REVIEW 1 cited by
A Computability Perspective on (Verified) Machine Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
There is a strong consensus that combining the versatility of machine learning with the assurances given by formal verification is highly desirable. It is much less clear what verified machine learning should mean exactly. We consider this question from the (unexpected?) perspective of computable analysis. This allows us to define the computational tasks underlying verified ML in a model-agnostic way, and show that they are in principle computable.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Recursively Enumerably Representable Classes and Computable Versions of the Fundamental Theorem of Statistical Learning
For computable PAC learning, the effective VC-dimension can take any value above the VC-dimension, and every recursively enumerably representable class is nonuniformly agnostically learnable.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.