Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless region and magnetization plateaus in easy-axis triangular weak-dimer antiferromagnet K$_2$Co$_2$(SeO$_3$)$_3$

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read K2Co2(SeO3)3 exhibits a finite-field Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless phase region whose transitions are governed by U(1) ⊗ S3 symmetry.

desk verdict The new magnetization and heat-capacity data on K2Co2(SeO3)3 are a real experimental contribution; the finite-field BKT claim is a plausible but unproven interpretation resting on a circular classical-MC label transfer. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09619 v2 pith:QXHZBHXR submitted 2025-01-16 cond-mat.str-el

Ying Fu , Han Ge , Jian Chen , Jie Xiao , Yi Tan , Le Wang , Junfeng Wang , Chao Dong
show 6 more authors
Zhe Qu Miao He Chuanying Xi Langsheng Ling Bin Xi Jia-Wei Mei
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thoulesstransitiontriangularlatticeantiferromagnetmagnetizationplateausbilayerquantummagnetspin-1/2dimeremergentsymmetryfrustratedmagnetismclassicalMonteCarlo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the bilayer triangular antiferromagnet K2Co2(SeO3)3 is a weak-dimer, easy-axis magnet whose low-field phases are controlled by an emergent $U(1) \otimes S_3$ symmetry, with $S_3 = \mathbb{Z}_3 \otimes \mathbb{Z}_2^d$ combining threefold sublattice permutations and bilayer dimer exchange. On this basis, it assigns the low-field experimental phase diagram a finite-field Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) region, together with tss, uud, and Y phases, and reports magnetization plateaus at 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, and 5/6 of saturation. A reader should care because a stable finite-field BKT phase in a real frustrated magnet has been elusive; if the identification holds, this compound becomes a concrete platform for studying two-dimensional topological phase transitions in a magnetic field.

What carries the argument

The model is a spin-1/2 (treated classically in simulation) easy-axis antiferromagnet on a bilayer triangular lattice, Eq. (1), with intralayer $J$, intra-dimer $J'_\perp$, and crossed-layer $J_\perp$ couplings and anisotropy $\Delta$. The order parameters $\psi^x_K$, $\psi^z_K$, and $\psi^z_\Gamma$ defined in Eq. (2) measure respectively U(1) spin-rotation breaking, $\mathbb{Z}_3$ sublattice-permutation breaking, and $\mathbb{Z}_2^d$ bilayer-dimer breaking; Binder ratios and scaled correlation lengths from parallel-tempering Monte Carlo locate the transition temperatures. The emergent symmetry $U(1) \otimes S_3$, continuous c-axis spin rotations combined with the discrete $\mathbb{Z}_3$ and $\mathbb{Z}_2^d$ factors, is the organizing principle that fixes the phase topology at low fields.

What would settle it

A neutron-scattering measurement in the region labeled BKT, roughly $B \simeq 1$–$3$ T and $T \simeq 0.1$–$0.5$ K, that found Bragg peaks instead of algebraically decaying spin correlations with a temperature-dependent exponent would refute the BKT assignment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Combining single-crystal magnetization, heat capacity, and magnetocaloric measurements with classical Monte Carlo simulations of a two-layer easy-axis triangular-lattice Hamiltonian, the paper establishes a low-field phase diagram in which the paramagnet gives way through an intermediate BKT phase to the 1/3-plateau uud phase, and at lower fields and temperatures to the S3-broken tss phase and a U(1)-broken Y phase. The central claim is that the sequence and universality of the transitions are dictated by the emergent $U(1) \otimes S_3$ symmetry, where $S_3 = \mathbb{Z}_3 \otimes \mathbb{Z}_2^d$ combines the threefold sublattice permutation of the triangular lattice with the swap symmetry of the weakly coupled Co2 dimers. The same symmetry argument explains why a BKT region survives at finite fields in this bilayer compound, whereas in the monolayer counterpart such a region is confined to zero field.

Load-bearing premise

The classical Monte Carlo simulation with parameters $J'_\perp/J = 1$, $J_\perp/J = 0.2$, and $\Delta = 3$ represents the low-field phase structure of the real spin-1/2 material faithfully enough to name the experimental phases.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A finite-field BKT region exists in K2Co2(SeO3)3, making it a concrete material where two-dimensional BKT physics survives in a magnetic field.
  • The low-field transitions are governed by the emergent $U(1) \otimes S_3$ symmetry, so the phase sequence PM–BKT–uud, with tss and Y at lower temperature, is fixed by symmetry rather than by the precise exchange-coupling values.
  • The magnetization plateaus at 1/3, 1/2, and 2/3 of saturation are reproduced by the classical model with the chosen parameters, while the 5/6 plateau requires effects beyond that model.
  • The transition between the S3-symmetric and $\mathbb{Z}_3$-broken regimes is not direct; it proceeds through an intermediate $\mathbb{Z}_2^d$-symmetric uud phase or through the BKT phase.
  • The finite-field BKT region distinguishes this bilayer compound from its monolayer counterpart and establishes the material as a platform for studying symmetry-driven phase transitions in frustrated magnets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same symmetry argument predicts that isostructural bilayer dimers such as K2Ni2(SeO3)3 should develop a finite-field BKT pocket, since the $S_3$ symmetry comes from bilayer geometry rather than from finely tuned couplings; heat-capacity scans at fields up to a few tesla would test this.
  • Beyond the paper, the 5/6 plateau that classical Monte Carlo cannot produce could be a signature of quantum order by disorder in the dimer-triangle lattice, and a tensor-network ground-state calculation at zero temperature could decide whether it is a fully quantum plateau.
  • Beyond the paper, a stable finite-field BKT region implies a universal jump in the spin stiffness at the BKT line, which is in principle measurable through low-frequency torque or specific-heat scaling; no such measurement is reported here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript combines high-field magnetization, specific heat, and magnetocaloric measurements on single-crystal K2Co2(SeO3)3 with classical Monte Carlo simulations of an easy-axis bilayer triangular Heisenberg model. The experiments show magnetization plateaus at 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, and 5/6 of saturation and a series of low-field thermodynamic anomalies from which the authors construct a B-T phase diagram. Guided by simulations, the low-field phases are labeled as a U(1)-broken 'Y' phase, an S3-broken tss phase, a Z3-broken uud 1/3-plateau phase, and an intermediate finite-field BKT phase. The authors argue that the low-field phase structure of the weak-dimer bilayer is governed by an emergent U(1)⊗S3 symmetry with S3 = Z3⊗Z2^d, and that the close agreement between experiment and simulation validates this symmetry description.

Significance. Should the finite-field BKT region and the S3 phase topology be confirmed, the paper would be a valuable experimental realization of nontrivial symmetry-enriched phase structure in a frustrated bilayer magnet, with clean plateau fractions and a promising platform for further study. The paper includes useful raw experimental data and a transparent symmetry-based framework. Its strengths include the observation of four fractional plateaus, the consistency between temperature- and field-dependent thermodynamic data, and the classical Monte Carlo analysis with Binder ratios and correlation-length crossings. However, the headline BKT claim is currently carried by a model-based labeling scheme whose parameters are not fixed by experiment and whose finite-field BKT phase is not directly probed; the significance therefore hinges on an inference that is not yet established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Theoretical phase diagram; Fig. 4(a); Fig. 3(d) caption] The phase labels BKT, tss, uud, and Y in Fig. 3(d) are explicitly imported from the classical Monte Carlo phase diagram of Eq. (1) computed at one parameter set (J'_⊥/J=1, J⊥/J=0.2, Δ=3). The same simulation is then used in the Discussion to claim that the agreement 'validates the pivotal role' of S3 symmetry. This is circular for phase identification: the thermodynamic anomalies establish transition lines, but not the broken-symmetry character of the phases between them. Moreover, the parameters are stated to remain undetermined. For the central BKT claim to be load-bearing, the authors must either determine J'_⊥/J, J⊥/J, and Δ from experiment (for example by fitting the susceptibility, critical fields, or neutron data) or explicitly present the phase labels as a model-based scenario rather than an experimental identification. The current wording 'identify a BKT phase region' in the abstract exceeds the evidence.
  2. [Phase diagram below 14 T; Fig. 3(a)-3(d)] The experimental case for a BKT phase rests on broad specific-heat anomalies and field-derivative features; no measurement directly establishes quasi-long-range order, a universal BKT jump, or algebraic correlation decay. Since the observed peaks are broad and the transitions are identified only by peak positions, the same data could be described by weak first-order transitions or crossovers. To support a BKT label, the authors need either a direct probe of in-plane correlations (e.g., neutron scattering), a quantitative finite-size/universality test of the transition, or a clear statement that 'BKT' is a theoretical interpretation inferred from the simulation rather than an experimental determination.
  3. [Weak-dimer interaction and multiple magnetization plateaus; Eq. (1)] The weak-dimer classification is supported mainly by the similarity of χ(T) and critical fields to the monolayer compound and the absence of an obvious spin gap at 2 K. These are suggestive but do not determine J'_⊥/J; the simulation uses J'_⊥/J=1, which is not a small dimer coupling. If the actual intra-dimer coupling is stronger, the S3=Z3⊗Z2^d symmetry reduction and the BKT phase derived from it would not apply. The manuscript should provide a quantitative estimate of J'_⊥ (e.g., from a fit of the full susceptibility or from the dimer gap scale) before using the weak-dimer regime as the basis for the phase diagram.
  4. [Discussions and Conclusions] The classical model used for the low-field labels is acknowledged not to reproduce the 5/6 plateau, which is attributed to quantum effects. While this concerns high fields, it weakens the 'remarkable agreement' argument used to validate the model and thereby the transferability of the low-field labels. Please specify the field and temperature range over which the parameter set is actually validated, and discuss how the missing plateau affects the confidence in the low-field phase identification.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Discussions and Conclusions] In the sentence 'the exact experimental parameters of K2Co2(SeO3)2 remain undetermined', the formula appears to be a typo for K2Co2(SeO3)3; please correct it.
  2. [Eq. (2)] The order parameters in Eq. (2) do not include a normalization by the number of dimer sites, and the quantity δq in the correlation-length expression is only loosely defined. Please make the definitions self-contained.
  3. [Fig. 3(d)] The phase-boundary lines are 'guides for the eye'; please indicate which symbols correspond to specific-heat, magnetization, and MCE data and add error bars or symbol-size information so the reader can judge the uncertainty in boundary positions.
  4. [Supplementary Material] The paper references fine-tuned simulations that reproduce the 1/3, 1/2, and 2/3 plateaus (Fig. S2) and the MCE data (Fig. S4), but the text does not give the corresponding parameter values or a link to the supplementary file. Please provide these details for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the BKT phase is a computed consequence of an explicit classical Monte Carlo model, and the experimental transition lines are independently measured.

full rationale

The paper does not reduce its central claim to its own inputs. The theoretical phase diagram is obtained by classical Monte Carlo simulation of the explicit Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) with stated parameters (J'_⊥/J=1, J⊥/J=0.2, Δ=3), using order parameters, Binder ratios, and correlation-length crossings. The BKT phase is an emergent result of the simulation, not a fitted target or a definitional consequence of the model. The experimental phase diagram is constructed from independent thermodynamic measurements (specific heat, magnetization, magnetocaloric effect), and the phase labels in Fig. 3(d) are explicitly stated in the caption to be based on subsequent theoretical simulations; this is a labeling choice, not a derivation of the data from the theory. The claimed agreement is between computed boundary shapes and measured anomaly lines, not between a quantity and its own definition. No parameter is fitted to the BKT boundary itself, and the model's parameters are acknowledged to remain undetermined. The self-citations in the reference list are contextual (related compounds and prior method papers) and are not load-bearing for the BKT claim. The acknowledged inability of the classical model to reproduce the 5/6 plateau and the need for quantum effects are limitations of the model's applicability, not circularity. The analysis therefore finds no circular step under the specified rubric.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theoretical phase diagram that carries the paper's interpretation rests on three hand-picked exchange parameters (J'_⊥/J = 1, J⊥/J = 0.2, Δ = 3) plus additional fine-tuned values referenced only to Fig. S2. No neutron scattering, no ab initio calculation, and no quantitative fit constrain these numbers. The classical treatment of S=1/2 moments adds a quantum-to-classical leap that the authors partially acknowledge when they attribute the 5/6 plateau to quantum effects. The symmetry argument supplies some independent robustness, but the specific phase labels in the experimental diagram are imported from this same simulation.

