the heterostructure. (C, D) Map of local Mn doping relative to bulk LSMO as a function of position normal to the LSMO/PZT interface for the bottom (A) and top (B) LSMO layers. The marked boundaries o… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: STEM analysis of the Fe2O3/Cr2O3 superlattice. (A) Cross-sectional STEM-HAADF image of the film, inset with high magnification images of the film–substrate interface and superlattice. (B) STEM-EDS map of the Al K, Fe K, and Cr K peaks. (C) Radial-difference filtered STEM-HAADF image of the region used for EELS measurements; a line scan has been extracted and subsequent spectra have been integrated in the m… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: STEM sample preparation. Cross-sectional secondary electron image of the polished STEM lift-out, with the gradient from thick to thin foil marked by the arrow. The bright horizontal band corresponds to the location of the film–substrate interface. Reprinted with permission from reference [116]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier. Figure 6A shows a representative cross-sectional STEM-HAADF image of the heterostructure… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: LSCO/STO interface characterization. (A) Representative cross-sectional STEM-HAADF image of the LSCO/STO interface taken along the [100] zone-axis. (B) Average of 10 A- and B-site profiles taken across the interface, with the shaded region indicating the interface position. Reprinted with permission from reference [116]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier. Since the cation species are chemically similar, STEM-EDS pro… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Thickness dependence of STEM-EDS mapping. (A–B) Composite STEM-EDS maps and corresponding A- and B-site net X-ray count line profiles for ∼33 and ∼75 nm-thick STO/LSCO interfaces, respectively; line profiles have been averaged in the plane of the maps. (C) Interface width as a function of sample thickness for each species. Adapted with permission from reference [114]. Copyright 2017 Microscopy Society of A… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Surface textures induced by different ion species. Xe+- and Ar+-PFIB-exposed regions of AlGaN/GaN on Al2O3 are highlighted in yellow (top row). Cross-sections of each prepared specimen are shown below (bottom row). Only the Xe+-exposed surface exhibited bubbling; Xe+ also produced terrace-like curtaining in Al2O3 not observed with Ar+. Despite these advantages, achieving ultra-thin electron-transparent lam… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Inverted lift-out preparation workflow. (A) A thinned window (< 50 nm) on an inverted NiO/Ga2O3 TEM specimen prepared by Xe and Ar PFIB. (B) Inverted specimen workflow for a rotation-capable nanomanipulator. 7 Toward AI-Guided Characterization of Oxide Interfaces As aberration-correction and large, high-speed detectors have become mainstream, the microscopy community has increasingly begun to struggle with… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Few-shot machine learning enables rapid, label-efficient segmentation of oxide microstructures. (A) Segmentation of an epitaxial SrTiO3/Ge heterostructure interface, (B) phase separation in La0.8Sr0.2FeO3 thin films, and (C) MoO3 nanoparticle morphologies, shown with original images (left), support sets (center), and segmented outputs with quantified phase fractions (right). The approach generalizes acros… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Recurrent neural network forecasting captures electron beam-driven valence changes in a perovskite oxide. A long short-term memory (LSTM) model trained on in situ EELS time-series data predicts the trajectory of a crystalline-to-amorphous phase transition in SrTiO3 driven by electron beam reduction. (A) At t ≈ 15 s, the predicted spectrum (orange) reproduces the Ti4+-dominated fine structure, including th… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Multi-modal computer vision reveals irradiation-induced disorder at complex oxide interfaces. A hybrid machine learning pipeline combining STEM-HAADF and EDS detects structural and chemical signatures of ion-irradiation-induced disorder in epitaxial LaFeO3 (LFO)/SrTiO3 (STO) heterostructures. (A) Prior to irradiation, community detection, agglomerative clustering, and few-shot classification consistently … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) is a cornerstone of our understanding of oxide interfaces and superlattices. No other technique provides the same level of insight into structure, chemistry, composition, and dynamics across as wide a variety of material systems. STEM imaging and diffraction, coupled with electron energy loss (EELS) and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDS) spectroscopies, offer unparalleled, high-resolution analysis of structure--property relationships. In this chapter we highlight investigations into key phenomena, including interfacial conductivity in oxide superlattices, charge screening effects in magnetoelectric heterostructures, interface engineering in iron oxides, and the complex physics governing atomic-scale chemical mapping. We also discuss emerging plasma preparation techniques and artificial intelligence-guided approaches to both ex situ and in situ microscopy. These studies illustrate how unique insights from STEM characterization can be integrated with other techniques and theory calculations to develop more predictive models for the behavior of functional oxides.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. This review chapter positions scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), combined with EELS and EDS spectroscopies, as a cornerstone technique for atomic-scale characterization of oxide interfaces and superlattices. It claims that no other method matches STEM's insight into structure, chemistry, composition, and dynamics across material systems. The chapter summarizes prior investigations into interfacial conductivity in oxide superlattices, charge screening in magnetoelectric heterostructures, interface engineering in iron oxides, and atomic-scale chemical mapping, while also covering emerging plasma preparation methods and AI-guided ex situ/in situ approaches. Emphasis is placed on integrating STEM results with other techniques and theory to build predictive models for functional oxides.

