Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Simple BSM explanations of $a_\mu$ in light of the FNAL muon $g-2$ measurement

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.07156 v1 pith:QTVBCZ5S submitted 2021-10-14 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords darkexperimentexplainmattermuoncolliderdiscrepancyexamines
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Now that the Fermilab muon $g-2$ experiment has released the results of its Run-1 data, which agrees with the results of the Brookhaven experiment, one can examine the potential of simple extensions to explain the combined $4.2\sigma$ discrepancy between the SM prediction and experiment. This proceeding examines a single-, two-, and three-field extension of the standard model and examines their ability to explain the muon $g-2$ anomaly, and where possible, produce a dark matter candidate particle with the observed relic density. This is based on work carried out for Ref. [1]. It is found that one can only explain the $a_\mu$ discrepancy whilst avoiding dark matter and collider constraints when the contributions from BSM fields benefit from a chirality flip enhancement. However, in general without small couplings and/or large masses, these models can be heavily constrained by collider and dark matter experiments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools