Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

OIBench: Benchmarking Strong Reasoning Models with Olympiad in Informatics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.10481 v1 pith:R5HAUX3D submitted 2025-06-12 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords modelsoibenchreasoningbenchmarkbenchmarkschallengingefficiencyexperiments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As models become increasingly sophisticated, conventional algorithm benchmarks are increasingly saturated, underscoring the need for more challenging benchmarks to guide future improvements in algorithmic reasoning. This paper introduces OIBench, a high-quality, private, and challenging olympiad-level informatics dataset comprising 250 carefully curated original problems. We detail the construction methodology of the benchmark, ensuring a comprehensive assessment across various programming paradigms and complexities, and we demonstrate its contamination-resistant properties via experiments. We propose Time/Space Completion Curves for finer-grained efficiency analysis and enable direct human-model comparisons through high-level participant evaluations. Our experiments reveal that while open-source models lag behind closed-source counterparts, current SOTA models already outperform most human participants in both correctness and efficiency, while still being suboptimal compared to the canonical solutions. By releasing OIBench as a fully open-source resource (https://huggingface.co/datasets/AGI-Eval/OIBench), we hope this benchmark will contribute to advancing code reasoning capabilities for future LLMs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AutoCodeBench: Large Language Models are Automatic Code Benchmark Generators

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AutoCodeBench is an LLM-generated, sandbox-verified code benchmark with 3,920 problems across 20 languages, where top models reach only 52.4% pass@1.

  2. UniCode: Augmenting Evaluation for Code Reasoning

    cs.SE 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    UniCode's LLM-generated coding benchmark drops top-model pass@1 to 70.3% and indicates current LLMs rely on memorized seed logic instead of generalizing to new algorithmic problems.

Pith tools