Traveling Wave Solutions to a Large Class of Brenner-Navier-Stokes-Fourier Systems

Namhyun Eun; Saehoon Eo

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 34 references

Traveling Wave Solutions to a Large Class of Brenner-Navier-Stokes-Fourier Systems

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For any positive temperature-dependent viscosity and heat-conduction laws, the Brenner–Navier–Stokes–Fourier system has a unique small-amplitude viscous shock connecting admissible end states.

desk verdict Genuinely new result and a clever reduction, but the proof has a real regularity gap at the heart of the GSP argument. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02224 v1 pith:QSN7SMYU submitted 2025-07-03 math.AP math-phmath.MP

Saehoon Eo , Namhyun Eun This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 76N1535Q3035C0735K65

keywords travelingwavesolutionsviscousshocksBrenner-Navier-Stokes-Fouriersystemtemperature-dependenttransportcoefficientsgeometricsingularperturbationtheoryRankine-HugoniotconditionLaxentropypolytropicgas

topics Navier-Stokes Regularity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that the one-dimensional Brenner–Navier–Stokes–Fourier (BNSF) system — a two-velocity reformulation of gas dynamics — admits a unique monotone traveling wave (viscous shock) connecting any two nearby states that obey the Rankine–Hugoniot and Lax entropy conditions, for arbitrary positive temperature-dependent viscosity, heat conductivity, and the Brenner coefficient. This goes beyond the previous constant-coefficient result by allowing the transport coefficients to be any positive $C^2$ functions of temperature, as kinetic theory predicts for real gases. The proof reduces the traveling-wave ODEs to a single higher-order equation using the implicit function theorem, then applies geometric singular perturbation theory to a one-dimensional critical manifold. Along with existence and uniqueness, the paper establishes quantitative estimates — exponential decay at a rate proportional to the shock amplitude, comparable derivative magnitudes, and a sharp logistic-type profile law — that a companion stability study requires. If the theorem is correct, these profiles are the building blocks for studying inviscid limits from this class of viscous systems.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a geometric singular perturbation reduction. The traveling-wave ODE system is integrated to a first-order system; using the polytropic gas law, the implicit function theorem eliminates the temperature variable and its derivative in favor of $v$, $v'$, $v''$, producing a single third-order ODE. A scaling $v=v_-+\varepsilon w_0(\varepsilon\xi)$, $v'=\varepsilon^2 w_1(\varepsilon\xi)$, $v''=\varepsilon^2 w_2(\varepsilon\xi)$ turns this into the singularly perturbed system (3.1), whose critical manifold — the set where the fast variables are equilibrated — is the one-dimensional curve $M_0=\{w_2=0,\ w_1=A(w_0-w_0^2)\}$. A standard geometric singular perturbation result, Fenichel's first theorem, asserts that this normally hyperbolic manifold persists as a nearby locally invariant manifold for small $\varepsilon$; the two critical points $(0,0,0)$ and $(1,0,0)$ lie on it, yielding the connecting orbit. The quantitative estimates come from the same manifold: the profile law $\tilde v'/((v_+-\tilde v)(\tilde v-v_-))=A+O(\varepsilon)$ is literally the parametrization $w_1=A w_0(1-w_0)+\varepsilon s_1(w_0,\varepsilon)$.

What would settle it

Fix an admissible case, for example a 3-shock with the polytropic law, $\gamma=1.4$, $\tau(\theta)=1+\theta^2$, $\mu(\theta)=\theta^2$, $\kappa(\theta)=\theta^2$, and amplitude $\varepsilon=10^{-3}$. Numerically integrate the traveling-wave ODE system (3.15) from near the left state toward the right state and compute the ratio $\tilde v'/((v_+-\tilde v)(\tilde v-v_-))$ across the layer. If the ratio departs from the constant $A$ in (1.15) by more than $O(\varepsilon)$, or if two distinct monotone connecting orbits emerge for the same end states, the sharp-profile law or the uniqueness claim is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for any positive $C^2$ functions $\tau(\theta)$, $\mu(\theta)$, $\kappa(\theta)$ and any left state $(v_-,u_-,\theta_-)$, every right state satisfying the Rankine–Hugoniot and Lax entropy conditions with sufficiently small amplitude $\varepsilon=|v_--v_+|$ is connected to the left state by a unique monotone traveling wave $(\tilde v,\tilde u,\tilde\theta)(x-\sigma t)$. Theorem 1.2 quantifies the profile: the wave approaches its end states exponentially at rate $C\varepsilon$; the three derivatives are comparable, $|\tilde v'|\sim|\tilde u'|\sim|\tilde\theta'|$; and the shock layer obeys the sharp law $\tilde v'=A(v_+-\tilde v)(\tilde v-v_-)+O(\varepsilon)(v_+-\tilde v)(\tilde v-v_-)$, with an explicit constant $A$ built from the transport coefficients at the left state and the sound speed. The wave is monotone in each component, with signs depending on whether it is a 1-shock or a 3-shock. The quantity $A$ is not an afterthought: it is exactly the slope of the critical manifold in the reduced system, so the theorem identifies the precise shape of the viscous shock at small amplitude.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes the gas obeys the ideal polytropic law $p=R\theta/v$ with internal energy $e=R\theta/(\gamma-1)$; the shock-speed formula, the implicit-function reduction, and the explicit constant $A$ are all derived from this law, so a different equation of state would require redoing the whole geometric construction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every admissible right state with small amplitude is connected to the left state by exactly one monotone viscous shock, up to translation, so the small-amplitude shock family is fully classified near the end state.
The profile law makes the shock layer approximately logistic: with $y=(\tilde v-v_-)/\varepsilon$, one has $dy/d\xi=A\varepsilon y(1-y)+O(\varepsilon^2)$, so the wave shape is a rescaled logistic curve whose thickness is set by $A\varepsilon$.
The exponential decay and derivative-ratio estimates supply exactly the uniform bounds required by the companion contraction-stability argument, making these waves usable as reference solutions for stability of Riemann shocks.
For a 1-shock the constructed profile satisfies $\tilde v'<0$, $\tilde u'<0$, $\tilde\theta'>0$, and for a 3-shock the signs are opposite; the fixed monotonicity pattern is part of the uniqueness statement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: the logistic profile law implies the small-amplitude shock thickness is of order $1/(A\varepsilon)$, so measuring the layer width at two different amplitudes would give a direct numerical estimate of the constant $A$.
Beyond the paper: because the construction needs only an invertible implicit-function Jacobian and a normally hyperbolic critical manifold, the same reduction is likely to work for other temperature-dependent viscous systems, such as Navier–Stokes–Korteweg, provided an analogous reduced ODE can be formed.
Beyond the paper: the one-dimensional unstable-manifold argument used for uniqueness does not by itself classify non-monotone heteroclinic orbits; ruling those out would require controlling trajectories that leave the invariant manifold and return, which the present theorem does not address.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. First, the paper genuinely does something new: it proves existence, uniqueness, and quantitative profile estimates for small-amplitude viscous shocks in the one-dimensional BNSF system with arbitrary positive C^2 temperature-dependent coefficients, generalizing the constant-coefficient result [13] and supplying the exact estimates the companion stability paper [12] needs. The use of the implicit function theorem to eliminate θ and reduce to a singular perturbation problem is substantive and sensible, and the critical manifold calculation giving the constant A is careful. The paper reads as honest, workmanlike applied PDE, not a cosmetic generalization.

The soft spot is a regularity gap in the geometric singular perturbation reduction. The proof claims that f in (3.4) extends smoothly to ε=0, based on the Taylor expansion (3.8) of g2. But the coefficients are only C^2, and because h1 contains τ'(θ), the implicit function theorem gives g2 only C^1 (or at best C^2 in some directions). A C^2 function with a second-order zero does not become smooth after division by ε^2—ε^2|ε| is a counterexample. So the conclusion that (1/ε^2)g2 is smooth on V is not justified, and the application of Fenichel's theorem as stated (Proposition 2.1, which requires smooth f) is not legitimate. Section 4 then differentiates the invariant manifold up to third order, which demands even more regularity. This is not a manufactured objection; the gap is in the written proof. It may be fixable by assuming C^∞ coefficients, by a finite-regularity GSP argument, or by approximation, but none of that is in the paper.

The rest of the proof—uniqueness via the unstable manifold, exponential decay, and the ratio estimates—is standard and appears sound once the invariant manifold exists. The ideal polytropic gas law is a stated restriction, not a hidden flaw.

Who is this for? Mathematical fluid dynamicists working on viscous shock profiles and their stability, especially those using contraction-with-shifts methods. I would send it to a serious referee, but the referee should insist on a fix for the regularity issue before acceptance. I would not cite it as a finished result until that is sorted.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies traveling wave solutions (viscous shocks) for the one-dimensional Brenner-Navier-Stokes-Fourier system in Lagrangian coordinates, with temperature-dependent transport coefficients τ(θ), μ(θ), κ(θ). The main results, Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2, assert that for any positive C^2 coefficients and any left state, sufficiently small-amplitude right states satisfying the Rankine-Hugoniot and Lax entropy conditions admit a unique monotone traveling wave profile, with quantitative exponential decay and derivative estimates, including the sharp profile law ṽ' = A(v+−ṽ)(ṽ−v−)+O(ε)(v+−ṽ)(ṽ−v−). The proof uses integration of the ODE system, elimination of the velocity variable, the implicit function theorem to express temperature and its derivative in terms of v and its derivatives, and then geometric singular perturbation theory via Fenichel's first theorem. This generalizes the authors' earlier constant-coefficient work [13] and is motivated by the stability analysis in [12].

Significance. If the proof is correct, the result is a useful and nontrivial generalization of the constant-coefficient existence theory to physically realistic temperature-dependent coefficients, and the explicit constant A in (1.15) and the quantitative estimates in Theorem 1.2 are precisely the type of information needed for the contraction-stability approach of [12]. The geometric reduction using the implicit function theorem is a sound strategy and could apply to other systems with nonlinear coefficients. However, the manuscript's central regularity claim—that the reduced vector field f in (3.4) extends smoothly to ε=0 under only C^2 assumptions—is not justified and is load-bearing for the application of Fenichel's theorem and for the derivative estimates in Section 4.

major comments (3)

[Section 3, Eq. (3.4) and (3.8)] The assertion that f can be smoothly extended to ε=0 is not supported by the arguments given. The implicit function theorem applied to the C^2 functions h1 and h2 yields g1 and g2 only of class C^2. The Taylor expansion (3.8) shows only that the limit of ε^{-2} g2(v_- + εw0, ε^2 w1, ε^2 w2, ε) exists as ε→0; it does not establish that the quotient is differentiable, let alone smooth. For example, φ(ε)=ε^{5/2} is C^2 with φ(0)=φ'(0)=0, while φ(ε)/ε^2=ε^{1/2} is not differentiable at 0. Since Proposition 2.1 requires the vector field to be smooth, the application of Fenichel's first theorem to (3.1) is not justified as written. This is a load-bearing gap: the invariant manifold parametrization (3.11) and all subsequent estimates depend on the smoothness of f near ε=0.
[Section 4, after Eq. (4.3)] The estimates |w''_1(z)| ≤ C|w'_0(z)| and |w'''_1(z)| ≤ C|w'_0(z)| are obtained by differentiating (4.3) up to three times, which requires the function s1(w0,ε) to be of class C^3 in both variables. Even if the reduced vector field f were smooth, this is a strong regularity requirement; under the stated C^2 hypotheses on τ, μ, κ, the manuscript does not establish the needed regularity of the invariant manifold. Please either prove the required regularity of s1 or rework the argument so that (1.8)-(1.9) follow from the lower-regularity information that is actually available. As written, the proof of the quantitative estimates requires more regularity than the hypotheses provide.
[General scope] The theorem is stated for arbitrary positive C^2 coefficients, but the proof appears to require considerably more regularity: at minimum, the reduced vector field must be C^1 for a finite-regularity Fenichel-type result, and the derivative estimates in Section 4 seem to require at least C^3 regularity of the invariant manifold. It would be helpful if the authors specified precisely which regularity of τ, μ, κ is needed for each step; if the intended scope is indeed C^2, a substantially different argument or an approximation argument is required.

minor comments (5)

