Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 45 references

Half-metallic ferromagnetism and Ru-induced localization in quaternary Heusler alloy CoRuMnSi

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read CoRuMnSi stays half-metallic even with 50 percent atomic disorder

desk verdict CoRuMnSi half-metallicity holds up experimentally and in DFT; the Ru-flat-band localization mechanism is a plausible but unproven overreach. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07804 v1 pith:R4PS3WRP submitted 2019-08-21 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Y. Venkateswara , Deepika Rani , K. G. Suresh , Aftab Alam This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 71.20.-b75.50.Cc61.43.-j85.75.-d31.15.E
keywords half-metallicferromagnetquaternaryHeusleralloyCoRuMnSispinpolarizationCo-Rudisorderlocalizationflatbandsspintronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the quaternary Heusler alloy CoRuMnSi is a robust half-metallic ferromagnet and that its low-temperature electrical-resistivity upturn is an intrinsic electronic-structure effect. Density-functional calculations give a minority-spin band gap of about 0.50 eV and a total moment of 4.00 $\mu_B$ per formula unit, matching the measured saturation moment of 3.92 $\mu_B$ at 3 K and the Slater-Pauling rule. The alloy orders magnetically near 780 K, and its resistivity lacks the $T^2$ single-magnon term expected in normal ferromagnets, which the authors read as indirect evidence for half-metallicity. The explanation for the localization is a band-structure mechanism: flat, hole-like $e_g$ bands of Ru character sit at the Fermi level in the majority-spin channel and overlap sharp conduction bands. If true, the material offers a stable, high-temperature source of fully spin-polarized current whose useful property survives the 50% Co-Ru swap disorder seen in the actual L2$_1$ structure.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spin-resolved band structure of CoRuMnSi computed by density-functional theory, read through atom-projected d-orbital characters. The decisive feature is a set of almost flat majority-spin $e_g$ bands lying at the Fermi level that arise purely from Ru ions and form heavy-hole pockets at $\Gamma$, overlapping sharply varying conduction bands that form electron pockets near L and X; this flat-band overlap is what the paper identifies as the intrinsic mechanism for the low-temperature $T^{1/2}$ resistivity localization. The Slater-Pauling relation $M_s = N_v - 24$ supplies the integer-moment constraint, and 32-atom supercell swap-disorder calculations test how the electronic structure changes under 12.5% to 50% Co-Ru exchange.

