Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Focus-N-Fix: Region-Aware Fine-Tuning for Text-to-Image Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.06481 v1 pith:R7T2KBKJ submitted 2025-01-11 cs.CV

Xiaoying Xing , Avinab Saha , Junfeng He , Susan Hao , Paul Vicol , Moonkyung Ryu , Gang Li , Sahil Singla
show 4 more authors
Sarah Young Yinxiao Li Feng Yang Deepak Ramachandran
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords fine-tuningimagesmodelmodelsrewardfocus-n-fixgenerationhuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Text-to-image (T2I) generation has made significant advances in recent years, but challenges still remain in the generation of perceptual artifacts, misalignment with complex prompts, and safety. The prevailing approach to address these issues involves collecting human feedback on generated images, training reward models to estimate human feedback, and then fine-tuning T2I models based on the reward models to align them with human preferences. However, while existing reward fine-tuning methods can produce images with higher rewards, they may change model behavior in unexpected ways. For example, fine-tuning for one quality aspect (e.g., safety) may degrade other aspects (e.g., prompt alignment), or may lead to reward hacking (e.g., finding a way to increase rewards without having the intended effect). In this paper, we propose Focus-N-Fix, a region-aware fine-tuning method that trains models to correct only previously problematic image regions. The resulting fine-tuned model generates images with the same high-level structure as the original model but shows significant improvements in regions where the original model was deficient in safety (over-sexualization and violence), plausibility, or other criteria. Our experiments demonstrate that Focus-N-Fix improves these localized quality aspects with little or no degradation to others and typically imperceptible changes in the rest of the image. Disclaimer: This paper contains images that may be overly sexual, violent, offensive, or harmful.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Selective Timestep Weighting and Advantage-Based Replay for Sample-Efficient Diffusion RLHF

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Two plug-and-play strategies — per-timestep advantage weighting and advantage-based trajectory replay — improve diffusion RLHF sample efficiency up to 6× across five reward functions.

  2. VARD: Efficient and Dense Fine-Tuning for Diffusion Models with Value-based RL

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    VARD fine-tunes diffusion models by backpropagating through a learned value function that assigns dense, differentiable reward estimates to every intermediate denoising step, with KL regularization keeping the model n...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Aleixo, Juan G

    Everton L. Aleixo, Juan G. Colonna, Marco Cristo, and Everlandio Fernandes. Catastrophic forgetting in deep learning: A comprehensive taxonomy. arxiv preprint arxiv:2312.10549, 2023. 8, 3

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Blended diffusion for text-driven editing of natural images

    Omri Avrahami, Dani Lischinski, and Ohad Fried. Blended diffusion for text-driven editing of natural images. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18208–18218, 2022. 3

    2022

  3. [3]

    Which pretrain samples to rehearse when finetuning pretrained models? arxiv preprint arxiv:2402.08096, 2024

    Andrew Bai, Chih-Kuan Yeh, Cho-Jui Hsieh, and Ankur Taly. Which pretrain samples to rehearse when finetuning pretrained models? arxiv preprint arxiv:2402.08096, 2024. 3

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Universal guidance for diffusion models

    Arpit Bansal, Hong-Min Chu, Avi Schwarzschild, Soumyadip Sengupta, Micah Goldblum, Jonas Geip- ing, and Tom Goldstein. Universal guidance for diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 843–852,

  5. [5]

    Multimodal datasets: Misogyny, pornography, and ma- lignant stereotypes

    Abeba Birhane, Vinay Uday Prabhu, and Emmanuel Kahem- bwe. Multimodal datasets: Misogyny, pornography, and ma- lignant stereotypes. arxiv preprint arxiv:2110.01963, 2021. 3

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Training diffusion models with reinforce- ment learning

    Kevin Black, Michael Janner, Yilun Du, Ilya Kostrikov, and Sergey Levine. Training diffusion models with reinforce- ment learning. In ICML 2023 Workshop on Structured Prob- abilistic Inference & Generative Modeling, 2023. 2

    2023

  7. [7]

    In- structPix2Pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions

    Tim Brooks, Aleksander Holynski, and Alexei A Efros. In- structPix2Pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18392–18402, 2023. 3

    2023

  8. [8]

    PaLI: A jointly-scaled multilingual language-image model

    Xi Chen, Xiao Wang, Soravit Changpinyo, AJ Piergiovanni, Piotr Padlewski, Daniel Salz, Sebastian Goodman, Adam Grycner, Basil Mustafa, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Joan Puigcerver, Nan Ding, Keran Rong, Hassan Akbari, Gaurav Mishra, Linting Xue, Ashish Thapliyal, James Brad- bury, Weicheng Kuo, Mojtaba Seyedhosseini, Chao Jia, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Ca...

    arXiv 2023

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Diffusion pos- terior sampling for general noisy inverse problems

    Hyungjin Chung, Jeongsol Kim, Michael Thompson Mc- cann, Marc Louis Klasky, and Jong Chul Ye. Diffusion pos- terior sampling for general noisy inverse problems. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representa- tions, 2023. 5

    2023

  2. [10]

    Kevin Clark, Paul Vicol, Kevin Swersky, and David J. Fleet. Directly fine-tuning diffusion models on differentiable re- wards. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

    2024

  3. [11]

    Diffusion models beat GANs on image synthesis

    Prafulla Dhariwal and Alexander Nichol. Diffusion models beat GANs on image synthesis. Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, 34:8780–8794, 2021. 2

    2021

  4. [12]

    System safety and artificial intelligence

    Roel Dobbe. System safety and artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Ac- countability, and Transparency, page 1584. Association for Computing Machinery, 2022. 3

    2022

  5. [13]

    Optimizing DDPM sampling with shortcut fine-tuning

    Ying Fan and Kangwook Lee. Optimizing DDPM sampling with shortcut fine-tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13362,

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Re- inforcement learning for fine-tuning text-to-image diffusion models

    Ying Fan, Olivia Watkins, Yuqing Du, Hao Liu, Moonkyung Ryu, Craig Boutilier, Pieter Abbeel, Moham- mad Ghavamzadeh, Kangwook Lee, and Kimin Lee. Re- inforcement learning for fine-tuning text-to-image diffusion models. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Process...

    2023

  7. [15]

    Erasing concepts from diffusion models

    Rohit Gandikota, Joanna Materzy ´nska, Jaden Fiotto- Kaufman, and David Bau. Erasing concepts from diffusion models. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Con- ference on Computer Vision, 2023. 3

    2023

  8. [16]

    Unified concept editing in diffusion models

    Rohit Gandikota, Hadas Orgad, Yonatan Belinkov, Joanna Materzy´nska, and David Bau. Unified concept editing in diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Win- ter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , pages 5111–5120, 2024. 3

    2024

  9. [17]

    VersaT2I: Improving text-to-image mod- els with versatile reward

    Jianshu Guo, Wenhao Chai, Jie Deng, Hsiang-Wei Huang, Tian Ye, Yichen Xu, Jiawei Zhang, Jenq-Neng Hwang, and Gaoang Wang. VersaT2I: Improving text-to-image mod- els with versatile reward. arxiv preprint arxiv:2403.18493,

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Safety and fair- ness for content moderation in generative models

    Susan Hao, Piyush Kumar, Sarah Laszlo, Shivani Poddar, Bhaktipriya Radharapu, and Renee Shelby. Safety and fair- ness for content moderation in generative models. In CVPR Workshop, 2023. 1, 3, 4

    2023

  11. [19]

    Harm amplification in text-to- image models

    Susan Hao, Renee Shelby, Yuchi Liu, Hansa Srinivasan, Mukul Bhutani, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Ryan Poplin, Shivani Poddar, and Sarah Laszlo. Harm amplification in text-to- image models. arxiv preprint arxiv:2402.01787 , 2024. 2, 3

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Clipscore: A reference-free evaluation met- ric for image captioning

    Jack Hessel, Ari Holtzman, Maxwell Forbes, Ronan Le Bras, and Yejin Choi. Clipscore: A reference-free evaluation met- ric for image captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08718,

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    GANs trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local Nash equilib- rium

    Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. GANs trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local Nash equilib- rium. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 30, 2017. 1

    2017

  14. [22]

    Denoising diffu- sion probabilistic models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffu- sion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 2, 3

    2020

  15. [23]

    LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen- Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. InIn- ternational Conference on Learning Representations , 2022. 3

    2022

  16. [24]

    TIFA: Ac- curate and interpretable text-to-image faithfulness evaluation with question answering

    Yushi Hu, Benlin Liu, Jungo Kasai, Yizhong Wang, Mari Ostendorf, Ranjay Krishna, and Noah A Smith. TIFA: Ac- curate and interpretable text-to-image faithfulness evaluation with question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, page...

