Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 45 references

Splay Stiffening and Twist Softening in a Ferroelectric Nematic Liquid Crystal

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In a material that shows both an ordinary nematic and a ferroelectric nematic phase, magnetic-field thresholds reveal that polar order raises the splay elastic constant by nearly an order of magnitude while softening twist.

desk verdict Splay stiffening is real, but the twist softening is likely an artifact of the chi_m,a extrapolation that the paper's own birefringence data contradict. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15714 v1 pith:QWTLWKZ7 submitted 2025-05-21 cond-mat.soft

Evangelia E. Zavvou , Alexander Jarosik , Hajnalka Nádasi , Christoforos A. Krontiras , Panagiota K. Karahaliou , Rachel Tuffin , Melanie Klasen-Memmer , Alexey Eremin This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords ferroelectricnematicelasticconstantssplaystiffeningtwistsofteningFréedericksztransitionelectrostaticscreeningpolarizationboundchargediamagneticanisotropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks how the mechanical elasticity of a liquid crystal changes when it acquires true ferroelectric order, and it answers by measuring the same material in its nonpolar nematic (N) and ferroelectric nematic ($N_F$) phases. Using magnetic Fréedericksz transitions, it finds that entering the $N_F$ phase raises the splay elastic constant $K_{11}$ by nearly an order of magnitude while significantly lowering the twist constant $K_{22}$. The authors trace the splay stiffening to the electrostatic energy of the bound polarization charges that any splay deformation creates, and they connect the twist softening to competing elastic and electrostatic torques that favor twisted director configurations. These results matter because ferroelectric nematics are the first three-dimensional ferroelectric fluids, and knowing how their mechanical response is shaped by electrostatic interactions is central to understanding their textures, defects, and potential uses in fast electro-optic devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective wavevector-dependent splay elastic constant $K_{\rm eff}(k)=K_1+P_0^2/(\varepsilon\varepsilon_0(k^2+\kappa^2))$, derived in the supplementary information from the screened-Coulomb free energy of bound charges $\rho=-\nabla\cdot\mathbf{P}$. In the long-wavelength limit it becomes $K_1+P_0^2\lambda_D^2/(\varepsilon\varepsilon_0)$, which for typical values ($P_0=6\ \mu\mathrm{C\,cm}^{-2}$, $\varepsilon=100$, $\lambda_D\approx100\ \mathrm{nm}$) gives a correction of order 400 pN. The measurement machinery is the magnetic Fréedericksz transition: threshold fields $B_c=(\pi/d)\sqrt{\mu_0 K_i/\chi_{m,a}}$ in splay and twist geometries give $K_{11}$ and $K_{22}$, with the diamagnetic anisotropy $\chi_{m,a}$ determined in the N phase by combining electric and magnetic thresholds and then extrapolated into the $N_F$ phase by a Haller fit.

What would settle it

Measure the diamagnetic anisotropy directly in the $N_F$ phase by an independent method (for example torque magnetometry or a geometry that isolates the magnetic torque) and recompute $K_{11}$ and $K_{22}$ from the measured Fréedericksz thresholds; if the corrected values no longer show the near-order-of-magnitude splay increase and the twist decrease, the paper's central mechanical claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that polar order reverses the mechanical hierarchy of the nematic state: in the $N_F$ phase the splay constant grows sharply, by nearly an order of magnitude compared with the adjacent N phase, while the twist constant softens markedly. The evidence comes from the magnetic Fréedericksz transition, where the critical field for splay and twist reorientation of the director is measured optically in planar cells; the same geometry yields the N-phase constants, so the comparison is made on one material across its N, intermediate, and $N_F$ phases. The splay jump is attributed to the electrostatic cost of polarization splay: with $\mathbf{P}=P_0\mathbf{n}$, a splay deformation creates bound charge, and screened Coulomb repulsion between those charges adds a wavevector-dependent term to the elastic energy, giving an effective splay constant $K_{\rm eff}(k)=K_1+P_0^2/(\varepsilon\varepsilon_0(k^2+\kappa^2))$. The twist softening is interpreted through the idea that electrostatic interactions in a polar fluid favor ambidextrous twist deformations, so the Frank twist term is effectively reduced.

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on a diamagnetic anisotropy that is extrapolated from the nonpolar nematic phase into the ferroelectric phase rather than measured there, so if polar order changes how strongly the molecules respond to a magnetic field, both the reported splay stiffening and twist softening would be systematically wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Splay deformations in the $N_F$ phase become much more expensive than in the N phase, so polar-aligned cells should resist splay distortions and favor configurations that avoid director divergence.
  • Twist reorientation becomes easier in the $N_F$ phase, so twist Fréedericksz transitions should occur at lower magnetic fields and twisted textures should appear more readily.
  • The electrostatic contribution to $K_{\rm eff}$ depends on the Debye screening length, so ionic content and impurity concentration should measurably alter the apparent splay rigidity.
  • Because the effective splay constant is wavevector-dependent, the stiffening is strongest at short wavelengths, which bears on the formation of striped textures, conics, and other small-scale director structures in ferroelectric nematics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The extrapolated diamagnetic anisotropy is the main quantitative uncertainty; an independent measurement in the $N_F$ phase could shift both constants, though the qualitative stiffening would survive unless the anisotropy changes by a large factor.
  • The electrostatic formula suggests a direct experiment the paper does not report: doping the material with an ionic additive should shorten the Debye length and continuously tune $K_{\rm eff}$, providing a separate check of the mechanism.
  • Twist softening implies that weak-anchoring or confined $N_F$ samples might spontaneously develop twisted or chiral director fields, connecting this measurement to the helical polar phases mentioned in the introduction.
  • The wavevector dependence of $K_{\rm eff}$ means that Fréedericksz thresholds probe only its long-wavelength value; short-wavelength distortions such as defect cores should experience a much larger effective stiffness, which could explain the evolution of the striped textures observed near the transition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a multi-technique study of a liquid crystal mixture exhibiting N, M (antiferroelectric), and NF (ferroelectric nematic) phases, with the goal of comparing the Frank elastic constants of the nonpolar and polar nematic phases. Birefringence, second-harmonic generation, broadband dielectric spectroscopy, and electric/magnetic Fréedericksz transition measurements are combined. The central claims are that the splay elastic constant K11 increases by nearly an order of magnitude in the NF phase, that the twist elastic constant K22 softens significantly in the NF phase, and that the splay stiffening can be attributed to the electrostatic energy of polarization splay, described in the supplementary information by an effective splay constant Keff(k) = K1 + P0^2/(εε0(k^2+κ^2)). The NF-phase elastic constants are obtained from magnetic Fréedericksz thresholds using a diamagnetic anisotropy χm,a extrapolated from the N phase via a Haller-type fit.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper provides valuable quantitative information on how ferroelectric polar order modifies the mechanical response of a fluid nematic, and it tests a comparatively simple electrostatic model for splay stiffening. The strengths include the use of complementary experimental techniques, the SHG confirmation of polar order, a self-contained derivation in supplementary S3 that uses externally specified parameters rather than fitting the measured elastic constants, and the explicit recognition of the difficulty of measuring χm,a directly in the NF phase. However, the twist-softening claim rests on an extrapolated diamagnetic anisotropy that is contradicted by the paper's own birefringence data, and the absence of error bars on the NF elastic constants makes it difficult to assess the significance of the reported softening. The central splay-stiffening claim is more robust to the extrapolation issue, but the electrostatic estimate contains an apparent arithmetic inconsistency. These issues require substantive revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.4, Fig. 8b and Fig. 2] The Haller extrapolation of χm,a into the NF phase is load-bearing. The text states that 'Haller-type behaviour of the orientational order parameter across the whole range of N and NF phases was established by birefringence measurements,' but Fig. 2 shows the opposite: Δn deviates upward in the M phase and jumps at the M–NF transition, so the orientational order parameter in NF lies above the Haller continuation. Since χm,a is proportional to the orientational order parameter at leading order, the extrapolated χm,a is likely an underestimate of the true NF value. Every NF elastic constant Ki = (Bc d/π)^2 χm,a/μ0 is then proportionally underestimated. In particular, the twist softening in Fig. 9b may be an artifact: with a larger, physically motivated χm,a, K22 in the NF phase moves upward and the softening could vanish. The splay stiffening would survive this correction, but the twist claim needs either a direct measurement of χm,a in the NF phase or a sensitivity analysis over the plausible range of χm,a values.
  2. [Section 3.4, Fig. 9] No error bars or uncertainty propagation are provided for the elastic constants in the NF phase. The Haller parameters are quoted with uncertainties, e.g., χm,a0 = (6 ± 1) × 10^-6, and the threshold fields in Fig. S2b also carry measurement uncertainty. These propagate directly into K. Without confidence intervals it is not possible to judge whether the reported twist softening is statistically significant, which is essential because the softening is the less robust part of the central claim.
  3. [Section 3.4, electrostatic estimate] The numerical estimate for the electrostatic contribution is arithmetically inconsistent as written. The paper states that P0 = 6 μC cm^-2, ε = 100, and λD ≈ 100 nm give a correction of 400 pN. Direct evaluation of P0^2 λD^2/(εε0) gives approximately 4 × 10^-8 N = 4 × 10^4 pN, a factor of 100 larger than the quoted value. If a different choice of parameters is intended, that must be stated explicitly; as written, the claim that the electrostatic correction is of 'similar order of magnitude' to the observed stiffening is not supported by the formula and parameters given.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (1)] The exponent N in the conductive term σDC/(iωε0)^N is not defined in the text; please specify its range and role in the fitting.
  2. [Section 3.4, Fig. 9] The text says the splay constant 'exhibits a sharp increase by nearly an order of magnitude,' but the actual K11 values and the temperatures at which they are compared are not quoted. Please state these values so the reader can verify the magnitude of the effect.
  3. [Section 3.4, first paragraph] The sentence 'A limitation of magnetic field measurements, however, is the need for accurate knowledge of the diamagnetic anisotropy, which is often challenging to determine directly' is important, but the subsequent discussion does not explain how the uncertainty in this extrapolation affects the central claims. A brief quantitative sensitivity statement would be helpful.
  4. [Supplementary S2, Fig. S2b] The phase boundaries (N–M and M–NF) are not marked in Fig. S2b; adding vertical lines would make it easier to identify where the extrapolated χm,a is being used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation; the electrostatic splay-stiffening model is self-contained, though the Haller-extrapolated chi_m,a is an unsupported input that can affect the twist-softening magnitude.

full rationale

The central claim, splay stiffening with Keff(k) = K1 + P0^2/(epsilon*epsilon0*(k^2+kappa^2)), is derived in Supplementary S3 from screened Coulomb interactions between polarization charges. The numerical estimate uses external parameter values (P0 = 6 uC/cm^2, epsilon = 100, lambda_D about 100 nm) and is not fitted to the measured K11 or K22 values, so the model is not circular. The NF-phase elastic constants are obtained from magnetic Fredericksz thresholds using chi_m,a extrapolated by a Haller fit; chi_m,a is an input, not a restatement of the elastic-constant result, so the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern does not apply. The main load-bearing caveat is a correctness risk, not circularity: Section 3.4 asserts that 'The Haller-type behaviour of the orientational order parameter across the whole range of N and NF phases was established by birefringence measurements,' but Section 3.1 reports that birefringence 'progressively deviates from the Haller trend' in the M phase and that 'a distinct jump in Delta n is observed at the M-NF transition.' If the true NF chi_m,a is larger than the extrapolation, all NF elastic constants are proportionally underestimated, which could weaken or remove the reported twist softening; however, this is an input-validity issue, not an equation-level circularity. Self-citation [24] is used for context ('As demonstrated in our previous work...'), but Supplementary S3 provides an independent derivation, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. No circular step is present; the score reflects one minor non-load-bearing self-citation and the explicitly noted input-validity risk.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental result depends on the standard Fréedericksz threshold analysis with strong anchoring, on the assumption that the polarization is locked to the director (P = P0n), and most importantly on a Haller-type extrapolation of the diamagnetic anisotropy from the N phase into the NF phase. The electrostatic explanation further assumes Debye-screened Coulomb interactions and uses typical literature values for P0, epsilon and lambda_D rather than measured values for this material. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (9)
  • chi_m,a0 (Haller amplitude for diamagnetic anisotropy) = (6 +/- 1) x 10^-6
    Fitted to N-phase magnetic susceptibility data; used to extrapolate chi_m,a into the NF phase, directly setting the scale of NF elastic constants.
  • T* (Haller extrapolated temperature) = 359.8 +/- 0.3 K
    Fitted parameter in the diamagnetic anisotropy Haller fit; controls the temperature dependence of the extrapolation into NF.
  • beta (Haller exponent for diamagnetic anisotropy) = 0.40 +/- 0.06
    Fitted exponent in the Haller fit; determines how chi_m,a varies with temperature and affects the extrapolated NF values.
  • Delta n0, T*_IN, beta_birefringence = 0.315 +/- 0.005, 357.2 +/- 0.3 K, 0.225 +/- 0.006
    Fitted parameters for the birefringence Haller fit, used to compute the orientational order parameter and justify the chi_m,a extrapolation.
  • P0 (spontaneous polarization in electrostatic estimate) = 6 uC/cm^2 (assumed typical value)
    Typical polarization for ferroelectric nematics from literature, not measured for this mixture; used in the electrostatic splay-stiffening estimate.
  • epsilon (dielectric permittivity in estimate) = 100 (assumed)
    Assumed bare dielectric constant of the ferroelectric nematic, not measured for this material; used in the electrostatic correction estimate.
  • lambda_D (Debye screening length) = 100 nm (assumed)
    Assumed Debye length, not measured; used in the estimate and noted as a source of discrepancy with experiment.
  • d_PI (polyimide alignment layer thickness) = 20 nm (assumed)
    Assumed value for the polyimide layer in the electric Fréedericksz analysis; affects the extracted dielectric anisotropy and hence chi_m,a.
  • epsilon_PI (polyimide permittivity) = 3.5 (assumed)
    Typical polyimide permittivity, assumed temperature- and frequency-independent; used in the capacitance correction.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Frank-Oseen elasticity and the Fréedericksz threshold formula Bc = (pi/d) sqrt(mu0 Ki / chi_m,a) apply to the ferroelectric nematic phase.
