Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 135 references

Straintronics and twistronics in bilayer graphene

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Strain, not just twist, controls flat-band width and valley topology in twisted bilayer graphene.

desk verdict Comprehensive, genuinely useful TB+continuum study of strained TBG, but the commensurate-cell parameter drift is a real blind spot—referee it, but require a convergence check on ε_b→0 and a clear nominal-vs-fitted parameter table. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.02692 v2 pith:QTSVQFVI submitted 2026-02-02 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Federico Escudero , Dong Wang , Pierre A. Pantaleón , Shengjun Yuan , Francisco Guinea , Zhen Zhan This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el
keywords twistedbilayergrapheneheterostrainmagicangleflatbandsvalleyChernnumberHartreeinteractioncommensuratesupercellstraintronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that strain is a practical second knob, alongside the twist angle, for engineering flat bands and valley topology in twisted bilayer graphene. Using a general construction that makes any twist plus heterostrain commensurate, and comparing atomistic tight-binding with a continuum model, the authors find that the twist angle of minimum bandwidth shifts with strain direction while the minimum achievable bandwidth rises almost linearly with strain magnitude. They also show that shear strain distorts the moiré bands more strongly than uniaxial strain at the same magnitude. Adding electrostatic interactions, the Hartree renormalization weakens as strain broadens the bare bands, so strained devices can have bandwidths comparable to pristine magic-angle ones. Finally, strain drives the valley Chern numbers of the narrow bands from ±1 to 0 by closing and reopening the gap with the remote bands, and with interactions the two bands can switch at different strain values, allowing a regime where only one band is topological.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a combination of a commensurability algorithm that adds a very small biaxial strain to any twist and heterostrain so that the eight integer parameters of an interlayer transformation matrix can be rounded to define an exact commensurate supercell; a strain-extended continuum Hamiltonian whose strain-induced scalar and gauge potentials (particularly the gauge potential) reproduce the tight-binding spectra; and a self-consistent Hartree potential used to compute the valley Chern numbers of the narrow bands. The paper identifies the linear-in-strain growth of the moiré vectors as the origin of the linear scaling of the minimum bandwidth with strain magnitude.

What would settle it

Measure the gap between the narrow and remote bands in a device under controlled uniaxial strain at the magic angle: if the predicted Chern-number transition (at strain magnitudes around 0.5 to 1.5 percent, depending on direction) is not accompanied by the predicted band-touching signature in magnetotransport or nonlinear Hall measurements, the topological part of the claim fails. Alternatively, compute the same quantities in fully incommensurate large supercells with the residual biaxial strain reduced toward zero; if the transition strain shifts by more than a few tenths of a percent, the co

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that strain acts as a tunable control for flat-band engineering and valley topology in twisted bilayer graphene. At fixed twist angle, strain broadens the narrow bands and splits the van Hove singularities, but the twist angle at which the bandwidth is minimum shifts with strain direction, and the minimum bandwidth itself increases practically linearly with strain magnitude. Under shear strain the distortion is stronger than under uniaxial strain of the same magnitude. A self-consistent Hartree calculation shows that strain-induced broadening reduces the electrostatic renormalization, so the effective interacting bandwidth can be comparable to or smaller than in the

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that replacing the real, generally incommensurate twisted-and-strained bilayer with the nearest commensurate supercell—where a tiny residual biaxial strain absorbs the mismatch—does not change the electronic properties, especially the tiny gaps that decide the topological transitions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because the magic angle shifts with strain direction and magnitude, flat bands can be recovered at twist angles away from 1.05 degrees by applying strain, giving a practical tuning route for experimental devices.
  • Shear strain is the stronger distortion: experiments that interpret moiré distortions solely as uniaxial strain would misattribute the electronic signatures, so distinguishing the strain type matters for interpreting STM and transport data.
  • Strained samples can keep narrow bands even after electrostatic interactions, because the Hartree potential weakens as the bare bands broaden, so correlated phases are not ruled out in strained devices.
  • Strain alone is sufficient to drive the valley Chern numbers of the narrow bands from ±1 to 0, and when combined with interactions it can create a regime with a single topological band, which could be detected as a nonlinear Hall response.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the linear minimum-bandwidth relation is generic, strain magnitude could serve as a continuous dial between flat and dispersive bands in other moiré systems, such as transition-metal dichalcogenide bilayers, where the same commensurability construction should apply.
  • A direct check of the topological claim would be to repeat the Chern-number calculation for progressively smaller residual biaxial strain (toward the true incommensurate limit) and confirm that the strain magnitude at which the gap closes converges; without that check, the topological transitions rest on the commensurate-cell approximation.
  • The predicted asymmetric interacting transition suggests a concrete experiment: measuring the nonlinear Hall effect as a function of strain direction and filling factor near the magic angle, where a regime with only one topological band would show a characteristic sign change.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies twisted bilayer graphene under uniaxial and shear heterostrain. It introduces a commensurate-supercell construction that rounds the eight integer parameters of the Park–Madden transformation and absorbs the residual mismatch with a small biaxial strain. Using atomistic tight-binding and a strain-extended continuum model, it reports strain-induced broadening of the narrow bands, a linear increase of the minimum bandwidth with strain magnitude, a strong dependence of the DOS and magic-angle shift on strain direction, shear strain being more effective than uniaxial strain, and strain-driven topological transitions of the valley Chern numbers, with an asymmetry induced by the Hartree potential in the interacting case.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a useful map of how strain can be used to engineer flat bands and valley topology in twisted bilayer graphene, and it offers a concrete computational recipe for building commensurate strained moiré cells. The combination of atomistic tight-binding calculations, relaxed geometries, and a continuum model with systematic parameter tables in the Supplemental Materials is a strength. The TB/continuum comparison across multiple twist angles and strain configurations is valuable, and the Hartree-level treatment goes beyond the bare band picture. However, the key quantitative claims—especially the strain-direction dependence and the topological transitions—rest on a commensuration approximation whose convergence is not demonstrated, and on continuum-model results that are not independently checked by TB for the topology itself.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. III.E, Fig. 7; SM S12] The linear scaling of the minimum bandwidth with strain is presented as a central result, but the text itself credits this scaling to Ref. [20]. The new element appears to be the strain-direction dependence of the magic-angle shift and the demonstration that the linear scaling persists in the continuum model with fitted parameters. Please clarify the incremental claim relative to Ref. [20], and specify whether the linear fit in the bottom panels of Fig. 7 is a guide to the eye or a numerical fit with a stated functional form and residuals.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV, Eq. (33) and following] In the text after Eq. (33), 'relative primitivity' should be 'relative permittivity'.
  2. [Eq. (8) and SM S2] The statement that the fitted shear-strain direction is the real direction plus π/4 is confusing. In Table III, the fitted direction for nominal '0' is 0.5266 rad; it would help to state explicitly which column corresponds to the physical strain direction and which to the rotated angle used in Eq. (8).
  3. [SM S2, Tables II and III] The tables list fitted twist/strain values with many digits but no uncertainties. A modest rounding and a note on the accuracy of the fitting procedure would improve readability.
  4. [Sec. II.B, Eq. (17)] The sentence 'These projections will always fall into the five high-symmetry points' is only true for the unstrained case. In the strained case, the projections are at arbitrary positions, as the following sentences acknowledge. Please rephrase to avoid contradiction.
  5. [Sec. V.A, Fig. 10] In the caption, 'top left panel show' should be 'shows'; also, the white crosses are not consistently defined in the text for the shear panel. Please add a legend or explicit description.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: TB benchmarks are independent, continuum extrapolations are not forced by construction, and self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's core quantitative claims rest on atomistic tight-binding calculations with Slater-Koster hoppings, a LAMMPS-relaxed geometry, and a valley projector; these are externally defined inputs, not outputs of the continuum model. The strain-extended continuum parameters (u0, u1, ℏv/a, and the nonlocal λ's) are fitted to TB band structures at selected configurations, but the headline results — bandwidth vs θ/ϵ/ϕ, magic-angle shift, Hartree renormalization, and valley-Chern transitions — are computed from the fitted model over new parameter ranges rather than read back from the fit. No equation equates a predicted quantity to a fitted value by construction: for example, Eq. (14) plus SM Table II define the actual commensurate supercell geometry used in TB; the main-text labels are approximate, and the discrepancy is a validation/representativeness concern, not a circular one. Self-citations ([21], [72], [84], [115]) appear, but they are not load-bearing: the moiré-potential form is also supported by external Refs. [17,18], the strain gauge fields by Refs. [54,57,58,85,86], and the topological transitions are recomputed here from the model rather than imported from those references. The rounding-induced offset between nominal and fitted strain direction (e.g., SM Table II: proposed ϕ=0 vs fitted ϕ=0.5256 rad) is a real convergence/validation weakness, but it does not make any claim true by definition. No circular step can therefore be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard tight-binding and continuum models plus fitted parameters and several modeling assumptions. No new physical entities are postulated. The most fragile inputs are the calibrated continuum couplings and the unverified commensurate-approximation convergence.

free parameters (8)
  • TB intralayer hopping t0 = 2.8 eV
    Chosen in SM Sec. S3 to reproduce the magic angle at ~1.05°; central to defining the TB benchmark.
  • TB interlayer hopping t1 = 0.44 eV
    Chosen with t0 to put the magic angle at ~1.05°; central to flat-band positions.
  • Continuum Dirac velocity ħv/a (rigid) = 2.15 eV
    Fitted so continuum bands match rigid TB bands (Sec. III.C2).
  • Continuum moiré couplings u0=u1 (rigid) = 0.1 eV
    Fitted to TB for the rigid case; equal values keep remote bands touching the flat bands.
  • Continuum relaxed couplings u1, u0 = u1=0.096 eV, u0=0.05952 eV
    Fitted to relaxed TB bands; ratio u0<u1 reproduces the relaxation-induced gap.
  • Nonlocal moiré couplings λ1, λ2, λ3 = λ1=9 meV·nm, λ2=18 meV·nm, λ3=0
    Fitted to capture relaxation-induced particle-hole asymmetry in the continuum model.
  • Chern mass term m = 10 meV
    Ad hoc small inversion-breaking mass introduced to open a Dirac gap for Chern-number calculations (Sec. V).
  • Hartree gate distance d, dielectric εr, filling ν = d=40 nm, εr=7, ν=+2
    Representative experimental parameters used for Hartree calculations; results depend on screening and filling.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption p_z orbital Slater–Koster tight-binding with hopping cutoffs describes low-energy graphene bands
    Used throughout TB calculations; standard for graphene but an approximation.
  • domain assumption LAMMPS relaxation with AIREBO + Kolmogorov–Crespi potentials gives physical relaxed geometries
    Relaxation results (Sec. III.D and SM S7) rest on classical interatomic potentials.
  • domain assumption Continuum Hamiltonian truncated to three moiré harmonics is valid at small twist/strain
    Eq. (25) neglects higher harmonics; justified only for small deformations as stated.
  • ad hoc to paper Heterostrain defined by straining only one layer is equivalent to symmetric heterostrain near the first magic angle
    Authors distinguish from Refs [20,21] and assert equivalence relying on Refs [46,48,72], partly self-cited.
  • domain assumption Hartree-only mean-field (no Fock exchange) adequately captures electrostatic renormalization trends
    Fock exchange is omitted and acknowledged as beyond scope; may affect broken-symmetry or topology predictions.
  • ad hoc to paper Small mass term m=10 meV does not alter the strain values at which topological transitions occur
    m is an artificial regulator; no convergence in m is shown.
  • ad hoc to paper Rounding to commensurate Park–Madden integers with a tiny biaxial strain leaves electronic structure unchanged
    Core methodological premise; asserted but not convergence-tested.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Straintronics and twistronics in bilayer graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QTSVQFVI

@misc{pith2026260202692,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Straintronics and twistronics in bilayer graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QTSVQFVI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.02692}
}
read the original abstract

The interplay of twist and strain in bilayer graphene enables the formation of moir\'e patterns and narrow bands that host correlated and topological phases. While magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene has been widely studied, strain provides an additional and realistic control knob for band engineering. In this work, we first generate a global method to construct commensurate supercells for arbitrary twist and heterostrain. Then, using atomistic tight-binding and strain-extended continuum models to study the commensurate structures, we identify configurations that minimize the bandwidth beyond the magic angle. The results reveal a strong dependence of band narrowing and topology on strain type, magnitude, direction and lattice relaxation. Particularly, shear strain produces a stronger distortion than uniaxial strain. Including electron-electron interactions through a self-consistent Hartree potential shows that strain broadens the bare bands while reducing electrostatic renormalization. Strain also drives topological transitions as the narrow and remote bands hybridize, establishing twisted and strained bilayer graphene as a tunable platform for flat-band and topological phenomena.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.02692 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Moiré pattern of bilayer graphene with a twist [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Position of the Dirac points projected within [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Band structure and DOS for the commensurate structures of TBG with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Evolution of DOS with uniaxial strain direction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Band structure and DOS for relaxed TBG with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison of energy map of the top and bottom nar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Numerical continuum model results for the bandwidth evolution in the top narrow band, as a function of the twist angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Evolution of the band structure and DOS as a function of the electrostatic interactions (self-consistent Hartree), from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Evolution from a nonrigid to a rigid Hartree effect as the strain increases. Panel (a) shows the continuum model density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Strain-induced topology evolution of the narrow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. (a) Charge density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [20]

    Z. Bi, N. F. Q. Yuan, and L. Fu, Designing flat bands by strain, Physical Review B100, 035448 (2019)

    2019

  2. [1]

    E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, T. Senthil, E. Tutuc, A. Yaz- dani, and A. F. Young, The marvels of moiré materials, Nature Reviews Materials6, 201–206 (2021)

    2021

  3. [2]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 80 (2018)

    2018

  4. [3]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional su- perconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  5. [4]

    Kerelsky, L

    A. Kerelsky, L. J. McGilly, D. M. Kennes, L. Xian, M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J.Hone, C.Dean, A.Rubio,andA.N.Pasupathy,Maxi- mized electron interactions at the magic angle in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature572, 95 (2019)

    2019

  6. [5]

    Yankowitz, S

    M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science363, 1059 (2019)

    2019

  7. [6]

    X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, et al., Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature574, 653 (2019)

    2019

  8. [7]

    Saito, J

    Y. Saito, J. Ge, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. F. Young, Independent superconductors and correlated in- sulators in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Physics16, 926 (2020)

    2020

Show all 135 references
  1. [8]

    Zondiner, A

    U. Zondiner, A. Rozen, D. Rodan-Legrain, Y. Cao, R. Queiroz, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Oreg, F. von Oppen, A.Stern,et al.,Cascadeofphasetransitionsand dirac revivals in magic-angle graphene, Nature582, 203 (2020)

    2020

  2. [9]

    Y. Xu, S. Liu, D. A. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, V. Elser, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Correlatedinsulatingstatesatfractionalfillingsofmoiré superlattices, Nature587, 214 (2020)

    2020

  3. [10]

    Y. Choi, H. Kim, Y. Peng, A. Thomson, C. Lewandowski, R. Polski, Y. Zhang, H. S. Arora, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi,et al., Correlation-driven topological phases in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature589, 536 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    Y. Cao, D. Rodan-Legrain, J. M. Park, N. F. Yuan, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. M. Fernandes, L. Fu, andP.Jarillo-Herrero,Nematicityandcompetingorders in superconducting magic-angle graphene, Science372, 264 (2021)

    2021

  5. [12]

    Lopes dos Santos, N

    J. Lopes dos Santos, N. Peres, and A. Castro Neto, Graphene bilayer with a twist: Electronic structure, Physical Review Letters99, 256802 (2007)

    2007

  6. [13]

    Trambly de Laissardière, D

    G. Trambly de Laissardière, D. Mayou, and L. Mag- aud, Localization of dirac electrons in rotated graphene bilayers, Nano letters10, 804 (2010)

    2010

  7. [14]

    Suárez Morell, J

    E. Suárez Morell, J. Correa, P. Vargas, M. Pacheco, and Z. Barticevic, Flat bands in slightly twisted bilayer graphene: Tight-binding calculations, Physical Review B82, 121407 (2010)

    2010

  8. [15]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences108, 12233 (2011)

    2011

  9. [16]

    E. Y. Andrei and A. H. MacDonald, Graphene bilayers with a twist, Nature Materials19, 1265–1275 (2020)

    2020

  10. [17]

    Moon and M

    P. Moon and M. Koshino, Optical absorption in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review B87, 205404 (2013)

    2013

  11. [18]

    Koshino, Interlayer interaction in general incommen- surate atomic layers, New Journal of Physics17, 015014 (2015)