What would settle it

Measure the spin polarization of CoRuMnSi by point-contact Andreev reflection or by tunneling magnetoresistance in a magnetic tunnel junction: half-metallicity predicts near-100% polarization and a minority-spin gap of about 0.50 eV, while configuration II would give a different band structure and a markedly different polarization; separately, an ordered sample free of Co-Ru swaps should still show the $T^{1/2}$ resistivity upturn below 35 K if the localization is intrinsic.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that replacing Fe with Ru in CoFeMnSi turns a spin-gapless semiconductor into a localized half-metal, and that this change of electronic nature preserves the Slater-Pauling moment. In the ground-state configuration (Co and Ru on tetrahedral sites, Mn on the octahedral site), the minority-spin channel has a gap of about 0.50 eV, giving fully spin-polarized conduction, and the total moment is exactly 4.00 $\mu_B$/f.u.; the measured 3.92 $\mu_B$/f.u. at 3 K and the Curie temperature near 780 K support the theoretical picture. The paper further claims that the localization seen in resistivity below 35 K is intrinsic: the majority-spin $e_g$ orbitals at the Fermi level are flat, hole-like, and purely of Ru character, so conduction is carried by heavy holes coexisting with light electrons, producing the observed $T^{1/2}$ resistivity law. Finally, supercell calculations with 12.5% to 50% Co-Ru swap disorder show that the half-metallic gap and the 4 $\mu_B$ moment survive the disorder that X-ray diffraction finds in the real L2$_1$ sample.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the synthesized alloy has Mn on the octahedral site with Co and Ru on tetrahedral sites (configuration I), chosen by the empirical electronegativity rule even though the X-ray refinement also fits configuration II; if the real material were configuration II, the calculated spin gap, the flat Ru $e_g$ bands, and the intrinsic-localization conclusion would all change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • CoRuMnSi should deliver nearly fully spin-polarized currents even in the disordered L2$_1$ form that actually crystallizes, since the 0.50 eV minority gap and 4 $\mu_B$/f.u. moment survive 50% Co-Ru swapping.
  • The high Curie temperature near 780 K, roughly 160 K above CoFeMnSi, suggests spin polarization is not washed out near room temperature or above, a practical advantage for device operation.
  • The absence of a $T^2$ resistivity term in this alloy is a usable experimental signature of half-metallicity when direct spin-polarization measurements are unavailable.
  • The low-temperature $T^{1/2}$ resistivity upturn should be reproducible in different samples because it originates from intrinsic flat Ru $e_g$ bands rather than from impurities or extrinsic disorder.
  • The structural improvement from DO$_3$ in CoFeMnSi to L2$_1$ in CoRuMnSi by substituting a 4d element suggests a general route to reduce octahedral-site disorder in quaternary Heusler alloys.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the intrinsic-localization claim: grow ordered thin films or single crystals with less Co-Ru swap disorder; if the $T^{1/2}$ upturn and flat Ru $e_g$ bands persist, the localization mechanism is band-structural rather than disorder-driven.
  • The same atom-projected orbital analysis could be used to search other quaternary Heuslers for localized half-metals by looking for a heavy 4d/5d element whose $e_g$ states remain nonbonding at the Fermi level while the other transition metal bonds to the octahedral-site atom.
  • Because the total moment stays pinned at 4 $\mu_B$/f.u. across all disorder levels studied, the Slater-Pauling counting may also protect the spin polarization against small off-stoichiometry, such as CoRuMn$_{1\pm\delta}$Si, which would be worth testing experimentally.
  • The spin-gapless-to-localized-half-metal switch between CoFeMnSi and CoRuMnSi is attributed to the sign change of the $e_g$ carriers, from electron-like light carriers to hole-like heavy carriers; systematic Fe-Ru alloying CoRu$_x$Fe$_{1-x}$MnSi might allow continuous tuning between the two regimes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a combined experimental and DFT study of the equiatomic quaternary Heusler alloy CoRuMnSi. X-ray diffraction is interpreted as showing a Y-type-derived structure with 50% Co-Ru swap disorder on tetrahedral sites, i.e., an L21-type disordered structure. Magnetization measurements give a saturation moment of 3.92 μB/f.u. at 3 K and a Curie temperature near 780 K. Resistivity shows an upturn below 35 K, fitted to ρ = ρ0 − A T^(1/2), and power-law behavior at higher temperature. DFT (PBE-GGA) finds configuration I to be the ground state with a total moment of 4.00 μB/f.u. and a minority-spin gap of about 0.50 eV, supporting half-metallic ferromagnetism. The paper attributes the low-temperature localization to flat, Ru-derived eg bands that overlap sharply varying conduction bands in the majority-spin channel, and it reports supercell calculations showing that Co-Ru swap disorder up to 50% preserves the total moment and the half-metallic density of states.

Significance. If the claims hold, CoRuMnSi is a useful robust half-metallic ferromagnet: the measured saturation moment closely matches the Slater-Pauling value, the DFT minority-spin gap is sizable (0.50 eV), the Curie temperature is high, and the explicit disorder supercell calculations indicate that half-metallicity survives the 50% Co-Ru swapping present in the real sample. These are concrete, falsifiable results and the combination of experimental and first-principles evidence for the half-metallic state is a genuine strength. The proposed Ru-induced localization mechanism, however, is the least supported part of the paper: the flat-band analysis is performed for the ordered structure, while the measured sample is 50% disordered, and the resistivity upturn is also compatible with generic disorder-induced localization. The half-metallicity claim is therefore much stronger than the localization claim, and the latter needs additional support or appropriate qualification.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section IV (Figs. 5-6), Section V, and Conclusion] The localization mechanism is established only for the perfectly ordered configuration I: the flat Ru-eg bands, heavy-hole pockets at Γ, and overlap with sharply varying conduction bands are shown in Figs. 5 and 6 for the ordered structure. However, the measured sample is L21-type with 50% Co-Ru swap disorder (Section III A), and the disorder calculation in Fig. 8 and Table III reports only density of states and magnetic moments. No band dispersion, effective mass, or localization length is computed for the disordered supercell. Therefore the statements that the observed localization 'arises purely from the intrinsic electronic band structure' and 'should not be construed as due to other reasons such as disorder' are not supported by the presented calculations. The authors should either compute a band-structure or localization indicator for the 50%-disordered cell or revise these claims to a more cautious interpretation.
  2. [Section IV, Eq. (2)] The low-temperature upturn fitted as ρ(T) = ρ0 − A T^(1/2) is the standard signature of weak localization or electron-electron interaction effects in disordered conductors. Given that the sample contains 50% Co-Ru swap disorder, the functional form alone cannot distinguish intrinsic flat-band localization from disorder-induced localization. Additional evidence, such as the field dependence of the magnetoresistance or a comparison with an ordered reference sample, would be needed before attributing the upturn specifically to Ru-eg flat bands. As written, the attribution goes beyond what the resistivity data and ordered-structure band calculation establish.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section III A] The text says 'Rietveld refinement considering any of the pure configurations (I, II, II) did not fit well'; the third entry should read 'III' rather than 'II'.
  2. [Section III A] The sentence 'The difference of atomic form factors of Co and Mn is very negligible in comparison to that of Ru and Ge' appears to refer to Ru and Si, not Ge; as written this is confusing and should be corrected.
  3. [Section IV] There are minor typographical errors: 'band widths ... nad 3D band dispersion' should read 'and 3D band dispersion', and the caption of Fig. 6 labels the last panel '(fb)' instead of '(f)'.
  4. [Section III C, Eqs. (2)-(3)] Equations (2) and (3) contain a redundant 'ρ0 + ρ(T)' on the left-hand side; the notation should be simplified to a single expression for ρ(T).
  5. [Abstract and Section III A] The phrase 'L21 disorder' is potentially confusing because L21 usually denotes an ordered full-Heusler structure; 'L21-type disordered structure' would be clearer.
  6. [Section III A] The decision to discard configuration II is ultimately well supported by the DFT total energies and moments in Table II, but the text justifies it mainly by an empirical electronegativity rule. The authors should explicitly cite the 0.23 eV/atom energy difference and the 4.00 μB versus 0.39 μB moments when ruling out configuration II.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main claims are DFT-computed and benchmarked against external Slater-Pauling and magnetization data.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, half-metallic ferromagnetism in CoRuMnSi, is derived from spin-resolved DFT (VASP/PBE) with no parameter fitted to the target quantities: the minority-spin gap of about 0.50 eV and the total moment of 4.00 muB/f.u. are direct computational outputs. The measured saturation moment of 3.92 muB/f.u. is compared with the external Slater-Pauling relation (Nv - 24), an independent empirical benchmark. The choice of configuration I is supported by DFT total energies (Table II: config I is 0.23 eV/atom lower than config II and gives 4.00 muB, while config II gives 0.39 muB) and is consistent with the measured moment; the XRD ambiguity is explicitly acknowledged and resolved by an empirical electronegativity rule, not by a self-referential definition. The resistivity fitting (rho0 - A T^1/2, etc.) is used as a phenomenological characterization of the measured data, and the attribution of the low-temperature upturn to flat Ru-eg bands is an interpretive band-structure argument rather than a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Self-citations, such as the prior identification of CoFeMnSi as a spin gapless semiconductor, are motivational or comparative and are not load-bearing for the present DFT results or the Slater-Pauling consistency check. No equation is shown to reduce to its own input, and no fitted output is called a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard empirical rules (Slater-Pauling, electronegativity ordering), a standard DFT approximation, and qualitative band-structure interpretation. The only fitted quantities are the resistivity parameters and the disorder fraction; no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (8)
  • Co-Ru swap disorder fraction = 50%
    Fitted from room-temperature XRD Rietveld refinement; the paper concludes 50% swap disorder between Co and Ru at tetrahedral sites, which is central to the L2_1 structure claim and the disorder simulations.
  • Resistivity baseline rho01 (4-35 K) = 35.85 µOhm cm
    Fitted constant in the low-temperature resistivity equation rho(T) = rho0 - A*T^1/2, used to support the localization claim.
  • Resistivity coefficient A = 0.030(1) µOhm cm K^-1/2
    Fitted coefficient for the T^1/2 localization term in the 4-35 K range, taken from Table I.
  • Resistivity baseline rho02 (35-300 K) = 35.62 µOhm cm
    Fitted constant for the power-law region, taken from Table I.
  • Power-law exponent n (35-100 K) = 2.59(4)
    Fitted exponent in rho(T) = rho02 + B*T^n; the absence of a pure T^2 term is used as indirect evidence for half-metallicity.
  • Power-law exponent n (100-300 K) = 1.066(4)
    Fitted exponent attributed to electron-phonon scattering; used to claim absence of single-magnon scattering.
  • Power-law coefficient B (35-100 K) = 4.1(8) x 10^-6 µOhm cm K^-n
    Fitted amplitude in the intermediate temperature range, from Table I.
  • Power-law coefficient B (100-300 K) = 1.02 x 10^-2 µOhm cm K^-n
    Fitted amplitude in the high temperature range, from Table I; no uncertainty is given.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Slater-Pauling rule: Ms = Nv - 24 for half-metallic Heusler alloys
    Invoked in Section III B to compare the measured moment (3.92 μB) with the predicted value of 4 μB; the rule itself is cited from prior literature and is not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption Electronegativity-based site occupancy rule for Heusler alloys
    Used in Section III A to discard configuration II in the XRD refinement ('Co atoms will not occupy the octahedral site') and in Section IV to justify the ground-state configuration I; cited from ref 16.
  • domain assumption Absence of T^2 resistivity term implies half-metallic nature
    Used in Section III C to interpret the resistivity data as supporting half-metallicity; cited from refs 17, 36-40.
  • domain assumption T^1/2 resistivity upturn indicates electron localization
    Used in Section III C to interpret the low-temperature resistivity minimum; cited from refs 36, 41, 42.
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA DFT provides accurate band structure and magnetic moments for this alloy class
    Used throughout Section IV; standard approximation, not justified in the paper beyond citing the method.
  • domain assumption Flat eg bands overlapping sharp conduction bands cause the observed localization
    The interpretive link between the calculated band structure and the resistivity upturn in Section IV is qualitative; the paper does not compute transport coefficients.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Half-metallic ferromagnetism and Ru-induced localization in quaternary Heusler alloy CoRuMnSi." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R4PS3WRP

@misc{pith2026190807804,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Half-metallic ferromagnetism and Ru-induced localization in quaternary Heusler alloy CoRuMnSi},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R4PS3WRP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07804}
}
abstract

We report a combined theoretical and experimental investigation of half-metallic ferromagnetism in equiatomic quaternary Heusler alloy CoRuMnSi. Room temperature XRD analysis reveals that the alloy crystallizes in L21 disorder instead of pristine Y-type structure due to 50% swap disorder between the tetrahedral sites, i.e., Co and Ru atoms. Magnetization measurements reveal a net magnetization of 4 $\mu_B$ with Curie temperature of ~780 K. Resistivity measurement reveals the presence of localization effect below 35 K while above 100 K, a linear dependence is observed. Resistivity behavior indicates the absence of single magnon scattering, which indirectly supports the half-metallic nature. The majority spin band near the Fermi level clearly indicates the overlap of flat eg bands with sharply varying conduction bands that are responsible for the localization. In-depth analysis of the projected atomic d-orbital character of band structure reveals unusual bonding, giving rise to the flat eg bands purely arising out of Ru ions. Co-Ru swap disorder calculations indicate the robustness of half-metallic nature, even when the structure changes from Y-type to L21-type, with no major change in the net magnetization of the system. Thus, robust half-metallic nature, stable structure, and high Curie temperature make this alloy quite a promising candidate to be used as a source of highly spin-polarized currents in spintronic applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07804 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Spin resolved band structure for a localized half [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Rietveld refined room temperature XRD pattern of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Temperature dependence of electrical resistivity for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Isothermal magnetization curves at 3 K and 300 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Spin resolved density of states and band structure for CoRuMnSi at its equilibrium lattice parameter. The dispersion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. For CoRuMnSi, band structure with projected d [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. d-orbital character of Fe ions in spin up band struc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Spin-resolved DoS for CoRuMnSi with (a) 12.5%, (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bainsla , author A

    author author L. Bainsla , author A. I. \ Mallick , author M. M. \ Raja , author A. K. \ Nigam , author B. S. D. C. S. \ Varaprasad , author Y. K. \ Takahashi , author A. Alam , author K. G. \ Suresh , \ and\ author K. Hono ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.104408 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 91 ,\ pages 104408 ( year 2015 a ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.104408

  2. [2]

    Venkateswara , author S

    author author Enamullah , author Y. Venkateswara , author S. Gupta , author M. R. \ Varma , author P. Singh , author K. G. \ Suresh , \ and\ author A. Alam ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.224413 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 92 ,\ pages 224413 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.224413

  3. [3]

    Makinistian , author M

    author author L. Makinistian , author M. M. \ Faiz , author R. P. \ Panguluri , author B. Balke , author S. Wurmehl , author C. Felser , author E. A. \ Albanesi , author A. G. \ Petukhov , \ and\ author B. Nadgorny ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.220402 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 87 ,\ pages 220402 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.220402

  4. [4]

    Bainsla , author A

    author author L. Bainsla , author A. I. \ Mallick , author M. M. \ Raja , author A. A. \ Coelho , author A. K. \ Nigam , author D. D. \ Johnson , author A. Alam , \ and\ author K. G. \ Suresh ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.045201 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 92 ,\ pages 045201 ( year 2015 b ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.045201

  5. [5]

    Ouardi , author G

    author author S. Ouardi , author G. H. \ Fecher , author C. Felser , \ and\ author J. K\"ubler ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.100401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 110 ,\ pages 100401 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.100401 2013

  6. [6]

    Venkateswara , author S

    author author Y. Venkateswara , author S. Gupta , author S. S. \ Samatham , author M. R. \ Varma , author Enamullah , author K. G. \ Suresh , \ and\ author A. Alam ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.054407 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 97 ,\ pages 054407 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.054407

  7. [7]

    Herran , author R

    author author J. Herran , author R. Dalal , author P. Gray , author P. Kharel , \ and\ author P. V. \ Lukashev ,\ 10.1063/1.4998308 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 122 ,\ pages 153904 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4998308 2017

  8. [8]

    Stinshoff , author G

    author author R. Stinshoff , author G. H. \ Fecher , author S. Chadov , author A. K. \ Nayak , author B. Balke , author S. Ouardi , author T. Nakamura , \ and\ author C. Felser ,\ 10.1063/1.5000351 journal journal AIP Advances \ volume 7 ,\ pages 105009 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.5000351

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    author author M. E. \ Jamer , author Y. J. \ Wang , author G. M. \ Stephen , author I. J. \ McDonald , author A. J. \ Grutter , author G. E. \ Sterbinsky , author D. A. \ Arena , author J. A. \ Borchers , author B. J. \ Kirby , author L. H. \ Lewis , author B. Barbiellini , au...

    doi

  2. [10]

    Wang , author T

    author author X. Wang , author T. Li , author Z. Cheng , author X.-L. \ Wang , \ and\ author H. Chen ,\ 10.1063/1.5042604 journal journal Applied Physics Reviews \ volume 5 ,\ pages 041103 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    Singh , author M

    author author M. Singh , author M. K. \ Kashyap , \ and\ author H. S. \ Saini ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.05.027 journal journal Materials Today: Proceedings \ volume 5 ,\ pages 15421 ( year 2018 ) ,\ note 10th National Conference on Solid State Chemistry and Allie...

