Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 67 references

MOVi: Training-free Text-conditioned Multi-Object Video Generation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read MOVi is a training-free framework that gets existing text-to-video diffusion models to generate multiple distinct, moving objects by having an LLM plan per-object trajectories and steering the noise and attention accordingly.

desk verdict Useful training-free recipe with an overclaimed headline: the trajectory-binding claim is real but unmeasured by the current metrics. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22980 v1 pith:QXTRQGQL submitted 2025-05-29 cs.CV

Aimon Rahman , Jiang Liu , Ze Wang , Ximeng Sun , Jialian Wu , Xiaodong Yu , Yusheng Su , Vishal M. Patel
show 2 more authors
Zicheng Liu Emad Barsoum
This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords multi-objectvideogenerationtext-to-videodiffusionmodelstraining-freeinferencelargelanguagemodeltrajectoryplanningnoisereinitializationcross-attentionre-weightingobjectfeaturedisentanglementmotiondynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Text-to-video diffusion models already know how to draw and move a single object convincingly; what they lack is a way to keep several objects apart in one scene. MOVi is a training-free wrapper that adds that ability: it asks a large language model to choreograph one bounding-box trajectory per object, injects those trajectories into the low-frequency part of the initial noise so each object follows its own path, and then reweights cross-attention so each object region is driven mainly by its own text token. The paper reports that this lifts a VideoCrafter2 baseline from a weighted motion-plus-accuracy score of 0.43 to 0.85, a 42-point absolute gain, and raises the VBench multi-object score from 40.66% to 62.19%, while keeping motion smoothness high. The claim matters because it suggests multi-object control can be added to any existing text-to-video model without retraining, fine-tuning, or extra user input beyond the prompt itself.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is multi-object noise reinitialization combined with object-text token attention re-weighting. Starting from FreeInit-style frequency filtering, MOVi keeps the low-frequency components of the initial noise, the part diffusion models use to fix layout and foreground objects, and stitches them along each LLM-planned trajectory, so inter-frame content correlation carries the object's motion. The attention re-weighting then edits the cross-attention map inside each trajectory's bounding boxes, multiplying a competing object's text-token attention by a scalar $c\in[-2,2]$ (often $c=0$) so each region is generated mostly from its own object's token. The two mechanisms do complementary work: noise reinitialization governs where and how each object moves, while attention re-weighting governs what each object looks like.

What would settle it

Generate many videos for prompts pairing visually or motionally similar objects, such as 'a lion and a tiger walking' or 'a wolf and a husky running', and check whether the content inside each trajectory region matches the object assigned by the prompt; if identity swaps or merged features occur at a substantial rate, the implicit trajectory-object alignment that the method depends on has failed. The paper's own Figure 9 already shows overlapping bounding boxes and late-appearing objects as partial evidence of where this would show up.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the bottleneck in multi-object video generation is not missing training data but missing steering: the diffusion model's single-object priors, plus an LLM's commonsense knowledge of how objects move, are enough once the two are coupled through the noise and attention machinery. Specifically, the LLM produces trajectories as per-frame bounding-box centers from the text prompt alone; MOVi then creates a 'noise flow' by shifting the first frame's noise along each trajectory and swapping low-frequency noise components, which the diffusion model reads as layout and object position. On top of that, object-text token attention re-weighting scales down the influence of competing object tokens inside each trajectory region, preventing feature mixing such as a monkey's face on a squirrel. The authors argue this is why MOVi reaches 100% dynamic degree and 0.71 object accuracy on their metric set, and why the weighted average outperforms the second-best open model, Vchitect 2.0-2B, by a wide margin.

