Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Mechanical Characterization of Compliant Cellular Robots. Part II: Active Strain

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.06234 v1 pith:QVCGTDKQ submitted 2022-03-11 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords meshactiveactuationmacrodeformationactuatorscharacteristicsdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modular Active Cell Robots (MACROs) is a design approach in which a large number of linear actuators and passive compliant joints are assembled to create an active structure with a repeating unit cell. Such a mesh-like robotic structure can be actuated to achieve large deformation and shape-change. In this two-part paper, we use Finite Element Analysis (FEA) to model the deformation behavior of different MACRO mesh topologies and evaluate their passive and active mechanical characteristics. In part 1, we presented the passive stiffness characteristics of different MACRO meshes. Now, in this part 2 of the paper, we investigate the active strain characteristics of planar MACRO meshes. Using FEA, we quantify and compare the strains generated for the specific choice of MACRO mesh topology and further for the specific choice of actuators actuated in that particular mesh. We simulate a series of actuation modes that are based on the angular orientation of the actuators within the mesh and show that such actuation modes result in deformation that is independent of the size of the mesh. We also show that there exists a subset of such actuation modes that spans the range of deformation behavior. Finally, we compare the actuation effort required to actuate different MACRO meshes and show that the actuation effort is related to the nodal connectivity of the mesh.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools