Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On Decentralization of Bitcoin: An Asset Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.07646 v1 pith:QXVA3RN3 submitted 2021-05-17 cs.CR cs.SI

classification cs.CRcs.SI
keywords bitcoindecentralizationbeenassetanalysisconducteddecentralizeddegree
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Since its advent in 2009, Bitcoin, a cryptography-enabled peer-to-peer digital payment system, has been gaining increasing attention from both academia and industry. An effort designed to overcome a cluster of bottlenecks inherent in existing centralized financial systems, Bitcoin has always been championed by the crypto community as an example of the spirit of decentralization. While the decentralized nature of Bitcoin's Proof-of-Work consensus algorithm has often been discussed in great detail, no systematic study has so far been conducted to quantitatively measure the degree of decentralization of Bitcoin from an asset perspective -- How decentralized is Bitcoin as a financial asset? We present in this paper the first systematic investigation of the degree of decentralization for Bitcoin based on its entire transaction history. We proposed both static and dynamic analysis of Bitcoin transaction network with quantifiable decentralization measures developed based on network analysis and market efficiency study. Case studies are also conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed metrics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SoK: Measuring Blockchain Decentralization

    cs.CR 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematization of blockchain decentralization measurement plus an empirical factor analysis suggesting that in PoW systems participation and decentralization are distinct signals, while in PoS they align.

Pith tools