Load-bearing premise

The method never labels a trajectory with the object it is meant for; it assumes the diffusion model will automatically pair each LLM-planned trajectory with the correct object from the prompt, and the authors state in Section 10.1 that this implicit alignment 'may fail in ambiguous cases' when the model's priors for an object's movement are insufficient.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any existing text-conditioned video diffusion model with cross-attention can be upgraded to multi-object generation by adding MOVi's two inference-time blocks, with no weight updates.
  • The number of objects in the prompt can be scaled up; the paper reports accuracy for $n=2,3,4$ objects and shows that trajectory guidance plus attention refinement holds accuracy higher than the baseline as $n$ grows.
  • Object motion becomes controllable through language, because the LLM translates verbs like 'running', 'fighting', or 'jumping' into distinct trajectory shapes, and the paper's dynamic degree reaches 100% on its test prompts.
  • The method also raises the VBench multi-object score of the base model from 40.66% to 62.19% without rejection sampling, and to 71.95% with rejection sampling, placing it above several commercial models on that metric.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same trajectory-injection mechanism could plausibly transfer to image-to-video models, since the method only manipulates noise and attention rather than learned weights.
  • Editorial inference: because the LLM plans trajectories from natural language, the framework could act as a drop-in control layer for newer diffusion-transformer video models that expose cross-attention maps at inference time.
  • Editorial inference: prompts with repeated instances of the same class, such as 'two dogs', push all the separation work onto noise reinitialization because both instances share one text token; comparing those prompts against different-class prompts would isolate how much of the gain comes from attention re-weighting.
  • Editorial inference: feeding the LLM trajectories with explicit object identity labels and conditioning the noise flow on those labels is a direct stress test; if the paper's implicit-alignment assumption is correct, this should mostly preserve current performance, while if it is wrong, labeled trajectories should fix failure cases like the 'lion and tiger' swaps.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. MOVi is a training-free inference-time framework for text-conditioned multi-object video generation. It uses an LLM (Llama-3.1-405B) as a trajectory planner that outputs per-object bounding-box trajectories, injects those trajectories into a UNet-based T2V model through multi-object noise reinitialization (Section 3.3), and refines generation by reweighting cross-attention maps inside each object's box to suppress competing text tokens (Section 3.4). The paper reports large gains over the VideoCrafter2 backbone on a weighted dynamic-degree/accuracy score (0.85 vs. 0.43), a 100% Dynamic Degree, an improved VBench multi-object score (62.19% vs. 40.66%), and favorable human ratings against baseline and commercial models. The authors also include an ablation study and a comparison of LLM trajectory generators, with the main results and limitations discussed in Sections 4 and 10.

Significance. If the central claim is sustained, MOVi would be a practical contribution: it is training-free, uses only text input, is simple to implement on existing UNet-based video diffusion models, and the paper provides a code repository and evaluations against standard benchmarks (VBench, FVD, CLIPSim) as well as human ratings. The method is internally consistent and the qualitative examples are plausible. However, the headline quantitative claims are not yet tied to the mechanism's core promise—that the correct object follows the correct planned trajectory. The reported metrics measure global motion, object presence, and appearance accuracy, but not identity-preserving trajectory adherence. This gap is acknowledged by the authors in Section 10.1, and closing it with a trajectory-identity metric is necessary before the claimed 'precise control' can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.3–§3.4, §10.1] The central mechanism does not bind object identity to a planned trajectory: Eq. (7) replaces noise inside a mask with a shifted random patch, and Eq. (8) reweights a text token inside a bounding box, but neither encodes that a particular box belongs to a particular object. The paper's own §10.1 concedes that trajectories are not labeled with their intended objects. None of the headline evaluations can detect a swap or drift: Dynamic Degree is a global optical-flow statistic, the YOLO accuracy in Table 1 counts and classifies objects, and the VBench multi-object score in Table 5 checks per-frame presence of all prompt objects. All of these can be high while the dog travels along the cat's planned trajectory or while an object leaves its planned box. The paper should report a per-object trajectory-adherence metric, e.g., track detected instances over frames, match them to the LLM's planned boxes by Hungarian assignment, and report the fraction of frames in which the detected class in a box matches the class assigned to that trajectory. Without such a metric, the claimed 42% absolute improvement and 100% Dynamic Degree do not establish precise control of individual object motion.
  2. [§4.2–§4.3] MOVi is instantiated only on VideoCrafter2 in the main tables and qualitative comparisons, yet the abstract and introduction claim it enhances 'existing T2V models' in general. This generality claim is not yet supported. Please run the same protocol on at least one additional UNet-based T2V backbone (e.g., AnimateDiff or CogVideoX-2B) and report dynamic degree, object accuracy, and the trajectory-adherence metric on that backbone; if the method is VideoCrafter2-specific, the text should say so.
  3. [§4.4, Table 4] The trajectory-generator selection in Section 4.4 scores candidates by feeding their trajectories through the full MOVi pipeline (FVD) and by GPT-4 ratings; the selected generator, Llama-3.1-405B, is therefore chosen partly because it interacts well with VideoCrafter2 and the MOVi attention schedule. This is acceptable as an engineering choice, but the paper should state that the comparison measures generator quality only within the MOVi+VideoCrafter2 pipeline, not trajectory quality per se. Otherwise the 'LLM director' claim risks being circular.
  4. [§3.3–§3.4] Several hyperparameters essential for reproduction are unspecified: the value of c in Eq. (8), the cutoff and shape of the low-pass filter H in Eq. (2), and the mapping from the LLM's (x,y) coordinates to the pixel-space masks in Eq. (7). Please provide these values or point to the released configuration. Without them, the experiments cannot be independently replicated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 2] The human study uses 23 participants and reports point means without confidence intervals or significance tests; the object rating for MOVi (3.47) is below Luma AI (4.47), which is consistent with the text but the difference is not tested. Report per-item mean ratings, standard deviations, and a paired test.
  2. [Table 1] The 'Weighted Average' metric is not defined in the text, and Dynamic Degree is reported as 100% without describing the threshold or the number of prompts and videos used. Define both metrics and report variance or the number of generated videos.
  3. [§4.2 and §7.2] Vchitect-2.0-2B is cited as [8] in the body and Table 1 but should be [45]; Section 7.2 cites MSR-VTT as [41] but the correct reference is [57].
  4. [§4.4] Section 4.4 refers to 'Table 6' for the trajectory-generator scores, but the corresponding table is Table 4; the LLaVA names are also misspelled as 'LLaV A' in the table and text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: MOVi is an empirical combination of external components evaluated on external benchmarks.