    Section 3.4, Eq. for critical fields. Assumes that the standard torque balance holds in the NF phase despite polar order, with electrostatic effects only renormalizing the splay constant.
  • domain assumption Strong planar anchoring at the cell surfaces throughout the measurement range.
    Invoked in Fig. 6 caption: 'Strong planar anchoring condition is assumed.' Weak anchoring would change the threshold fields and the extracted constants.
  • domain assumption The polarization is locked parallel to the director, P = P0 n, in the NF phase.
    Used in the electrostatic derivation in supplementary S3. Standard for ferroelectric nematics, but not directly verified for this mixture.
  • ad hoc to paper Diamagnetic anisotropy chi_m,a follows the Haller-type temperature dependence extrapolated from the N phase into the NF phase.
    Section 3.4, Fig. 8b. This is the load-bearing assumption for computing NF elastic constants; if the true chi_m,a deviates in the polar phase, the central result is affected.
  • domain assumption Electrostatic interactions between bound polarization charges are described by a Debye-screened Yukawa potential.
    Supplementary S3. Assumes a screening length kappa and neglects local-field corrections and nonlinear screening effects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Splay Stiffening and Twist Softening in a Ferroelectric Nematic Liquid Crystal." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QWTLWKZ7

@misc{pith2026250515714,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Splay Stiffening and Twist Softening in a Ferroelectric Nematic Liquid Crystal},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QWTLWKZ7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15714}
}
read the original abstract

The recent discovery of ferroelectric nematics-genuine 3D ferroelectric fluids-has underscored the importance of electrostatic interactions in shaping the physical behaviour of soft matter systems. In this paper, we investigate the mechanical properties of ferroelectric nematics by directly comparing the splay and twist elastic constants in a liquid crystal system that exhibits both nonpolar and ferroelectric nematic phases. Our results reveal that polar ordering results in increased splay rigidity and a concomitant reduction in twist elasticity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.15714 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Polarising optical microscopy textures of the studied compound in a 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Temperature dependence of birefringence ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Second Harmonic Generation: (a) Temperature dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 3D plot of the imaginary part of the complex dielectric permittivity ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Temperature dependence of the relaxation frequency maxima [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematic representation of the measurement geometries for the splay (a) and twist (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Voltage dependence of the dielectric permittivity of the LC layer measured in the N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Temperature dependences of (a) dielectric anisotropy (χ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Elastic constants in the N and NF phases: (a) the splay (K11) and bend (K33) elastic constants in the N phase determined by eFT and fitting the dielectric permittivity εLC(U) with eqs. (3) and (4). (b) Comparison of the elastic constants determined using the mFT and eF…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. G. d. Gennes, J. Prost, The Physics of Liquid Crystals, Clarendon Press, Clarendon Press, 1995. 21

    work page 1995

  2. [2]

    Fréedericksz, A

    V . Fréedericksz, A. Repiewa, Theoretisches und Experimentelles zur Frage nach der Natur der anisotropen Flüssigkeiten, Zeitschrift für Physik 42 (7) (1927) 532–546

    work page 1927

  3. [3]

    Nishikawa, K

    H. Nishikawa, K. Shiroshita, H. Higuchi, Y . Okumura, Y . Haseba, S. Ya- mamoto, K. Sago, H. Kikuchi, A Fluid Liquid-Crystal Material with Highly Polar Order, Advanced Materials 29 (43) (2017) 1702354. doi:10.1002/ adma.201702354

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    R. J. Mandle, S. J. Cowling, J. W. Goodby, Rational design of rod-like liq- uid crystals exhibiting two nematic phases, Chemistry–A European Journal 23 (58) (2017) 14554–14562

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Mertelj, L

    A. Mertelj, L. Cmok, N. Sebastián, R. J. Mandle, R. R. Parker, A. C. Whit- wood, J. W. Goodby, M. ˇCopiˇc, Splay Nematic Phase, Physical Review X 8 (4) (2018) 041025

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    X. Chen, E. Korblova, D. Dong, X. Wei, R. Shao, L. Radzihovsky, M. A. Glaser, J. E. Maclennan, D. Bedrov, D. M. Walba, N. A. Clark, First- principles experimental demonstration of ferroelectricity in a thermotropic nematic liquid crystal: Polar domains and striking electro-optics, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 117 (25) (2020) 14...

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Brown, E

    S. Brown, E. Cruickshank, J. M. D. Storey, C. T. Imrie, D. Pociecha, M. Majewska, A. Makal, E. Gorecka, Multiple Polar and Non-polar Nematic Phases, ChemPhysChem 22 (24) (2021) 2506–2510

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Sebastián, L

    N. Sebastián, L. Cmok, R. J. Mandle, M. R. d. l. Fuente, I. D. Olenik, M. ˇCopiˇc, A. Mertelj, Ferroelectric-Ferroelastic Phase Transition in a Ne- matic Liquid Crystal, Physical Review Letters 124 (3) (2020) 037801

    work page 2020

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    N. A. Clark, X. Chen, J. E. MacLennan, M. A. Glaser, Dielectric spec- troscopy of ferroelectric nematic liquid crystals: Measuring the capaci- tance of insulating interfacial layers, Physical Review Research 6 (1) (2024) 013195

    2024

  2. [10]

    Adaka, M

    A. Adaka, M. Rajabi, N. Haputhantrige, S. Sprunt, O. D. Lavrentovich, A. Jákli, Dielectric Properties of a Ferroelectric Nematic Material: Quantita- tive Test of the Polarization-Capacitance Goldstone Mode, Physical Review Letters 133 (3) (2024) 038101. 22

    2024

  3. [11]

    Vaupoti ˇc, D

    N. Vaupoti ˇc, D. Pociecha, P. Rybak, J. Matraszek, M. ˇCepiˇc, J. M. Wolska, E. Gorecka, Dielectric response of a ferroelectric nematic liquid crystalline phase in thin cells, Liquid Crystals 50 (4) (2023) 584–595

    2023

  4. [12]

    Erkoreka, J

    A. Erkoreka, J. Martinez-Perdiguero, R. J. Mandle, A. Mertelj, N. Sebastián, Dielectric spectroscopy of a ferroelectric nematic liquid crystal and the effect of the sample thickness, Journal of Molecular Liquids 387 (2023) 122566

    2023

  5. [13]

    P. M. Rupnik, L. Cmok, N. Sebastián, A. Mertelj, Viscous Mechano-Electric Response of Ferroelectric Nematic Liquid, Advanced Functional Materials 34 (2024) 2402554

    2024

  6. [14]

    Zattarin, E

    A. Zattarin, E. Cruickshank, D. Pociecha, J. M. Storey, E. Gorecka, C. T. Imrie, A design approach to obtaining highly polar liquid crystal dimers, Liquid Crystals 51 (6) (2024) 1035–1046

    2024

  7. [15]

    Mrukiewicz, M

    M. Mrukiewicz, M. Czerwi ´nski, N. Podoliak, D. Repˇcek, P. Perkowski, R. J. Mandle, D. W˛ egłowska, Polar nematic phases with enantiotropic ferro- and antiferroelectric behaviour, Journal of Materials Chemistry C 12 (20) (2024) 7214–7224

    2024

  8. [16]

    X. Chen, V . Martinez, E. Korblova, G. Freychet, M. Zhernenkov, M. A. Glaser, C. Wang, C. Zhu, L. Radzihovsky, J. E. Maclennan, D. M. Walba, N. A. Clark, The smectic ZA phase: Antiferroelectric smectic order as a prelude to the ferroelectric nematic, Proceedings of the Nationa...

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Medle Rupnik, E

    P. Medle Rupnik, E. Hanžel, M. Lovšin, N. Osterman, C. J. Gibb, R. J. Mandle, N. Sebastián, A. Mertelj, Antiferroelectric order in nematic liquids: Flexoelectricity versus electrostatics, Advanced Science 12 (2025) 2414818

    2025

  10. [18]

    Nishikawa, F

    H. Nishikawa, F. Araoka, A New Class of Chiral Nematic Phase with Helical Polar Order, Advanced Materials 33 (35) (2021) 2101305

    2021

  11. [19]

    Karcz, J

    J. Karcz, J. Herman, N. Rychłowicz, P. Kula, E. Górecka, J. Szydlowska, P. W. Majewski, D. Pociecha, Spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking in po- lar fluid–heliconical ferroelectric nematic phase, Science 384 (6700) (2024) 1096–1099. 23

    2024

  12. [20]

    C. J. Gibb, J. Hobbs, D. I. Nikolova, T. Raistrick, S. R. Berrow, A. Mertelj, N. Osterman, N. Sebastián, H. F. Gleeson, R. J. Mandle, Spontaneous sym- metry breaking in polar fluids, Nature Communications 15 (1) (2024) 5845

    2024

  13. [21]

    Kumari, B

    P. Kumari, B. Basnet, H. Wang, O. D. Lavrentovich, Ferroelectric nematic liquids with conics, Nature Communications 14 (1) (2023) 748

    2023

  14. [22]

    Basnet, M

    B. Basnet, M. Rajabi, H. Wang, P. Kumari, K. Thapa, S. Paul, M. O. Lavren- tovich, O. D. Lavrentovich, Soliton walls paired by polar surface interac- tions in a ferroelectric nematic liquid crystal, Nature Communications 13 (1) (2022) 3932

    2022

  15. [23]

    Caimi, G

    F. Caimi, G. Nava, S. Fuschetto, L. Lucchetti, P. Paiè, R. Osellame, X. Chen, N. A. Clark, M. A. Glaser, T. Bellini, Fluid superscreening and polariza- tion following in confined ferroelectric nematics, Nature Physics 19 (2023) 1658–1666

    2023

  16. [24]

    Zavvou, M

    E. Zavvou, M. Klasen-Memmer, A. Manabe, M. Bremer, A. Eremin, Polarisation-driven magneto-optical and nonlinear-optical behaviour of a room-temperature ferroelectric nematic phase, Soft Matter 18 (46) (2022) 8804–8812

    2022

  17. [25]

    Jarosik, H

    A. Jarosik, H. Nádasi, M. Schwidder, A. Manabe, M. Bremer, M. Klasen- Memmer, A. Eremin, Fluid fibers in true 3d ferroelectric liquids, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences 121 (13) (2024) e2313629121

    2024

  18. [26]

    Sebastián, M

    N. Sebastián, M. ˇCopiˇc, A. Mertelj, Ferroelectric nematic liquid-crystalline phases, Physical Review E 106 (2) (2022) 021001

    2022

  19. [27]

    Sebastián, R

    N. Sebastián, R. J. Mandle, A. Petelin, A. Eremin, A. Mertelj, Electroop- tics of mm-scale polar domains in the ferroelectric nematic phase, Liquid Crystals 48 (14) (2021) 2055–2071

    2021

  20. [28]

    Haller, Thermodynamic and static properties of liquid crystals, Progress in Solid State Chemistry 10 (1975) 103–118

    I. Haller, Thermodynamic and static properties of liquid crystals, Progress in Solid State Chemistry 10 (1975) 103–118

    1975

  21. [29]

    Yadav, Y

    N. Yadav, Y . P. Panarin, W. Jiang, G. H. Mehl, J. K. Vij, Spontaneous mirror symmetry breaking and chiral segregation in the achiral ferronematic com- pound dio, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 25 (13) (2023) 9083–9091. 24

    2023

  22. [30]

    Erkoreka, A

    A. Erkoreka, A. Mertelj, M. Huang, S. Aya, N. Sebastián, J. Martinez- Perdiguero, Collective and non-collective molecular dynamics in a ferro- electric nematic liquid crystal studied by broadband dielectric spectroscopy, The Journal of Chemical Physics 159 (18) (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Matko, E

