Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

On symmetry breaking in the self-dual higher-spin theory

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In the broken phase of self-dual higher-spin theory, only the spin-one gauge field is sourced.

desk verdict A technically solid but avowedly partial analysis of symmetry breaking in the self-dual sector; the central decoupling claim holds only for the z-independent sector, and the authors say so plainly. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01477 v1 pith:QYFVM4G4 submitted 2025-09-01 hep-th

V.E. Didenko , I.S. Faliakhov This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords higher-spintheoryself-dualsectorsymmetrybreakingAdSvacuumFockprojectorcurrentconservationholographyunfoldeddynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that when the self-dual (chiral) sector of four-dimensional higher-spin theory is placed on a vacuum that breaks anti-de Sitter symmetry down to three-dimensional Poincare symmetry, the higher-spin gauge fields decouple: among all Weyl tensors with helicities s >= -1, only the s = -1 self-dual Maxwell tensor sources a gauge field, so all non-negative helicity gauge fields become free spectators. The same vacuum also disentangles the dual higher-spin currents from the gauge fields; currents of helicity s >= 2 generally stop being conserved, while the s = +1 current remains conserved after a deformation. The mechanism is a Fock-type projector in the vacuum that annihilates all fluctuations except those of the form w(y+), together with a previously unnoticed identity among vertex integration domains that kills many would-be interaction vertices. If correct, this gives a concrete toy model of higher-spin symmetry breaking in which only low-spin (0, 1/2, 1) interactions survive, with higher spins projected out by the vacuum structure.

What carries the argument

The central object is the modified vacuum operator D_nu = dz + {Lambda0, .}_* (4.7), whose z-independent cohomologies are the physical gauge fields w(y+), functions of the combination y+_alpha = y_alpha + i ybar_alpha. The vacuum itself is built around the Fock projector P = 4 e^{y ybar}, which satisfies P * P = P and annihilates fluctuations through y+ * P = P * y- = 0; this projector projects away states and is what makes the higher-spin vertices collapse. A second load-bearing ingredient is the union property of the vertex integration domains, where the domains D[k]_n with odd k and even k cover the same region up to measure-zero sets (2.19), which the paper proves in Appendix B and uses

What would settle it

Solve the homogeneous equation D_nu W = 0 with the vacuum (4.1) and exhibit a z-dependent solution not of the form w(y+) whose insertion into (4.3a) sources a gauge field of helicity s >= 1, or whose insertion into the dual equations changes the conservation of the s = +1 current. Such a solution would falsify the decoupling and current-conservation claims.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper constructs a two-parameter vacuum for the self-dual higher-spin equations in which the background is still anti-de Sitter space but carries a scalar expectation value phi = nu1 z + nu2 z^2 that depends only on the radial coordinate. Setting nu2 = 0, the authors linearize around this vacuum and restrict the physical gauge-field fluctuations to the z-independent cohomologies w(y+) of the modified vacuum operator D_nu = dz + {Lambda0, .}_*. They find that, among the infinitely many Weyl tensors with helicities s >= -1, only the helicity s = -1 (self-dual Maxwell) tensor sources a gauge field; all higher-spin gauge fields decouple for non-negative helicities. On the dual side, the high

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the relevant gauge-field fluctuations are exactly the z-independent functions w(y+), and that other solutions of the modified vacuum equation would not re-couple the decoupled higher-spin fields; the authors state plainly that they have not classified all such solutions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the symmetry-broken phase, the only gauge field sourced by matter is self-dual Maxwell (helicity s = -1); gauge fields of helicity s >= 0 are free and decoupled from the Weyl module.
  • Dual higher-spin currents of helicity s >= 2 are generally not conserved, with non-conservation receiving contributions from all lower helicities s' <= s - 2; the s = +1 current remains conserved.
  • The lower-spin sector (helicities -1, 0, +/-1/2) is untouched by the symmetry breaking, so low-spin dynamics is unchanged.
  • The symmetry-breaking parameter nu drops out of the gauge-field equations entirely, and only linear-in-nu terms survive in the Weyl sector, thanks to the projector and the integration-domain identity.
  • The holographic dual of the broken phase is a deformed version of the singleton tensor-product current conservation, where only lower-spin currents conserve.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the decoupling persists beyond the linearized level, the broken phase would behave like a low-spin theory (spins 0, 1/2, 1) with higher-spin states as free spectators, making this a tractable model of the idea that symmetry breaking leaves only low-spin interactions.
  • A natural test would be to include the nu2 branch (conformal dimension Delta = 2); since the two branches are related by a Poincare transformation, the same projector mechanism may yield a similar or richer decoupling pattern, but this is not shown in the paper.
  • The completeness gap in the cohomologies of D_nu could be probed by classifying all solutions of (4.8); if z-dependent solutions exist, they may source higher-spin gauge fields, which would change the decoupling conclusion.
  • The vertex integration-domain identity (2.19) is a general property of the holomorphic vertices, so similar cancellations may appear in other computations beyond the vacuum considered here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies symmetry breaking in the holomorphic (self-dual) sector of four-dimensional higher-spin theory. It constructs a two-parameter vacuum consisting of the AdS4 connection (3.9) and a scalar profile C0 = ν1 z + ν2 z^2 (3.13), which breaks the AdS isometries down to the three-dimensional Poincaré algebra. Setting ν2 = 0, the authors linearize the all-order generating system of [54] around this vacuum. Restricting the 1-form gauge-field cohomologies of the modified vacuum operator Dν (4.7) to z-independent functions w(y+) (4.17), they derive a simplified system (4.41): the gauge-field sector is sourced only by the helicity s = -1 Weyl tensor, while the Weyl module is constrained to helicities s ≥ -1. In the dual 3D current formulation (5.10), the s ≥ 1 currents acquire ν-dependent non-conservation except for s = 1, while the s = -1, 0, ±1/2 equations remain unchanged. The paper concludes that the higher-spin gauge sector decouples in the broken phase and that only lower-spin degrees of freedom interact.

Significance. Within the chosen sector, the paper is a substantial technical contribution. It provides an explicit symmetry-breaking vacuum, reduces the self-dual vertex system to a handful of local terms, proves the new domain decomposition (2.19) in Appendix B, and performs detailed d_x^2 and [d_x, d_z] consistency checks in Appendix D. The Fock-projector mechanism behind the decoupling is interesting and likely to be useful for further work on higher-spin symmetry breaking. The main caveat is scope: the derivation concerns the closed z-independent w(y+) sector, and the unrestricted linearized problem is not solved. As such, the advertised decoupling of "the higher-spin gauge sector" is conditional on a completeness assumption that the authors themselves explicitly flag. This is a significant, honest advance, but the central claim needs to be reframed or completed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, 4.3, Eq. (4.8) and Sec. 6] The central claim that only the s = -1 Weyl tensor sources gauge fields, so higher-spin gauge fields decouple, is proven only for the restricted z-independent sector w(y+) (4.17). The authors explicitly state in Sec. 4.3 that the full solution set of (4.8) is unknown, and Sec. 4.2 exhibits other solutions of the integrability condition (4.13), e.g. (4.18), that are not of w(y+) type and acquire z-dependent corrections. Since physical 1-forms should be parameterized by arbitrary w(y+, y-) (Sec. 4.1), unaccounted solutions could source the supposedly decoupled gauge fields through (4.3a) or modify (5.41). Closure of the w(y+) sector at linearized level does not imply that omitted modes decouple. This completeness gap is load-bearing for the abstract and Sec. 6 conclusions and should either be resolved or clearly carried into the statements of the results.
  2. [Sec. 2, footnote 4] The all-order generating system (2.2) of [54] is used as the definition of the self-dual sector. Footnote 4 states that its equivalence to Vasiliev's equations is established only to a few orders. The linearized reduction (4.29)-(4.41) relies on the vertex structure of this system, including the vanishing of Υ(w(y+), C0^n) in Appendix C. If the two systems diverge at higher orders, terms beyond those kept in (4.41) could in principle appear. The paper should either state the results as properties of the [54] system, or give an argument that the equivalence to the needed order is sufficient.
  3. [Sec. 5.2, Eq. (5.34)] The list of primaries is first said to "may not be complete" and then asserted to be the "full list" on the strength of "it is not hard to make sure" (Eq. (5.34)). Since the notion of primary is definition-dependent when σν does not respect the grading, and completeness of this list supports the holographic interpretation of which currents remain primary/conserved, the assertion needs proof or explicit conjectural status. Without it, the component equations (5.43) and (5.46) are rigorous, but the interpretation in terms of primaries is not fully supported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 1.1] The phrase "setting η = 0 (¯η = 0)" is inconsistent with the following paragraph, which sets η = 0 and ¯η = 1; presumably one of the two should be the non-vanishing coupling. Please correct.
  2. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (4.17)] The phrase "w(y+) represents physical fluctuations" is too strong; the next paragraph immediately says these functions do not encompass all degrees of freedom. Suggest "a family of physical fluctuations" or "the z-independent physical fluctuations".
  3. [Sec. 6, first bullet] "The dependence on ν completely disappears in the gauge field sector" is imprecise: the explicit vertex in (4.41a) is ν-independent, but the source C is ν-dependent through (4.41b). Suggest rewording to "no explicit ν-dependent terms appear in the gauge-field equation".
  4. [Sec. 5.2, Eq. (5.45)] The derivation of (5.45) is summarized as "after some combinatorial algebra"; since this equation is the basis for the s = 1 conservation and s ≥ 2 non-conservation, a few intermediate steps would improve verifiability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Decoupling claim is partly self-definitional: the w(y+) sector is chosen so that Fock-projector identities kill the source vertices, and the paper itself flags the incomplete cohomology of Dν.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 4.3, Eqs. (4.17), (4.26), (4.27); Sec. 6]
    "In our approach, we consider only w(y+) as the physical cohomologies for the fluctuating 1-forms. ... the contribution containing w drops off from (4.4b), {w(y+), Λ0}∗ = 0 ⇒ W ′′[w, C0] = 0. This implies that not every structure on the right-hand side of (4.3a) is actually present."