    M. Koshino, Interlayer interaction in general incommen- surate atomic layers, New Journal of Physics17, 015014 (2015)

    2015

  12. [19]

    San-Jose, J

    P. San-Jose, J. González, and F. Guinea, Non-abelian gauge potentials in graphene bilayers, Physical Review Letters108, 10.1103/physrevlett.108.216802 (2012)

    2012 doi

  13. [21]

    Escudero, A

    F. Escudero, A. Sinner, Z. Zhan, P. A. Pantaleón, and F. Guinea, Designing moiré patterns by strain, Physical Review Research6, 023203 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Tarnopolsky, A

    G. Tarnopolsky, A. J. Kruchkov, and A. Vishwanath, Origin of magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review Letters122, 106405 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Kapfer, B

    M. Kapfer, B. S. Jessen, M. E. Eisele, M. Fu, D. R. Danielsen, T. P. Darlington, S. L. Moore, N. R. Finney, A. Marchese, V. Hsieh,et al., Programming twist an- gle and strain profiles in 2d materials, Science381, 677 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Y. Hou, J. Zhou, M. Xue, M. Yu, Y. Han, Z. Zhang, and Y. Lu, Strain engineering of twisted bilayer graphene: The rise of strain-twistronics, Small21, 2311185 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    J. S. Alden, A. W. Tsen, P. Y. Huang, R. Hov- den, L. Brown, J. Park, D. A. Muller, and P. L. McEuen, Strain solitons and topological defects in bi- layer graphene, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110, 11256 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    Lu, Y.-C

    C.-C. Lu, Y.-C. Lin, Z. Liu, C.-H. Yeh, K. Suenaga, and P.-W. Chiu, Twisting bilayer graphene superlat- tices, ACS Nano7, 2587 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    S. W. Schmucker, C. D. Cress, J. C. Culbertson, J. W. Beeman, O. D. Dubon, and J. T. Robinson, Raman sig- nature of defected twisted bilayer graphene, Carbon93, 250 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    J. H. Wilson, Y. Fu, S. Das Sarma, and J. Pixley, Dis- order in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review Re- search2, 023325 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    Schäpers, J.Sonntag, L.Valerius, B.Pestka, J.Stras- das, K

    A. Schäpers, J.Sonntag, L.Valerius, B.Pestka, J.Stras- das, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Wirtz, M. Mor- genstern, B. Beschoten,et al., Raman imaging of twist 18 angle variations in twisted bilayer graphene at interme- diate angles, 2D Materials9, 045009 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    T. E. Beechem, T. Ohta, B. Diaconescu, and J. T. Robinson, Rotational disorder in twisted bilayer graphene, ACS Nano8, 1655 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    A. C. Gadelha, D. A. Ohlberg, F. C. Santana, G. S. Eliel, J. S. Lemos, V. Ornelas, D. Miranda, R. B. Nadas, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi,et al., Twisted bi- layer graphene: a versatile fabrication method and the detection of variable nanometric strain caused by twist- angle disor...

    2021

  24. [32]

    Huder, A

    L. Huder, A. Artaud, T. Le Quang, G. T. De Lais- sardière, A. G. Jansen, G. Lapertot, C. Chapelier, and V. T. Renard, Electronic spectrum of twisted graphene layers under heterostrain, Physical Review Letters120, 156405 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    N. P. Kazmierczak, M. Van Winkle, C. Ophus, K. C. Bustillo, S. Carr, H. G. Brown, J. Ciston, T. Taniguchi, K.Watanabe,andD.K.Bediako,Strainfieldsintwisted bilayer graphene, Nature Materials20, 956 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Mesple, A

    F. Mesple, A. Missaoui, T. Cea, L. Huder, F. Guinea, G. Trambly de Laissardière, C. Chapelier, and V. T. Renard, Heterostrain determines flat bands in magic- angle twisted graphene layers, Physical Review Letters 127, 126405 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Mannaï and S

    M. Mannaï and S. Haddad, Twistronics versus strain- tronics in twisted bilayers of graphene and transition metal dichalcogenides, Physical Review B103, L201112 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Sinner, P

    A. Sinner, P. A. Pantaleón, and F. Guinea, Strain- Induced Quasi-1D Channels in Twisted Moiré Lattices, Physical Review Letters131, 166402 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    X. Wang, J. Finney, A. L. Sharpe, L. K. Rodenbach, C. L. Hsueh, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Kast- ner, O. Vafek, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Unusual mag- netotransport in twisted bilayer graphene from strain- induced open fermi surfaces, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of...

    2023

  30. [38]

    Jiang, J

    Y. Jiang, J. Mao, J. Duan, X. Lai, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and E. Y. Andrei, Visualizing strain- induced pseudomagnetic fields in graphene through an hbn magnifying glass, Nano Letters17, 2839–2843 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    J. Mao, S. P. MilovanoviC, M. AnđelkoviC, X. Lai, Y. Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Covaci, F. M. Peeters, A. K. Geim, Y. Jiang, and E. Y. Andrei, Ev- idence of flat bands and correlated states in buckled graphene superlattices, Nature584, 215–220 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    T. Peña, A. Dey, S. A. Chowdhury, A. Azizimanesh, W. Hou, A. Sewaket, C. Watson, H. Askari, and S. M. Wu, Moiré engineering in 2d heterostructures with process-induced strain, Applied Physics Letters122, 143101 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    M. Kögl, P. Soubelet, M. Brotons-Gisbert, A. V. Stier, B. D. Gerardot, and J. J. Finley, Moiré straintronics: a universal platform for reconfigurable quantum materi- als, npj 2D Materials and Applications7, 32 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    N.Hasan, T.Peña, A.Dey, D.Yoon, Z.Islam, Y.Zhang, M. V. G. Leal, A. M. van der Zande, H. Askari, and S. M. Wu, Strain-induced moiré reconstruction and memorization in two-dimensional materials without twist, arXiv 10.48550/ARXIV.2510.13699 (2025)

    2025 doi

  35. [43]

    X. Gao, H. Sun, D.-H. Kang, C. Wang, Q. J. Wang, and D. Nam, Heterostrain-enabled dynamically tunable moiré superlattice in twisted bilayer graphene, Scientific Reports11, 21402 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Sequeira, A

    I. Sequeira, A. Z. Barabas, A. H. Barajas-Aguilar, M. G. Bacani, N. Nakatsuji, M. Koshino, T. Taniguichi, K. Watanabe, and J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, Manipulat- ing moires by controlling heterostrain in van der waals devices, Nano Letters24, 15662 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Y. Xie, B. Lian, B. Jäck, X. Liu, C.-L. Chiu, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yazdani, Spectroscopic signatures of many-body correlations in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature572, 101 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    J. Yu, G. Jia, Q. Li, Z. Zhan, Y. Wang, K. Xiao, Y. Ju, H. Zhang, Z. Hu, Y. Guo, B. Lian, P. Tang, P. A. Pan- taleón, S. Zhou, F. Guinea, Q.-K. Xue, and W. Li, Twist angle driven electronic structure evolution of twisted bilayer graphene, arxiv 10.48550/ARXIV.2406.20040 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  39. [47]

    Ouyang, J

    P. Ouyang, J. Yu, Q. Li, G. Jia, Y. Wang, K. Xiao, H. Zhang, Z. Hu, P. A. Pantaleón, Z. Zhan,et al., Structural and electronic signatures of strain-tunable marginally twisted bilayer graphene, National Science Review13, nwaf568 (2026)

    2026

  40. [48]

    Carrasco, F

    R. Carrasco, F. Escudero, Z. Zhan, E. C.-d. Rio, B. Viña-Bausa, Y. Maximenko, P. A. Pantaleon, F. Guinea, and I. Brihuega, Twistraintronics in square moire superlattices of stacked graphene layers, arXiv 10.48550/ARXIV.2511.04741 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    Herzog-Arbeitman, J

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, J. Yu, D. Călugăru, H. Hu, N. Regnault, O. Vafek, J. Kang, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological heavy fermion model as an efficient repre- sentation of atomistic strain and relaxation in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review B112, 125128 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    Herzog-Arbeitman, D

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, D. Călugăru, H. Hu, J. Yu, N. Regnault, J. Kang, B. A. Bernevig, and O. Vafek, Kekulé spiral order from strained topological heavy fermions, Physical Review B112, 125129 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    A. Zhu, D. Bennett, D. T. Larson, M. M. A. Ezzi, E. Manousakis, and E. Kaxiras, Twisted bilayer graphene from first-principles: structural and electronic properties, arXiv 10.48550/ARXIV.2601.16851 (2026)

    2026 doi arXiv

  44. [52]

    Gonçalves, B

    M. Gonçalves, B. Amorim, F. Riche, E. V. Castro, and P.Ribeiro,Incommensurabilityenabledquasi-fractalor- der in 1d narrow-band moiré systems, Nature Physics 20, 1933–1940 (2024)

    1933

  45. [53]

    V. M. Pereira, A. Castro Neto, and N. Peres, Tight- binding approach to uniaxial strain in graphene, Phys- ical Review B80, 045401 (2009)

    2009

  46. [54]

    M. A. Vozmediano, M. Katsnelson, and F. Guinea, Gauge fields in graphene, Physics Reports496, 109 (2010)

    2010

  47. [55]

    Amorim, A

    B. Amorim, A. Cortijo, F. De Juan, A. G. Grushin, F. Guinea, A. Gutiérrez-Rubio, H. Ochoa, V. Parente, R. Roldán, P. San-Jose,et al., Novel effects of strains in graphene and other two dimensional materials, Physics Reports617, 1 (2016)

    2016

  48. [56]

    G. G. Naumis, S. Barraza-Lopez, M. Oliva-Leyva, and H. Terrones, Electronic and optical properties of strained graphene and other strained 2d materials: a re- view, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 096501 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    Suzuura and T

    H. Suzuura and T. Ando, Phonons and electron-phonon scattering in carbon nanotubes, Physical review B65, 19 235412 (2002)

    2002

  50. [58]

    J. L. Manes, Symmetry-based approach to electron- phonon interactions in graphene, Physical Review B76, 045430 (2007)

    2007

  51. [59]

    Guinea and N

    F. Guinea and N. R. Walet, Electrostatic effects, band distortions, and superconductivity in twisted graphene bilayers, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences115, 13174 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    T. Cea, N. R. Walet, and F. Guinea, Electronic band structure and pinning of fermi energy to van hove sin- gularities in twisted bilayer graphene: A self-consistent approach, Physical Review B100, 205113 (2019)

    2019

  53. [61]

    Z. A. Goodwin, V. Vitale, X. Liang, A. A. Mostofi, and J. Lischner, Hartree theory calculations of quasiparticle properties in twisted bilayer graphene, Electronic Struc- ture2, 034001 (2020)

    2020

  54. [62]

    Cea and F

    T. Cea and F. Guinea, Coulomb interaction, phonons, and superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2107874118 (2021)

    2021

  55. [63]

    V. T. Phong, P. A. Pantaleón, T. Cea, and F. Guinea, Band structure and superconductivity in twisted tri- layergraphene,PhysicalReviewB104,L121116(2021)

    2021

  56. [64]

