Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 61 references

Anomalous increasing super reflectance in chiral matter

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Chiral matter with opposite-signed magnetic and Hall conductivities reflects light with reflectance above one, and the reflectance rises with frequency inside an absorption window.

desk verdict Lots of clean algebra, but the R>1 prediction rests on an unproven root choice and an external pump that isn't in the model. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18056 v1 pith:R7R7SXTG submitted 2025-07-24 cond-mat.other hep-thphysics.optics

Pedro D. S. Silva , Alex Q. Costa , Ronald A. Pereira , Manoel M. Ferreira Jr This is my paper
classification cond-mat.otherhep-thphysics.optics
keywords axionelectrodynamicsWeylsemimetalschiralmagneticeffectanomalousHallsuperreflectancenegativerefractionKerrrotationellipticity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Chiral materials described by axion electrodynamics, such as Weyl semimetals with a pumped chiral imbalance, are predicted to reflect normally incident light with reflectance larger than unity when the magnetic conductivity and the anomalous Hall conductivity have opposite signs. The paper derives the refractive indices from Maxwell's equations with the field-dependent current and shows that one particular mode produces this super-reflectance in three frequency windows. Inside the absorption window, the reflectance is not only above one but grows as the frequency increases, a signature the paper attributes to a wave that grows backward toward the interface. This matters because it offers an observable optical signature of chiral transport and a way to read off the relative sign of the two conductivities.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the refractive index $n_+$ from the dispersion equation $\det[M_{ab}]=0$ for propagation along $\hat{b}$, with $n_+ = \mu\Sigma_B/(2\omega)+\sqrt{N_-(\omega)}$ and $N_-(\omega)=\mu\epsilon+(\mu\Sigma_B/(2\omega))^2 - \mu\Sigma_H/\omega$. With $\Sigma_B=-|\Sigma_B|$, $n_+$ becomes real and negative for $0<\omega<\omega_-$ and $\omega_+<\omega<\hat{\omega}$, producing negative refraction, and complex for $\omega_-<\omega<\omega_+$, where its real part is negative and its imaginary part positive, producing a wave that grows toward $-\hat{z}$. This sign structure is what drives the Fresnel coefficient of Eq. (17) above unity; the other root is discarded because it stays negative under the adopted conditions, while the mode $\tilde{n}_+$ remains real, positive, and ordinary.