free parameters (4)
  • J'_⊥/J = 1
    Intra-dimer coupling strength in Fig. 4(a); chosen by hand, not determined from experiment.
  • J⊥/J = 0.2
    Crossed-layer coupling in Fig. 4(a); chosen by hand; likely not the true value.
  • Δ = 3
    Easy-axis anisotropy; assumed uniform; chosen to match the low-field phase diagram.
  • Fine-tuned exchange parameters for high-field plateaus = not stated
    Discussion: 'by fine-tuning parameters, classical MC successfully reproduces the 1/3, 1/2, and 2/3 plateaus (Fig. S2)'; values not given in main text.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Classical spin approximation for S=1/2 Co2+ moments
    The MC simulation treats spins as classical vectors; real Co2+ is an effective S=1/2 quantum spin, and the paper acknowledges quantum effects are needed for the 5/6 plateau (Discussion).
  • domain assumption Effective S=1/2 state of Co2+ in the 40-100 K range
    Used for Curie-Weiss comparison and for mapping to the spin model; no ab initio derivation is given here.
  • domain assumption Uniform easy-axis anisotropy Δ across all bonds
    Eq. (1) assumes a single Δ for intralayer, intra-dimer, and interlayer bonds; no independent constraint is given.
  • domain assumption U(1)⊗S3 symmetry controls low-field phase structure independent of interaction values
    This is the central theoretical premise, taken from symmetry classification literature (Melchy and Zhitomirsky, Jose et al.), not derived from the material's Hamiltonian ab initio.
  • domain assumption Bilayer antiferromagnetic dimer geometry and order-parameter sign convention
    Order parameters in Eq. (2) use a minus sign between layers based on antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling; the structure supports this.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless region and magnetization plateaus in easy-axis triangular weak-dimer antiferromagnet K$_2$Co$_2$(SeO$_3$)$_3$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QXHZBHXR

@misc{pith2026250109619,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless region and magnetization plateaus in easy-axis triangular weak-dimer antiferromagnet K$_2$Co$_2$(SeO$_3$)$_3$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QXHZBHXR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09619}
}
abstract

We investigate the magnetic phase diagram of the bilayer triangular antiferromagnet K$_2$Co$_2$(SeO$_3$)$_3$, revealing a rich interplay among geometric frustration, bilayer coupling, and symmetry-driven phenomena. High-field magnetization measurements show fractional magnetization plateaus at 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, and 5/6 of the saturation magnetization. To elucidate the experimental magnetic phase diagram at low fields, we propose that K$_2$Co$_2$(SeO$_3$)$_3$ can be described as an easy-axis triangular weak-dimer antiferromagnet. We emphasize the critical role of the emergent $U(1) \otimes S_3$ symmetry, where $S_3 = \mathbb{Z}_3 \otimes \mathbb{Z}_2^d$, in determining the magnetic phases at low fields. The remarkable agreement between the experimental and theoretical phase diagrams suggests that the phase transitions are governed by this symmetry. Notably, our combined experimental and theoretical results identify a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) phase region at finite fields. These findings provide new insights into the phase structure of frustrated magnets and establish K$_2$Co$_2$(SeO$_3$)$_3$ as a compelling platform for exploring unconventional quantum phenomena in $U(1) \otimes S_3$ systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09619 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Spin configurations illustrating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (c) compares the magnetization curves of K2Co2(SeO3)3 and K2Co(SeO3)2 at 2 K. Despite the large Curie-Weiss temperatures (exceeding 40 K), the critical fields for the onset of the 1/3 magnetization plateau are relatively small, a behavior attributed to the strong magnetic anisotropy in both systems. The close proximity of the critical fields, with their difference being significantly smaller than the Curie￾Weiss tem… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Magnetic specific heat divided by temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Phase diagram obtained from classical Monte Carlo sim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum spin-glass criticality in disordered frustrated dimer magnets