    D. E. Parker, T. Soejima, J. Hauschild, M. P. Zaletel, and N. Bultinck, Strain-induced quantum phase transi- tions in magic-angle graphene, Physical Review Letters 127, 027601 (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    Wagner, Y

    G. Wagner, Y. H. Kwan, N. Bultinck, S. H. Simon, and S. Parameswaran, Global phase diagram of the normal state of twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review Let- ters128, 156401 (2022)

    2022

  58. [66]

    H. Hu, G. Rai, L. Crippa, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, D. Călugăru, T. Wehling, G. Sangiovanni, R. Valentí, A. M. Tsvelik, and B. A. Bernevig, Symmetric kondo latticestatesindopedstrainedtwistedbilayergraphene, Physical Review Letters131, 166501 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    E. J. Mele, Commensuration and interlayer coherence in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review B81, 161405 (2010)

    2010

  60. [68]

    Trambly de Laissardière, D

    G. Trambly de Laissardière, D. Mayou, and L. Magaud, Numerical studies of confined states in rotated bilayers of graphene, Physical Review B86, 125413 (2012)

    2012

  61. [69]

    L. D. Landau, L. Pitaevskii, A. M. Kosevich, and E. M. Lifshitz,Theory of elasticity: volume 7, Vol. 7 (Elsevier, 2012)

    2012

  62. [70]

    M. E. Gurtin, E. Fried, and L. Anand,The mechanics and thermodynamics of continua(Cambridge university press, 2010)

    2010

  63. [71]

    F. N. Escudero, F. Guinea, and Z. Zhan, Geometrical properties of strained and twisted moiré heterostruc- tures, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter (2025)

    2025

  64. [72]

    Escudero, Z

    F. Escudero, Z. Zhan, P. A. Pantaleón, and F. Guinea, Moiré-driven equilibrium, arXiv 10.48550/ARXIV.2601.00948 (2026)

    2026 doi arXiv

  65. [73]

    Artaud, L

    A. Artaud, L. Magaud, T. Le Quang, V. Guisset, P. David, C. Chapelier, and J. Coraux, Universal classi- fication of twisted, strained and sheared graphene moiré superlattices, Scientific Reports6, 25670 (2016)

    2016

  66. [74]

    X. Lai, G. Li, A. M. Coe, J. H. Pixley, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and E. Y. Andrei, Moiré periodic and quasiperiodic crystals in heterostructures of twisted bi- layer graphene on hexagonal boron nitride, Nature ma- terials , 1 (2025)

    2025

  67. [75]

    See Supplemental Materials at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for details on commensurate structures with twist and strain, the tight-binding model, relaxation ef- fects, Berry curvature and topology, and extended nu- merical results

  68. [76]

    J. H. Los, L. M. Ghiringhelli, E. J. Meijer, and A. Fa- solino, Improved long-range reactive bond-order poten- tial for carbon. i. construction, Physical Review B72, 214102 (2005)

    2005

  69. [77]

    A.N.KolmogorovandV.H.Crespi,Registry-dependent interlayer potential for graphitic systems, Physical Re- view B71, 235415 (2005)

    2005

  70. [78]

    Ramires and J

    A. Ramires and J. L. Lado, Electrically Tunable Gauge Fields in Tiny-Angle Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Physi- cal Review Letters121, 146801 (2018)

    2018

  71. [79]

    Ramires and J

    A. Ramires and J. L. Lado, Impurity-induced triple point fermions in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Re- view B99, 245118 (2019)

    2019

  72. [80]

    Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, Journal of Computational Physics 117, 1–19 (1995)

    S. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, Journal of Computational Physics 117, 1–19 (1995)

    1995

  73. [81]

    Y. Li, Z. Zhan, X. Kuang, Y. Li, and S. Yuan, Tbplas: Atight-bindingpackageforlarge-scalesimulation,Com- puter Physics Communications285, 108632 (2023)

    2023

  74. [82]

    Hams and H

    A. Hams and H. De Raedt, Fast algorithm for finding the eigenvalue distribution of very large matrices, Phys- ical Review E62, 4365 (2000)

    2000

  75. [83]

    Polizzi, Density-matrix-based algorithm for solving eigenvalue problems, Physical Review B79, 115112 (2009)

    E. Polizzi, Density-matrix-based algorithm for solving eigenvalue problems, Physical Review B79, 115112 (2009)

    2009

  76. [84]

    P. A. Pantaleón, V. T. Phong, G. G. Naumis, and F. Guinea, Interaction-enhanced topological hall effects in strained twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review B 106, L161101 (2022)

    2022

  77. [85]

    Oliva-Leyva and G

    M. Oliva-Leyva and G. G. Naumis, Understanding elec- tron behavior in strained graphene as a reciprocal space distortion, Physical Review B88, 085430 (2013)

    2013

  78. [86]

    Oliva-Leyva and G

    M. Oliva-Leyva and G. G. Naumis, Generalizing the fermi velocity of strained graphene from uniform to nonuniform strain, Physics Letters A379, 2645–2651 (2015)

    2015

  79. [87]

    Koshino, N

    M. Koshino, N. F. Yuan, T. Koretsune, M. Ochi, K. Kuroki, and L. Fu, Maximally localized wannier or- bitals and the extended hubbard model for twisted bi- layer graphene, Physical Review X8, 031087 (2018)

    2018

  80. [88]

    Koshino and N

    M. Koshino and N. N. Nam, Effective continuum model for relaxed twisted bilayer graphene and moiré electron- phonon interaction, Physical Review B101, 195425 (2020)

    2020

  81. [89]

    S. Carr, S. Fang, Z. Zhu, and E. Kaxiras, Exact contin- uum model for low-energy electronic states of twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review Research1, 013001 (2019)