Significance. As a review without new derivations or experimental claims, the manuscript's significance rests on the balance and utility of its synthesis of established STEM capabilities. The positioning statement regarding STEM's unique level of insight is a standard framing in the field and is illustrated via the selected example studies. Credit is due for explicitly noting integration with theory calculations and other experimental methods. The selection of phenomena (conductivity, charge screening, iron oxides) appears representative of active research areas rather than introducing evident selection bias, consistent with the stress-test concern not landing as a load-bearing issue.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states the central positioning claim without qualification; if the full chapter includes a dedicated limitations or comparison section, cross-referencing it would strengthen the claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for recommending acceptance of the manuscript. The report contains no major comments requiring a point-by-point response.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; review chapter with no derivations

full rationale

The paper is a review summarizing established STEM techniques and citing example studies on oxide interfaces. It contains no equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or derivation chains. The central claim about STEM's unique insight level is a positioning statement supported by external citations rather than an internal reduction to self-defined inputs. No load-bearing steps reduce to self-citation chains or ansatzes. This matches the default expectation for non-derivational review content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review chapter with no new derivations, parameters, or entities introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5691 in / 898 out tokens · 32801 ms · 2026-07-01T01:27:28.664544+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 107 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The correction of electron lens aberrations.Ultramicroscopy156,A1–A64

    Hawkes, P. The correction of electron lens aberrations.Ultramicroscopy156,A1–A64. doi:10. 1016/j.ultramic.2015.03.007(2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    L.et al.An electron microscope for the aberration-corrected era.Ultramicroscopy 108,179–95

    Krivanek, O. L.et al.An electron microscope for the aberration-corrected era.Ultramicroscopy 108,179–95. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2007.07.010(Feb. 2008)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2007.07.010(feb 2007

  3. [3]

    A.et al.Atomic-scale chemical imaging of composition and bonding by aberration- corrected microscopy.Science319,1073–6

    Muller, D. A.et al.Atomic-scale chemical imaging of composition and bonding by aberration- corrected microscopy.Science319,1073–6. doi:10.1126/science.1148820(Feb. 2008)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1148820(feb 2008

  4. [4]

    Bosman, M.et al.Two-Dimensional Mapping of Chemical Information at Atomic Resolution.Phys. Rev. Lett.99,086102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.086102(Aug. 2007)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.086102(aug 2007

  5. [5]

    Nature450,702–704

    Kimoto, K.et al.Element-selective imaging of atomic columns in a crystal using STEM and EELS. Nature450,702–704. doi:10.1038/nature06352(2007)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature06352(2007 2007

  6. [6]

    Varela, M.et al.Spectroscopic Imaging of Single Atoms Within a Bulk Solid.Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 095502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.095502(Mar. 2004)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.095502(mar 2004

  7. [7]

    E., Dellby, N

    Batson, P. E., Dellby, N. & Krivanek, O. L. Sub-ångstrom resolution using aberration corrected electron optics.Nature418,617–20. doi:10.1038/nature00972(Aug. 2002)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature00972(aug 2002

  8. [8]

