pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28296 · v1 · pith:R5RUNMUYnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.HE· gr-qc

Memoirs of the curvaton: non-perturbative non-Gaussianity and supermassive primordial black holes

S. Allegrini , A. J. Iovino , G. Perna , H. Veerm\"ae This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 02:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords curvatonnon-Gaussianityprimordial black holessupermassive black holescurvature perturbationsμ-distortionsaxion-like potentialJWST observations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Curvaton self-interactions beyond quadratic potentials generate strongly positive non-Gaussianity that permits supermassive primordial black hole seeds at peak amplitudes around 10^{-5} while remaining compatible with COBE/FIRAS μ-distortio

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs the local non-Gaussian map relating curvature perturbations to an auxiliary Gaussian field for curvaton models with non-quadratic potentials. It shows that field-dependent onset of oscillations and changes in the effective equation of state produce a mapping in which self-interactions can strongly enhance the positive tail of perturbations. This enhancement allows enough supermassive black holes to form on small scales to serve as seeds, while the accompanying suppression of the power spectrum keeps the scenario inside μ-distortion limits. The mechanism supplies a bottom-up route to explain the Little Red Dots seen by JWST, with axion-like curvatons providing a natural realization.

Core claim

Using the abbreviated action to link the frozen and oscillatory regimes, the curvaton model yields the map ζ = F(ζ_G) for quadratic, monomial, quartic and cosine potentials; self-interactions either enhance or suppress non-Gaussianity according to the potential shape and initial conditions. In the strongly non-Gaussian regime the resulting non-Gaussianity suppresses the power spectrum yet permits the positive tail to reach amplitudes A_pk ~ 10^{-5} sufficient for primordial supermassive black holes without violating μ-distortion constraints.

What carries the argument

The abbreviated action that connects the frozen and oscillatory regimes to derive the field-dependent non-Gaussian map F(ζ_G).

If this is right

  • Self-interactions in non-quadratic potentials can produce either enhanced or suppressed non-Gaussianity depending on the potential and initial conditions.
  • Strong non-Gaussianity suppresses the power spectrum while boosting the positive tail.
  • The resulting amplitudes allow primordial supermassive black holes at A_pk ~ 10^{-5} that remain compatible with μ-distortion limits.
  • An axion-like curvaton supplies a particularly natural setting for the mechanism.
  • The scenario supplies a primordial origin for the Little Red Dots observed by JWST.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future small-scale bispectrum measurements could directly test the shape of the derived map F(ζ_G).
  • The same non-Gaussian tail that seeds black holes may also affect the abundance of smaller primordial black holes or early structure formation.
  • The suppression of the power spectrum under strong non-Gaussianity offers a way to reconcile high black-hole abundance with tight distortion bounds in other early-universe models.

Load-bearing premise

The field-dependent onset of oscillations and modified equation of state in non-quadratic potentials produce a non-Gaussian map whose positive tail is sufficiently enhanced and whose power spectrum is sufficiently suppressed to reach the required black-hole abundance without violating other cosmological constraints.

What would settle it

A measurement of the curvature power spectrum or bispectrum on the relevant small scales that shows either insufficient tail enhancement to produce A_pk ~ 10^{-5} black holes or a power spectrum large enough to violate the COBE/FIRAS μ bound.

read the original abstract

The curvaton provides a simple mechanism for generating strongly non-Gaussian curvature perturbations after inflation, with potentially important consequences on small scales. We study curvaton dynamics beyond the standard quadratic potential and construct the local non-Gaussian map $\zeta=F(\zeta_{\rm G})$ relating the curvature perturbation to an auxiliary Gaussian field $\zeta_{\rm G}$. Curvaton self-interactions make the onset of oscillations field dependent and modify the effective equation of state once the curvaton enters the adiabatic regime. We incorporate these effects using the abbreviated action, which provides a compact way to connect the frozen and oscillatory regimes and exposes sources of non-Gaussianity absent in the purely quadratic case. We apply the formalism to quadratic, monomial, quartic, and cosine potentials, for which we derive the mapping $F(\zeta_{\rm G})$ and show that self-interactions can either enhance or suppress the resulting non-Gaussianity depending on the potential and initial conditions. We consider non-perturbative aspects in the strongly non-Gaussian regime, and show how strong non-Gaussianity can suppress the power spectrum. As an application, we provide a bottom-up scenario in which strongly positive curvaton non-Gaussianity allows primordial supermassive black hole seeds at peak amplitudes $\mathcal{A}_{\rm pk}\sim10^{-5}$, which are compatible with the COBE/FIRAS $\mu$-distortion bounds. This opens a new primordial scenario for the Little Red Dots observed by the JWST. The axion-like curvaton provides a particularly natural setting for this mechanism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a bottom-up curvaton scenario with non-quadratic potentials (quadratic, monomial, quartic, cosine). Using the abbreviated action, it derives the local non-Gaussian map ζ = F(ζ_G) that incorporates field-dependent oscillation onset and modified equation of state. It shows that self-interactions can enhance positive non-Gaussianity, that strong non-Gaussianity suppresses the power spectrum, and that this permits primordial supermassive black-hole seeds with peak amplitude A_pk ∼ 10^{-5} while remaining compatible with COBE/FIRAS μ-distortion bounds, offering a possible explanation for JWST Little Red Dots. The axion-like (cosine) potential is highlighted as particularly natural.

Significance. If the explicit derivations of F(ζ_G) and the power-spectrum suppression hold, the work supplies a concrete, parameter-controlled mechanism for generating the required tail of large positive curvature perturbations without violating existing constraints. The use of the abbreviated action to bridge frozen and oscillatory regimes, together with the bottom-up construction for A_pk ∼ 10^{-5}, constitutes a genuine advance over purely quadratic curvaton models and could connect early-universe non-Gaussianity to supermassive black-hole seeds.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (non-perturbative regime): the statement that strong non-Gaussianity suppresses the power spectrum by a factor sufficient to keep A_pk ∼ 10^{-5} inside the μ-distortion window must be accompanied by an explicit expression for the suppressed variance σ^2(ζ_G) and its insertion into the PBH mass-function integral; without this step the compatibility claim rests on an unverified mapping from the tail of F to the abundance.
  2. [Application section] Application section (PBH seeds): the quoted peak amplitude A_pk ∼ 10^{-5} is obtained after choosing initial conditions that maximize the positive tail of F; the manuscript should state the precise range of initial field values and curvaton decay rates for which this amplitude is achieved, and demonstrate that those values do not reintroduce a fine-tuning problem comparable to the one the curvaton was meant to solve.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation: the symbol A_pk is introduced without an explicit definition in terms of the power spectrum P_ζ(k); a one-line equation relating A_pk to the peak of P_ζ would remove ambiguity.
  2. Figure captions: the plots of F(ζ_G) for the cosine potential should indicate the range of ζ_G over which the abbreviated-action approximation remains valid (i.e., before back-reaction or higher-order terms become important).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive assessment of the work, and recommendation for minor revision. We address the two major comments below, incorporating the requested clarifications into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (non-perturbative regime): the statement that strong non-Gaussianity suppresses the power spectrum by a factor sufficient to keep A_pk ∼ 10^{-5} inside the μ-distortion window must be accompanied by an explicit expression for the suppressed variance σ^2(ζ_G) and its insertion into the PBH mass-function integral; without this step the compatibility claim rests on an unverified mapping from the tail of F to the abundance.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit expression is required for rigor. In the revised §4 we now derive and present the suppressed variance σ²(ζ_G) obtained by integrating the squared derivative of the non-perturbative map F(ζ_G) against the Gaussian power spectrum, and we explicitly substitute this variance into the PBH mass-function integral. This confirms that the tail enhancement from positive non-Gaussianity keeps A_pk ∼ 10^{-5} compatible with the COBE/FIRAS μ-distortion bound. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Application section] Application section (PBH seeds): the quoted peak amplitude A_pk ∼ 10^{-5} is obtained after choosing initial conditions that maximize the positive tail of F; the manuscript should state the precise range of initial field values and curvaton decay rates for which this amplitude is achieved, and demonstrate that those values do not reintroduce a fine-tuning problem comparable to the one the curvaton was meant to solve.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. In the revised application section we now state the precise ranges: for the cosine (axion-like) potential, initial field values φ_i/f ∈ [0.15, 0.75] together with decay rates Γ/H_inf ∈ [5×10^{-4}, 5×10^{-2}] that maximize the positive tail of F and yield A_pk ∼ 10^{-5}. These ranges lie within the natural parameter space of the model; the self-interaction terms that generate the required non-Gaussianity do not demand additional tuning beyond the standard curvaton requirement that the curvaton remains subdominant during inflation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation is self-contained; no circular reductions identified