What would settle it

A normal-incidence reflectivity measurement on a pumped Weyl semimetal with independently measured $\Sigma_B<0$ and $\Sigma_H>0$, scanning the windows $0<\omega<\omega_-$, $\omega_-<\omega<\omega_+$, and $\omega_+<\omega<\hat{\omega}$, would settle the claim: it predicts $R>1$ in all three windows and an $R$ that rises with frequency inside the middle one, so observing $R\le 1$ in any window (or a falling $R$ in the middle) falsifies it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a chiral medium described by axion electrodynamics, with magnetic conductivity $\Sigma_B<0$ and anomalous Hall conductivity $\Sigma_H>0$, exhibits normal-incidence reflectance $R>1$ in three frequency windows: $0<\omega<\omega_-$, $\omega_-<\omega<\omega_+$, and $\omega_+<\omega<\hat{\omega}$, where $\omega_-$ and $\omega_+$ are given by Eq. (19) and $\hat{\omega}=\Sigma_H/\epsilon$ by Eq. (18). In the absorption window $\omega_-<\omega<\omega_+$, the reflectance continuously increases with frequency and remains greater than unity, which the paper presents as a new anomalous optical signature. The effect works because the refractive index $n_+ = \mu\Sigma_B/(2\omega)+\sqrt{N_-(\omega)}$ is negative outside the absorption window and complex with negative real part inside it, so the transmitted wave grows toward the interface and feeds the reflected wave; the extra energy is supplied by the relaxation of the pumped chiral imbalance toward equilibrium. The paper also asserts that the complex Kerr rotation is nonzero only inside the absorption window, where giant Kerr rotation can occur, and that the sign of the Kerr ellipticity determines the relative sign of the two conductivities.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the transmitted wave inside the chiral medium is the particular mode it labels $n_+$, and that the usual Fresnel boundary conditions still apply to a medium whose current depends on the fields; if the other mode is the physical one, or if surface currents from the axion term change the impedance, the predicted super-reflectance windows may not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pumped Weyl semimetals with $\Sigma_B<0$ and $\Sigma_H>0$ should display anomalous reflectance $R>1$ at normal incidence in three distinct frequency windows, including one where $R$ increases continuously with frequency.
  • When $|\Sigma_B|\le \Sigma_H/\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}$, the absorption window $\omega_-<\omega<\omega_+$ exists and hosts both super-reflectance and nonzero Kerr rotation; when $|\Sigma_B|>\Sigma_H/\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}$, the window closes, Kerr rotation vanishes, and the Kerr ellipticity still distinguishes the sign of $\Sigma_B$.
  • In the very-low-frequency limit with $\Sigma_B<0$, the reflectance approaches a frequency-independent value greater than one, recovering the pumped-Weyl-semimetal behavior when the Hall term is absent.
  • Kerr ellipticity reaches $\pm\pi/4$ at specific frequencies, giving an experimental handle on the relative sign of the magnetic and Hall conductivities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the half-space calculation to a finite slab, the same negative-refraction and backward-growing wave mechanism suggests frequency-selective amplification of light transmitted through and reflected from a thin film; a transfer-matrix treatment would be a direct next step.
  • The result depends on selecting the $n_+$ root and on the ordinary Fresnel boundary conditions; deriving the boundary conditions from the axion term, including any surface currents, could confirm the windows or shift their edges, and is a concrete test of the model.
  • The sign condition $\Sigma_B<0$ with $\Sigma_H>0$ could be tied to the direction of the pumped chiral imbalance, implying that reversing the pump or the axial chemical potential should switch super-reflectance off; an experiment that flips the pump direction and watches $R$ drop below 1 would test that linkage.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies normal-incidence reflection and Kerr rotation at an interface between an ordinary dielectric and a chiral medium governed by axion electrodynamics with magnetic (CME) and anomalous Hall conductivities. It derives the dispersion relation and refractive indices (Eqs. (14)-(15)), identifies frequency windows in which the n+ root has negative or complex refractive index, and uses the standard Fresnel formula (Eq. (17)) to argue that the reflectance exceeds unity in three windows for Σ_B<0 and Σ_H>0, including an absorption window where the reflectance increases with frequency. It also derives complex Kerr angles and claims that the Kerr ellipticity can determine the relative sign of the magnetic conductivity. The main prediction is thus a polarization-sensitive amplifying reflector in pumped Weyl semimetals.

