Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Key Point Analysis via Contrastive Learning and Extractive Argument Summarization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.15086 v2 pith:QUTWKEVW submitted 2021-09-30 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords analysisapproachargumentspointtaskargumentcontrastiveextractive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Key point analysis is the task of extracting a set of concise and high-level statements from a given collection of arguments, representing the gist of these arguments. This paper presents our proposed approach to the Key Point Analysis shared task, collocated with the 8th Workshop on Argument Mining. The approach integrates two complementary components. One component employs contrastive learning via a siamese neural network for matching arguments to key points; the other is a graph-based extractive summarization model for generating key points. In both automatic and manual evaluation, our approach was ranked best among all submissions to the shared task.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ArgCMV: An Argument Summarization Benchmark for the LLM-era

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ArgCMV is a new LLM-curated benchmark of about 12,000 arguments from r/ChangeMyView, and current key point extraction methods transfer poorly to it.

Pith tools