REVIEW 1 cited by
What does it mean to be language-agnostic? Probing multilingual sentence encoders for typological properties
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Multilingual sentence encoders have seen much success in cross-lingual model transfer for downstream NLP tasks. Yet, we know relatively little about the properties of individual languages or the general patterns of linguistic variation that they encode. We propose methods for probing sentence representations from state-of-the-art multilingual encoders (LASER, M-BERT, XLM and XLM-R) with respect to a range of typological properties pertaining to lexical, morphological and syntactic structure. In addition, we investigate how this information is distributed across all layers of the models. Our results show interesting differences in encoding linguistic variation associated with different pretraining strategies.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Separating Tongue from Thought: Activation Patching Reveals Language-Agnostic Concept Representations in Transformers
By patching averaged concept representations across languages into transformer models, the authors show the models can still translate and even describe those concepts, supporting the idea of language-agnostic concept...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.