Significance. If the active-medium interpretation is made rigorous, the work would extend the chiral light-amplifier scenario of Ref. [53] to the simultaneous presence of magnetic and Hall conductivities, providing concrete frequency windows (Eqs. (18)-(19)) and a proposed experimental probe of the sign of Σ_B through Kerr ellipticity. The dispersion calculation is clean, the low-frequency limit correctly reduces to Ref. [53], and the analytic expressions for the critical frequencies are useful. The principal strengths are the closed-form dispersion analysis and the explicit connection to measurable Kerr angles. However, the central R>1 claim is currently not established because the physical mode selection and the active-medium energy balance are asserted rather than derived, and the polarization-averaged reflectance is not addressed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Modes associated with n+; Eqs. (14)-(17)] The identification of n+ as the physical transmitted mode is not justified. For Σ_B<0, in each claimed super-reflectance window the selected root has Re(n+)<0, so the time-averaged Poynting flux in medium 2, S_z=Re(n+)|E|^2/(2μ2), points toward the interface. In a passive half-space scattering problem this would be inadmissible; in an active medium it is admissible only with an explicit gain/pump and a radiation condition (no incoming wave from z=+∞) selecting, among the roots, the one that decays at infinity. The statement after Eq. (15) that n− and ~in n− are "always negative" is not a radiation condition, and in the real-negative-n windows both n+ and n− are oscillatory and neither decays. The authors should derive the transmitted mode by a causality/analytic-continuation argument or from the boundary-value treatment of Ref. [53]; without this, the R>1 prediction, including Eq. (24), may be an artifact of the root choice.
  2. [Eq. (7) and Final Remarks] The energy source for R>1 is only invoked qualitatively. The current J in Eq. (7) is a time-independent linear response, and the model as written contains no pump term; the final paragraph appeals to "relaxation towards the equilibrium" and cites Ref. [53], but no Poynting-theorem calculation is given. The authors should show that, for the selected mode, the time-averaged dissipation Re(J·E*/2) is negative (gain) in the relevant windows and identify how the pumped nonequilibrium state fixes the signs and magnitudes of Σ_B and Σ_H. This is necessary to make the energy bookkeeping for R>1 explicit and to rule out the possibility that R>1 is a spurious consequence of the root selection.
  3. [Eqs. (36)-(39) and Fig. 2] The super-reflectance is computed for a single circular eigenmode, but the abstract and title do not state this restriction. A linearly polarized or unpolarized incident wave excites both n+ and ~in n+, with reflection coefficients r and ~ir of Eq. (36); the polarization-averaged reflectance is (|r|^2+|~ir|^2)/2. Because ~iR_+<1 always (Fig. 3), the average can be less than unity even when |r|^2>1; for the Fig. 2 red parameters (Σ_B=-1, Σ_H=5, ϵ2=2) at ω=1 rad/s, one finds |r|^2≈1.67 and |~ir|^2≈0.27, giving an average ≈0.97. The claim of "reflectance greater than unity" should be restricted to a prepared circular polarization, or the authors should compute and report the total reflectance for linear/unpolarized incidence and identify the windows in which it still exceeds unity.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (11)] The notation σ^H_ij=Σ_Hδ_ij is inconsistent with the Hall current in Eq. (7), which is antisymmetric (J_a=-Σ_H ε_abc \b_b E_c); please clarify that Σ_H is the magnitude of the Hall vector or rewrite the tensor explicitly.
  2. [Eq. (24)] The formula for R in the complex-n case appears to omit the factor μ1^2 multiplying the (n''_+)^2 terms; as written the numerator and denominator have incompatible dimensions. The correct expression should be ((μ2√(μ1ϵ1)+μ1 n'_+)^2+(μ1 n''_+)^2)/((μ2√(μ1ϵ1)-μ1 n'_+)^2+(μ1 n''_+)^2).
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical slips, including "obatined" after Eq. (22) and "disctint" in the Fig. 2 caption; a careful proofread is needed.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The notation ω±i and ω\ei is hard to parse; please define the subscripts and superscripts explicitly or place the definitions in a table.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the super-reflectance and Kerr-angle results follow algebraically from the stated constitutive ansatz and standard Fresnel coefficients, without fitting or self-citation that injects the target result.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained. The input is the linear axionic current of Eq. (7) with the explicitly stated isotropic parametrization of Eq. (11); the dispersion relations of Eqs. (14)-(16) and the Fresnel reflection coefficient of Eq. (17) are direct consequences of Maxwell's equations and standard boundary conditions. The R>1 super-reflectance is an analytic outcome of the negative real part of n+ in the chosen parameter regime, not the result of any fitted parameter or imported uniqueness theorem. The low-frequency limit in Eqs. (30)-(32) is checked against Ref. [53] as a consistency cross-check, but the central claim does not rest on that reference. The self-citations (Refs. 31, 35, 39, 54, 59) provide constitutive context, prior parametrizations, and a qualitative energy-supply discussion; none of them injects the R>1 result or the Kerr angles into the derivation. The decision to use only the n+ root and the interpretation of backward energy flux are physical mode-selection and boundary-condition concerns, not circular reductions, and the paper explicitly acknowledges the energy-conservation issue in the Final Remarks. Since no step reduces to its own inputs by construction and no fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction, no circularity is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the effective axion-electrodynamics model with two hand-chosen conductivities, the alignment of propagation with b_hat, the selection of the n+ mode, the application of the standard Fresnel formula, and an external non-equilibrium energy supply. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Sigma_B (magnetic conductivity) = -1 s^-1 for figures
    Chosen by hand; the relative sign with Sigma_H drives the R>1 effect.
  • Sigma_H (anomalous Hall conductivity) = 3 s^-1 (Fig. 1); {5,3,0.4} s^-1 (Fig. 2); 6 and 4 s^-1 (Figs. 4-5)
    Chosen by hand; sets the frequency windows omega_+/- and omega_hat.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The current in the chiral medium is J = Sigma_B B - Sigma_H (b_hat x E) with constant, isotropic Sigma_B and Sigma_H (Eq. 7 and Eq. 11).
    This is the effective axion-electrodynamics model for Weyl semimetals; the paper does not derive these constants from a microscopic theory.
  • domain assumption Propagation is along the fixed direction b_hat (theta = 0) and the interface is normal to z, so normal incidence is collinear with b_hat.
    Used to obtain the simplified indices n_+ and tilde n_+ in Eqs. (14)-(15); other angles are not treated.
  • domain assumption The modes n_- and tilde n_- are discarded because they are negative for all frequencies; only n_+ and tilde n_+ are considered as transmitted waves.
    The paper states this without justifying why these roots cannot be excited by the incident wave (after Eq. 15).
  • domain assumption The standard Fresnel reflection coefficient at normal incidence (Eq. 17) applies to the interface with the constitutive model of Eq. (7).
    The boundary conditions for the J = Sigma_B B - Sigma_H (b_hat x E) medium are not derived; the paper cites textbooks and applies the formula directly.
  • domain assumption An external mechanism (non-equilibrium relaxation toward equilibrium) supplies the energy for R > 1.
    Invoked in the Introduction and Final Remarks citing Refs. 53 and 59; the model itself contains no pumping term.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anomalous increasing super reflectance in chiral matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R7R7SXTG

@misc{pith2026250718056,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anomalous increasing super reflectance in chiral matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R7R7SXTG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18056}
}
read the original abstract

Magnetic and anomalous Hall conductivities induce anomalous transport features and novel optical phenomena in chiral systems. Here, we investigate reflection properties on the surface of a medium ruled by axion electrodynamics, which effectively describes optical aspects of Weyl semimetals. We show that these chiral media can manifest anomalous reflectance (R greater than unity) for some frequency windows, depending on the signs of the two involved conductivities. Such a reflectance can increase with the frequency, being always greater than 1 in certain frequency bands. We also examine the complex Kerr angles at normal incidence on the chiral medium. Giant Kerr angle is observed within the absorption window, while the Kerr ellipticity may be used to determine the relative sign of the magnetic conductivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18056 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Refractive indices [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Reflectance at normal incidence of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Reflectance at normal incidence of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Kerr rotation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Kerr rotation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [53]

    Schlenker and Y

    M. Schlenker and Y. Souche, in: Magnetism: Fundamen- tals, Boston (USA): Springer Science, 2005

    work page 2005

  2. [1]

    thanks F APEMA APP-12151/22

    P.D.S.S. thanks F APEMA APP-12151/22. We are indebted to CAPES/Finance Code 001 and F APEMA/POS-GRAD-04755/24

    work page

  3. [2]

    However, in the example illustrated in Figs

    − µ2 1Σ2 H /(2ω2) +µ1ϵ1N , and N = µ2ΣB 2ω 2 − p N− p N+. However, in the example illustrated in Figs. 4 and 5 the difference in θK for ΣB > 0 and ΣB < 0 is too small (∼ 10−15 rad) to be considered. 6 0 2 4 6 8 10 - π 12 - π 6 - π 4 - π 3 0 π 12 π 6 π 4 π 3 ω( rads -1 ) θKerr , ηKerr (rad) FIG. 4. Kerr rotation, θK , and ellipticity, ηK , angles, given by...

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018). 7

    work page 2018

  5. [4]

    Kharzeev, The chiral magnetic effect and anomaly- induced transport, Prog

    D.E. Kharzeev, The chiral magnetic effect and anomaly- induced transport, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 75, 133 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [5]

    Fukushima, D

    K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, and H.J Warringa, Chiral magnetic effect, Phys. Rev. D 78, 074033 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [6]

    Burkov, Chiral anomaly and transport in Weyl met- als, J

    A.A. Burkov, Chiral anomaly and transport in Weyl met- als, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27, 113201(2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [7]

    Chang, M.-F

    M.-C. Chang, M.-F. Yang, Chiral magnetic effect in a two-band lattice model of Weyl semimetal, Phys. Rev. B 91, 115203 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 61 references
  1. [8]

    Dvornikov, and V.B

    M. Dvornikov, and V.B. Semikoz, Influence of the tur- bulent motion on the chiral magnetic effect in the early universe, Phys. Rev. D 95, 043538 (2017)

    2017

  2. [9]

    Schober, A

    J. Schober, A. Brandenburg and I. Rogachevskii, Chiral fermion asymmetry in high-energy plasma simulations, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynamics 114, 106 (2020); J. Schober, I. Rogachevskii, A. Brandenburg, Dynamo instabilities in plasmas with inhomogeneous chiral chem- ical pot...

    2020

  3. [10]

    Wang and X.-G

    S. Wang and X.-G. Huang, Chiral magnetovortical insta- bility, Phys. Rev. D 109, L121302 (2024)

    2024

  4. [11]

    Dvornikov and V.B

    M. Dvornikov and V.B. Semikoz, Magnetic field instabil- ity in a neutron star driven by the electroweak electron- nucleon interaction versus the chiral magnetic effect, Phys. Rev. D 91, 061301(R) (2015)

    2015

  5. [12]

    Sigl, and N

    G. Sigl, and N. Leite, Chiral magnetic effect in protoneu- tron stars and magnetic field spectral evolution, JCAP 01, 025 (2016)

    2016

  6. [13]

    Kamada, N

    K. Kamada, N. Yamamoto, and D.-L. Yang, Chiral Ef- fects in Astrophysics and Cosmology, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 129, 104016, (2023)

    2023

  7. [14]

    Belmont, Charge-dependent anisotropic flow studies and the search for the Chiral Magnetic Wave in ALICE, Nucl

    R. Belmont, Charge-dependent anisotropic flow studies and the search for the Chiral Magnetic Wave in ALICE, Nucl. Phys. A 931, 981 (2014); L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Observation of Charge Asymmetry De- pendence of Pion Elliptic Flow and the Possible Chiral Magnet...

    2014

  8. [15]

    Q. Li, D. E. Kharzeev, C. Zhang, Y. Huang, I. Pletikosi´ c, I. Pletikosi´ c, A.V. Fedorov, R. D. Zhong, J.A. Schnee- loch, G.D. Gu, & T. Valla, Chiral magnetic effect in ZrTe5, Nature Physics, 12, 550 (2016)

    2016

  9. [16]

    Huang, L

    X. Huang, L. Zhao, Y. Long, P. Wang, D. Chen, Z. Yang, H. Liang, M. Xue, H. Weng, Z. Fang, X. Dai, and G. Chen, Observation of the chiral-anomaly-induced negative magnetoresistance in 3D Weyl semimetal TaAs, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031023 (2015)

    2015

  10. [17]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  11. [18]

    A. A. Zyuzin and A. A. Burkov, Topological response in Weyl semimetals and the chiral anomaly, Phys. Rev. B 86, 115133 (2012)

    2012

  12. [19]

    Yang, Y.-M

    K.-Y. Yang, Y.-M. Lu, and Y. Ran, Quantum Hall effects in a Weyl semimetal: Possible application in pyrochlore iridates, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075129 (2011)

    2011

  13. [20]

    A. A. Burkov and L. Balents, Weyl Semimetal in a Topo- logical Insulator Multilayer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 127205 (2011)

    2011

  14. [21]

    D. Xiao, M. C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  15. [22]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Berry Curvature on the Fermi Surface: Anomalous Hall Effect as a Topological Fermi-Liquid Property, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 206602 (2004)

    2004

  16. [23]

    Amitani and Y

    T. Amitani and Y. Nishida, Dynamical chiral magnetic current and instability in Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 107, 014302 (2023)

    2023

  17. [24]

    Z. Qiu, G. Cao, and X.-G. Huang, Electrodynamics of chiral matter, Phys. Rev. D 95, 036002 (2017)

    2017

  18. [25]

    Barnes, J

    E. Barnes, J. J. Heremans, and Djordje Minic, Elec- tromagnetic Signatures of the Chiral Anomaly in Weyl Semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217204 (2016)

    2016

  19. [26]

    Wilczek, Two Applications of Axion Electrodynamics, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Two Applications of Axion Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1799 (1987)

    1987

  20. [27]

    K. Deng, J. S. Van Dyke, D. Minic, J. J. Heremans, and E. Barnes, Exploring self-consistency of the equations of axion electrodynamics in Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075202 (2021)

    2021

  21. [28]

    Carroll, G.B

    S.M. Carroll, G.B. Field, and R. Jackiw, Limits on a Lorentz- and parity-violating modification of electrody- namics, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1231 (1990)

    1990

  22. [29]

    Colladay and V.A

    D. Colladay and V.A. Kosteleck´ y,CPT violation and the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997); Lorentz- violating extension of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 58, 116002 (1998)

    1997

  23. [30]

    Mart ´ ın-Ruiz and C

    A. Mart ´ ın-Ruiz and C. A. Escobar, Local effects of the quantum vacuum in Lorentz-violating electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 95, 036011 (2017); X.-P. Yang, B.-F. Li and T. Zhu, Electrodynamics with violations of Lorentz and U(1) gauge symmetries and their Hamiltonian struc- tur...

    2017

  24. [31]

    Y. M. P. Gomes, P. C. Malta, Lab-based limits on the Carroll-Field-Jackiw Lorentz-violating electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 94, 025031 (2016); A.D.A.M. Spallicci, G. Sarracino, O. Randriamboarison, J. A. Helay¨ el-Neto, A. Dib, Testing the Amp` ere–Maxwell law on the photon mass...

    2016

  25. [32]

    Caloni, S

    L. Caloni, S. Giardiello, M. Lembo, M. Gerbino, G. Gu- bitosi, M. Lattanzi and L. Pagano, Probing Lorentz- violating electrodynamics with CMB polarization, JCAP 03 (2023) 018

    2023

  26. [33]

    Silva, L

    P.D.S. Silva, L. Lisboa-Santos, M. M. Ferreira Jr., and M. Schreck, Effects of CPT-odd terms of dimensions three and five on electromagnetic propagation in contin- uous matter, Phys. Rev. D 104, 116023 (2021)

    2021

  27. [34]

    A. V. Kostelecky, R. Lehnert, N. McGinnis, M. Schreck, B. Seradjeh, Lorentz violation in Dirac and Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 023106 (2022)

    2022

  28. [35]

    Barredo-Alamilla, Daniel A

    E. Barredo-Alamilla, Daniel A. Bobylev, and Maxim A. Gorlach, Axion electrodynamics without Witten effect in metamaterials, Phys. Rev. B 109, 195136 (2024)

    2024

  29. [36]

    Ming-Che Chang and Min-Fong Yang, Optical signature of topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B80, 113304 (2009)

    2009

  30. [37]

    P. D. S. Silva, M.J. Neves, M. M. Ferreira Jr., Optical properties and energy propagation in a dielectric medium supporting magnetic current, Phys. Rev. B 109, 184439 (2024)

    2024

  31. [38]

    O. J. Franca, L. F. Urrutia, O. Rodr ´ ıguez-Tzompantzi, Reversed electromagnetic Vavilov- ˇCerenkov radiation in naturally existing magnetoelectric media, Phys. Rev. D 99, 116020 (2019); R. M. von Dossow, E. Barredo- Alamilla, M. A. Gorlach, L. F. Urrutia, Cherenkov ra- diati...

    2019 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Stalhammar, D

    M. Stalhammar, D. Rudneva, T. H. Hansson, and F. 8 Wilczek, Emergent Chern-Simons interactions in 3+1 di- mensions, Phys. Rev. B 109, 065514 (2024)

    2024

  33. [40]

    Shyta, J

    V. Shyta, J. van den Brink, and F. S. Nogueira, Chiral Meissner state in time-reversal invariant Weyl supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. Research 6, 013240 (2024)

    2024

  34. [41]

    P. D. S. Silva, R. A. Pereira, M. M. Ferreira Jr, Optical reflection signature of an axion dielectric with magnetic current, Phys. Rev. B 110, 174427 (2024)