    2019

  82. [90]

    S. Carr, D. Massatt, S. B. Torrisi, P. Cazeaux, M. Luskin, and E. Kaxiras, Relaxation and domain formation in incommensurate two-dimensional het- erostructures, Physical Review B98, 224102 (2018)

    2018

  83. [91]

    M. M. A. Ezzi, G. N. Pallewela, C. De Beule, E. Mele, and S. Adam, Analytical model for atomic relaxation in twisted moiré materials, Physical Review Letters133, 266201 (2024)

    2024

  84. [92]

    Ceferino and F

    A. Ceferino and F. Guinea, Pseudomagnetic fields in fully relaxed twisted bilayer and trilayer graphene, 2D Materials11, 035015 (2024)

    2024

  85. [93]

    V. H. Nguyen and P. Dollfus, Strain-induced modula- 20 tionofdiracconesandvanhovesingularitiesinatwisted graphene bilayer, 2D Materials2, 035005 (2015)

    2015

  86. [94]

    M. Long, Z. Zhan, P. A. Pantaleón, J. A. Silva- Guillén, F. Guinea, and S. Yuan, Electronic properties of twisted bilayer graphene suspended and encapsulated with hexagonal boron nitride, Physical Review B107, 115140 (2023)

    2023

  87. [95]

    M. Long, P. A. Pantaleón, Z. Zhan, F. Guinea, J. A. Silva-Guillén, and S. Yuan, An atomistic approach for the structural and electronic properties of twisted bi- layergraphene-boronnitrideheterostructures,npjCom- putational Materials8, 73 (2022)

    2022

  88. [96]

    G. Li, R. Krishna Kumar, P. Stepanov, P. A. Pan- taleón, Z. Zhan, H. Agarwal, A. Bercher, J. Bar- rier, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. B. Kuzmenko, F. Guinea, I. Torre, and F. H. L. Koppens, Infrared spectroscopy for diagnosing superlattice minibands in twisted bilayer graphene...

    2024

  89. [97]

    Escudero, Diagrammatic perturbation approach to moiré bands in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Re- view B110, 045442 (2024)

    F. Escudero, Diagrammatic perturbation approach to moiré bands in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Re- view B110, 045442 (2024)

    2024

  90. [98]

    Choi, S.-H

    S.-M. Choi, S.-H. Jhi, and Y.-W. Son, Controlling en- ergy gap of bilayer graphene by strain, Nano Letters10, 3486 (2010)

    2010

  91. [99]

    Guinea and N

    F. Guinea and N. R. Walet, Continuum models for twisted bilayer graphene: Effect of lattice deformation and hopping parameters, Physical Review B99, 205134 (2019)

    2019

  92. [100]

    I. V. Lebedeva and A. M. Popov, Two phases with dif- ferent domain wall networks and a reentrant phase tran- sition in bilayer graphene under strain, Physical Review Letters124, 116101 (2020)

    2020

  93. [101]

    Mesple, N

    F. Mesple, N. R. Walet, G. Trambly de Laissardière, F. Guinea, D. Došenović, H. Okuno, C. Paillet, A. Mi- chon, C. Chapelier, and V. T. Renard, Giant atomic swirl in graphene bilayers with biaxial heterostrain, Ad- vanced Materials35, e2306312 (2023)

    2023

  94. [102]

    Meunier, and J.-C

    V.HungNguyen, D.Paszko, M.Lamparski, B.VanTro- eye, V. Meunier, and J.-C. Charlier, Electronic localiza- tion in small-angle twisted bilayer graphene, 2D Mate- rials8, 035046 (2021)

    2021

  95. [103]

    Timmel and E

    A. Timmel and E. Mele, Dirac-harper theory for one- dimensional moiré superlattices, Physical Review Let- ters125, 166803 (2020)

    2020

  96. [104]

    Kang and O

    J. Kang and O. Vafek, Pseudomagnetic fields, particle- hole asymmetry, and microscopic effective continuum hamiltonians of twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Re- view B107, 075408 (2023)

    2023

  97. [105]

    S. Fang, S. Carr, Z. Zhu, D. Massatt, and E. Kaxiras, Angle-dependentab initiolow-energy hamiltonians for a relaxed twisted bilayer graphene heterostructure, arxiv 10.48550/ARXIV.1908.00058 (2019)

    1908 doi arXiv

  98. [106]

    Y. H. Kwan, G. Wagner, T. Soejima, M. P. Zaletel, S. H. Simon, S. A. Parameswaran, and N. Bultinck, Kekulé spiral order at all nonzero integer fillings in twisted bi- layer graphene, Physical Review X11, 041063 (2021)

    2021

  99. [107]

    Vafek and J

    O. Vafek and J. Kang, Continuum effective hamiltonian for graphene bilayers for an arbitrary smooth lattice de- formation from microscopic theories, Physical Review B 107, 075123 (2023)

    2023

  100. [108]

    Kang and O

    J. Kang and O. Vafek, Analytical solution for the re- laxed atomic configuration of twisted bilayer graphene including heterostrain, Physical Review B112, 125138 (2025)

    2025

  101. [109]

    Hsieh, D

    V. Hsieh, D. Halbertal, N. R. Finney, Z. Zhu, E. Gerber, M. Pizzochero, E. Kucukbenli, G. R. Schleder, M. An- geli, K. Watanabe,et al., Domain-dependent surface adhesion in twisted few-layer graphene: Platform for moiré-assisted chemistry, Nano Letters23, 3137 (2023)

    2023

  102. [110]

    Cazeaux, D

    P. Cazeaux, D. Clark, R. Engelke, P. Kim, and M. Luskin, Relaxation and domain wall structure of bilayer moiré systems, Journal of Elasticity154, 443 (2023)