    The physical 1-form sector is defined to be the z-independent subspace w(y+). By the Fock-projector identities (3.23)/(4.16), any such w automatically anticommutes with Λ0 and satisfies w∗C0−C0∗π(w)=0. Equation (4.27) then makes all vertices that could source higher-spin gauge fields vanish identically. The advertised conclusion that 'the higher-spin gauge sector decouples for all non-negative helicities' (Sec. 6) is therefore not a dynamical output of the full linearized theory; it is built into the choice of the sector. The paper concedes the sector is incomplete ('we do not have the complete set of solutions of (4.8)'), so the decoupling result is a self-definitional property of the selected subsector, not a derived statement about the full cohomology.

full rationale

The paper performs a self-contained computation within a clearly defined sector: it constructs a symmetry-breaking vacuum, linearizes around it, restricts physical 1-forms to w(y+), and then derives the simplified system (4.41). The vertex computations, the constraint (4.32), and the current non-conservation formula (5.45) are nontrivial and not fitted to any data; the s=1 current conservation follows from a real combinatorial calculation. There is no fitted-parameter-called-prediction circularity, and the self-citations to [54], [55], [73], [74] are prior-work inputs whose equivalence caveats are explicitly stated. However, the central decoupling claim is partly circular in the structural sense: the sector w(y+) is selected precisely because the Fock-projector identities (3.23)/(4.16) make it decouple from the vacuum insertion, so the vanishing of the higher-spin source vertices is an input property rather than a fully derived consequence for the complete set of linearized fluctuations. The paper is honest about the missing completeness of the Dν cohomology in Secs. 4.2, 4.3, and 6, but that limitation directly bears on the headline claim; hence the moderate score rather than 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on (i) the external all-order vertex system of [54,55], whose equivalence to Vasiliev's equations is not fully proven to all orders, and (ii) the self-imposed restriction to the w(y+) sector, whose completeness is unknown. The only free parameters are the vacuum coefficients nu_1 and nu_2, arbitrary symmetry-breaking scales rather than fitted values.

free parameters (2)
  • nu_1 (denoted nu) = arbitrary
    Coefficient of the Delta=1 scalar vacuum branch; sets the symmetry-breaking scale. Not fitted to data, chosen as an arbitrary constant.
  • nu_2 = 0
    Coefficient of the Delta=2 scalar branch; set to zero throughout the analysis. The general two-parameter case is deferred.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The holomorphic generating system of [54] reproduces the self-dual sector of Vasiliev's higher-spin theory to all orders.
    Footnote 4: the equivalence is established only for a few orders, and divergence at high orders is not ruled out. The all-order vertices used here come from this system.
  • ad hoc to paper Physical 1-form fluctuations in the broken vacuum are exhausted by the z-independent functions w(y+).
    Sections 4.2 and 4.3: the complete cohomology of the operator D_nu in (4.7) is not known; the paper selects w(y+) and checks consistency of the truncated system.
  • domain assumption Star-product functions must be regular analytic functions of y and bar-y; star-periodic functions are excluded.
    Appendix E shows that the star-periodic functions that would solve (4.23) have non-analytic symbols and are therefore disregarded.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On symmetry breaking in the self-dual higher-spin theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QYFVM4G4

@misc{pith2026250901477,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On symmetry breaking in the self-dual higher-spin theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QYFVM4G4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01477}
}
abstract

We explore the symmetry-broken phase of the self-dual (chiral) sector of higher-spin theory in four dimensions. To that end, we construct a two-parameter vacuum that breaks the AdS symmetry but remains symmetric under the leftover Poincar\'{e} algebra in three dimensions. The vacuum non-zero fields include spin-two AdS frame fields and a scalar, which has a profile that extends along the AdS radial direction. The two free parameters correspond to two scalar branches of conformal dimensions $\Delta=1$ and $\Delta=2$. Focusing on the $\Delta=1$ branch, we analyze the dynamics of free fields around this vacuum and examine its holographic dual. We observe that certain higher spin states decouple in the broken phase. This is illustrated by a set of gauge fluctuations, which acquire no source from higher-spin currents, leading to their complete decoupling, except for the gauge field associated with spin one. The dual higher-spin currents appear to be disentangled from the gauge fields and generally do not conserve; however, their lower-spin components with helicities $s = -1, 0$, and $\pm 1/2$ remain unaffected by the symmetry breaking. Notably, the helicity $s=+1$ current, while deformed, remains conserved.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BRST-BV approach to fields in Poincare patch of AdS

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A universal BRST-BV Lagrangian for free AdS fields is obtained by solving algebraic defining equations for spin operators, with explicit solutions for totally symmetric integer-spin and continuous-spin fields.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [54]

    V. E. Didenko, On holomorphic sector of higher-spin theory, JHEP 10 (2022), 191 [arXiv:2209.01966 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [1]

    Weinberg, Photons and Gravitons in S-Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conserva- tion and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Photons and Gravitons in S-Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conserva- tion and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass, Phys. Rev. 135 (1964), B1049-B1056

    1964

  3. [2]

    S. R. Coleman and J. Mandula, All Possible Symmetries of the S Matrix, Phys. Rev. 159 (1967), 1251-1256

    1967

  4. [3]

    Aragone and S

    C. Aragone and S. Deser, Consistency Problems of Hypergravity, Phys. Lett. B 86 (1979), 161-163

    1979

  5. [4]

    On the Non-Local Obstruction to Interacting Higher Spins in Flat Space

    M. Taronna, On the Non-Local Obstruction to Interacting Higher Spins in Flat Space, JHEP 05 (2017), 026 [arXiv:1701.05772 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  6. [5]

    Roiban and A

    R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin, On four-point interactions in massless higher spin theory in flat space, JHEP 04 (2017), 139 [arXiv:1701.05773 [hep-th]]. 37

    arXiv 2017

  7. [6]

    Bekaert, N

    X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger and P. Sundell, How higher-spin gravity surpasses the spin two barrier: no-go theorems versus yes-go examples, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012), 987-1009 [arXiv:1007.0435 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2012

  8. [7]

    E. S. Fradkin and M. A. Vasiliev, Cubic Interaction in Extended Theories of Massless Higher Spin Fields, Nucl. Phys. B 291 (1987), 141-171

    1987

Show all 90 references
  1. [8]

    E. S. Fradkin and M. A. Vasiliev, On the Gravitational Interaction of Massless Higher Spin Fields, Phys. Lett. B 189 (1987), 89-95

    1987

  2. [9]

    R. R. Metsaev, Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order anal- ysis on mass shell, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 (1991), 359-367

    1991

  3. [10]

    R. R. Metsaev, Effective Action in String Theory. PhD thesis, Lebedev Physical Institute, 1991

    1991

  4. [11]