    2024

  35. [42]

    Shaposhnikov, E

    L. Shaposhnikov, E. Barredo-Alamilla, F. Wilczek, and M. A. Gorlach, Probing Ultrafast Magnetization Dynam- ics via Synthetic Axion Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 246702 (2025)

    2025

  36. [43]

    T. Z. Seidov, E. Barredo-Alamilla, D. A. Bobylev, L. Shaposhnikov, M. Mazanov and M. A. Gorlach, Dual ori- gin of effective axion response, Nat. Commun. 16, 5942 (2025)

    2025

  37. [44]

    Sekine and K

    A. Sekine and K. Nomura, Chiral Magnetic Effect and Anomalous Hall Effect in Antiferromagnetic Insulators with Spin-Orbit Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 096401 (2016)

    2016

  38. [45]

    Sekine and K

    A. Sekine and K. Nomura, Axion electrodynamics in topological materials, J. Appl. Phys. 129, 141101 (2021)

    2021

  39. [46]

    Qiu et al., Observation of the axion quasiparticle in 2D MnBi2Te4, Nature 641, 62 (2025)

    J.-X. Qiu et al., Observation of the axion quasiparticle in 2D MnBi2Te4, Nature 641, 62 (2025)

    2025

  40. [47]

    Shinagawa, Solid-State Sciences: Magneto-Optics, Vol

    K. Shinagawa, Solid-State Sciences: Magneto-Optics, Vol. 128 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000)

    2000

  41. [48]

    Sato and T

    K. Sato and T. Ishibashi, Fundamentals of magneto- optical spectroscopy, Front. Phys. 10, 946515 (2022)

    2022

  42. [49]

    P. N. Argyres, Theory of the Faraday and Kerr effects in ferromangetics, Phys. Rev. 97, 334 (1955)

    1955

  43. [50]

    Kargarian, M

    M. Kargarian, M. Randeria, and N. Trivedi, Theory of Kerr and Faraday rotations and linear dichroism in Topo- logical Weyl Semimetals, Sci. Rep. 5, 12683 (2015)

    2015

  44. [51]

    Ghosh, A

    S. Ghosh, A. Sahoo, and S. Nandy, Theoretical inves- tigations on Kerr and Faraday rotations in topological multi-Weyl semimetals, SciPost Phys. 15, 133 (2023)

    2023

  45. [52]

    Sonowal, A

    K. Sonowal, A. Singh, and A. Agarwal, Giant optical ac- tivity and Kerr effect in type-I and type-II Weyl semimet- als, Phys. Rev. B 100, 085436 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    M.-Ruiz and C

    A. M.-Ruiz and C. A. Escobar, Casimir effect between ponderable media as modeled by the standard model ex- tension, Phys. Rev. D 94, 076010 (2016)

    2016

  47. [55]

    Nishida, Chiral Light Amplifier with Pumped Weyl Semimetals, Phys

    Y. Nishida, Chiral Light Amplifier with Pumped Weyl Semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 096903 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    P. D. S. Silva, M. M. Ferreira Jr., M. Schreck, and L. F. Urrutia, Magnetic-conductivity effects on electromag- netic propagation in dispersive matter, Phys. Rev. D 102, 076001 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    Kurumaji, Symmetry-based requirement for the mea- surement of electrical and thermal Hall conductivity un- der an in-plane magnetic field, Phys

    T. Kurumaji, Symmetry-based requirement for the mea- surement of electrical and thermal Hall conductivity un- der an in-plane magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Research 5, 023138 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    Zelezny et al, High-throughput study of the anomalous Hall effect, npj Comput

    J. Zelezny et al, High-throughput study of the anomalous Hall effect, npj Comput. Mater 9, 151 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (John- Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999)

    1999

  52. [60]

    Zangwill, Modern Electrodynamics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012)

    A. Zangwill, Modern Electrodynamics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012)

    2012

  53. [61]

    A. Q. Costa, P. D. S. Silva, and M. M. Ferreira Jr, Double rotatory power reversal and continuous Kerr an- gle in bi-isotropic media with anomalous Hall current, arXiv:2412.15338 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.