    Batson, P. E. Simultaneous STEM imaging and electron energy-loss spectroscopy with atomic- column sensitivity.Nature366,727–728. doi:10.1038/366727a0(Dec. 1993)

    work page doi:10.1038/366727a0(dec 1993

  9. [9]

    Duscher, G., Browning, N. D. & Pennycook, S. J. Atomic Column Resolved Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy.Phys. status solidi166,327–342. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521- 396X(199803)166: 1<327::AID-PSSA327>3.0.CO;2-R(Mar. 1998)

    work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1521- 1998

  10. [10]

    D., Chisholm, M

    Browning, N. D., Chisholm, M. F. & Pennycook, S. J. Atomic-resolution chemical analysis using a scanning transmission electron microscope.Nature366,143–146. doi:10.1038/366143a0 (Nov. 1993)

    work page doi:10.1038/366143a0 1993

  11. [11]

    A., Tzou, Y., Raj, R

    Muller, D. A., Tzou, Y., Raj, R. & Silcox, J. Mapping sp2 and sp3 states of carbon at sub-nanometre spatial resolution.Nature366,725–727. doi:10.1038/366725a0(Dec. 1993)

    work page doi:10.1038/366725a0(dec 1993

  12. [12]

    Y.et al.Emergent phenomena at oxide interfaces.Nat

    Hwang, H. Y.et al.Emergent phenomena at oxide interfaces.Nat. Mater.11,103–113. doi: 10. 1038/nmat3223(Jan. 2012)

    2012

  13. [13]

    & Ramesh, R

    Martin, L., Chu, Y.-H. & Ramesh, R. Advances in the growth and characterization of magnetic, ferroelectric, and multiferroic oxide thin films.Mater. Sci. Eng. R Reports68,89–133. doi: 10. 1016/j.mser.2010.03.001(May 2010)

    2010

  14. [14]

    & Spaldin, N

    Ramesh, R. & Spaldin, N. a. Multiferroics: progress and prospects in thin films.Nat. Mater.6, 21–9. doi:10.1038/nmat1805(Jan. 2007)

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat1805(jan 2007

  15. [15]

    Chambers, S. A. Epitaxial growth and properties of doped transition metal and complex oxide films.Adv. Mater.22,219–48. doi:10.1002/adma.200901867(Jan. 2010)

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.200901867(jan 2010

  16. [16]

    Chambers, S. A. Epitaxial growth and properties of thin film oxides.Surf. Sci. Rep.39,105–180. doi:10.1016/S0167-5729(00)00005-4(Aug. 2000)

    work page doi:10.1016/s0167-5729(00)00005-4(aug 2000

  17. [17]

    & Malac, M

    Egerton, R., Li, P. & Malac, M. Radiation damage in the TEM and SEM.Micron35,399–409. doi:10.1016/j.micron.2004.02.003(Aug. 2004). 26

    work page doi:10.1016/j.micron.2004.02.003(aug 2004

  18. [18]

    & Kotani, A.Core Level Spectroscopy of Solids(CRC Press, 2008)

    De Groot, F. & Kotani, A.Core Level Spectroscopy of Solids(CRC Press, 2008)

    2008

  19. [19]

    doi:10.1093/jmicro/dfu011 (June 2014)

    Ootsuki, S.et al.Impact of Local Strain on Ti L2,3 Electron Energy-Loss Near-Edge Structures of BaTiO3: A First-Principles Multiplet Study.Microscopy63,249–254. doi:10.1093/jmicro/dfu011 (June 2014)

    work page doi:10.1093/jmicro/dfu011 2014

  20. [20]

    & Govind, N

    Lopata, K. & Govind, N. Near and above ionization electronic excitations with non-hermitian real-time time-dependent density functional theory.J. Chem. Theory Comput.9,4939–4946. doi:10.1021/ct400569s(2013)

    work page doi:10.1021/ct400569s(2013 2013

  21. [21]

    Ootsuki, S.et al.Ab-Initio Multiplet Calculation of Oxygen Vacancy Effect on TiL2,3 Electron EnergyLossNearEdgeStructuresofBaTiO 3.Appl. Phys. Lett.99,233109.doi: 10.1063/1.3663543 (Dec. 2011)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3663543 2011