    2023

  17. [25]

    Imagic: Text-based real image editing with diffusion models

    Bahjat Kawar, Shiran Zada, Oran Lang, Omer Tov, Huiwen Chang, Tali Dekel, Inbar Mosseri, and Michal Irani. Imagic: Text-based real image editing with diffusion models. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 6007–6017, 2023. 3

    2023

  18. [26]

    Pick-a-pic: An open dataset of user preferences for text-to-image generation

    Yuval Kirstain, Adam Polyak, Uriel Singer, Shahbuland Ma- tiana, Joe Penna, and Omer Levy. Pick-a-pic: An open dataset of user preferences for text-to-image generation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 36: 36652–36663, 2023. 2, 1

    2023

  19. [27]

    VIEScore: Towards explainable metrics for condi- tional image synthesis evaluation

    Max Ku, Dongfu Jiang, Cong Wei, Xiang Yue, and Wenhu Chen. VIEScore: Towards explainable metrics for condi- tional image synthesis evaluation. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages 12268–12290...

    2024

  20. [28]

    Ablating con- cepts in text-to-image diffusion models

    Nupur Kumari, Bingliang Zhang, Sheng-Yu Wang, Eli Shechtman, Richard Zhang, and Jun-Yan Zhu. Ablating con- cepts in text-to-image diffusion models. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023. 3

    2023

  21. [29]

    Aligning text- to-image models using human feedback

    Kimin Lee, Hao Liu, Moonkyung Ryu, Olivia Watkins, Yuqing Du, Craig Boutilier, Pieter Abbeel, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, and Shixiang Shane Gu. Aligning text- to-image models using human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.12192, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Parrot: Pareto-optimal multi-reward reinforcement learn- ing framework for text-to-image generation

    Seung Hyun Lee, Yinxiao Li, Junjie Ke, Innfarn Yoo, Han Zhang, Jiahui Yu, Qifei Wang, Fei Deng, Glenn Entis, Jun- feng He, Gang Li, Sangpil Kim, Irfan Essa, and Feng Yang. Parrot: Pareto-optimal multi-reward reinforcement learn- ing framework for text-to-image generation. arxi...

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Rich human feedback for text-to-image generation

    Youwei Liang, Junfeng He, Gang Li, Peizhao Li, Arseniy Klimovskiy, Nicholas Carolan, Jiao Sun, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Sarah Young, Feng Yang, et al. Rich human feedback for text-to-image generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognitio...

    2024

  24. [32]

    Mitigating the alignment tax of RLHF

    Yong Lin, Hangyu Lin, Wei Xiong, Shizhe Diao, Jianmeng Liu, Jipeng Zhang, Rui Pan, Haoxiang Wang, Wenbin Hu, Hanning Zhang, Hanze Dong, Renjie Pi, Han Zhao, Nan Jiang, Heng Ji, Yuan Yao, and Tong Zhang. Mitigating the alignment tax of RLHF. arxiv preprint arxiv:2309.06256 ,

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Decoupled weight de- cay regularization

    Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight de- cay regularization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019. 1

    2019

  26. [34]

    MACE: Mass concept erasure in diffusion models

    Shilin Lu, Zilan Wang, Leyang Li, Yanzhu Liu, and Adams Wai-Kin Kong. MACE: Mass concept erasure in diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 6430–6440, 2024. 3

    2024

  27. [35]

    LLMScore: Unveiling the power of large language models in text-to-image synthesis evaluation

    Yujie Lu, Xianjun Yang, Xiujun Li, Xin Eric Wang, and William Yang Wang. LLMScore: Unveiling the power of large language models in text-to-image synthesis evaluation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 36,

  28. [36]

    GLIDE: Towards photorealistic image gener- ation and editing with text-guided diffusion models

    Alex Nichol, Prafulla Dhariwal, Aditya Ramesh, Pranav Shyam, Pamela Mishkin, Bob McGrew, Ilya Sutskever, and Mark Chen. GLIDE: Towards photorealistic image gener- ation and editing with text-guided diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741, 2021. 3

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Training lan- guage models to follow instructions with human feedback

    Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Car- roll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. Training lan- guage models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 35...

    2022

  30. [38]

    Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis, 2023

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas M ¨uller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis, 2023. 4

    2023

  31. [39]

    Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model

    Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christo- pher D Manning, Stefano Ermon, and Chelsea Finn. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural In- formation Processing Systems, 2023. 1, 2

    2023

  32. [40]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 1, 2, 5

    2022

  33. [41]

    Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding

    Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Jay Whang, Emily L Denton, Kamyar Ghasemipour, Raphael Gontijo Lopes, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Tim Salimans, et al. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. Advances in Neural Information...

