Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Inference of Marginalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.24079 v3 pith:R4XDNP7M submitted 2024-10-31 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords inferencelinearcarlomodelsmontealgorithmapproachhamiltonian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Bayesian reasoning in linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) is challenging and often requires advanced sampling techniques like Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). A common approach is to write the model in a probabilistic programming language and then sample via Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC). However, there are many ways a user can transform a model that make inference more or less efficient. In particular, marginalizing some variables can greatly improve inference but is difficult for users to do manually. We develop an algorithm to easily marginalize random effects in LMMs. A naive approach introduces cubic time operations within an inference algorithm like HMC, but we reduce the running time to linear using fast linear algebra techniques. We show that marginalization is always beneficial when applicable and highlight improvements in various models, especially ones from cognitive sciences.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools