REVIEW 1 cited by
PLanAR: Planning-Language-Grounded Agentic Reasoning for Robot Manipulation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
PLanAR: Planning-Language-Grounded Agentic Reasoning for Robot Manipulation
read the original abstract
Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) have enabled increasing progress in real-world robot manipulation. However, long-horizon manipulation in unstructured environments requires VLMs to reason about changing scene states, action constraints, and execution outcomes, which remains difficult with natural language reasoning alone. We present PLanAR, a planning-language-grounded robot agent framework for open-vocabulary, long-horizon manipulation. PLanAR uses a planning-language interface to define the VLM reasoning space: object predicates represent scene states, action schemas specify robot skills with preconditions and effects, and symbolic plans provide executable intermediate representations. This interface enables stepwise verification: after each action, PLanAR uses onboard observations to check whether the expected symbolic effects have been achieved, allowing the VLM-based agent to update task states, detect failures, and replan when execution deviates from expectation. Across robot embodiments, VLM backends, and tasks including stacking, crossword solving, and long-horizon kitchen workflows, PLanAR demonstrates strong real-world capability while revealing key limitations of current VLMs in embodied reasoning.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Closing the Loop in Humanoid VLA: Persistent 3D Object Tokens for Verifiable Loco-Manipulation
Persistent role-indexed 3D object tokens that condition both action generation and geometric verification improved a GR00T-N1.7 humanoid's loco-manipulation success from 39/80 to 71/80 across eight real-world task families.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.