  22. [22]

    Simulation in Elemental Mapping Using Aberration-Corrected Electron Microscopy

    Allen, L. Simulation in Elemental Mapping Using Aberration-Corrected Electron Microscopy. Ultramicroscopy178,110–120. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.03.001(July 2017)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.03.001(july 2017

  23. [23]

    & Findlay, S

    Allen, L., D’Alfonso, A. & Findlay, S. Modelling the inelastic scattering of fast electrons. Ultramicroscopy151,11–22. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.10.011(Apr. 2015)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.10.011(apr 2014

  24. [24]

    J.Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopydoi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6533-2 (Springer US, Boston, MA, 2010)

    Kirkland, E. J.Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopydoi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6533-2 (Springer US, Boston, MA, 2010)

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6533-2 2010

  25. [25]

    Cowley, J. M. & Moodie, A. F. The scattering of electrons by atoms and crystals. I. A new theoretical approach.Acta Crystallogr.10,609–619. doi:10.1107/S0365110X57002194(Oct. 1957)

    work page doi:10.1107/s0365110x57002194(oct 1957

  26. [26]

    Gázquez, J.et al.Applications of STEM-EELS to Complex Oxides.Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 65,49–63. doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2016.06.005(2017)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2016.06.005(2017 2016

  27. [27]

    & Ramasse, Q

    MacLaren, I. & Ramasse, Q. M. Aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy for atomic-resolution studies of functional oxides.Int. Mater. Rev.59,115–131. doi: 10.1179/ 1743280413Y.0000000026(Apr. 2014)

    2014

  28. [28]

    Varela, M.et al.Materials characterization in the aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscope.Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.35,539–569. doi: 10.1146/annurev.matsci.35. 102103.090513(Aug. 2005)

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.35 2005

  29. [29]

    Chambers, S.et al.Instability, intermixing and electronic structure at the epitaxial LaAlO3/SrTiO3(001) heterojunction.Surf. Sci. Rep.65,317–352. doi:10.1016/j.surfrep.2010.09.001(Oct. 2010)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.surfrep.2010.09.001(oct 2010

  30. [30]

    Nakagawa, N., Hwang, H. Y. & Muller, D. A. Why some interfaces cannot be sharp.Nat. Mater. 5,204–209. doi:10.1038/nmat1569(Mar. 2006)

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat1569(mar 2006

  31. [31]

    Mater.24,3952–3957

    Cantoni, C.et al.Electron Transfer and Ionic Displacements at the Origin of the 2D Electron Gas at the LAO/STO Interface: Direct Measurements with Atomic-Column Spatial Resolution.Adv. Mater.24,3952–3957. doi:10.1002/adma.201200667(Aug. 2012)

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201200667(aug 2012

  32. [32]

    B.et al.Probing Interfacial Electronic Structures in Atomic Layer LaMnO3 and SrTiO3 Superlattices.Adv

    Shah, A. B.et al.Probing Interfacial Electronic Structures in Atomic Layer LaMnO3 and SrTiO3 Superlattices.Adv. Mater.22,1156–1160. doi:10.1002/adma.200904198(Feb. 2010)

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.200904198(feb 2010

  33. [33]

    B.et al.Presence and spatial distribution of interfacial electronic states in LaMnO3 - SrMnO3 superlattices.Phys

    Shah, A. B.et al.Presence and spatial distribution of interfacial electronic states in LaMnO3 - SrMnO3 superlattices.Phys. Rev. B82,115112. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.115112 (Sept. 2010). 27

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.115112 2010

  34. [34]

    Kothleitner, G.et al.Quantitative Elemental Mapping at Atomic Resolution Using X-Ray Spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. Lett.112,085501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.085501(2014)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.085501(2014 2014

  35. [35]

    & Ikuhara, Y

    Lugg, N., Kothleitner, G., Shibata, N. & Ikuhara, Y. On the quantitativeness of EDS STEM. Ultramicroscopy151,150–159. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.11.029(2014)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.11.029(2014 2014

  36. [36]

    D.et al.Contribution of thermally scattered electrons to atomic resolution elemental maps.Phys

    Forbes, B. D.et al.Contribution of thermally scattered electrons to atomic resolution elemental maps.Phys. Rev. B86,024108. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.024108(2012)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.024108(2012 2012

  37. [37]

    J., Freitag, B., Klenov, D

    D’Alfonso, A. J., Freitag, B., Klenov, D. & Allen, L. J. Atomic-resolution chemical mapping using energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. B81,100101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.100101 (Mar. 2010)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.100101 2010

  38. [38]

    P.et al.Interpreting atomic-resolution spectroscopic images.Phys

    Oxley, M. P.et al.Interpreting atomic-resolution spectroscopic images.Phys. Rev. B76,064303. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.76.064303(Aug. 2007)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.064303(aug 2007

  39. [40]

    Gulec, A., Phillips, P. J. & Klie, R. F. Position-sensitive change in the transition metal L-edge fine structures.Appl. Phys. Lett.107,143111. doi:10.1063/1.4932637(2015)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4932637(2015 2015

  40. [41]

    L., Dwyer, C

    Xin, H. L., Dwyer, C. & Muller, D. A. Is there a Stobbs factor in atomic-resolution STEM-EELS mapping?Ultramicroscopy139,38–46. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.01.006(Apr. 2014)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.01.006(apr 2014

  41. [43]

    Dwyer, C., Findlay, S. D. & Allen, L. J. Multiple elastic scattering of core-loss electrons in atomic resolution imaging.Phys. Rev. B77,184107. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.184107(May 2008)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.184107(may 2008

  42. [44]

    R.et al.Towards Data-Driven Next-Generation Transmission Electron Microscopy

    Spurgeon, S. R.et al.Towards Data-Driven Next-Generation Transmission Electron Microscopy. Nat. Mater.20,274–279. doi:10.1038/s41563-020-00833-z(2021)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-020-00833-z(2021 2021

  43. [45]

    Learn.doi:10.1063/5.0267699(2025)

    Guinan, G.et al.Mind the Gap: Bridging the Divide Between AI Aspirations and the Reality of Autonomous Microscopy.APL Mach. Learn.doi:10.1063/5.0267699(2025)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0267699(2025 2025

  44. [46]

    Mater.7,187

    Akers, S.et al.Rapid and Flexible Segmentation of Electron Microscopy Data Using Few-Shot Machine Learning.npj Comput. Mater.7,187. doi:10.1038/s41524-021-00652-z(2021)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-021-00652-z(2021 2021

  45. [47]

    V.et al.Machine Learning in Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy.Nat

    Kalinin, S. V.et al.Machine Learning in Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy.Nat. Rev. Methods Primers2,11. doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00095-w(2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00095-w(2022 2022

  46. [48]

    Ede, J. M. Deep Learning in Electron Microscopy.Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol.2,011004. doi:10. 1088/2632-2153/abd614(2021)

    2021

  47. [49]

    T.et al.Deep Learning Ferroelectric Polarization Distributions from STEM Data via With and Without Atom Finding.npj Comput

    Nelson, C. T.et al.Deep Learning Ferroelectric Polarization Distributions from STEM Data via With and Without Atom Finding.npj Comput. Mater.7,149. doi: 10.1038/s41524-021-00613-6 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-021-00613-6 2021

  48. [50]

    V., Ghosh, A., Vasudevan, R

    Kalinin, S. V., Ghosh, A., Vasudevan, R. K. & Ziatdinov, M. From Atomically Resolved Imaging to Generative and Causal Models.Nat. Phys.18,1152–1160. doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01666-0 (2022). 28

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01666-0 2022

  49. [51]

    Mater.6,

    Ziatdinov, M.et al.Causal Analysis of Competing Atomistic Mechanisms in Ferroelectric Materials from High-Resolution Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Data.npj Comput. Mater.6,

  50. [52]

    doi:10.1038/s41524-020-00396-2(2020)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-020-00396-2(2020 2020

  51. [53]

    Mater.11,1

    Ter-Petrosyan, A.et al.Revealing the Evolution of Order in Materials Microstructures Using Multi-Modal Computer Vision.npj Comput. Mater.11,1. doi: 10.1038/s41524-025-01831-y (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01831-y 2025