    Ponomarev, Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality, JHEP 12 (2017), 141 [arXiv:1710.00270 [hep-th]]

    D. Ponomarev, Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality, JHEP 12 (2017), 141 [arXiv:1710.00270 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Bekaert, N

    X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger, A. Campoleoni, M. Chiodaroli, D. Francia, M. Grigoriev, E. Sez- gin and E. Skvortsov, Snowmass White Paper: Higher Spin Gravity and Higher Spin Sym- metry, [arXiv:2205.01567 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  6. [13]

    Buchbinder, E

    I. Buchbinder, E. Ivanov and N. Zaigraev, Unconstrained off-shell superfield formulation of 4D, N = 2 supersymmetric higher spins, JHEP 12 (2021), 016 [arXiv:2109.07639 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Buchbinder, E

    I. Buchbinder, E. Ivanov and N. Zaigraev, Off-shell cubic hypermultiplet couplings to N = 2 higher spin gauge superfields, JHEP 05 (2022), 104 [arXiv:2202.08196 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Y. A. Tatarenko and M. A. Vasiliev, Bilinear Fronsdal currents in the AdS 4 higher-spin theory, JHEP 07 (2024), 246 [arXiv:2405.02452 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Y. M. Zinoviev, On the Fradkin-Vasiliev formalism in d=4, Nucl. Phys. B 1012 (2025), 116839 [arXiv:2410.16798 [hep-th]]

    2025 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Bekaert, J

    X. Bekaert, J. Erdmenger, D. Ponomarev and C. Sleight, Quartic AdS Interac- tions in Higher-Spin Gravity from Conformal Field Theory, JHEP 11 (2015), 149 [arXiv:1508.04292 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Neiman, Quartic locality of higher-spin gravity in de Sitter and Euclidean anti-de Sitter space, Phys

    Y. Neiman, Quartic locality of higher-spin gravity in de Sitter and Euclidean anti-de Sitter space, Phys. Lett. B 843 (2023), 138048 [arXiv:2302.00852 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [19]

    O. A. Gelfond, Moderately non-local η ¯η vertices in the AdS4 higher-spin gauge theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) no.12, 1154 [arXiv:2308.16281 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [20]

    M. A. Vasiliev, More on equations of motion for interacting massless fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 285 (1992), 225-234

    1992

  14. [21]

    M. A. Vasiliev, Consistent Equations for Interacting Massless Fields of All Spins in the First Order in Curvatures, Annals Phys. 190 (1989), 59-106 38

    1989

  15. [22]

    Misuna, Unfolded dynamics approach and quantum field theory, JHEP 12 (2023), 119 [arXiv:2208.04306 [hep-th]]

    N. Misuna, Unfolded dynamics approach and quantum field theory, JHEP 12 (2023), 119 [arXiv:2208.04306 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Misuna, Scalar electrodynamics and Higgs mechanism in the unfolded dynamics ap- proach, JHEP 12 (2024), 090 [arXiv:2402.14164 [hep-th]]

    N. Misuna, Scalar electrodynamics and Higgs mechanism in the unfolded dynamics ap- proach, JHEP 12 (2024), 090 [arXiv:2402.14164 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Misuna, Unfolded Formulation of 4d Yang-Mills Theory, [arXiv:2408.13212 [hep-th]]

    N. Misuna, Unfolded Formulation of 4d Yang-Mills Theory, [arXiv:2408.13212 [hep-th]]

  18. [25]

    Fronsdal, Massless Fields with Integer Spin, Phys

    C. Fronsdal, Massless Fields with Integer Spin, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978), 3624

    1978

  19. [26]

    M. A. Vasiliev, Higher spin gauge theories: Star product and AdS space, [arXiv:hep- th/9910096 [hep-th]]

  20. [27]

    Bekaert, S

    X. Bekaert, S. Cnockaert, C. Iazeolla and M. A. Vasiliev, Nonlinear higher spin theories in various dimensions, [arXiv:hep-th/0503128 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  21. [28]

    V. E. Didenko and E. D. Skvortsov, Elements of Vasiliev Theory, Lect. Notes Phys. 1028 (2024), 269-456 [arXiv:1401.2975 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [29]

    O. A. Gelfond and A. V. Korybut, Manifest form of the spin-local higher-spin vertex Υ ηη ωCCC , Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) no.7, 605 [arXiv:2101.01683 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [30]