full rationale

MOVi does not derive its central claim from its own inputs by construction. The LLM trajectory planner, the FreeTraj-style noise reinitialization (cited to [35,55]), and the attention re-weighting are concrete mechanisms that are applied and then measured against independent external benchmarks: VBench dynamic degree, YOLO object accuracy, FVD, and human preference ratings. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then reported as a prediction; the reported 42% absolute improvement is an aggregate of these external measurements, not a restatement of a fitted value. The trajectory-generator ablation in Section 4.4 selects among candidate LLMs by end-to-end FVD and GPT-4 trajectory ratings; this is a model-selection step and would be methodologically cleaner with a held-out split, but it is not a circular reduction because the chosen generator is then used as a component and the evaluation is performed on the downstream video outputs rather than on the selection score itself. The limitation acknowledged in Section 10.1, that trajectories are not explicitly labeled with their intended objects and that implicit alignment may fail in ambiguous cases, is a genuine correctness risk that the reported metrics may not fully capture, but it is a limitation of the empirical validation, not a circular dependency in the derivation. There are no load-bearing self-citations, no imported uniqueness theorems, and no renaming of a known result as a new one. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks, so the appropriate circularity finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on three broad assumptions inherited from prior work: low-frequency noise governs object layout, LLMs can plan plausible trajectories from text, and cross-attention maps can be reweighted to separate objects. The paper itself acknowledges the key dependency that trajectories are not explicitly labeled with object identities, making implicit alignment a critical premise.

free parameters (3)
  • Attention scaling factor c = Not specified; range [-2,2] given
    Controls how much a competing text token is amplified or suppressed inside an object's bounding-box region (Eq. 8). The paper does not state the value used in experiments, so it is a hand-set hyperparameter that directly affects object separation and appearance.
  • Low-pass filter cutoff H in Eq. (2) = Inherited from FreeInit [55]
    The frequency split that separates object-defining low frequencies from background high frequencies is a design choice adopted from prior work. MOVi depends on this split to inject trajectory information through the noise.
  • Coordinate-to-mask mapping for LLM trajectories = Not specified
    The method converts LLM-generated (x,y) coordinate sequences into masks M_f for noise replacement and attention reweighting. The normalization and scaling are not described, and some examples in the appendix use coordinates outside the frame, indicating this mapping is an unstated free choice.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Low-frequency components of the initial noise determine object layout and shape, while high-frequency components represent background (Section 3.1).
    The entire noise reinitialization strategy relies on this property of diffusion models, borrowed from FreeInit [55]. If the frequency split does not robustly control object placement, trajectory injection may not steer objects.
  • domain assumption An LLM with few-shot examples can generate physically plausible object trajectories for arbitrary text prompts (Section 3.2).
    The method assumes Llama 3.1 405B or similar can produce coherent bounding-box trajectories from a prompt without training. The authors test several LLMs but do not prove general coverage of prompts or object interactions.
  • domain assumption Cross-attention maps can be reweighted at inference to strengthen or suppress individual text tokens within spatial regions (Section 3.4).
    The attention reweighting mechanism assumes that scaling attention scores for a token in a bounding box directly changes the generated object's identity and that this does not destabilize generation. No formal justification is given beyond empirical results.
  • domain assumption The base diffusion model implicitly assigns each LLM-planned trajectory to the intended object without explicit labels (Section 10.1 limitations).
    The authors explicitly state this as a limitation: because trajectories are not labeled with object identities, the method depends on implicit alignment between noise placement, attention reweighting, and the model's priors. This is the weakest load-bearing premise.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MOVi: Training-free Text-conditioned Multi-Object Video Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QXTRQGQL