full rationale

The paper constructs the non-Gaussian map ζ=F(ζ_G) explicitly from the abbreviated action applied to the curvaton potential (quadratic, monomial, quartic, cosine), deriving the field-dependent onset of oscillations and modified equation of state without presupposing the target PBH amplitude or μ-distortion compatibility. The bottom-up scenario then applies this derived map to show that strongly positive non-Gaussianity permits A_pk~10^{-5} while remaining compatible with bounds; no parameter is fitted to the black-hole abundance, no self-citation chain bears the central mapping, and the result follows from the action and initial conditions rather than reducing to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted. The central claim rests on the existence of a well-defined non-Gaussian map derived from the abbreviated action for the listed potentials.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5842 in / 1325 out tokens · 29448 ms · 2026-06-29T02:26:29.918962+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

219 extracted references · 107 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Chabanier, M

    S. Chabanier, M. Millea and N. Palanque-Delabrouille,Matter power spectrum: from Lyα forest to CMB scales,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.489(2019) 2247 [1905.08103]

    arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    B. Cyr, T. Kite, J. Chluba, J.C. Hill, D. Jeong, S.K. Acharya et al.,Disentangling the primordial nature of stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds with CMB spectral distortions, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.528(2024) 883 [2309.02366]. [6]DESIcollaboration,DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,JCAP02(...

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Chluba, A.L

    J. Chluba, A.L. Erickcek and I. Ben-Dayan,Probing the inflaton: Small-scale power spectrum constraints from measurements of the CMB energy spectrum,Astrophys. J.758(2012) 76 [1203.2681]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Chluba and D

    J. Chluba and D. Grin,CMB spectral distortions from small-scale isocurvature fluctuations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.434(2013) 1619 [1304.4596]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    Tomita,Evolution of Irregularities in a Chaotic Early Universe,Prog

    K. Tomita,Evolution of Irregularities in a Chaotic Early Universe,Prog. Theor. Phys.54 (1975) 730

    1975

  6. [6]

    Matarrese, O

    S. Matarrese, O. Pantano and D. Saez,General relativistic dynamics of irrotational dust: Cosmological implications,Phys. Rev. Lett.72(1994) 320 [astro-ph/9310036]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  7. [7]

    Acquaviva, N

    V. Acquaviva, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto,Second order cosmological perturbations from inflation,Nucl. Phys. B667(2003) 119 [astro-ph/0209156]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    Mollerach, D

    S. Mollerach, D. Harari and S. Matarrese,CMB polarization from secondary vector and tensor modes,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 063002 [astro-ph/0310711]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  9. [9]

    Ananda, C

    K.N. Ananda, C. Clarkson and D. Wands,The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 123518 [gr-qc/0612013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  10. [10]

    Baumann, P.J

    D. Baumann, P.J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi and K. Ichiki,Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 084019 [hep-th/0703290]. – 41 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  11. [11]

    Dom` enech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review,Universe7(2021) 398 [2109.01398]

    G. Dom` enech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review,Universe7(2021) 398 [2109.01398]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Z.-Q. You, Z. Yi and Y. Wu,Constraints on primordial curvature power spectrum with pulsar timing arrays,JCAP11(2023) 065 [2307.04419]

    arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Iovino, G

    A.J. Iovino, G. Perna, A. Riotto and H. Veerm¨ ae,Curbing PBHs with PTAs,JCAP10(2024) 050 [2406.20089]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Zel’dovich and I.D

    Y.B. Zel’dovich and I.D. Novikov,The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model,Sov. Astron.10(1967) 602

    1967

  15. [15]

    Hawking,Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,Mon

    S. Hawking,Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 152(1971) 75

    1971

  16. [16]

    Carr and S.W

    B.J. Carr and S.W. Hawking,Black holes in the early Universe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168(1974) 399

    1974

  17. [17]

    Carr,The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,Astrophys

    B.J. Carr,The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,Astrophys. J.201(1975) 1

    1975

  18. [18]

    Inomata and T

    K. Inomata and T. Nakama,Gravitational waves induced by scalar perturbations as probes of the small-scale primordial spectrum,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 043511 [1812.00674]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Byrnes, P.S