    S. F. Prokushkin and M. A. Vasiliev, Higher spin gauge interactions for massive matter fields in 3-D AdS space-time, Nucl. Phys. B 545 (1999), 385 [arXiv:hep-th/9806236 [hep- th]]

    1999 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Giombi and X

    S. Giombi and X. Yin, Higher Spin Gauge Theory and Holography: The Three-Point Functions, JHEP 09 (2010), 115 [arXiv:0912.3462 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Boulanger, P

    N. Boulanger, P. Kessel, E. D. Skvortsov and M. Taronna,Higher spin interactions in four- dimensions: Vasiliev versus Fronsdal, J. Phys. A 49 (2016) no.9, 095402 [arXiv:1508.04139 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [33]

    M. A. Vasiliev, Current Interactions and Holography from the 0-Form Sector of Nonlinear Higher-Spin Equations, JHEP 10 (2017), 111 [arXiv:1605.02662 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  27. [34]

    M. A. Vasiliev, Differential contracting homotopy in higher-spin theory, JHEP 11 (2023), 048 [arXiv:2307.09331 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [35]

    P. T. Kirakosiants, D. A. Valerev and M. A. Vasiliev, Quadratic Corrections to the Higher- Spin Equations by the Differential Homotopy Approach, [arXiv:2506.16634 [hep-th]]

  29. [36]

    I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, AdS dual of the critical O(N) vector model, Phys. Lett. B 550, 213-219 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0210114 [hep-th]]

    2002 arXiv

  30. [37]

    R. G. Leigh and A. C. Petkou, Holography of the N=1 higher spin theory on AdS(4), JHEP 06, 011 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0304217 [hep-th]]

    2003 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Sezgin and P

    E. Sezgin and P. Sundell, Holography in 4D (super) higher spin theories and a test via cubic scalar couplings, JHEP 07, 044 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0305040 [hep-th]]. 39

    2005 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Sleight and M

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, Higher-Spin Gauge Theories and Bulk Locality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) no.17, 171604 [arXiv:1704.07859 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Tran, Toward a twistor action for chiral higher-spin gravity, Phys

    T. Tran, Toward a twistor action for chiral higher-spin gravity, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) no.4, 046015 [arXiv:2209.00925 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Tsulaia and D

    M. Tsulaia and D. Weissman, Supersymmetric quantum chiral higher spin gravity, JHEP 12 (2022), 002 [arXiv:2209.13907 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Adamo and T

    T. Adamo and T. Tran, Higher-spin Yang–Mills, amplitudes and self-duality, Lett. Math. Phys. 113 (2023) no.3, 50 [arXiv:2210.07130 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Monteiro, From Moyal deformations to chiral higher-spin theories and to celestial alge- bras, JHEP 03 (2023), 062 [arXiv:2212.11266 [hep-th]]

    R. Monteiro, From Moyal deformations to chiral higher-spin theories and to celestial alge- bras, JHEP 03 (2023), 062 [arXiv:2212.11266 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Ponomarev, Chiral higher-spin double copy, JHEP 01 (2025), 143 [arXiv:2409.19449 [hep-th]]

    D. Ponomarev, Chiral higher-spin double copy, JHEP 01 (2025), 143 [arXiv:2409.19449 [hep-th]]

    2025 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Serrani, On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space, [arXiv:2505.12839 [hep-th]]

    M. Serrani, On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space, [arXiv:2505.12839 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  39. [46]

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, A proposal for the role of higher spin fields in Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, [arXiv:2507.06634 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  40. [47]

    Basile, Massless chiral fields in six dimensions, [arXiv:2409.12800 [hep-th]]

    T. Basile, Massless chiral fields in six dimensions, [arXiv:2409.12800 [hep-th]]

  41. [48]

    O. A. Gelfond and M. A. Vasiliev, Homotopy Operators and Locality Theorems in Higher- Spin Equations, Phys. Lett. B 786 (2018), 180-188 [arXiv:1805.11941 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [49]

    V. E. Didenko, O. A. Gelfond, A. V. Korybut and M. A. Vasiliev, Spin-locality of η2 and η2 quartic higher-spin vertices, JHEP 12 (2020), 184 [arXiv:2009.02811 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  43. [50]

    V. E. Didenko, O. A. Gelfond, A. V. Korybut and M. A. Vasiliev, Homotopy Properties and Lower-Order Vertices in Higher-Spin Equations, J. Phys. A 51 (2018) no.46, 465202 [arXiv:1807.00001 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  44. [51]

    O. A. Gelfond and M. A. Vasiliev, Spin-Locality of Higher-Spin Theories and Star-Product Functional Classes, JHEP 03 (2020), 002 [arXiv:1910.00487 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [52]

    V. E. Didenko, O. A. Gelfond, A. V. Korybut and M. A. Vasiliev, Limiting Shifted Ho- motopy in Higher-Spin Theory and Spin-Locality, JHEP 12 (2019), 086 [arXiv:1909.04876 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  46. [53]

    V. E. Didenko and A. V. Korybut, On z-dominance, shift symmetry and spin locality in higher-spin theory, JHEP 05 (2023), 133 [arXiv:2212.05006 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    V. E. Didenko and M. A. Povarnin, All vertices for unconstrained symmetric gauge fields, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) no.12, 126012 [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) no.10, 109901] [arXiv:2409.00808 [hep-th]]. 40

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Sharapov, E

    A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, A. Sukhanov and R. Van Dongen, More on Chiral Higher Spin Gravity and convex geometry, Nucl. Phys. B 990 (2023), 116152 [arXiv:2209.15441 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    M. A. Vasiliev, Projectively-compact spinor vertices and space-time spin-locality in higher- spin theory, Phys. Lett. B 834 (2022), 137401 [arXiv:2208.02004 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [58]

    D. J. Gross and P. F. Mende, The High-Energy Behavior of String Scattering Amplitudes, Phys. Lett. B 197 (1987), 129-134

    1987

  51. [59]

    D. J. Gross and P. F. Mende, String Theory Beyond the Planck Scale, Nucl. Phys. B 303 (1988), 407-454

    1988

  52. [60]

    D. J. Gross, High-Energy Symmetries of String Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988), 1229

    1988

  53. [61]

    Sundborg, Stringy gravity, interacting tensionless strings and massless higher spins, Nucl

    B. Sundborg, Stringy gravity, interacting tensionless strings and massless higher spins, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 102 (2001), 113-119 [arXiv:hep-th/0103247 [hep-th]]

    2001 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Sezgin and P

    E. Sezgin and P. Sundell, Massless higher spins and holography, Nucl. Phys. B 644 (2002), 303-370 [erratum: Nucl. Phys. B 660 (2003), 403-403] [arXiv:hep-th/0205131 [hep-th]]

    2002 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Bonelli, On the tensionless limit of bosonic strings, infinite symmetries and higher spins, Nucl

    G. Bonelli, On the tensionless limit of bosonic strings, infinite symmetries and higher spins, Nucl. Phys. B 669 (2003), 159-172 [arXiv:hep-th/0305155 [hep-th]]

    2003 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Sagnotti and M

    A. Sagnotti and M. Tsulaia, On higher spins and the tensionless limit of string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 682 (2004), 83-116 [arXiv:hep-th/0311257 [hep-th

    2004 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Sagnotti, Notes on Strings and Higher Spins, J

    A. Sagnotti, Notes on Strings and Higher Spins, J. Phys. A 46 (2013), 214006 [arXiv:1112.4285 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  58. [66]

    M. A. Vasiliev, From Coxeter Higher-Spin Theories to Strings and Tensor Models, JHEP 08 (2018), 051 [arXiv:1804.06520 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  59. [67]

    A. A. Tarusov, K. A. Ushakov and M. A. Vasiliev, Linearized Coxeter higher-spin theories, JHEP 08 (2025), 052 [arXiv:2503.05948 [hep-th]]

    2025 arXiv

  60. [68]

    R. R. Metsaev, IIB supergravity and various aspects of light cone formalism in AdS space- time, [arXiv:hep-th/0002008 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    C. Y. R. Chen, E. Joung, K. Mkrtchyan and J. Yoon, Higher-order chiral scalar from boundary reduction of 3d higher-spin gravity, JHEP 05 (2025), 186 [arXiv:2501.16463 [hep- th]]

    2025 arXiv

  62. [70]

    M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, Tensionless string spectra on AdS3, JHEP 05 (2018), 085 [arXiv:1803.04423 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Eberhardt, M

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, The Worldsheet Dual of the Symmetric Product CFT, JHEP 04 (2019), 103 [arXiv:1812.01007 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Eberhardt, M

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, Deriving the AdS 3/CFT2 correspon- dence, JHEP 02 (2020), 136 [arXiv:1911.00378 [hep-th]]. 41

    2020 arXiv

  65. [73]

    V. E. Didenko and A. V. Korybut, Interaction of symmetric higher-spin gauge fields, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) no.8, 086031 [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.6, 069901] [arXiv:2304.08850 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  66. [74]

    V. E. Didenko and A. V. Korybut, Toward higher-spin symmetry breaking in the bulk, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) no.2, 026007 [arXiv:2312.11096 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    R. Aros, C. Iazeolla, J. Nore˜ na, E. Sezgin, P. Sundell and Y. Yin, FR W and domain walls in higher spin gravity, JHEP 03 (2018), 153 [arXiv:1712.02401 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Flato and C

    M. Flato and C. Fronsdal, One Massless Particle Equals Two Dirac Singletons: Elementary Particles in a Curved Space. 6., Lett. Math. Phys. 2 (1978), 421-426

    1978

  69. [77]

    M. A. Vasiliev, Holography, Unfolding and Higher-Spin Theory, J. Phys. A 46 (2013), 214013 [arXiv:1203.5554 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  70. [78]

    F. Diaz, C. Iazeolla and P. Sundell, Fractional spins, unfolding, and holography. Part I. Parent field equations for dual higher-spin gravity reductions, JHEP 09 (2024), 109 [arXiv:2403.02283 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    F. Diaz, C. Iazeolla and P. Sundell, Fractional spins, unfolding, and holography. Part II. 4D higher spin gravity and 3D conformal dual, JHEP 10 (2024), 066 [arXiv:2403.02301 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  72. [80]

    A. V. Korybut, On consistency of the interacting (anti)holomorphic higher-spin sector, [arXiv:2505.13125 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    V. E. Didenko and M. A. Vasiliev, Static BPS black hole in 4d higher-spin gauge the- ory, Phys. Lett. B 682 (2009), 305-315 [erratum: Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013), 389] [arXiv:0906.3898 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Iazeolla and P

    C. Iazeolla and P. Sundell, Families of exact solutions to Vasiliev’s 4D equations with spherical, cylindrical and biaxial symmetry, JHEP 12 (2011), 084 [arXiv:1107.1217 [hep- th]]

    2011 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Kraus and E

    P. Kraus and E. Perlmutter, Probing higher spin black holes, JHEP 02 (2013), 096 [arXiv:1209.4937 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  76. [84]

    V. E. Didenko and A. V. Korybut, Planar solutions of higher-spin theory. Nonlinear cor- rections, JHEP 01 (2022), 125 [arXiv:2110.02256 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Iazeolla, E

    C. Iazeolla, E. Sezgin and P. Sundell, Real forms of complex higher spin field equations and new exact solutions, Nucl. Phys. B 791 (2008), 231-264 [arXiv:0706.2983 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  78. [86]

    V. E. Didenko and E. D. Skvortsov, Towards higher-spin holography in ambient space of any dimension, J. Phys. A 46 (2013), 214010 [arXiv:1207.6786 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  79. [87]

    V. E. Didenko and E. D. Skvortsov, Exact higher-spin symmetry in CFT: all correlators in unbroken Vasiliev theory, JHEP 04 (2013), 158 [arXiv:1210.7963 [hep-th]]. 42

    2013 arXiv

  80. [88]

    V. E. Didenko and M. A. Vasiliev, Test of the local form of higher-spin equations via AdS / CFT, Phys. Lett. B 775 (2017), 352-360 [arXiv:1705.03440 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  81. [89]

    David and Y

    A. David and Y. Neiman, Bulk interactions and boundary dual of higher-spin-charged particles, JHEP 03 (2021), 264 [arXiv:2009.02893 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Lysov and Y

    V. Lysov and Y. Neiman, Higher-spin gravity’s “string”: new gauge and proof of holographic duality for the linearized Didenko-Vasiliev solution, JHEP 10 (2022), 054 [arXiv:2207.07507 [hep-th]]. 43

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.