Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Loop Polarity Analysis to Avoid Underspecification in Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.10211 v2 pith:QZBFHEC2 submitted 2023-09-18 cs.LG cs.HCstat.ME

classification cs.LGcs.HCstat.ME
keywords learningdeeppolarityprocessstructuresystemanalysiscausal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning is a powerful set of techniques for detecting complex patterns in data. However, when the causal structure of that process is underspecified, deep learning models can be brittle, lacking robustness to shifts in the distribution of the data-generating process. In this paper, we turn to loop polarity analysis as a tool for specifying the causal structure of a data-generating process, in order to encode a more robust understanding of the relationship between system structure and system behavior within the deep learning pipeline. We use simulated epidemic data based on an SIR model to demonstrate how measuring the polarity of the different feedback loops that compose a system can lead to more robust inferences on the part of neural networks, improving the out-of-distribution performance of a deep learning model and infusing a system-dynamics-inspired approach into the machine learning development pipeline.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools