Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Fundamental Incompatibility of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and Data Subsampling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1502.01510 v1 pith:RB3RU74S submitted 2015-02-05 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords hamiltoniancarlomontedatasubsamplingefficientexplorationflow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Leveraging the coherent exploration of Hamiltonian flow, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo produces computationally efficient Monte Carlo estimators, even with respect to complex and high-dimensional target distributions. When confronted with data-intensive applications, however, the algorithm may be too expensive to implement, leaving us to consider the utility of approximations such as data subsampling. In this paper I demonstrate how data subsampling fundamentally compromises the efficient exploration of Hamiltonian flow and hence the scalable performance of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo itself.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Calibration of Quantum Devices via Robust Statistical Methods

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Advanced Bayesian samplers, especially sequential Monte Carlo with MCMC moves and tempered likelihood estimation, outperform Qiskit's default calibration fits on IBMQ hardware, cutting data needs by up to about 99% in...

Pith tools