    2023

  103. [111]

    B. A. Bernevig, Z.-D. Song, N. Regnault, and B. Lian, Twisted bilayer graphene. iii. interacting hamiltonian and exact symmetries, Physical Review B103, 205413 (2021)

    2021

  104. [112]

    Rademaker and P

    L. Rademaker and P. Mellado, Charge-transfer insula- tion in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review B98, 235158 (2018)

    2018

  105. [113]

    Cea and F

    T. Cea and F. Guinea, Band structure and insulating states driven by coulomb interaction in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review B102, 045107 (2020)

    2020

  106. [114]

    M. M. A. Ezzi, L. Peng, Z. Liu, J. H. Z. Chao, G. N. Pallewela, D. Foo, and S. Adam, A self-consistent hartree theory for lattice-relaxed magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, arXiv 10.48550/ARXIV.2404.17638 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  107. [115]

    P. A. Pantaleón, T. Low, and F. Guinea, Tunable large berry dipole in strained twisted bilayer graphene, Phys- ical Review B103, 205403 (2021)

    2021

  108. [116]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal in- variant materials, Physical Review Letters115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  109. [117]

    T. Low, Y. Jiang, and F. Guinea, Topological currents in black phosphorus with broken inversion symmetry, Physical Review B92, 235447 (2015)

    2015

  110. [118]

    Sinha, P

    S. Sinha, P. C. Adak, A. Chakraborty, K. Das, K. Deb- nath, L. D. V. Sangani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, U. V. Waghmare, A. Agarwal, and M. M. Deshmukh, Berry curvature dipole senses topological transition in a moiré superlattice, Nature Physics18, 765–770 (2022)

    2022

  111. [119]

    Fukui, Y

    T. Fukui, Y. Hatsugai, and H. Suzuki, Chern numbers in discretized brillouin zone: Efficient method of com- puting (spin) hall conductances, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan74, 1674 (2005)

    2005

  112. [120]

    J. Pan, H. Wang, L. Zou, X. Wang, L. Zhang, X. Dong, H. Xie, Y. Ding, Y. Zhang, T. Taniguchi,et al., Topo- logical valley transport in bilayer graphene induced by interlayer sliding, Physical Review Letters135, 126603 (2025)

    2025

  113. [121]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Reviews of modern physics82, 1959 (2010)

    1959

  114. [122]

    Battilomo, N

    R. Battilomo, N. Scopigno, and C. Ortix, Berry curva- ture dipole in strained graphene: a fermi surface warp- ing effect, Physical review letters123, 196403 (2019)

    2019

  115. [123]

    Moulsdale, A

    C. Moulsdale, A. Knothe, and V. Fal’ko, Engineering of the topological magnetic moment of electrons in bi- layer graphene using strain and electrical bias, Physical Review B101, 085118 (2020)

    2020

  116. [124]

    P. A. Pantaleón, T. Cea, R. Brown, N. R. Walet, and F. Guinea, Narrow bands, electrostatic interactions and band topology in graphene stacks, 2D Materials8, 044006 (2021)

    2021

  117. [125]

    Cuypers, R

    K. Cuypers, R. Smeyers, B. Jorissen, and L. Co- 21 vaci, Evolution of the berry curvature dipole in uniaxially strained bilayer graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.05962 10.48550/ARXIV.2601.05962 (2026)

    2026 doi arXiv

  118. [126]

    X. Gao, A. Jimeno-Pozo, P. A. Pantaleon, E. Code- cido, D. L. Sharifi, Z. Zhang, Y. Liu, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, M. W. Bockrath, F. Guinea, and C. N. Lau, Double-edged role of interactions in superconducting twisted bilayer graphene, arXiv 10.48550/ARXIV.2412.01578 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  119. [127]

    Dutta, A

    R. Dutta, A. Ghosh, S. Mandal, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, H. Krishnamurthy, S. Banerjee, M. Jain, and A. Das, Electric field-tunable superconductivity with competing orders in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle, ACS Nano19, 5353 (2025)

    2025

  120. [128]

    Song and B

    Z.-D. Song and B. A. Bernevig, Magic-angle twisted bi- layer graphene as a topological heavy fermion problem, Physical Review Letters129, 047601 (2022)

    2022

  121. [129]

    Shi and X

    H. Shi and X. Dai, Heavy-fermion representation for twisted bilayer graphene systems, Physical Review B 106, 245129 (2022). 22 Supplemental Materials for: Straintronics and twistronics in bilayer graphene Federico Escudero, Dong Wang, Pierre A. Pantaleón, Shengjun Yuan, Franci...

    2022

  122. [130]

    Start with a set of four parameters (θ, ϵu/s, ϕ, ϵb) that totally determine the twist and strain

  123. [131]

    (9)–(12) of the main text

    Calculate the eight parameters by using Eqs. (9)–(12) of the main text. (Note that the direct solutions of the eight parameters are generally not integers.)

  124. [132]

    Round the obtained values of the eight parameters to the nearest integers to find the closest commensurate case

  125. [133]

    (13) of the main text

    Calculate (a, b, c, d) by constructing the Park-Madden transformation matrix according to Eq. (13) of the main text

  126. [134]

    (14) of the main text

    Determine the fitted geometrical parameters (θc, ϵc u/s, ϕc, ϵc b) according to Eq. (14) of the main text

  127. [135]

    (9) and (12) of the main text by using the commensurate twist and strain, respectively

    Finally, recalculate the strained lattice vectors and superlattice vectors in Eqs. (9) and (12) of the main text by using the commensurate twist and strain, respectively. This general procedure allows us to generate commensurate structures for arbitrary values of twist and dif...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.