    V . Matko, E. Gorecka, D. Pociecha, J. Matraszek, N. Vaupoti ˇc, Interpreta- tion of dielectric spectroscopy measurements of ferroelectric nematic liquid crystals, Physical Review Research 6 (4) (2024) L042017

    2024

  24. [32]

    J. W. Goodby, P. J. Collings, T. Kato, C. Tschierske, H. Gleeson, P. Raynes, V . Vill, Handbook of liquid crystals, V ol. 1, John Wiley & Sons, 2014

    2014

  25. [33]

    Luigi Nordio, G

    P. Luigi Nordio, G. Rigatti, U. Segre, Dielectric relaxation theory in nematic liquids, Molecular Physics 25 (1) (1973) 129–136

    1973

  26. [34]

    J. G. Kirkwood, The dielectric polarization of polar liquids, The Journal of Chemical Physics 7 (10) (1939) 911–919

    1939

  27. [35]

    Bordewijk, Extension of the kirkwood-fröhlich theory of the static dielec- tric permittivity to anisotropic liquids, Physica 75 (1) (1974) 146–156

    P. Bordewijk, Extension of the kirkwood-fröhlich theory of the static dielec- tric permittivity to anisotropic liquids, Physica 75 (1) (1974) 146–156

    1974

  28. [36]

    E. E. Zavvou, E. Ramou, Z. Ahmed, C. Welch, G. H. Mehl, A. G. Vanakaras, P. K. Karahaliou, Dipole–dipole correlations in the nematic phases of sym- metric cyanobiphenyl dimers and their binary mixtures with 5cb, Soft Matter 19 (47) (2023) 9224–9238

    2023

  29. [37]

    R. J. Mandle, N. Sebastián, J. Martinez-Perdiguero, A. Mertelj, On the molecular origins of the ferroelectric splay nematic phase, Nature Commu- nications 12 (1) (2021) 4962

    2021

  30. [38]

    Yadav, Y

    N. Yadav, Y . P. Panarin, J. K. Vij, W. Jiang, G. H. Mehl, Two mechanisms for the formation of the ferronematic phase studied by dielectric spectroscopy, Journal of Molecular Liquids 378 (2023) 121570

    2023

  31. [39]

    Erkoreka, N

    A. Erkoreka, N. Sebastián, A. Mertelj, J. Martinez-Perdiguero, A molecular perspective on the emergence of long-range polar order from an isotropic fluid, Journal of Molecular Liquids 407 (2024) 125188

    2024

  32. [40]

    Vaupoti ˇc, T

    N. Vaupoti ˇc, T. Krajnc, E. Gorecka, D. Pociecha, V . Matko, Ferroelectric ne- matics: materials with high permittivity or low resistivity?, Liquid Crystals 2 (2025) 1–13. doi:10.1080/02678292.2025.2484234. 25

    2025

  33. [41]

    H. J. Deuling, Deformation of Nematic Liquid Crystals in an Electric Field, Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals 19 (2) (2007) 123 – 131

    2007

  34. [42]

    L. Paik, J. V . Selinger, Flexoelectricity versus Electrostatics in Polar Ne- matic Liquid Crystals, arXiv (2024). arXiv:2408.10347, doi:10.48550/ arxiv.2408.10347

    2024 doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    S. M. Shamid, S. Dhakal, J. V . Selinger, Statistical mechanics of bend flex- oelectricity and the twist-bend phase in bent-core liquid crystals, Physical Review E 87 (5) (2013) 052503 – 052512. doi:10.1103/physreve.87. 052503

    2013 doi

  36. [44]

    M. T. Máthé, N. Éber, Á. Buka, H. Nishikawa, F. Araoka, A. Jákli, P. Sala- mon, Reorientation of ferroelectric nematic liquid crystals under out-of- plane electric and magnetic fields, Journal of Molecular Liquids 428 (2025) 127525. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2025.127525

    2025

  37. [45]

    Z ˜ρ(k)eik·r dk (2π)3 #

    A. Khachaturyan, Development of helical cholesteric structure in a nematic liquid crystal due to the dipole-dipole interaction, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 36 (10) (1975) 1055–1061. 26 Supplementary information S1. Dielectric properties Figure S1: (Left) Represe...

    1975

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.