[Section 1.1, paragraph 1] The phrase 'admits tor viscous shocks' appears to be a typo; it should likely read 'admits viscous shocks' or 'admits two viscous shocks'.
[Eq. (2.4)] The arguments of h1 and h2 are written as (ṽ, θ̃, ṽ′, ṽ′′, θ̃, ε), but from the context and from (2.6) the fourth argument should be θ̃′; please correct the notation.
[Eq. (3.8)] The term 'l.o.t.' in the Taylor expansion is not precise. Given the C^2 regularity of g2, the remainder is o(ε^2), not necessarily O(ε^3); specifying the exact remainder order would clarify why the limit, but not the smoothness, of the quotient follows.
[Section 4, text after (4.1)] 'It also requires to obtain the bounds' is grammatically awkward; consider rephrasing to 'It is also necessary to obtain the bounds for |ũ''_ε| and |θ̃''_ε|'.
[Proof of Corollary 1.1] 'Sincey(ξ)' is missing a space; it should read 'Since y(ξ)'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: all constants and profile estimates are derived from the stated BNSF system and polytropic equation of state; self-citations are motivational or comparative, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The reduced ODE system (2.1), the shock speed formula (2.5), the implicit-function reduction (2.6)-(2.7), and the critical manifold calculation (3.10) are all derived from the stated PDE (1.3), the polytropic gas law (1.4), and the hypothesis that tau, mu, kappa are positive C^2 functions of theta. No parameter is fitted to any target quantity: the constant A in (1.15) is explicitly computed from the system data and left state, and the sharp profile law (1.16) is deduced from the invariant-manifold parametrization (3.11), not imposed as an ansatz. The citations to the authors' prior works are not load-bearing: [13] is used for comparison and for the standard GSPT framework, while the explicit formula (2.5) is written out and follows from the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions under (1.4); [12] appears only as motivation and as a downstream application of the quantitative estimates. The reviewer-flagged concern that C^2 coefficients may not suffice for the smoothness of f in (3.4) and for the third-order differentiability used in Section 4 is a correctness or regularity risk, not a circularity: it does not show that any claimed output is equivalent to an input by construction. Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is derived from the stated PDE system using standard dynamical systems theorems. All constants, including A, are computed from the transport coefficients and the left state; there are no free parameters fitted to data and no new postulated entities. The only non-standard ingredients are the physical modeling assumptions (polytropic gas and Brenner's constitutive relation), which are explicit.

assumptions (6)

standard math Fenichel's first theorem (geometric singular perturbation theory), Proposition 2.1 as stated in the paper.
Used in Section 3.1 to construct the locally invariant manifold Mε for system (3.1); standard background result, cited to [20].
standard math Unstable manifold theorem for autonomous ODEs, Proposition 3.1.
Used in Section 3.2 to prove uniqueness; cited to [33].
domain assumption Ideal polytropic gas equation of state p=Rθ/v and e=Rθ/(γ−1).
Stated in (1.4); the derivation of the integrated ODE system (2.1), the shock speed formula (2.5), and the critical manifold constant A all rely on it.
domain assumption Brenner's constitutive relation um = uv + κ(θ)/cp v_x/v.
Stated in (1.2) and used to rewrite the BNSF system into (1.3); it is the physical modeling assumption inherited from Brenner's bi-velocity theory.
domain assumption Transport coefficients τ, μ, κ are positive C2 functions of θ on the relevant temperature range.
Assumed in Theorems 1.1 and 1.2; positivity makes the Jacobian (3.2) nonsingular and the critical manifold normally hyperbolic near the chosen end state.
domain assumption End states satisfy Rankine-Hugoniot and Lax entropy conditions (1.5) with sufficiently small amplitude ε.
This defines the class of shocks for which the traveling wave problem is posed; smallness of ε is needed to apply Fenichel's theorem and the implicit function theorem.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Traveling Wave Solutions to a Large Class of Brenner-Navier-Stokes-Fourier Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QSN7SMYU

@misc{pith2026250702224,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Traveling Wave Solutions to a Large Class of Brenner-Navier-Stokes-Fourier Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QSN7SMYU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02224}
}

abstract

The Brenner-Navier-Stokes-Fourier (BNSF) system, introduced by Howard Brenner, was developed to address some deficiencies in the classical Navier-Stokes-Fourier system, based on the concept of volume velocity. We consider the one-dimensional BNSF system in Lagrangian mass coordinates, incorporating temperature-dependent transport coefficients, which yields a more physically realistic framework. We establish the existence and uniqueness of monotone traveling wave solutions (or viscous shocks) to the BNSF system with any positive $C^2$ dissipation coefficients, provided that the shock amplitude is sufficiently small. We utilize geometric singular perturbation theory as in the constant coefficient case [13]; however, due to the arbitrary nonlinearities of the coefficients, we employ the implicit function theorem, which grants robustness to our approach. This work is motivated by [12], which proves a contraction property of any large solutions to the BNSF system around the traveling wave solutions. Thus, we also derive some quantitative estimates on the traveling wave solutions that play a fundamental role in [12].

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

[13]

S. Eo, N. Eun, M.-J. Kang, and H. Oh. Traveling wave solutions to brenner-navier-stokes-fourier system. Journal of Differential Equations , 422:639–658, 2025

work page 2025
[12]

S. Eo, N. Eun, and M.-J. Kang. Stability of a Riemann Shock in a Physical Class: from Brenner-Navier- Stokes-Fourier to Euler. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03613 , 2024

arXiv 2024
[1]

E. B. Arkilic, K. S. Breuer, and M. A. Schmidt. Mass flow and tangential momentum accommodation in silicon micromachined channels. Journal of fluid mechanics , 437:29–43, 2001

work page 2001
[2]

H. Brenner. Kinematics of volume transport. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 349(1-2):11–59, 2005

work page 2005
[3]

H. Brenner. Navier–stokes revisited. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 349(1-2):60– 132, 2005

work page 2005
[4]

H. Brenner. Fluid mechanics revisited. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 370(2):190–224, 2006

work page 2006
[5]

Bˇ rezina and E

J. Bˇ rezina and E. Feireisl. Measure-valued solutions to the complete Euler system revisited. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. , 69(3):Paper No. 57, 17, 2018

work page 2018
[6]

Chakraborty and F

S. Chakraborty and F. Durst. Derivations of extended navier-stokes equations from upscaled molecular transport considerations for compressible ideal gas flows: Towards extended constitutive forms. Physics of Fluids , 19(8), 2007

work page 2007

Show all 34 references

[7]

Chapman and T

S. Chapman and T. G. Cowling. The mathematical theory of non uniform gases, cambridge mathemat- ical library, 1970

1970
[8]

S. K. Dadzie, J. M. Reese, and C. R. McInnes. A continuum model of gas flows with localized density variations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 387(24):6079–6094, 2008

2008
[9]

Dongari, F

N. Dongari, F. Durst, and S. Chakraborty. Predicting microscale gas flows and rarefaction effects through extended navier–stokes–fourier equations from phoretic transport considerations. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics , 9:831–846, 2010

2010
[10]

Dongari, R

N. Dongari, R. Sambasivam, and F. Durst. Extended navier-stokes equations and treatments of micro- channel gas flows. Journal of Fluid Science and Technology , 4(2):454–467, 2009

2009
[11]

Durst, N

F. Durst, N. Krishnan, D. Filimonov, R. Sambasivam, S. K. Das, et al. Treatments of flows through micro-channels based on the extended navier-stokes-equations. 2011

2011
[14]

Feireisl, M

E. Feireisl, M. Luk´ aˇ cov´ a-Medvid’ov´ a, and H. Mizerov´ a. A finite volume scheme for the Euler system inspired by the two velocities approach. Numer. Math. , 144(1):89–132, 2020

2020
[15]

Feireisl and A

E. Feireisl and A. F. Vasseur. New perspectives in fluid dynamics: Mathematical analysis of a model proposed by howard brenner. New Directions in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics: The Alexander V. Kazhikhov Memorial Volume , pages 153–179, 2010

2010
[16]

C. J. Greenshields and J. M. Reese. The structure of shock waves as a test of brenner’s modifications to the navier–stokes equations. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 580:407–429, 2007

2007
[17]

Han, M.-J

S. Han, M.-J. Kang, and J. Kim. Large-time behavior of composite waves of viscous shocks for the barotropic Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 55(5):5526–5574, 2023

2023
[18]

Han, M.-J

S. Han, M.-J. Kang, J. Kim, and H. Lee. Long-time behavior towards viscous-dispersive shock for Navier-Stokes equations of Korteweg type. J. Differential Equations , 426:317–387, 2025

2025
[19]

J. C. Harley, Y. Huang, H. H. Bau, and J. N. Zemel. Gas flow in micro-channels. Journal of fluid mechanics, 284:257–274, 1995

1995
[20]

C. K. R. T. Jones. Geometric singular perturbation theory. In Dynamical systems (Montecatini Terme, 1994), volume 1609 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 44–118. Springer, Berlin, 1995

1994
[21]

Kang and A

M.-J. Kang and A. F. Vasseur. Contraction property for large perturbations of shocks of the barotropic Navier-Stokes system. J. Eur. Math. Soc. , 23(2):585–638, 2021

2021
[22]

Kang and A

M.-J. Kang and A. F. Vasseur. Uniqueness and stability of entropy shocks to the isentropic Euler system in a class of inviscid limits from a large family of Navier-Stokes systems. Invent. Math. , 224(1):55–146, 2021

2021
[23]

Kang and A

M.-J. Kang and A. F. Vasseur. Well-posedness of the Riemann problem with two shocks for the isentropic Euler system in a class of vanishing physical viscosity limits. J. Differential Equations , 338:128–226, 2022

2022
[24]

M.-J. Kang, A. F. Vasseur, and Y. Wang. Time-asymptotic stability of composite waves of viscous shock and rarefaction for barotropic Navier-Stokes equations. Adv. Math., 419:Paper No. 108963, 66, 2023. 18 EO AND EUN

2023
[25]

M.-J. Kang, A. F. Vasseur, and Y. Wang. Time-asymptotic stability of generic Riemann solutions for compressible Navier–Stokes–Fourier equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 249(4):Paper No. 42, 2025

2025
[26]

Kittel and H

C. Kittel and H. Kroemer. Thermal physics . Macmillan, 1980

1980
[27]

Kittel and P

C. Kittel and P. McEuen. Introduction to solid state physics . John Wiley & Sons, 2018

2018
[28]

Y. L. Klimontovich. On the need for and the possibility of a unified description of kinetic and hydro- dynamic processes. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , 92(2):909–921, 1992

1992
[29]

Y. L. Klimontovich. From the hamiltonian mechanics to a continuous media. dissipative structures. criteria of self-organization. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , 96:1035–1056, 1993

1993
[30]

H. Liu, T. Yang, H. Zhao, and Q. Zou. One-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes equations with temperature dependent transport coefficients and large data. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 46(3):2185–2228, 2014

2014
[31]

R. G. Plaza and J. M. Valdovinos. Global decay of perturbations of equilibrium states for one- dimensional heat conducting compressible fluids of korteweg type. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16300 , 2023

2023 arXiv
[32]

J. M. Reese, M. A. Gallis, and D. A. Lockerby. New directions in fluid dynamics: non-equilibrium aerodynamic and microsystem flows. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , 361(1813):2967–2988, 2003

2003
[33]

G. Teschl. Ordinary differential equations and dynamical systems , volume 140. American Mathematical Soc., 2012

2012
[34]

W. G. Vincenti, C. H. Kruger Jr., and T. Teichmann. Introduction to physical gas dynamics, 1966. (Saehoon Eo) Department of Mathematics, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA Email address : eosehoon@stanford.edu (Namhyun Eun) Department of Mathematical Sciences, Korea Advanced I...

1966

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [13]

S. Eo, N. Eun, M.-J. Kang, and H. Oh. Traveling wave solutions to brenner-navier-stokes-fourier system. Journal of Differential Equations , 422:639–658, 2025

work page 2025

[2] [12]

S. Eo, N. Eun, and M.-J. Kang. Stability of a Riemann Shock in a Physical Class: from Brenner-Navier- Stokes-Fourier to Euler. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03613 , 2024

arXiv 2024

[3] [1]

E. B. Arkilic, K. S. Breuer, and M. A. Schmidt. Mass flow and tangential momentum accommodation in silicon micromachined channels. Journal of fluid mechanics , 437:29–43, 2001

work page 2001

[4] [2]

H. Brenner. Kinematics of volume transport. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 349(1-2):11–59, 2005

work page 2005

[5] [3]

H. Brenner. Navier–stokes revisited. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 349(1-2):60– 132, 2005

work page 2005

[6] [4]

H. Brenner. Fluid mechanics revisited. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 370(2):190–224, 2006

work page 2006

[7] [5]

Bˇ rezina and E

J. Bˇ rezina and E. Feireisl. Measure-valued solutions to the complete Euler system revisited. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. , 69(3):Paper No. 57, 17, 2018

work page 2018

[8] [6]

Chakraborty and F

S. Chakraborty and F. Durst. Derivations of extended navier-stokes equations from upscaled molecular transport considerations for compressible ideal gas flows: Towards extended constitutive forms. Physics of Fluids , 19(8), 2007

work page 2007