    2022

  34. [42]

    Improved techniques for training GANs

    Tim Salimans, Ian Goodfellow, Wojciech Zaremba, Vicki Cheung, Alec Radford, and Xi Chen. Improved techniques for training GANs. Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, 29, 2016. 1

    2016

  35. [43]

    Safe latent diffusion: Mitigating inappro- priate degeneration in diffusion models

    Patrick Schramowski, Manuel Brack, Bj ¨orn Deiseroth, and Kristian Kersting. Safe latent diffusion: Mitigating inappro- priate degeneration in diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 22522–22531, 2023. 3, 5

    2023

  36. [44]

    Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization

    Ramprasaath R Selvaraju, Michael Cogswell, Abhishek Das, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision, pages 618–626,

  37. [45]

    Deep inside convolutional networks: Visualising image classification models and saliency maps

    Karen Simonyan, Andrea Vedaldi, and Andrew Zisserman. Deep inside convolutional networks: Visualising image classification models and saliency maps. arxiv preprint arxiv:1312.6034, 2014. 2, 4

    2014 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Learning to summarize with human feed- back

    Nisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Daniel Ziegler, Ryan Lowe, Chelsea V oss, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, and Paul F Christiano. Learning to summarize with human feed- back. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, pages 3008–3021, 2020. 1

    2020

  39. [47]

    Diffusion model align- ment using direct preference optimization

    Bram Wallace, Meihua Dang, Rafael Rafailov, Linqi Zhou, Aaron Lou, Senthil Purushwalkam, Stefano Ermon, Caiming Xiong, Shafiq Joty, and Nikhil Naik. Diffusion model align- ment using direct preference optimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision a...

    2024

  40. [48]

    Bovik, H.R

    Zhou Wang, A.C. Bovik, H.R. Sheikh, and E.P. Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 13(4): 600–612, 2004. 1

    2004

  41. [49]

    Transforming and combining rewards for aligning large lan- guage models

    Zihao Wang, Chirag Nagpal, Jonathan Berant, Jacob Eisen- stein, Alex D’Amour, Sanmi Koyejo, and Victor Veitch. Transforming and combining rewards for aligning large lan- guage models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00742, 2024. 2, 3

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Human preference score v2: A solid benchmark for evaluating human preferences of text-to-image synthesis

    Xiaoshi Wu, Yiming Hao, Keqiang Sun, Yixiong Chen, Feng Zhu, Rui Zhao, and Hongsheng Li. Human preference score v2: A solid benchmark for evaluating human preferences of text-to-image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09341 ,

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Better aligning text-to-image models with human preference

    Xiaoshi Wu, Keqiang Sun, Feng Zhu, Rui Zhao, and Hong- sheng Li. Better aligning text-to-image models with human preference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14420, 1(3), 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    ImageRe- ward: Learning and evaluating human preferences for text- to-image generation

    Jiazheng Xu, Xiao Liu, Yuchen Wu, Yuxuan Tong, Qinkai Li, Ming Ding, Jie Tang, and Yuxiao Dong. ImageRe- ward: Learning and evaluating human preferences for text- to-image generation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023. 1, 2

    2023

  45. [53]

    What you see is what you read? Im- proving text-image alignment evaluation

    Michal Yarom, Yonatan Bitton, Soravit Changpinyo, Roee Aharoni, Jonathan Herzig, Oran Lang, Eran Ofek, and Idan Szpektor. What you see is what you read? Im- proving text-image alignment evaluation. arxiv preprint arxiv:2305.10400, 2023. 8, 3

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Scaling autoregressive models for content-rich text-to-image generation

    Jiahui Yu, Yuanzhong Xu, Jing Yu Koh, Thang Luong, Gun- jan Baid, Zirui Wang, Vijay Vasudevan, Alexander Ku, et al. Scaling autoregressive models for content-rich text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10789, 2(3):5, 2022. 5, 3

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Forget-me-not: Learning to forget in text-to- image diffusion models

    Eric Zhang, Kai Wang, Xingqian Xu, Zhangyang Wang, and Humphrey Shi. Forget-me-not: Learning to forget in text-to- image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.08332,

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Perceptual artifacts localization for image synthesis tasks

    Lingzhi Zhang, Zhengjie Xu, Connelly Barnes, Yuqian Zhou, Qing Liu, He Zhang, Sohrab Amirghodsi, Zhe Lin, Eli Shechtman, and Jianbo Shi. Perceptual artifacts localization for image synthesis tasks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pag...

    2023

  49. [57]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shecht- man, and Oliver Wang. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion, pages 586–595, 2018. 1

    2018

  50. [58]

    Large-scale reinforcement learning for diffusion models

    Yinan Zhang, Eric Tzeng, Yilun Du, and Dmitry Kislyuk. Large-scale reinforcement learning for diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12244, 2024. 2, 3

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    A garden gnome wearing a bikini

    Qingping Zheng, Ling Zheng, Yuanfan Guo, Ying Li, Song- cen Xu, Jiankang Deng, and Hang Xu. Self-adaptive reality- guided diffusion for artifact-free super-resolution. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 25806–25816, 20...

    2024

Pith tools