  52. [54]

    R.et al.Forecasting of In Situ Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy.npj Comput

    Lewis, N. R.et al.Forecasting of In Situ Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy.npj Comput. Mater. 8,252. doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00940-2(2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00940-2(2022 2022

  53. [55]

    Microanal.28,1611–1621

    Olszta, M.et al.An Automated Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope Guided by Sparse Data Analytics.Microsc. Microanal.28,1611–1621. doi:10.1017/S1431927622012065(2022)

    work page doi:10.1017/s1431927622012065(2022 2022

  54. [56]

    V.et al.Automated and Autonomous Experiments in Electron and Scanning Probe Microscopy.ACS Nano15,12604–12627

    Kalinin, S. V.et al.Automated and Autonomous Experiments in Electron and Scanning Probe Microscopy.ACS Nano15,12604–12627. doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c02104(2021)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c02104(2021 2021

  55. [57]

    V.et al.Machine Learning for Automated Experimentation in Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy.npj Comput

    Kalinin, S. V.et al.Machine Learning for Automated Experimentation in Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy.npj Comput. Mater.9,227. doi:10.1038/s41524-023-01142-0(2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-023-01142-0(2023 2023

  56. [58]

    Commun.17,3473

    Guinan, G.et al.Revealing the Hidden Third Dimension of Point Defects in Two-Dimensional MXenes.Nat. Commun.17,3473. doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71670-y(2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71670-y(2026 2026

  57. [59]

    M., Torsi, R., Robinson, J., Kalinin, S

    Roccapriore, K. M., Torsi, R., Robinson, J., Kalinin, S. & Ziatdinov, M. Dynamic STEM-EELS for Single-Atom and Defect Measurement During Electron Beam Transformations.Sci. Adv.10, eadn5899. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adn5899(2024)

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adn5899(2024 2024

  58. [60]

    & Schlom, D

    Mannhart, J. & Schlom, D. G. Oxide Interfaces–An Opportunity for Electronics.Science327, 1607–1611. doi:10.1126/science.1181862(Mar. 2010)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1181862(mar 2010

  59. [61]

    G.et al.Strain Tuning of Ferroelectric Thin Films.Annu

    Schlom, D. G.et al.Strain Tuning of Ferroelectric Thin Films.Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.37,589–626. doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.37.061206.113016(Aug. 2007)

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.37.061206.113016(aug 2007

  60. [62]

    Electron

    Chen, S.et al.LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 Heterointerface: 20 Years and Beyond.Adv. Electron. Mater.10, 2300730. doi:10.1002/aelm.202300730(2024)

    work page doi:10.1002/aelm.202300730(2024 2024

  61. [63]

    & Hwang, H

    Ohtomo, A. & Hwang, H. Y. A high-mobility electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerface. Nature427,423–426. doi:10.1038/nature02308(Jan. 2004)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature02308(jan 2004

  62. [64]

    Qiao, L.et al.Epitaxial Growth, Structure, and Intermixing at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 Interface as the Film Stoichiometry is Varied.Phys. Rev. B83,085408. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.085408 (Feb. 2011)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.085408 2011

  63. [65]

    Willmott, P.et al.Structural Basis for the Conducting Interface between LaAlO3 and SrTiO3. Phys. Rev. Lett.99,155502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.155502(Oct. 2007)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.155502(oct 2007

  64. [66]

    B.et al.Interface-Induced Polarization in SrTiO3–LaCrO3 Superlattices.Adv

    Comes, R. B.et al.Interface-Induced Polarization in SrTiO3–LaCrO3 Superlattices.Adv. Mater. Interfaces3,1500779. doi:10.1002/admi.201500779(May 2016)

    work page doi:10.1002/admi.201500779(may 2016

  65. [67]

    Emergence of Compositional Representations in Restricted Boltzmann Machines

    Chambers, S. A.et al.Band Alignment, Built-In Potential, and the Absence of Conductivity at the LaCrO3 / SrTiO3 (001) Heterojunction.Phys. Rev. Lett.107,206802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 107.206802(Nov. 2011)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2011

  66. [68]

    B.et al.Probing the Origin of Interfacial Carriers in SrTiO3–LaCrO3 Superlattices

    Comes, R. B.et al.Probing the Origin of Interfacial Carriers in SrTiO3–LaCrO3 Superlattices. Chem. Mater.29,1147–1155. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04329(Feb. 2017). 29

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04329(feb 2017

  67. [69]

    Varela, M.et al.Atomic-resolution imaging of oxidation states in manganites.Phys. Rev. B79, 085117. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.79.085117(Feb. 2009)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.085117(feb 2009

  68. [70]

    Colby, R.et al.Cation intermixing and electronic deviations at the insulating LaCrO3/SrTiO3(001) interface.Phys. Rev. B88,155325. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.88.155325(Oct. 2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.155325(oct 2013

  69. [71]

    C.et al.Built-In Potential in Fe2O3–Cr2O3 Superlattices for Improved Photoexcited Carrier Separation.Adv

    Kaspar, T. C.et al.Built-In Potential in Fe2O3–Cr2O3 Superlattices for Improved Photoexcited Carrier Separation.Adv. Mater.28,1616–1622. doi:10.1002/adma.201504545(Feb. 2016)

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201504545(feb 2016

  70. [72]

    Arévalo-López, Á. M. & Alario-Franco, M. Á. Reliable Method for Determining the Oxidation State in Chromium Oxides.Inorg. Chem.48,11843–11846. doi:10.1021/ic901887y(Dec. 2009)

    work page doi:10.1021/ic901887y(dec 2009

  71. [73]

    Vaz, C. A. F., Walker, F. J., Ahn, C. H. & Ismail-Beigi, S. Intrinsic interfacial phenomena in manganite heterostructures.J. Phys. Condens. Matter27,123001. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/27/ 12/123001(2015)

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/27/ 2015

  72. [74]

    & Nan, C.-W

    Wang, Y., Hu, J., Lin, Y. & Nan, C.-W. Multiferroic magnetoelectric composite nanostructures. NPG Asia Mater.2,61–68. doi:10.1038/asiamat.2010.32(2010)

    work page doi:10.1038/asiamat.2010.32(2010 2010

  73. [75]

    Wu, T.et al.Observation of magnetoelectric effect in epitaxial ferroelectric film/manganite crystal heterostructures.Phys. Rev. B73,1–6. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.73.134416(Apr. 2006)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.134416(apr 2006

  74. [76]

    & Thiele, C

    Dörr, K. & Thiele, C. Multiferroic bilayers of manganites and titanates.Phys. Status Solidi243, 21–28. doi:10.1002/pssb.200562441(Jan. 2006)

    work page doi:10.1002/pssb.200562441(jan 2006

  75. [77]

    & Moreo, A

    Dagotto, E., Hotta, T. & Moreo, A. Colossal magnetoresistant materials: the key role of phase separation.Phys. Rep.344,1–153. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00121-6(Apr. 2001)

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00121-6(apr 2001

  76. [78]

    Coey, J. M. D., Viret, M. & von Molnár, S. Mixed-valence manganites.Adv. Phys.48,167–293. doi:10.1080/000187399243455(Mar. 1999)

    work page doi:10.1080/000187399243455(mar 1999

  77. [79]

    Astrov, D. N. The magnetoelectric effect in antiferromagnetic materials.Zhurnal Eksp. i Teor. Fiz. 38,984–985 (1960)

    1960

  78. [80]

    Revival of the magnetoelectric effect.J

    Fiebig, M. Revival of the magnetoelectric effect.J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys.38,R123–R152. doi:10. 1088/0022-3727/38/8/R01(Apr. 2005)

    2005

  79. [81]

    & Scott, J

    Catalan, G. & Scott, J. F. Physics and Applications of Bismuth Ferrite.Adv. Mater.21,2463–2485. doi:10.1002/adma.200802849(June 2009)

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.200802849(june 2009

  80. [82]

    Magnetoelectric Composites.Annu

    Srinivasan, G. Magnetoelectric Composites.Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.40,153–178. doi:10.1146/ annurev-matsci-070909-104459(June 2010)

    2010

Showing first 80 references.