REVIEW 1 cited by
Key Point Analysis via Contrastive Learning and Extractive Argument Summarization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Key point analysis is the task of extracting a set of concise and high-level statements from a given collection of arguments, representing the gist of these arguments. This paper presents our proposed approach to the Key Point Analysis shared task, collocated with the 8th Workshop on Argument Mining. The approach integrates two complementary components. One component employs contrastive learning via a siamese neural network for matching arguments to key points; the other is a graph-based extractive summarization model for generating key points. In both automatic and manual evaluation, our approach was ranked best among all submissions to the shared task.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
ArgCMV: An Argument Summarization Benchmark for the LLM-era
ArgCMV is a new LLM-curated benchmark of about 12,000 arguments from r/ChangeMyView, and current key point extraction methods transfer poorly to it.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.