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a disordered triangular bilayer Heisenberg magnet, theory predicts a quantum spin glass whose near-critical order is sparse and nearly collinear — 'doubly weak' — with strongly suppressed amplitude (Higgs) mode weight.

  2. Frustrated kagome-lattice bilayer quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For a strongly coupled kagome bilayer Heisenberg antiferromagnet just below saturation, low-temperature physics maps to a classical gas of hard rhombi, yielding no singlet-ordering transition and sample-shape-dependen...

  3. Wannier states and spin supersolid physics in the triangular antiferromagnet K$_2$Co(SeO$_3$)$_2$

    cond-mat.str-el 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    K2Co(SeO3)2 shows Wannier entropy and continuum spin excitations consistent with a spin supersolid described by a triangular-lattice XXZ model, as supported by neutron scattering and quantum Monte Carlo.

  4. Emergent Spin Supersolids in Frustrated Quantum Materials

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    Spin supersolids featuring coexisting longitudinal spin order breaking lattice symmetry and transverse order breaking spin U(1) symmetry have been established in frustrated quantum magnets through consistent experimen...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    V . Zapf, M. Jaime, and C. D. Batista, Bose-Einstein condensa- tion in quantum magnets, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 563 (2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    1(c)), while preserving a continuousU (1) symmetry associated with FIG

    enriches the triangular lattice’s Z3 symmetry, extending it to S3 = Z3 ⊗ Zd 2 (Fig. 1(c)), while preserving a continuousU (1) symmetry associated with FIG. 1. (a) Spin configurations illustrating Z3 symmetry in an an- tiferromagnetic triangle. (b) Spin configurations demonstrating Z6 symmetry in a single-layer triangle with time-reversal symmetry. (c) Spi...

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    H. T. Diep, Frustrated Spin Systems (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    T. Ono, H. Tanaka, H. A. Katori, F. Ishikawa, H. Mitamura, and T. Goto, Magnetization plateau in the frustrated quantum spin system Cs2CuBr4, Phys. Rev. B 67, 104431 (2003)

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    Alicea, A

    J. Alicea, A. V . Chubukov, and O. A. Starykh, Quantum sta- bilization of the 1/3-magnetization plateau in Cs 2CuBr4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 137201 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    H. D. Zhou, C. Xu, A. M. Hallas, H. J. Silverstein, C. R. Wiebe, I. Umegaki, J. Q. Yan, T. P. Murphy, J. H. Park, Y . Qiu, J. R. D. Copley, J. S. Gardner, and Y . Takano, Successive Phase Tran- sitions and Extended Spin-Excitation Continuum in the S= 1 2 Triangular-Lattice Antiferromagnet Ba3CoSb2O9, Phys. Rev. Lett 109, 267206 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Susuki, N

    T. Susuki, N. Kurita, T. Tanaka, H. Nojiri, A. Matsuo, K. Kindo, and H. Tanaka, Magnetization Process and Collective Excita- tions in the S = 1 2 Triangular-Lattice Heisenberg Antiferro- magnet Ba3CoSb2O9, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 267201 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    M. Lee, E. S. Choi, X. Huang, J. Ma, C. R. Dela Cruz, M. Mat- suda, W. Tian, Z. L. Dun, S. Dong, and H. D. Zhou, Mag- netic phase diagram and multiferroicity of Ba 3MnNb2O9: A spin- 5 2 triangular lattice antiferromagnet with weak easy-axis anisotropy, Phys. Rev. Lett 90, 224402 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Zhong, S

    R. Zhong, S. Guo, G. Xu, Z. Xu, and R. J. Cava, Strong quan- tum fluctuations in a quantum spin liquid candidate with a Co- based triangular lattice, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 14505 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    N. Li, Q. Huang, X. Yue, W. Chu, Q. Chen, E. Choi, X. Zhao, H. Zhou, and X. Sun, Possible itinerant excitations and quantum spin state transitions in the effective spin-1 2 triangular-lattice an- tiferromagnet Na2BaCo(PO4)2, Nat. Commun.11, 4216 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Sheng, L

    J. Sheng, L. Wang, A. Candini, W. Jiang, L. Huang, B. Xi, J. Zhao, H. Ge, N. Zhao, Y . Fu, et al. , Two-dimensional quantum universality in the spin- 1 2 triangular-lattice quantum antiferromagnet Na2BaCo(PO4)2, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2211193119 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    N. Li, Q. Huang, A. Brassington, X. Yue, W. Chu, S. Guang, X. H. Zhou, P. Gao, E. X. Feng, H. B. Cao,et al., Quantum spin state transitions in the spin-1 equilateral triangular lattice anti- ferromagnet Na2BaNi(PO4)2, Phys. Rev. B104, 104403 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Sheng, J.-W

    J. Sheng, J.-W. Mei, L. Wang, X. Xu, W. Jiang, L. Xu, H. Ge, N. Zhao, T. Li, A. Candini, B. Xi, J. Zhao, Y . Fu, J. Yang, Y . Zhang, G. Biasiol, S. Wang, J. Zhu, P. Miao, X. Tong, D. Yu, R. Mole, Y . Cui, L. Ma, Z. Zhang, Z. Ouyang, W. Tong, A. Podlesnyak, L. Wang, F. Ye, D. Y...

    2025

  6. [14]

    Zhong, S

    R. Zhong, S. Guo, and R. Cava, Frustrated magnetism in the layered triangular lattice materials K 2Co(SeO3)2 and Rb2Co(SeO3)2, Phys. Rev. Mat. 4, 084406 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    M. Zhu, V . Romerio, N. Steiger, S. Nabi, N. Murai, S. Ohira- Kawamura, K. Y . Povarov, Y . Skourski, R. Sibille, L. Keller, et al., Continuum excitations in a spin supersolid on a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 186704 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    T. Chen, A. Ghasemi, J. Zhang, L. Shi, Z. Tagay, L. Chen, E.- S. Choi, M. Jaime, M. Lee, Y . Hao, et al., Phase Diagram and Spectroscopic Evidence of Supersolids in Quantum Ising Mag- net K2Co(SeO3)2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15869 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Ishii, S

    R. Ishii, S. Tanaka, K. Onuma, Y . Nambu, M. Tokunaga, T. Sakakibara, N. Kawashima, Y . Maeno, C. Broholm, D. P. Gautreaux, J. Y . Chan, and S. Nakatsuji, Successive phase tran- sitions and phase diagrams for the quasi-two-dimensional easy- 6 axis triangular antiferromagnet Rb...

    2009

  10. [18]

    Aczel, Y

    A. Aczel, Y . Kohama, M. Jaime, K. Ninios, H. B. Chan, L. Bal- icas, H. Dabkowska, and G. Luke, Bose-Einstein condensation of triplons in Ba3Cr2O8, Phys. Rev. B 79, 100409 (2009)

    2009

  11. [19]

    Aczel, Y

    A. Aczel, Y . Kohama, C. Marcenat, F. Weickert, M. Jaime, O. Ayala-Valenzuela, R. McDonald, S. Selesnic, H. Dabkowska, and G. Luke, Field-induced Bose-Einstein condensation of triplons up to 8 K in Sr 3Cr2O8, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 207203 (2009)

    2009

  12. [20]

    Kofu, J.-H

    M. Kofu, J.-H. Kim, S. Ji, S.-H. Lee, H. Ueda, Y . Qiu, H.-J. Kang, M. Green, and Y . Ueda, Weakly coupledS = 1/2 quan- tum spin singlets in Ba 3Cr2O8, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 037206 (2009)

    2009

  13. [21]

    Zhong, S

    R. Zhong, S. Guo, L. T. Nguyen, and R. J. Cava, Frus- trated spin-1/2 dimer compound K 2Co2(SeO3)3 with easy-axis anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B 102, 224430 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    X. Xu, T. Chen, H. Wang, W. Xie, C. Broholm, and R. J. Cava, Frustrated magnetism in a potential quantum material based on spin-1/2 Co2+ dimers, Chem. Mater. 36, 4157 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Z. Li, Z. Ouyang, J. Cao, L. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Xia, and J. Wang, Magnetism in the S = 1 triangular dimer lattice anti- ferromagnet K2Ni2(SeO3)3, Phys. Rev. B 109, 224413 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    L. Yue, Z. Lu, K. Yan, L. Wang, S. Guo, R. Guo, P. Chen, X. Chen, and J.-W. Mei, Magnetic phase transitions in the triangular-lattice spin-1 dimer compound K 2Ni2(SeO3)3, Phys. Rev. B 109, 214430 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Yamamoto and I

    D. Yamamoto and I. Danshita, Magnon supersolid and anoma- lous hysteresis in spin dimers on a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 88, 014419 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    Stre ˇcka, K

    J. Stre ˇcka, K. Karˇlov´a, V . Baliha, and O. Derzhko, Ising versus Potts criticality in low-temperature magnetothermodynamics of a frustrated spin- 1 2 Heisenberg triangular bilayer, Phys. Rev. B 98, 174426 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    G. V . Chen, Emergent Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless and Kugel-Khomskii Physics in the Triangular Lattice Bilayer Col- baltate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 136703 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    A. V . Chubukov and D. I. Golosov, Quantum theory of an anti- ferromagnet on a triangular lattice in a magnetic field, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 3, 69 (1991)

    1991

  21. [29]

    Sheng and C

    Q. Sheng and C. L. Henley, Ordering due to disorder in a tri- angular Heisenberg antiferromagnet with exchange anisotropy, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 4, 2937 (1992)

    1992

  22. [30]

    Miyashita, Magnetic Properties of Ising-Like Heisenberg Antiferromagnets on the Triangular Lattice, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 55, 3605 (1986)

    S. Miyashita, Magnetic Properties of Ising-Like Heisenberg Antiferromagnets on the Triangular Lattice, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 55, 3605 (1986)

    1986

  23. [31]

    Miyashita, Phase transition in spin systems with various types of fluctuations, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Se- ries B 86, 643 (2010)

    S. Miyashita, Phase transition in spin systems with various types of fluctuations, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Se- ries B 86, 643 (2010)

    2010

  24. [32]

    Melchy and M

    P.-E. Melchy and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Interplay of anisotropy and frustration: Triple transitions in a triangular-lattice antifer- romagnet, Phys. Rev. B 80, 064411 (2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    J. V . Jos´e, L. P. Kadanoff, S. Kirkpatrick, and D. R. Nelson, Renormalization, vortices, and symmetry-breaking perturba- tions in the two-dimensional planar model, Phys. Rev. B 16, 1217 (1977)

    1977

  26. [34]

    F. Y . Wu, The Potts model, Rev. Mod. Phys.54, 235 (1982)

    1982

  27. [35]

    Nienhuis, Critical behavior of two-dimensional spin models and charge asymmetry in the coulomb gas, Journal of Statistical Physics 34, 731 (1984)

    B. Nienhuis, Critical behavior of two-dimensional spin models and charge asymmetry in the coulomb gas, Journal of Statistical Physics 34, 731 (1984)