@misc{pith2026250522980,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MOVi: Training-free Text-conditioned Multi-Object Video Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QXTRQGQL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22980}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advances in diffusion-based text-to-video (T2V) models have demonstrated remarkable progress, but these models still face challenges in generating videos with multiple objects. Most models struggle with accurately capturing complex object interactions, often treating some objects as static background elements and limiting their movement. In addition, they often fail to generate multiple distinct objects as specified in the prompt, resulting in incorrect generations or mixed features across objects. In this paper, we present a novel training-free approach for multi-object video generation that leverages the open world knowledge of diffusion models and large language models (LLMs). We use an LLM as the ``director'' of object trajectories, and apply the trajectories through noise re-initialization to achieve precise control of realistic movements. We further refine the generation process by manipulating the attention mechanism to better capture object-specific features and motion patterns, and prevent cross-object feature interference. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our training free approach in significantly enhancing the multi-object generation capabilities of existing video diffusion models, resulting in 42% absolute improvement in motion dynamics and object generation accuracy, while also maintaining high fidelity and motion smoothness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22980 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Results of multiple-object video generation: Baseline [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pipeline of the proposed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Video frames generated by the prompt “A monkey and a squirrel on a tree.” [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative comparison between MOVi and state-of-the-art T2V models given the prompt “a cat and a dog playing.” Notably, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Results of multiple-object video generation. Baseline [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Qualitative Comparison with baseline model. The moving version is attached with the supplementary materials as .pptx file. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative Comparison with baseline model. The moving version is attached with the supplementary materials as .pptx file. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Examples of failure cases are shown: (a) Overlapping bounding boxes may lead to anomalies. (b) Generated outputs might [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    GPT-4 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023

    Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. GPT-4 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023. 8

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Frozen in time: A joint video and im- age encoder for end-to-end retrieval

    Max Bain, Arsha Nagrani, G ¨ul Varol, and Andrew Zisserman. Frozen in time: A joint video and im- age encoder for end-to-end retrieval. InIEEE Inter- national Conference on Computer Vision, 2021. 1, 2

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Lumiere: A space-time diffusion model for video generation

    Omer Bar-Tal, Hila Chefer, Omer Tov, Charles Her- rmann, Roni Paiss, Shiran Zada, Ariel Ephrat, Jun- hwa Hur, Guanghui Liu, Amit Raj, et al. Lumiere: A space-time diffusion model for video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12945, 2024. 1

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Multidiffusion: Fusing diffusion paths for con- trolled image generation

    Omer Bar-Tal, Lior Yariv, Yaron Lipman, and Tali Dekel. Multidiffusion: Fusing diffusion paths for con- trolled image generation. 2023. 1

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023

    Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Sumith Kulal, Daniel Mendelevitch, Maciej Kilian, Dominik Lorenz, Yam Levi, Zion English, Vikram V oleti, Adam Letts, et al. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023. 5, 8

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Andreas Blattmann, Robin Rombach, Huan Ling, Tim Dockhorn, Seung Wook Kim, Sanja Fidler, and Karsten Kreis. Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with latent diffusion models. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 22563–22575,

    work page

  7. [7]

    Videodreamer: Customized multi-subject text-to- video generation with disen-mix finetuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00990, 2023

    Hong Chen, Xin Wang, Guanning Zeng, Yipeng Zhang, Yuwei Zhou, Feilin Han, and Wenwu Zhu. Videodreamer: Customized multi-subject text-to- video generation with disen-mix finetuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00990, 2023. 2

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Videocrafter2: Overcoming data limitations for high- quality video diffusion models

    Haoxin Chen, Yong Zhang, Xiaodong Cun, Meng- han Xia, Xintao Wang, Chao Weng, and Ying Shan. Videocrafter2: Overcoming data limitations for high- quality video diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, pages 7310–7320, 2024. 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9

    work page 2024

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Panda-70m: Captioning 70m videos with multiple cross-modality teachers

    Tsai-Shien Chen, Aliaksandr Siarohin, Willi Mena- pace, Ekaterina Deyneka, Hsiang-wei Chao, Byung Eun Jeon, Yuwei Fang, Hsin-Ying Lee, Jian Ren, Ming-Hsuan Yang, et al. Panda-70m: Captioning 70m videos with multiple cross-modality teachers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer...

    2024

  2. [10]

    Sora as an agi world model? a complete survey on text-to-video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05131, 2024

    Joseph Cho, Fachrina Dewi Puspitasari, Sheng Zheng, Jingyao Zheng, Lik-Hang Lee, Tae-Ho Kim, Choong Seon Hong, and Chaoning Zhang. Sora as an agi world model? a complete survey on text-to-video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05131, 2024. 2

    2024

  3. [11]

    Data-Juicer Sandbox: A Comprehensive Suite for Multimodal Data-Model Co-development

    Data-Juicer. Data-Juicer Sandbox: A Comprehensive Suite for Multimodal Data-Model Co-development. https : / / modelscope . cn / models / Data - Juicer/Data- Juicer- T2V- v2, 2024. Ac- cessed: 2024-11-13. 1

    2024

  4. [12]

    DiffSynth-Studio: Enjoy the magic of Diffusion models!https://github.com/ modelscope/DiffSynth-Studio, 2024

    DiffSynth-Studio. DiffSynth-Studio: Enjoy the magic of Diffusion models!https://github.com/ modelscope/DiffSynth-Studio, 2024. Ac- cessed: 2024-11-13. 1

    2024

  5. [13]

    Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning.International Conference on Learn- ing Representations, 2024

    Yuwei Guo, Ceyuan Yang, Anyi Rao, Zhengyang Liang, Yaohui Wang, Yu Qiao, Maneesh Agrawala, Dahua Lin, and Bo Dai. Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning.International Conference on Learn- ing Representations, 2024. 5, 7, 8, 9

    2024

  6. [14]

    Latent video diffusion models for high-fidelity video generation with arbitrary lengths

    Yingqing He, Tianyu Yang, Yong Zhang, Ying Shan, and Qifeng Chen. Latent video diffusion models for high-fidelity video generation with arbitrary lengths. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.13221, 2022. 9

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    CLIPScore: a reference- free evaluation metric for image captioning

    Jack Hessel, Ari Holtzman, Maxwell Forbes, Ro- nan Le Bras, and Yejin Choi. CLIPScore: a reference- free evaluation metric for image captioning. In EMNLP, 2021. 8, 9

    2021

  8. [16]

    Examples of failure cases are shown: (a) Overlapping bounding boxes may lead to anomalies

    Jonathan Ho, William Chan, Chitwan Saharia, Jay 13 a) Failure due to overlapping bounding boxes b) Unexpected noise around the objects MOVi Baseline (VideoCrafter2) c) Bad generation of objects d) Object appearing after few frames Prompt: A zebra and a bear walking Prompt: A z...

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Denois- ing diffusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denois- ing diffusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 1, 3

    2020

  10. [18]

    Video diffusion models.arXiv:2204.03458,

    Jonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, Alexey Gritsenko, William Chan, Mohammad Norouzi, and David J Fleet. Video diffusion models.arXiv:2204.03458,

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Cogvideo: Large-scale pretraining for text-to-video generation via transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15868, 2022

    Wenyi Hong, Ming Ding, Wendi Zheng, Xinghan Liu, and Jie Tang. Cogvideo: Large-scale pretraining for text-to-video generation via transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15868, 2022. 2, 9

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Vbench: Comprehensive benchmark suite for video generative models

    Ziqi Huang, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Fan Zhang, Chenyang Si, Yuming Jiang, Yuanhan Zhang, Tianx- ing Wu, Qingyang Jin, Nattapol Chanpaisit, et al. Vbench: Comprehensive benchmark suite for video generative models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pa...

    2024

  13. [21]

    High-quality Text-to-video Models

    JiuTianCV. High-quality Text-to-video Models. https://jiutiancv.github.io/JV- CV- T2V/, 2024. Accessed: 2024-11-13. 1

    2024

  14. [22]

    KLING AI: Next-Generation AI Creative Studio.https://www.klingai.com/, 2024

    KuaiShou. KLING AI: Next-Generation AI Creative Studio.https://www.klingai.com/, 2024. Accessed: 2024-11-13. 2, 7, 9

    2024

  15. [23]

    Multi-concept cus- tomization of text-to-image diffusion

    Nupur Kumari, Bingliang Zhang, Richard Zhang, Eli Shechtman, and Jun-Yan Zhu. Multi-concept cus- tomization of text-to-image diffusion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1931–1941, 2023. 1

    1931

  16. [24]

    Trackdiffusion: Tracklet- conditioned video generation via diffusion models

    Pengxiang Li, Kai Chen, Zhili Liu, Ruiyuan Gao, Lanqing Hong, Guo Zhou, Hua Yao, Dit-Yan Yeung, Huchuan Lu, and Xu Jia. Trackdiffusion: Tracklet- conditioned video generation via diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00651, 2023. 2, 5, 7, 8

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Gligen: Open-set grounded text-to- image generation

    Yuheng Li, Haotian Liu, Qingyang Wu, Fangzhou Mu, Jianwei Yang, Jianfeng Gao, Chunyuan Li, and 14 Yong Jae Lee. Gligen: Open-set grounded text-to- image generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion, pages 22511–22521, 2023. 2

    2023

  18. [26]

    Movideo: Motion-aware video generation with diffusion model

    Jingyun Liang, Yuchen Fan, Kai Zhang, Radu Tim- ofte, Luc Van Gool, and Rakesh Ranjan. Movideo: Motion-aware video generation with diffusion model. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 56–74. Springer, 2025. 1

    2025

  19. [27]

    Visual instruction tuning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36, 2024

    Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. Visual instruction tuning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36, 2024. 8

    2024

  20. [28]

    Detector guidance for multi-object text-to-image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02236, 2023

    Luping Liu, Zijian Zhang, Yi Ren, Rongjie Huang, Xiang Yin, and Zhou Zhao. Detector guidance for multi-object text-to-image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02236, 2023. 1

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Sora: A re- view on background, technology, limitations, and op- portunities of large vision models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17177, 2024

    Yixin Liu, Kai Zhang, Yuan Li, Zhiling Yan, Chu- jie Gao, Ruoxi Chen, Zhengqing Yuan, Yue Huang, Hanchi Sun, Jianfeng Gao, et al. Sora: A re- view on background, technology, limitations, and op- portunities of large vision models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17177, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Lumaai.https://lumalabs.ai/,

    Luma Labs. Lumaai.https://lumalabs.ai/,

  23. [31]

    Vidm: Video implicit diffusion models

    Kangfu Mei and Vishal Patel. Vidm: Video implicit diffusion models. InProceedings of the AAAI Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37, pages 9117–9125, 2023. 1, 2

    2023

  24. [32]

    Hailuo AI: Captivating AI Videos Gen- erated with Hailuo AI .https://hailuoai

    MiniMax. Hailuo AI: Captivating AI Videos Gen- erated with Hailuo AI .https://hailuoai. video/, 2024. Accessed: 2024-11-13. 2, 7, 9

    2024

  25. [33]

    Dreamix: Video diffusion models are general video editors.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01329, 2023

    Eyal Molad, Eliahu Horwitz, Dani Valevski, Alex Rav Acha, Yossi Matias, Yael Pritch, Yaniv Leviathan, and Yedid Hoshen. Dreamix: Video diffusion models are general video editors.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01329, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Worldsimbench: Towards video gen- eration models as world simulators.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18072, 2024

    Yiran Qin, Zhelun Shi, Jiwen Yu, Xijun Wang, Enshen Zhou, Lijun Li, Zhenfei Yin, Xihui Liu, Lu Sheng, Jing Shao, et al. Worldsimbench: Towards video gen- eration models as world simulators.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18072, 2024. 2

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Freetraj: Tuning- free trajectory control in video diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16863, 2024

    Haonan Qiu, Zhaoxi Chen, Zhouxia Wang, Yingqing He, Menghan Xia, and Ziwei Liu. Freetraj: Tuning- free trajectory control in video diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16863, 2024. 3, 4

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion mod- els

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion mod- els. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 1

    2022

  29. [37]

    Gen-2: Generate novel videos with text, im- ages or video clips, 2024

    Runway. Gen-2: Generate novel videos with text, im- ages or video clips, 2024. Accessed: 2024-11-13. 2, 5, 7, 8, 9

    2024

  30. [38]

    Introducing Gen-3 Alpha: A New Frontier for Video Generation, 2024

    Runway. Introducing Gen-3 Alpha: A New Frontier for Video Generation, 2024. Accessed: 2024-11-13. 2, 7, 9

    2024

  31. [39]

    Make-a-video: Text- to-video generation without text-video data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792, 2022

    Uriel Singer, Adam Polyak, Thomas Hayes, Xi Yin, Jie An, Songyang Zhang, Qiyuan Hu, Harry Yang, Oron Ashual, Oran Gafni, et al. Make-a-video: Text- to-video generation without text-video data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792, 2022. 2

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020. 1, 5

    2010 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Ucf101: A dataset of 101 human actions classes from videos in the wild.arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.0402, 2012

    Khurram Soomro, Amir Roshan Zamir, and Mubarak Shah. Ucf101: A dataset of 101 human actions classes from videos in the wild.arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.0402, 2012. 8, 9

    2012 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Raft: Recurrent all-pairs field transforms for optical flow

    Zachary Teed and Jia Deng. Raft: Recurrent all-pairs field transforms for optical flow. InComputer Vision– ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 16, pages 402–419. Springer, 2020. 7

    2020

  35. [43]

    Llama: Open and effi- cient foundation language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023

    Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timoth ´ee Lacroix, Baptiste Rozi `ere, Naman Goyal, Eric Ham- bro, Faisal Azhar, et al. Llama: Open and effi- cient foundation language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023. 8

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Fvd: A new metric for video generation

    Thomas Unterthiner, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Karol Ku- rach, Rapha ¨el Marinier, Marcin Michalski, and Syl- vain Gelly. Fvd: A new metric for video generation

  37. [45]

    Vchitect 2.0: Embark on a Visual Fan- tasy Journey.https://vchitect.intern- ai.org.cn/, 2024

    Vchitect. Vchitect 2.0: Embark on a Visual Fan- tasy Journey.https://vchitect.intern- ai.org.cn/, 2024. Accessed: 2024-11-13. 1, 2, 9

    2024

  38. [46]

    Phenaki: Variable length video gen- eration from open domain textual description.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02399, 2022

    Ruben Villegas, Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Pieter-Jan Kindermans, Hernan Moraldo, Han Zhang, Moham- mad Taghi Saffar, Santiago Castro, Julius Kunze, and Dumitru Erhan. Phenaki: Variable length video gen- eration from open domain textual description.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02399, 2022. 1

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Mod- elscope text-to-video technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06571, 2023

    Jiuniu Wang, Hangjie Yuan, Dayou Chen, Yingya Zhang, Xiang Wang, and Shiwei Zhang. Mod- elscope text-to-video technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06571, 2023. 2, 3, 9

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Boximator: Generating rich and controllable motions for video synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01566, 2024

    Jiawei Wang, Yuchen Zhang, Jiaxin Zou, Yan Zeng, Guoqiang Wei, Liping Yuan, and Hang Li. Boximator: Generating rich and controllable motions for video synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01566, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    CogVLM: Visual ex- pert for pretrained language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.03079, 2023

    Weihan Wang, Qingsong Lv, Wenmeng Yu, Wenyi Hong, Ji Qi, Yan Wang, Junhui Ji, Zhuoyi Yang, Lei Zhao, Xixuan Song, et al. CogVLM: Visual ex- pert for pretrained language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.03079, 2023. 8

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Emu3: 15 Next-token prediction is all you need.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18869, 2024

    Xinlong Wang, Xiaosong Zhang, Zhengxiong Luo, Quan Sun, Yufeng Cui, Jinsheng Wang, Fan Zhang, Yueze Wang, Zhen Li, Qiying Yu, et al. Emu3: 15 Next-token prediction is all you need.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18869, 2024. 9

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Worlddreamer: Towards general world models for video genera- tion via predicting masked tokens.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09985, 2024

    Xiaofeng Wang, Zheng Zhu, Guan Huang, Boyuan Wang, Xinze Chen, and Jiwen Lu. Worlddreamer: Towards general world models for video genera- tion via predicting masked tokens.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09985, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    LaVie: High-quality video generation with cascaded latent diffusion mod- els.IJCV, 2024

    Yaohui Wang, Xinyuan Chen, Xin Ma, Shangchen Zhou, Ziqi Huang, Yi Wang, Ceyuan Yang, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Peiqing Yang, et al. LaVie: High-quality video generation with cascaded latent diffusion mod- els.IJCV, 2024. 7, 9

    2024

  45. [53]

    Customvideo: Cus- tomizing text-to-video generation with multiple sub- jects.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09962, 2024

    Zhao Wang, Aoxue Li, Enze Xie, Lingting Zhu, Yong Guo, Qi Dou, and Zhenguo Li. Customvideo: Cus- tomizing text-to-video generation with multiple sub- jects.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09962, 2024. 2

    2024

  46. [54]

    Grit: A generative region-to-text transformer for ob- ject understanding

    Jialian Wu, Jianfeng Wang, Zhengyuan Yang, Zhe Gan, Zicheng Liu, Junsong Yuan, and Lijuan Wang. Grit: A generative region-to-text transformer for ob- ject understanding. InEuropean Conference on Com- puter Vision, pages 207–224. Springer, 2025. 9

    2025

  47. [55]

    Freeinit: Bridging initializa- tion gap in video diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.07537, 2023

    Tianxing Wu, Chenyang Si, Yuming Jiang, Ziqi Huang, and Ziwei Liu. Freeinit: Bridging initializa- tion gap in video diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.07537, 2023. 2, 3

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Dynamicrafter: An- imating open-domain images with video diffusion pri- ors

    Jinbo Xing, Menghan Xia, Yong Zhang, Haoxin Chen, Wangbo Yu, Hanyuan Liu, Gongye Liu, Xintao Wang, Ying Shan, and Tien-Tsin Wong. Dynamicrafter: An- imating open-domain images with video diffusion pri- ors. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 399–417. Springer, 202...

    2024

  49. [57]

    MSR- VTT: A large video description dataset for bridging video and language

    Jun Xu, Tao Mei, Ting Yao, and Yong Rui. MSR- VTT: A large video description dataset for bridging video and language. InCVPR, 2016. 8, 9

    2016

  50. [58]

    Advancing high-resolution video- language representation with large-scale video tran- scriptions

    Hongwei Xue, Tiankai Hang, Yanhong Zeng, Yu- chong Sun, Bei Liu, Huan Yang, Jianlong Fu, and Baining Guo. Advancing high-resolution video- language representation with large-scale video tran- scriptions. InInternational Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CV...

    2022

  51. [59]

    Video in- stance segmentation

    Linjie Yang, Yuchen Fan, and Ning Xu. Video in- stance segmentation. InICCV, 2019. 8

    2019

  52. [60]

    Eva: Zero-shot accurate attributes and multi-object video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16111, 2024

    Xiangpeng Yang, Linchao Zhu, Hehe Fan, and Yi Yang. Eva: Zero-shot accurate attributes and multi-object video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16111, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072,

    Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuanming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiaohan Zhang, Guanyu Feng, et al. Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072,

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    Show-1: Marrying pixel and latent diffusion models for text-to-video generation.Interna- tional Journal of Computer Vision, pages 1–15, 2024

    David Junhao Zhang, Jay Zhangjie Wu, Jia-Wei Liu, Rui Zhao, Lingmin Ran, Yuchao Gu, Difei Gao, and Mike Zheng Shou. Show-1: Marrying pixel and latent diffusion models for text-to-video generation.Interna- tional Journal of Computer Vision, pages 1–15, 2024. 1, 9

    2024

  55. [63]

    I2vgen-xl: High-quality image-to-video synthesis via cascaded diffusion mod- els.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04145, 2023

    Shiwei Zhang, Jiayu Wang, Yingya Zhang, Kang Zhao, Hangjie Yuan, Zhiwu Qin, Xiang Wang, Deli Zhao, and Jingren Zhou. I2vgen-xl: High-quality image-to-video synthesis via cascaded diffusion mod- els.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04145, 2023. 5, 8

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Real-time vehicle detection based on improved yolo v5.Sustainability, 14(19):12274, 2022

    Yu Zhang, Zhongyin Guo, Jianqing Wu, Yuan Tian, Haotian Tang, and Xinming Guo. Real-time vehicle detection based on improved yolo v5.Sustainability, 14(19):12274, 2022. 7

    2022

  57. [65]

    Open-sora: Democratizing efficient video production for all, March 2024

    Zangwei Zheng, Xiangyu Peng, Tianji Yang, Chenhui Shen, Shenggui Li, Hongxin Liu, Yukun Zhou, Tianyi Li, and Yang You. Open-sora: Democratizing efficient video production for all, March 2024. 5, 7, 8, 9

    2024

  58. [66]

    Magicvideo: Efficient video generation with latent diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11018, 2022

    Daquan Zhou, Weimin Wang, Hanshu Yan, Weiwei Lv, Yizhe Zhu, and Jiashi Feng. Magicvideo: Efficient video generation with latent diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11018, 2022. 9 16

    2022 arXiv

  59. [2024]

    2, 5, 7, 8

    Accessed: 2024-11-09. 2, 5, 7, 8

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.