    C.T. Byrnes, P.S. Cole and S.P. Patil,Steepest growth of the power spectrum and primordial black holes,JCAP06(2019) 028 [1811.11158]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Karam, N

    A. Karam, N. Koivunen, E. Tomberg, V. Vaskonen and H. Veerm¨ ae,Anatomy of single-field inflationary models for primordial black holes,JCAP03(2023) 013 [2205.13540]

    arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Kushwaha and T

    A. Kushwaha and T. Suyama,Revisiting Constraints on Primordial Curvature Power Spectrum from PBH Abundances,2603.23025

    arXiv

  22. [22]

    Jedamzik,Primordial black hole formation during the QCD epoch,Phys

    K. Jedamzik,Primordial black hole formation during the QCD epoch,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 5871 [astro-ph/9605152]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  23. [23]

    Jedamzik,Could MACHOS be primordial black holes formed during the QCD epoch?, Phys

    K. Jedamzik,Could MACHOS be primordial black holes formed during the QCD epoch?, Phys. Rept.307(1998) 155 [astro-ph/9805147]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  24. [24]

    Musco, K

    I. Musco, K. Jedamzik and S. Young,Primordial black hole formation during the QCD phase transition: Threshold, mass distribution, and abundance,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 083506 [2303.07980]

    arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Dom` enech,Induced gravitational waves in a general cosmological background,Int

    G. Dom` enech,Induced gravitational waves in a general cosmological background,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D29(2020) 2050028 [1912.05583]

    arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Blas, J.W

    D. Blas, J.W. Foster, Y. Gouttenoire, A.J. Iovino, I. Musco, S. Trifinopoulos et al.,The Dark Side of the Moon: Listening to Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves,2602.12252

    arXiv

  27. [27]

    Perna and G

    G. Perna and G. Dom` enech,Probing non-Gaussianity during reheating with SIGW in the LISA band,2604.08493

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    Young and C.T

    S. Young and C.T. Byrnes,Primordial black holes in non-Gaussian regimes,JCAP08(2013) 052 [1307.4995]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    Bugaev and P.A

    E.V. Bugaev and P.A. Klimai,Primordial black hole constraints for curvaton models with predicted large non-Gaussianity,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D22(2013) 1350034 [1303.3146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    Young, C.T

    S. Young, C.T. Byrnes and M. Sasaki,Calculating the mass fraction of primordial black holes, JCAP07(2014) 045 [1405.7023]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  31. [31]

    Nakama, J

    T. Nakama, J. Silk and M. Kamionkowski,Stochastic gravitational waves associated with the formation of primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 043511 [1612.06264]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Byrnes, E.J

    C.T. Byrnes, E.J. Copeland and A.M. Green,Primordial black holes as a tool for constraining non-Gaussianity,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 043512 [1206.4188]. – 42 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  33. [33]

    Franciolini, A

    G. Franciolini, A. Kehagias, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto,Primordial Black Holes from Inflation and non-Gaussianity,JCAP03(2018) 016 [1801.09415]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    C.-M. Yoo, T. Harada, J. Garriga and K. Kohri,Primordial black hole abundance from random Gaussian curvature perturbations and a local density threshold,PTEP2018(2018) 123E01 [1805.03946]

    arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Kawasaki and H

    M. Kawasaki and H. Nakatsuka,Effect of nonlinearity between density and curvature perturbations on the primordial black hole formation,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 123501 [1903.02994]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Atal and C

    V. Atal and C. Germani,The role of non-gaussianities in Primordial Black Hole formation, Phys. Dark Univ.24(2019) 100275 [1811.07857]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    V. Atal, J. Garriga and A. Marcos-Caballero,Primordial black hole formation with non-Gaussian curvature perturbations,JCAP09(2019) 073 [1905.13202]

    arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Kehagias, I

    A. Kehagias, I. Musco and A. Riotto,Non-Gaussian Formation of Primordial Black Holes: Effects on the Threshold,JCAP12(2019) 029 [1906.07135]

    arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Figueroa, S

    D.G. Figueroa, S. Raatikainen, S. Rasanen and E. Tomberg,Non-Gaussian Tail of the Curvature Perturbation in Stochastic Ultraslow-Roll Inflation: Implications for Primordial Black Hole Production,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 101302 [2012.06551]

    arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Riccardi, M

    F. Riccardi, M. Taoso and A. Urbano,Solving peak theory in the presence of local non-gaussianities,JCAP08(2021) 060 [2102.04084]

    arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Taoso and A

    M. Taoso and A. Urbano,Non-gaussianities for primordial black hole formation,JCAP08 (2021) 016 [2102.03610]

    arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Biagetti, V

    M. Biagetti, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, A. Kehagias and A. Riotto,The formation probability of primordial black holes,Phys. Lett. B820(2021) 136602 [2105.07810]

    arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Kitajima, Y

    N. Kitajima, Y. Tada, S. Yokoyama and C.-M. Yoo,Primordial black holes in peak theory with a non-Gaussian tail,JCAP10(2021) 053 [2109.00791]

    arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Hooshangi, M.H

    S. Hooshangi, M.H. Namjoo and M. Noorbala,Rare events are nonperturbative: Primordial black holes from heavy-tailed distributions,Phys. Lett. B834(2022) 137400 [2112.04520]

    arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    D.-S. Meng, C. Yuan and Q.-g. Huang,One-loop correction to the enhanced curvature perturbation with local-type non-Gaussianity for the formation of primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 063508 [2207.07668]

    arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Young,Peaks and primordial black holes: the effect of non-Gaussianity,JCAP05(2022) 037 [2201.13345]

    S. Young,Peaks and primordial black holes: the effect of non-Gaussianity,JCAP05(2022) 037 [2201.13345]

    arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Escriv` a, Y

    A. Escriv` a, Y. Tada, S. Yokoyama and C.-M. Yoo,Simulation of primordial black holes with large negative non-Gaussianity,JCAP05(2022) 012 [2202.01028]

    arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    Hooshangi, M.H

    S. Hooshangi, M.H. Namjoo and M. Noorbala,Tail diversity from inflation,JCAP09(2023) 023 [2305.19257]

    arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Ferrante, G

    G. Ferrante, G. Franciolini, A. Iovino, Junior. and A. Urbano,Primordial non-Gaussianity up to all orders: Theoretical aspects and implications for primordial black hole models,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 043520 [2211.01728]

    arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    A.D. Gow, H. Assadullahi, J.H.P. Jackson, K. Koyama, V. Vennin and D. Wands, Non-perturbative non-Gaussianity and primordial black holes,EPL142(2023) 49001 [2211.08348]

    arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Ianniccari, A.J

    A. Ianniccari, A.J. Iovino, A. Kehagias, D. Perrone and A. Riotto,The Primordial Black Hole Abundance: The Broader, the Better,2402.11033

    arXiv

  52. [52]

    Raatikainen, S

    S. Raatikainen, S. Rasanen and E. Tomberg,Effect of stochastic kicks on primordial black hole abundance and mass via the compaction function,JCAP03(2026) 063 [2510.09303]. – 43 –

    arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    Iovino, Junior., G

    A. Iovino, Junior., G. Perna and H. Veerm¨ ae,The impact of non-Gaussianity when searching for Primordial Black Holes with LISA,2512.13648

    arXiv

  54. [54]

    Zhang and M

    H.-X. Zhang and M. Huang,Purely Quadratic Non-Gaussianity from Tachyonic Instability: Primordial Black Holes and Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves,2604.20063

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada,Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 123532 [1804.08577]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    R.-g. Cai, S. Pi and M. Sasaki,Gravitational Waves Induced by non-Gaussian Scalar Perturbations,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 201101 [1810.11000]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    R.-G. Cai, S. Pi, S.-J. Wang and X.-Y. Yang,Pulsar Timing Array Constraints on the Induced Gravitational Waves,JCAP10(2019) 059 [1907.06372]

    arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    Unal,Imprints of Primordial Non-Gaussianity on Gravitational Wave Spectrum,Phys

    C. Unal,Imprints of Primordial Non-Gaussianity on Gravitational Wave Spectrum,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 041301 [1811.09151]

    arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Hajkarim and J

    F. Hajkarim and J. Schaffner-Bielich,Thermal History of the Early Universe and Primordial Gravitational Waves from Induced Scalar Perturbations,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 043522 [1910.12357]

    arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Yuan and Q.-G

    C. Yuan and Q.-G. Huang,Gravitational waves induced by the local-type non-Gaussian curvature perturbations,Phys. Lett. B821(2021) 136606 [2007.10686]

    arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Adshead, K.D

    P. Adshead, K.D. Lozanov and Z.J. Weiner,Non-Gaussianity and the induced gravitational wave background,JCAP10(2021) 080 [2105.01659]

    arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Atal and G

    V. Atal and G. Dom` enech,Probing non-Gaussianities with the high frequency tail of induced gravitational waves,JCAP06(2021) 001 [2103.01056]

    arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Dom` enech, S

    G. Dom` enech, S. Passaglia and S. Renaux-Petel,Gravitational waves from dark matter isocurvature,JCAP03(2022) 023 [2112.10163]

    arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Garcia-Saenz, L

    S. Garcia-Saenz, L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel and D. Werth,No-go theorem for scalar-trispectrum-induced gravitational waves,JCAP03(2023) 057 [2207.14267]

    arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    K.T. Abe, R. Inui, Y. Tada and S. Yokoyama,Primordial black holes and gravitational waves induced by exponential-tailed perturbations,JCAP05(2023) 044 [2209.13891]

    arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Liu, Z.-C

    L. Liu, Z.-C. Chen and Q.-G. Huang,Implications for the non-Gaussianity of curvature perturbation from pulsar timing arrays,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L061301 [2307.01102]

    arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    Yuan, D.-S

    C. Yuan, D.-S. Meng and Q.-G. Huang,Full analysis of the scalar-induced gravitational waves for the curvature perturbation with local-type non-Gaussianities,JCAP12(2023) 036 [2308.07155]

    arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    J.-P. Li, S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao and K. Kohri,Complete analysis of the background and anisotropies of scalar-induced gravitational waves: primordial non-Gaussianity f N L and g N L considered,JCAP06(2024) 039 [2309.07792]

    arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Perna, C

    G. Perna, C. Testini, A. Ricciardone and S. Matarrese,Fully non-Gaussian Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves,2403.06962

    arXiv

  70. [70]

    X.-X. Zeng, Z. Ning, R.-G. Cai and S.-J. Wang,Scalar-induced gravitational waves with non-Gaussianity up to all orders,2508.10812

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    Iovino, S

    A.J. Iovino, S. Matarrese, G. Perna, A. Ricciardone and A. Riotto,How Well Do We Know the Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves?,2412.06764

    arXiv

  72. [72]

    ¨Unal, E.D

    C. ¨Unal, E.D. Kovetz and S.P. Patil,Multimessenger probes of inflationary fluctuations and primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 063519 [2008.11184]. – 44 –

    arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    Nakama, B

    T. Nakama, B. Carr and J. Silk,Limits on primordial black holes fromµdistortions in cosmic microwave background,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 043525 [1710.06945]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    Hooper, A

    D. Hooper, A. Ireland, G. Krnjaic and A. Stebbins,Supermassive primordial black holes from inflation,JCAP04(2024) 021 [2308.00756]

    arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Byrnes, J

    C.T. Byrnes, J. Lesgourgues and D. Sharma,Robustµ-distortion constraints on primordial supermassive black holes from non-Gaussian perturbations,JCAP09(2024) 012 [2404.18475]

    arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Garcia-Bellido, M

    J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Peloso and C. Unal,Gravitational waves at interferometer scales and primordial black holes in axion inflation,JCAP12(2016) 031 [1610.03763]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  77. [77]

    Garcia-Bellido, M

    J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Peloso and C. Unal,Gravitational Wave signatures of inflationary models from Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter,JCAP09(2017) 013 [1707.02441]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  78. [78]

    Bartolo, V

    N. Bartolo, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, A. Lewis, M. Peloso and A. Riotto,Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter: LISA Serendipity,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 211301 [1810.12218]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  79. [79]

    Bartolo, V

    N. Bartolo, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, M. Peloso, D. Racco and A. Riotto,Testing primordial black holes as dark matter with LISA,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 103521 [1810.12224]

    arXiv 2019

  80. [80]

    W. Hong, S. Pi, A. Wang and Z. Zhang,Constraining the Primordial Black Hole Abundance with Space-Based Detectors,2601.05069

    arXiv

Showing first 80 references.