    1984

  28. [36]

    L. D. Landau, On the theory of phase transitions, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 7, 19 (1937)

    1937

  29. [37]

    Ji and X.-G

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transi- tions, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033417 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Chatterjee and X.-G

    A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen, Holographic theory for continu- ous phase transitions: Emergence and symmetry protection of gaplessness, Phys. Rev. B 108, 075105 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Z. Hu, Z. Ma, Y .-D. Liao, H. Li, C. Ma, Y . Cui, Y . Shangguan, Z. Huang, Y . Qi, W. Li, et al. , Evidence of the Berezinskii- Kosterlitz-Thouless phase in a frustrated magnet, Nat. Com- mun. 11, 5631 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Hukushima and K

    K. Hukushima and K. Nemoto, Exchange Monte Carlo Method and Application to Spin Glass Simulations, Journal of the Phys- ical Society of Japan 65, 1604 (1996)

    1996

  33. [41]

    Miyatake, M

    Y . Miyatake, M. Yamamoto, J. J. Kim, M. Toyonaga, and O. Nagai, On the implementation of the ‘heat bath’ algorithms for Monte Carlo simulations of classical Heisenberg spin sys- tems, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics19, 2539 (1986)

    1986

  34. [42]

    J. B. Goodenough, Goodenough-Kanamori rule, Scholarpedia 3, 7382 (2008), revision #122456

    2008

  35. [43]

    Leuenberger, B

    B. Leuenberger, B. Briat, J. C. Canit, A. Furrer, P. Fischer, and H. U. Guedel, Synthesis, structural characterization, and magnetic properties of vanadium (3+) dimer compounds. neu- tron scattering and magnetic circular dichroism study of ce- sium chlorovanadate (Cs3V2Cl9) an...

    1986

  36. [44]

    Ishii, Y

    Y . Ishii, Y . Narumi, Y . Matsushita, M. Oda, T. Kida, M. Hagi- wara, and H. Yoshida, Field-induced successive phase tran- sitions in the J1-J2 buckled honeycomb antiferromagnet Cs3Fe2Cl9, Phys. Rev. B 103, 104433 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    S. Gao, C. Pasco, O. Omar, Q. Zhang, D. M. Pajerowski, F. Ye, M. Frontzek, A. F. May, M. B. Stone, and A. D. Christianson, Codimension-two spiral spin-liquid in the effec- tive honeycomb-lattice compound Cs 3Fe2Cl9, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.18973 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Onizuka, H

    K. Onizuka, H. Kageyama, Y . Narumi, K. Kindo, Y . Ueda, and T. Goto, 1/3 magnetization plateau in SrCu2(BO3)2-stripe order of excited triplets, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 69, 1016 (2000)

    2000

  39. [47]

    Supplementary material for detailed experimental and calcula- tions

  40. [48]

    Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of ising model block dis- tribution functions, Zeitschrift f ¨ur Physik B Condensed Matter 43, 119 (1981)

    K. Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of ising model block dis- tribution functions, Zeitschrift f ¨ur Physik B Condensed Matter 43, 119 (1981)

    1981

  41. [49]

    Binder and D

    K. Binder and D. Heermann, Monte Carlo Simulation in Sta- tistical Physics: An Introduction , Graduate Texts in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010)

    2010

  42. [50]

    D. X. Viet and H. Kawamura, Monte Carlo studies of chiral and spin ordering of the three-dimensional Heisenberg spin glass, Phys. Rev. B 80, 064418 (2009)

    2009

  43. [51]

    Seabra, T

    L. Seabra, T. Momoi, P. Sindzingre, and N. Shannon, Phase di- agram of the classical Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a triangu- lar lattice in an applied magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B84, 214418 (2011)

    2011

  44. [52]

    J. I. Cirac, D. P ´erez-Garc´ıa, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Ma- trix product states and projected entangled pair states: Con- cepts, symmetries, theorems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045003 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.