REVIEW 2 cited by
Investigating Length Issues in Document-level Machine Translation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Transformer architectures are increasingly effective at processing and generating very long chunks of texts, opening new perspectives for document-level machine translation (MT). In this work, we challenge the ability of MT systems to handle texts comprising up to several thousands of tokens. We design and implement a new approach designed to precisely measure the effect of length increments on MT outputs. Our experiments with two representative architectures unambiguously show that (a)~translation performance decreases with the length of the input text; (b)~the position of sentences within the document matters, and translation quality is higher for sentences occurring earlier in a document. We further show that manipulating the distribution of document lengths and of positional embeddings only marginally mitigates such problems. Our results suggest that even though document-level MT is computationally feasible, it does not yet match the performance of sentence-based MT.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
XToM: Exploring the Multilingual Theory of Mind for Large Language Models
XToM translates three English theory-of-mind benchmarks into Chinese, German, French, and Japanese with human quality control, and shows LLMs' belief reasoning is weaker and less consistent across languages than their...
-
Optimising ChatGPT for creativity in literary translation: A case study from English into Dutch, Chinese, Catalan and Spanish
A simple 'translate creatively' prompt at temperature 1.0 yields the most creative ChatGPT translations in Dutch, Spanish and Chinese, but all ChatGPT outputs remain less creative and more error-prone than human translations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.