Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Navigating Tabular Data Synthesis Research: Understanding User Needs and Tool Capabilities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.20959 v1 pith:QTMPMDJ3 submitted 2024-05-31 cs.AI cs.DB

classification cs.AIcs.DB
keywords dataresearchtabularneedsapplicationschallengescolumncomplex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In an era of rapidly advancing data-driven applications, there is a growing demand for data in both research and practice. Synthetic data have emerged as an alternative when no real data is available (e.g., due to privacy regulations). Synthesizing tabular data presents unique and complex challenges, especially handling (i) missing values, (ii) dataset imbalance, (iii) diverse column types, and (iv) complex data distributions, as well as preserving (i) column correlations, (ii) temporal dependencies, and (iii) integrity constraints (e.g., functional dependencies) present in the original dataset. While substantial progress has been made recently in the context of generational models, there is no one-size-fits-all solution for tabular data today, and choosing the right tool for a given task is therefore no trivial task. In this paper, we survey the state of the art in Tabular Data Synthesis (TDS), examine the needs of users by defining a set of functional and non-functional requirements, and compile the challenges associated with meeting those needs. In addition, we evaluate the reported performance of 36 popular research TDS tools about these requirements and develop a decision guide to help users find suitable TDS tools for their applications. The resulting decision guide also identifies significant research gaps.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SynthGuard: Redefining Synthetic Data Generation with a Scalable and Privacy-Preserving Workflow Framework

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SynthGuard combines Kubernetes/Kubeflow orchestration with SDV/SynthGauge evaluations into a modular, owner-controlled pipeline framework for synthetic data generation.

Pith tools