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    Picozzi \ and\ author A

    author author S. Picozzi \ and\ author A. J. \ Freeman ,\ 10.1088/0953-8984/19/31/315215 journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 19 ,\ pages 315215 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  5. [13]

    Seema \ and\ author R

    author author K. Seema \ and\ author R. Kumar ,\ 10.1063/1.4929252 journal journal AIP Conference Proceedings \ volume 1675 ,\ pages 030036 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  6. [14]

    Bruski , author S

    author author P. Bruski , author S. C. \ Erwin , author M. Ramsteiner , author O. Brandt , author K.-J. \ Friedland , author R. Farshchi , author J. Herfort , \ and\ author H. Riechert ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.140409 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 83 ,\ pages 140409 ( yea...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Miura , author K

    author author Y. Miura , author K. Nagao , \ and\ author M. Shirai ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.144413 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 69 ,\ pages 144413 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  8. [16]

    Graf , author C

    author author T. Graf , author C. Felser , \ and\ author S. S. \ Parkin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2011.02.001 journal journal Progress in Solid State Chemistry \ volume 39 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  9. [17]

    Rani , author Enamullah , author K

    author author D. Rani , author Enamullah , author K. G. \ Suresh , author A. K. \ Yadav , author S. N. \ Jha , author D. Bhattacharyya , author M. R. \ Varma , \ and\ author A. Alam ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.184404 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 184404 ( year 2...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Kharel , author J

    author author P. Kharel , author J. Herran , author P. Lukashev , author Y. Jin , author J. Waybright , author S. Gilbert , author B. Staten , author P. Gray , author S. Valloppilly , author Y. Huh , \ and\ author D. J. \ Sellmyer ,\ 10.1063/1.4972797 journal journal AIP Advan...

    doi

  11. [19]

    Choudhary , author P

    author author R. Choudhary , author P. Kharel , author S. R. \ Valloppilly , author Y. Jin , author A. O’Connell , author Y. Huh , author S. Gilbert , author A. Kashyap , author D. J. \ Sellmyer , \ and\ author R. Skomski ,\ 10.1063/1.4943306 journal journal AIP Advances \ vol...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Alijani , author J

    author author V. Alijani , author J. Winterlik , author G. H. \ Fecher , author S. S. \ Naghavi , author S. Chadov , author T. Gruhn , \ and\ author C. Felser ,\ 10.1088/0953-8984/24/4/046001 journal journal J. Phys.: Conden. Matt. \ volume 24 ,\ pages 046001 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi

  13. [21]

    Bainsla , author M

    author author L. Bainsla , author M. M. \ Raja , author A. Nigam , \ and\ author K. Suresh ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.150 journal journal J. Alloy Compd. \ volume 651 ,\ pages 631 ( year 2015 c ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  14. [22]

    Klaer , author M

    author author P. Klaer , author M. Kallmayer , author H. J. \ Elmers , author L. Basit , author J. Thöne , author S. Chadov , \ and\ author C. Felser ,\ 10.1088/0022-3727/42/8/084001 journal journal Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics \ volume 42 ,\ pages 084001 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [23]

    Kanomata , author M

    author author T. Kanomata , author M. Kikuchi , \ and\ author H. Yamauchi ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2005.06.079 journal journal Journal of Alloys and Compounds \ volume 414 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  16. [24]

    Kundu , author S

    author author A. Kundu , author S. Ghosh , author R. Banerjee , author S. Ghosh , \ and\ author B. Sanyal ,\ 10.1038/s41598-017-01782-5 journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 7 ,\ pages 1803 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    author author J. M. \ Khalaf Al-zyadi , author A. A. \ Kadhim , \ and\ author K.-L. \ Yao ,\ 10.1039/C8RA02918K journal journal RSC Adv. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 25653 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    https://www.ill.eu/sites/fullprof/php/tutorials.html title https://www.ill.eu/sites/fullprof/php/tutorials.html , \ NoStop

  19. [27]

    Rodríguez-Carvajal ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I journal journal Physica B: Condensed Matter \ volume 192 ,\ pages 55 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    author author J. Rodríguez-Carvajal ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I journal journal Physica B: Condensed Matter \ volume 192 ,\ pages 55 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    1993 doi

  20. [28]

    Kresse \ and\ author J

    author author G. Kresse \ and\ author J. Furthm\"uller ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 54 ,\ pages 11169 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  21. [29]

    Kresse \ and\ author D

    author author G. Kresse \ and\ author D. Joubert ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 59 ,\ pages 1758 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999 doi

  22. [30]

    author author A. Kokalji ,\ 10.1016/S0927-0256(03)00104-6 journal journal Computational Materials Science \ volume 28 ,\ pages 155 ( year 2003 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/Proceedings of the Symposium on Software Development for Process and Materials Design Proceedings of the Sym...

    2003 doi

  23. [31]

    Momma \ and\ author F

    author author K. Momma \ and\ author F. Izumi ,\ 10.1107/S0021889811038970 journal journal Journal of Applied Crystallography \ volume 44 ,\ pages 1272 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  24. [32]

    Rani , author Enamullah , author L

    author author D. Rani , author Enamullah , author L. Bainsla , author K. G. \ Suresh , \ and\ author A. Alam ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.104429 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 104429 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    Alijani , author J

    author author V. Alijani , author J. Winterlik , author G. H. \ Fecher , author S. S. \ Naghavi , \ and\ author C. Felser ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.184428 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 83 ,\ pages 184428 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  26. [34]

    author author J. C. \ Slater ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.49.931 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 49 ,\ pages 931 ( year 1936 ) NoStop

    1936 doi

  27. [35]

    Pauling ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.54.899 journal journal Phys

    author author L. Pauling ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.54.899 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 54 ,\ pages 899 ( year 1938 ) NoStop

    1938 doi

  28. [36]

    Rani , author J

    author author D. Rani , author J. Kangsabanik , author K. G. \ Suresh , author N. Patra , author D. Bhattacharyya , author S. N. \ Jha , \ and\ author A. Alam ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.054022 journal journal Phys. Rev. Applied \ volume 10 ,\ pages 054022 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  29. [37]

    Aftab , author G

    author author M. Aftab , author G. H. \ Jaffari , author S. K. \ Hasanain , author T. A. \ Abbas , \ and\ author S. I. \ Shah ,\ 10.1088/0022-3727/45/47/475001 journal journal Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics \ volume 45 ,\ pages 475001 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi

  30. [38]

    Srinivas , author T

    author author K. Srinivas , author T. Prasanna Kumari , author M. Manivel Raja , \ and\ author S. V. \ Kamat ,\ 10.1063/1.4813519 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 114 ,\ pages 033911 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  31. [39]

    author author M. J. \ Otto , author R. A. M. \ van Woerden , author P. J. \ van der Valk , author J. Wijngaard , author C. F. \ van Bruggen , \ and\ author C. Haas ,\ 10.1088/0953-8984/1/13/008 journal journal J. Phys : Condens. Matter \ volume 1 ,\ pages 2351 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    doi

  32. [40]

    Kubo , Kenn; Ohata ,\ 10.1143/JPSJ.33.21 journal journal J

    author author N. Kubo , Kenn; Ohata ,\ 10.1143/JPSJ.33.21 journal journal J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. \ volume 33 ( year 1972 ),\ 10.1143/JPSJ.33.21 NoStop

    1972 doi

  33. [41]

    author author J. C. \ Prestigiacomo , author D. P. \ Young , author P. W. \ Adams , \ and\ author S. Stadler ,\ 10.1063/1.4862966 journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 115 ,\ pages 043712 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  34. [42]

    Bainsla , author K

    author author L. Bainsla , author K. G. \ Suresh , author A. K. \ Nigam , author M. M. \ Raja , author B. S. D. C. S. \ Varaprasad , author Y. K. \ Takahashi , \ and\ author K. Hono ,\ 10.1063/1.4902831 journal journal J. Appl.Phys. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 203902 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

  35. [43]

    Gardelis , author J

    author author S. Gardelis , author J. Androulakis , author P. Migiakis , author J. Giapintzakis , author S. K. \ Clowes , author Y. Bugoslavsky , author W. R. \ Branford , author Y. Miyoshi , \ and\ author L. F. \ Cohen ,\ 10.1063/1.1739293 journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ vol...

    doi

  36. [44]

    Venkateswara , author S

    author author Y. Venkateswara , author S. S. \ Samatham , author P. D. \ Babu , author K. G. \ Suresh , \ and\ author A. Alam ,\ @noop title Co-existence of spin semi-metallic and weyl semi-metallic behavior in ferhcrge , \ ( year 2019 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1902.01593...

    2019 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Galanakis , author P

    author author I. Galanakis , author P. H. \ Dederichs , \ and\ author N. Papanikolaou ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.174429 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 66 ,\ pages 174429 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.