REVIEW 2 cited by
Goals as Reward-Producing Programs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
People are remarkably capable of generating their own goals, beginning with child's play and continuing into adulthood. Despite considerable empirical and computational work on goals and goal-oriented behavior, models are still far from capturing the richness of everyday human goals. Here, we bridge this gap by collecting a dataset of human-generated playful goals (in the form of scorable, single-player games), modeling them as reward-producing programs, and generating novel human-like goals through program synthesis. Reward-producing programs capture the rich semantics of goals through symbolic operations that compose, add temporal constraints, and allow for program execution on behavioral traces to evaluate progress. To build a generative model of goals, we learn a fitness function over the infinite set of possible goal programs and sample novel goals with a quality-diversity algorithm. Human evaluators found that model-generated goals, when sampled from partitions of program space occupied by human examples, were indistinguishable from human-created games. We also discovered that our model's internal fitness scores predict games that are evaluated as more fun to play and more human-like.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Generation and Evaluation in the Human Invention Process through the Lens of Game Design
A two-stage model adding simulated-play funness to a language-model proposal prior best fits novice-invented games, but the model comparison is undermined by including the observed games in the normalization set and b...
-
Assessing Adaptive World Models in Machines with Novel Games
The paper proposes a framework called world model induction and a novel-game benchmark paradigm for evaluating rapid adaptation in AI.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.