Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Chain of Thought with Explicit Evidence Reasoning for Few-shot Relation Extraction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.05922 v3 pith:RARVG6BK submitted 2023-11-10 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords extractionrelationtrainingapproachchain-of-thoughtcot-erevidencefew-shot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Few-shot relation extraction involves identifying the type of relationship between two specific entities within a text, using a limited number of annotated samples. A variety of solutions to this problem have emerged by applying meta-learning and neural graph techniques which typically necessitate a training process for adaptation. Recently, the strategy of in-context learning has been demonstrating notable results without the need of training. Few studies have already utilized in-context learning for zero-shot information extraction. Unfortunately, the evidence for inference is either not considered or implicitly modeled during the construction of chain-of-thought prompts. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for few-shot relation extraction using large language models, named CoT-ER, chain-of-thought with explicit evidence reasoning. In particular, CoT-ER first induces large language models to generate evidences using task-specific and concept-level knowledge. Then these evidences are explicitly incorporated into chain-of-thought prompting for relation extraction. Experimental results demonstrate that our CoT-ER approach (with 0% training data) achieves competitive performance compared to the fully-supervised (with 100% training data) state-of-the-art approach on the FewRel1.0 and FewRel2.0 datasets.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GroupRAG: Cognitively Inspired Group-Aware Retrieval and Reasoning via Knowledge-Driven Problem Structuring

    cs.IR 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Structuring questions into knowledge-driven keypoint groups before retrieval and reasoning improves small-model accuracy on MedQA.

  2. Error-Aware Curriculum Learning for Biomedical Relation Classification

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A teacher-student pipeline in which GPT-4o diagnoses a student's errors, assigns difficulty scores, and generates remediations, then trains a smaller model by curriculum learning, reports new state-of-the-art F1 on fo...

Pith tools